SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with Intel Arc A350 is a lopsided desktop build: a high-end 20-core/28-thread CPU paired with a small 25 W GPU. The CPU ranks at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU at the 50th percentile, and the combined build at the 72nd percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this combination — the benchmark data has no measured FPS entries — so all gaming and rendering frame rates in this analysis are estimates, not measured results.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A350 uses Intel's Xe-HPG architecture and belongs to the Alchemist Arc 3 generation. The chip is DG2-128, built by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors and a 157 mm² die. The card is single-slot, consumes 25 W, and connects over PCIe 4.0 x8. Memory is 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, giving 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1937 MHz, quoted as 15.5 Gbps effective. Core clock is flat: 2000 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost. The rendering pipeline contains 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 RT cores. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. No tensor core count is listed, so AI-accelerated hardware characteristics are not quantified in the data. The output list is also empty: the database lists "No outputs" for displayOutputs. The GPU has an empty benchmark list, so there is no measured GPU score to evaluate; its 50th percentile ranking comes from the database's classification, not from a benchmark average. For rendering, the practical consequence is that the CPU's Cinebench scores are the only measured compute evidence in this pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The CPU side is strong: Cinebench R23 single-core 6235, Geekbench single-core 2578, and Passmark single-thread 4480. But the Arc A350 has 4 GB GDDR6, a 64-bit bus, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, and no measured FPS exists for this pairing. High-refresh gaming would be GPU-limited in most visually demanding titles; the CPU can handle game logic well, while the GPU memory and bandwidth cap the frame buffer. Treat all high-refresh figures as estimates.

Streaming. The 20-core/28-thread CPU has Cinebench R23 multi-core 44167 and Passmark multithread 52425, indicating enough parallel headroom to run streaming tasks alongside gameplay. Passmark data encryption of 40046 also indicates capable data handling. However, the Arc A350 is listed with no display outputs, so the stream output path cannot come from this GPU alone; a capture device or separate display adapter would be required.

Video editing. Timeline processing and export should be strong on the CPU side, supported by Cinebench R23 multi-core 44167, Geekbench multi-core 21462, and Passmark floating-point math 134393. The GPU's 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are small for texture-heavy effects and compositing. There is no measured GPU video benchmark in the data to confirm real export performance.

3D rendering. CPU rendering is the clearest workload for this build. Cinebench R15 multi-core 4452, R20 multi-core 18550, and R23 multi-core 44167 are direct render-compute scores. The Arc A350 contributes 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS, but with no GPU rendering benchmark, ray-traced performance is unmeasured. In CPU-based renderers, the 20-core CPU is the primary engine.

Software development. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 183056, extended instructions score of 40660, random string sorting score of 74723, and data compression score of 694963 indicate strong compilation and data-processing throughput. A 20-core/28-thread Raptor Lake-R CPU with 33 MB of shared L3 cache gives parallel builds substantial headroom. GPU involvement in most code workloads is minor, and the Arc A350's 4 GB memory is not a relevant factor there.

Student and office work. Daily responsiveness is more than covered by Passmark single-thread 4480 and Geekbench single-core 2578. But this is an unbalanced platform for light work: the CPU has a 125 W TDP, the GPU has no display outputs, and the combined 72nd percentile is far more compute than office documents need. A student or office user would need a separate display output path, and the CPU's measured capability would not be the deciding factor.

FAQ

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame entry is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Any frame-rate statement in this analysis is an estimate based on benchmark scores and specifications, not a measurement.

Q: What is the CPU's overall standing?

A: The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163 and ranks at the 94th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K.

Q: What are the GPU's key specifications?

A: The Arc A350 has 4 GB GDDR6, a 64-bit bus, 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2000 MHz base/boost clock, 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32. It has no benchmark scores and an empty nearestRivals list.

Q: Does the Arc A350 support ray tracing or AI acceleration?

A: It has 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The database does not list a tensor core count, so hardware AI acceleration characteristics are not quantified.

Q: Can this build handle DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, API support is not the same as measured performance; with 4 GB VRAM and no FPS data, actual game performance is estimated and likely limited by the GPU.

Q: What is the combined build percentile?

A: The combinedPercentile is 72, with the CPU at the 94th percentile and the GPU at the 50th. That puts the pairing in the upper-middle range overall, driven almost entirely by the CPU.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The i7-14700KF supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support listed as true. It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users whose workloads scale with 20 cores and 28 threads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core 44167 and Geekbench multi-core 21462 make it suitable for rendering, simulation, and batch processing roles. The GPU contributes little measured performance, so a buyer focused on CPU compute will not be held back by the Arc A350 except in visual tasks.

Content creators working with CPU-heavy pipelines are a natural fit. The R15, R20, and R23 multi-core scores show render and export strength. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and no display outputs mean it is not a primary display or GPU-accelerated editing solution.

Developers are another strong target. Passmark integer math 183056, data compression 694963, random string sorting 74723, and extended instructions 40660 all point to heavy compilation and data-processing work. The unlocked multiplier and 33 MB L3 cache add headroom for build-intensive projects.

Students and office users should only consider this build if they already have a separate display adapter. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate, but the GPU has no outputs and the CPU has no integrated graphics listed, meaning the pairing cannot drive a monitor on its own. For light document work, the 125 W TDP and 72nd combined percentile are wasted.

Small business workstations can use the CPU as a compute node: it is in active production, supports ECC memory, and uses desktop Socket 1700. The GPU is a weak point, though, because it is listed as end-of-life and has no display outputs. The measured CPU power is real; the GPU is not a long-lived display component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a large strength gap. The CPU is at the 94th percentile, the GPU at the 50th, and the combined build at the 72nd. The CPU's average benchmark score is 70163, while the GPU's benchmark list is empty and its average score is 0. No pairRankByFps exists, so there is no measured FPS scaling evidence for how these two parts behave together in games.

The bottleneck depends on the workload. In graphics-heavy work, the Arc A350's 4 GB GDDR6 and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors. The CPU's single-thread scores are high enough that logical game thread performance should not be the first constraint. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, sorting, and data compression, the CPU is the engine and the GPU stays mostly idle.

Without pairRankByFps, any FPS scaling claim is an estimate. The conservative reading is that the lower-percentile component governs visual workloads. The CPU could feed a much faster GPU, but this pairing does not include one.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame table is empty. Because dataIsMeasured is false, the following is an estimate, not a result.

In most games, the CPU should not be the main limit. Cinebench R23 single-core 6235, Geekbench single-core 2578, and Passmark single-thread 4480 indicate strong frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes. The GPU is the binding constraint: 4 GB GDDR6, a 64-bit bus, 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, 768 shading units, 24 ROPs, and 3.072 TFLOPS point to low-end graphics throughput. Modern high-detail games would exceed the capacity of this card quickly.

Ray-traced gaming is supported by the 6 RT cores on paper, but no GPU benchmark exists to validate how those cores perform. Older or lighter titles should be playable at modest settings; visually complex titles should be expected to strain the GPU well before the CPU becomes relevant. Exact frame rates cannot be derived from the benchmark data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU has a complete benchmark set:

Cinebench R15 multi-core: 4452; single-core: 628
Cinebench R20 multi-core: 18550; single-core: 2618
Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44167; single-core: 6235
Geekbench multi-core: 21462; single-core: 2578
Passmark multithread: 52425; single-thread: 4480
Passmark integer math: 183056; floating-point math: 134393
Passmark extended instructions: 40660
Passmark data compression: 694963
Passmark data encryption: 40046
Passmark find prime numbers: 212
Passmark random string sorting: 74723
Passmark physics: 2961

The CPU's average benchmark score is 70163, with a 94th percentile rank. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69996 with a 0.2% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 with a 0.4% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 with a 0.9% delta, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K at 70879 with a -1% delta.

The GPU has no benchmark scores. Its benchmark list is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and its nearestRivals list is empty. The GPU's percentile is 50. The combined percentile of 72 sits between the CPU's 94 and the GPU's 50, reflecting a build whose overall rank is pulled down by its weaker graphics half.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing, as indicated by buildClass. It combines Intel's Core 14th Gen i7-14700KF with an Intel Arc A350 from the Alchemist Arc 3 generation. The CPU is the dominant component: 20 cores, 28 threads, 94th percentile, and a 70163 average benchmark score. The GPU is a 50th percentile part with 4 GB GDDR6 and no measured benchmarks.

The combined percentile is 72, which places it in the upper-middle range overall. The CPU's launch MSRP is $384. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor. This is not a balanced gaming build; it is a strong CPU platform with a small, low-power GPU attached, and the overall tier is defined far more by the processor than by the graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The i7-14700KF is a desktop chip in Intel's Core 14th Gen series, built on Intel's 10 nm node with Raptor Lake-R architecture. It has 20 cores and 28 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Cache amounts are 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The memory controller supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support marked true. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, has no integrated graphics listed, and has an unlocked multiplier. The die size is 257 mm², TDP is 125 W, production status is active, and the part number is SRN3Y.

Real workload interpretation follows from the scores. Cinebench R23 multi-core 44167 and R20 multi-core 18550 indicate strong threaded rendering throughput. Geekbench multi-core 21462 and Passmark multithread 52425 reinforce broad parallel performance. Single-thread Cinebench 6235, Geekbench 2578, and Passmark 4480 indicate strong responsiveness for single-threaded tasks. Passmark integer math 183056 and data compression 694963 point to code compilation and data-heavy processing. The 33 MB L3 and DDR4/DDR5 support add flexibility, while ECC support makes the chip relevant for workstation-style roles. For any workload that fits in 28 threads, the CPU is the clear measured strength of this build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds