SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing is a study in extremes: an Intel Core i7-14700KF, a top-tier 20-core desktop processor that sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, paired with an Intel Arc A310, a low-profile 30W graphics card that lands in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows a desktop build where raw computational muscle is paired with entry-level graphics capability, creating a system that is overwhelmingly CPU-bound in nearly every graphics-intensive task. This analysis is based entirely on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, and it is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a Raptor Lake Refresh part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring a hybrid architecture with 20 cores and 28 threads. It runs on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and offers a base clock of 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is a significant frequency headroom for single-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for keeping the 20 cores fed with data. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability.

The benchmark results for the i7-14700KF paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily parallelized tasks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 44,167 in multi-core and 6,235 in single-core, demonstrating a strong balance. The Geekbench scores are equally impressive: 21,462 multi-core and 2,578 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 52,425 and a single-thread score of 4,480, confirming its position as a high-end desktop CPU. Its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs is backed by an average benchmark score of 70,163, which places it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.4% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.9% ahead). The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, is actually 1% ahead of the i7-14700KF, showing that while this is a fast part, it is not the absolute fastest on the market, but it is firmly in the top tier.

For real workloads, this CPU is a powerhouse. The high multi-core scores in Cinebench and Passmark indicate it can handle demanding productivity tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The strong single-core scores mean it remains responsive in everyday use and performs excellently in games that rely on one or two threads. The Passmark data compression score of 694,963 and integer math score of 183,056 highlight its capability in data-heavy and number-crunching applications. The presence of an unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the data suggests that even at stock settings, the i7-14700KF is a formidable processor for any CPU-bound workload.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-14700KF delivers exceptional CPU benchmark scores across the board. In the Cinebench series, it progresses from 4,452 in R15 multi-core to 18,550 in R20 and 44,167 in R23, showing excellent scaling with increased workload complexity. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21,462 further validates its position as a top-tier productivity chip. The Passmark suite provides a granular look at its strengths: a multi-thread score of 52,425, a floating-point math score of 134,393, and a random string sorting score of 74,723. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4,480.

The Intel Arc A310 presents a starkly different picture. It scores 30,607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,964 in Geekbench Vulkan, which are decent for compute tasks but reflect its entry-level positioning. The Passmark G3D score is 5,433, and the GPU compute score is 2,157. The DirectX scores are notably low, with DirectX 12 at 29, DirectX 11 at 33, and DirectX 10 at 31, indicating that this is not a card designed for high-end gaming. Its 40th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it near the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% behind), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% ahead). The A310 is essentially a display adapter with some compute capability, not a gaming card.

The combined picture is one of massive imbalance. The CPU is in the 94th percentile, while the GPU is in the 40th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 67, which is dragged down entirely by the GPU. In any workload that touches the GPU, the A310 will be the limiting factor. The CPU will sit mostly idle waiting for the GPU to finish its work, making this a system that is excellent for CPU-centric tasks but severely limited for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis for this pairing is unambiguous: the Intel Arc A310 is the limiting component in every graphics-related workload. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and the GPU's 40th percentile ranking show a massive performance gap. In gaming, the CPU is capable of driving hundreds of frames per second, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and low DirectX scores will cap the frame rate far below what the CPU can produce. The GPU's pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s are simply too low to feed a high-resolution display with modern game assets.

Conversely, in purely CPU-bound tasks like data compression, with a Passmark score of 694,963, or integer math, with a score of 183,056, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU will run at its full potential. The data shows that this system is not balanced for gaming; it is a CPU-first workstation that happens to have a basic graphics output. The suggested PSU of 200 W is low, which aligns with the GPU's 30W TDP, but the CPU's 125W TDP means the total system draw is modest. The FPS scaling is entirely dependent on the GPU, and given the A310's performance class, users should expect playable frame rates only at low resolutions and low settings in older or less demanding titles. The i7-14700KF will not be the cause of any performance limitation in this system; the A310 is the sole bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the lack of a memory bandwidth figure in the data means the impact of memory choice is not quantified. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a forward-looking interface, but the Arc A310 only uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the GPU is not saturating the CPU's PCIe lanes, leaving plenty of bandwidth for future expansion.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is a new graphics card. The CPU is powerful enough to support a much higher-tier GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The 125W TDP of the CPU and the 30W TDP of the GPU mean the current power draw is low, but the suggested PSU of 200 W is quite restrictive. Upgrading to a more powerful GPU would almost certainly require a larger power supply, as a high-end card alone can exceed the 200W budget. The motherboard and CPU are a solid foundation, so the upgrade path is clear: replace the A310 with a mid-range or high-end GPU to match the CPU's performance class. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a niche feature that may appeal to users running memory-intensive workloads, but the primary upgrade is the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700KF a fast CPU compared to its rivals?

A: Yes. The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70,163, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, though it lags 1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A310 compare to other entry-level GPUs?

A: The A310 has an average benchmark score of 7,550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. It is 1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, making it comparable to older entry-level cards.

Q: Can this system play modern games at high settings?

A: No. The GPU's low DirectX scores (29 in DirectX 12 and 33 in DirectX 11) and Passmark G3D score of 5,433 indicate it is not capable of high-settings gaming. The CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is.

Q: What is the CPU's memory and expansion support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it does not use all the CPU's available lanes.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU has a 125W TDP, and the GPU has a 30W TDP. The suggested PSU for this combination is 200 W, which is sufficient for the current components but leaves little headroom for upgrades.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing or 3D rendering?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21,462 show it is highly capable for CPU-based rendering tasks. However, GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow due to the A310's low compute score of 2,157.

Q: What is the release date and launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The CPU was released on 2023-10-16, and its launch MSRP is $384. The GPU was released on 2022-10-11 and has no listed launch MSRP.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable with the Arc A310. The GPU's low Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 will severely limit frame rates, even at 1080p. The CPU can support high refresh rates, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames.

Streaming: The CPU is excellent for software encoding, with high multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,167) that can handle both game and encode workloads. However, the GPU's low performance will limit the game's frame rate, making the stream quality poor if the game is demanding.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this task, with strong multi-core scores in Cinebench and Passmark. The GPU's low compute score of 2,157 will hinder GPU-accelerated effects and exports, but the CPU can handle most editing tasks in software, making it usable for basic edits.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be fast, as the i7-14700KF's 20 cores and 28 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,167) are ideal for this workload. GPU rendering will be very slow, as the A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance is minimal.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's high integer math score (183,056) and data compression score (694,963) show it can handle code compilation and data processing tasks quickly. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a productive workstation.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical office tasks, but it will handle them effortlessly. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,480 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness in applications, though the GPU's capabilities are unnecessary for word processing or spreadsheets.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M / mm². The GPU operates at a fixed 1750 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is quite limited for modern games.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, which are very low numbers. It has 6 ray tracing cores, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). These specs confirm it is a low-power (30W TDP) part designed for basic display output, not heavy rendering.

Benchmark results confirm its entry-level status. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 is decent for compute, but the Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and the low DirectX scores (29-33) show it struggles with graphics APIs. The 40th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, both of which are older or lower-end parts. For rendering, this GPU is not suitable for real-time 3D work or modern gaming. Its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be quickly exhausted, and its 2.688 TFLOPS compute is insufficient for demanding tasks. It is a capable display adapter for office work or media playback, but not a rendering workhorse.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system that pairs a high-end 20-core CPU with an entry-level 30W GPU. The Core i7-14700KF is a top-tier processor in the 94th percentile, while the Arc A310 is in the 40th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 67, reflecting the severe imbalance. The CPU is a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Socket 1700 platform, with support for DDR4/DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5. The GPU is an Alchemist (Arc 3) part on the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Overall, this build is a CPU-centric system. It is a powerful workstation for tasks that rely on the processor, such as software development, data processing, and CPU-based rendering. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light compute tasks but is a severe limitation for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The pairing is not a balanced gaming PC; it is a CPU powerhouse with a placeholder GPU. The overall tier, based on the 67th combined percentile, is mid-range, but the individual components are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum.

Who Should Build It

This system is suited for users who need maximum CPU performance but do not require strong graphics capabilities. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's high integer math (183,056) and data compression (694,963) scores, which speed up compilation and data processing. Students and office workers in technical fields will find the CPU's single-thread performance (4,480 in Passmark) makes for a responsive system, and the low-power GPU is fine for document work and web browsing. Small business workstations handling databases or financial modeling will see excellent CPU performance, though the GPU is irrelevant for these tasks.

Gamers at any resolution should avoid this build, as the GPU's low DirectX scores will not provide a satisfactory experience. Content creators who rely on GPU acceleration for video editing or 3D rendering will be hampered by the A310's low compute score of 2,157. However, those who do CPU-based rendering or heavy multitasking will find the i7-14700KF to be an outstanding performer. This build is for users who prioritize CPU compute power above all else and plan to use the system for tasks that do not heavily leverage the GPU, or for those who intend to immediately upgrade the graphics card to match the CPU's potential.