SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop build that combines a high-end 20-core processor with a mid-range 1080p-focused graphics card. This combination creates a system with substantial compute headroom for productivity tasks, while gaming performance is firmly anchored by the GPU’s capabilities. The data shows a clear division of labor: the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU provides a solid but not exceptional rasterization experience, making this a build for users who prioritize processor-heavy applications over extreme graphical fidelity.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The card’s base clock is 1968 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. With 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, the card delivers a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s.

For compute, the RX 6600 XT offers 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 21.21 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1). It includes 32 ray tracing cores, but notably, it has no tensor cores, which means AI-accelerated upscaling features are absent. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 1804 points, which places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This score indicates a capable 1080p card that will handle modern titles at high settings, but it will struggle with 4K resolution or heavy ray tracing workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6600 XT’s average benchmark score of 24442 is 0.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (score 24277) and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (score 24170). It is 0.8% lower than the Intel Arc A350M (score 24647). The performance parity with the RTX 2080 SUPER is notable, as that card has more VRAM in some variants, but the RX 6600 XT’s 8 GB frame buffer is a limiting factor for higher resolutions. For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 10.60 TFLOPS is respectable for entry-level 3D work, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware for AI denoising, which is common in GPU-accelerated renderers.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-14700KF posts strong results across CPU benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 44167 points in multi-core and 6235 points in single-core. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 21462 and a single-core score of 2578. The PassMark multithread score is 52425, with a single-thread score of 4480. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70163, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, scores 69996, a difference of 0.2%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879, which is 1% higher.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 16461, and its average benchmark score is 24442, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 82, indicating that the overall performance is above average, but the GPU drags down the total relative to the CPU’s high placement. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 102.6, ranking 2609 out of 3732 pairs. This rank suggests that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU limits the system to mid-pack performance in gaming scenarios.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a top-6% performer, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound tasks, the system will outperform most others, but in GPU-bound tasks, it will be comparable to systems with much weaker processors. The data confirms that this is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a workstation-oriented build with a passable gaming GPU attached.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance data clearly shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 70th percentile creates a significant gap. In gaming, the measured FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. For example, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 343 FPS at 1920x1080, but this drops to 236 FPS at 2560x1440 and 139 FPS at 3840x2160. The CPU is capable of far higher frame rates, as evidenced by the single-core score of 6235 in Cinebench R23, but the GPU’s rendering limits the output.

In more demanding titles, the GPU bottleneck is even more apparent. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 45.1 FPS at 1080p, 33.9 FPS at 1440p, and 25.9 FPS at 4K. The frame rate scales almost linearly with resolution, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU is not the limiting factor here; even a weaker processor would deliver similar FPS in this title at these settings. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1804 confirms that the GPU’s raw rendering power is the constraint.

For CPU-bound workloads, the bottleneck reverses. The PassMark data compression score of 694963 and integer math score of 183056 indicate that the processor can handle massive parallel tasks. In these cases, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system’s performance is dictated by the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads. The build is thus a "CPU-first" system, where the GPU is an afterthought for gaming, and the CPU is the main workhorse for productivity.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system achieves high frame rates in esports titles. Valorant runs at 355.8 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 156.1 FPS. For less demanding games, this is sufficient for high-refresh monitors. However, in AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 45.1 FPS at 1080p falls short of 144Hz requirements, meaning users will need to lower settings or use upscaling to reach competitive frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 52425 indicates that the processor can handle x264 encoding without impacting game performance. The GPU’s lack of tensor cores means no dedicated NVENC equivalent, but the CPU’s strength makes software encoding viable.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 shows that the CPU excels at rendering timelines and exporting video. The 94th percentile ranking ensures that tasks like 4K video editing will be smooth. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic effects, but heavy color grading or motion graphics may tax it.

3D rendering: The FP32 throughput of 10.60 TFLOPS on the GPU, combined with the CPU’s multi-core might, makes this a capable entry-level rendering workstation. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 score of 18550 suggests that CPU-based rendering will be fast. However, the GPU’s 8 GB memory is a limitation for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-core score of 6235 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation and IDE responsiveness. The PassMark data encryption score of 40046 shows strong cryptographic performance for secure development environments. The 33 MB of L3 cache aids in reducing latency for frequent code access.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s efficiency in single-threaded workloads (PassMark single-thread score of 4480) ensures snappy office applications. The GPU is more than adequate for document rendering and video playback, making this a high-performance workstation for academic work.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means that the CPU has the bandwidth for future high-speed storage or expansion cards. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 160 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. This leaves moderate headroom for upgrades, but a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for a more powerful GPU.

The socket 1700 platform is at the end of its lifecycle, as Intel has moved to newer sockets. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, such as a card with more VRAM and higher compute throughput, to match the CPU’s performance. The current GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a bottleneck for 1440p and 4K gaming. Replacing the RX 6600 XT with a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming. The CPU supports DDR5, so moving to a DDR5 motherboard and memory kit would also be an option if the current system uses DDR4, but this would require a full platform change.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured, so the FPS figures are actual results. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most titles. Valorant achieves 355.8 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 343 FPS, and Roblox runs at 201.9 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 172.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 184 FPS. These are excellent for competitive gaming. However, more demanding titles show the GPU’s limits. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 45.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39.6 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 23 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant still hits 300.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 100.9 FPS. But Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 33.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.9 FPS. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 1440p gaming in modern titles. At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Valorant remains playable at 239.6 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 25.9 FPS and Control at 33.4 FPS. This resolution is only viable for esports or older titles.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need massive CPU power but are willing to compromise on GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles will find this system excellent, as the measured FPS in Valorant (355.8) and CS:GO (343) exceeds most 144Hz monitors’ capabilities. However, gamers seeking 1440p or 4K performance should look elsewhere, as the GPU cannot maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (33.9 FPS at 1440p).

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU’s 44167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The system is ideal for software development, where the single-core score of 6235 ensures fast compilation. Students and small business workstations will find the CPU overkill, but the 94th percentile ranking ensures longevity. The GPU’s 70th percentile is sufficient for office tasks and light media work.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700KF good for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU is excellent for gaming. Its 94th percentile ranking and single-core score of 6235 in Cinebench R23 ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the overall gaming performance is limited by the RX 6600 XT, which is a 1080p-focused card.

Q: What is the GPU’s main limitation?

A: The RX 6600 XT’s main limitation is its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus, which restricts performance at higher resolutions. The measured FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 1440p and 4K in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing a motherboard and memory kit.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 160 W, so a 450 W PSU provides adequate headroom for this configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X’s score of 69515. This places the two processors in a similar performance tier.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No, not for demanding titles. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows that most AAA games run below 30 FPS, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 at 22.8 FPS. Only esports titles like Valorant (239.6 FPS) remain playable.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing performance?

A: The RX 6600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores, but its performance in ray-traced workloads is limited by the 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1804 suggests it is not a strong ray tracing performer.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². It features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and has a TDP of 125 W.

The benchmark scores translate directly to real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 is exceptional, making this CPU one of the fastest for multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 183056 and floating point math score of 134393 indicate strong number-crunching abilities. The PassMark data compression score of 694963 is particularly high, suggesting that file compression and decompression tasks will be lightning-fast. The data encryption score of 40046 shows robust security performance.

The single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2578 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4480. This ensures that the CPU does not bottleneck in everyday tasks or gaming, where single-thread performance is critical. The 94th percentile ranking means that this CPU outperforms 94% of all processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is only 0.2% slower, indicating that the two are essentially tied in overall performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% faster, but the i7-14700KF remains a top-tier choice for demanding workloads. The 33 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy applications, and the support for ECC memory makes it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is paramount.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds