SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Usage Scenarios

This Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc B580 pairing is a desktop-class configuration that delivers strong 1080p performance across most workloads, with clear limits at higher resolutions. The data shows this build excels in high-refresh 1080p gaming, where measured FPS averages 100.2 across all tested titles, placing it at rank 2738 out of 3732 pairs. For esports and competitive shooters, the combination is exceptional: Valorant hits 344 FPS at 1080p, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 331.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege delivers 178 FPS at 1080p. Even at 1440p, these titles remain highly playable with Valorant at 293 FPS and CS:GO at 228.6 FPS.

For streaming and content creation, the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide substantial headroom. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and PassMark multithread score of 52392 indicate the processor can handle simultaneous encoding, rendering, and gameplay without bottlenecking. The GPU's 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth supports texture-heavy workloads, though the PassMark GPU compute score of 7729 suggests compute tasks are not this card's primary strength.

Video editing workflows benefit from strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160, Geekbench single-core of 2569) combined with high multi-core throughput. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outpaces the vast majority of processors for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking is more modest, so effects-heavy 4K editing may see GPU acceleration limits.

3D rendering workloads lean heavily on the CPU's multi-core capabilities. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18544 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 position this processor near the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (deltaPct -0.2%) and AMD EPYC 9115 (deltaPct 0.1%). For Blender, Maya, or similar CPU-based renderers, this build performs at workstation-class levels. GPU-accelerated rendering via DirectX 12 (3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068) is serviceable but not leading-edge.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced architecture. PassMark data compression score of 695234 and random string sorting score of 74733 indicate rapid compilation and code processing. The 33 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provide low-latency access for frequent rebuilds and test runs. For students and office work, this build is overkill in raw compute but delivers instant responsiveness in productivity suites, with PassMark single-thread score of 4472 ensuring snappy UI interactions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides concrete performance figures across 53 games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the build delivers 60+ FPS in the majority of titles, with standout results in competitive games: Valorant at 344, CS:GO at 331.6, Call of Duty: Warzone at 177, and Counter-Strike 2 at 147.5. For AAA single-player titles at 1080p, performance is playable but sometimes marginal: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 41.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22 FPS. These figures suggest the GPU is the limiting factor in demanding modern titles.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops significantly across the board. Competitive titles remain smooth: Valorant at 293, CS:GO at 228.6, Warzone at 155.1, and Rainbow Six Siege at 117. However, AAA titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 35.2, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 29, and Ark to 14. At 3840x2160, only esports titles remain playable: Valorant at 235, CS:GO at 131.5, and Warzone at 132.4. Most AAA games fall below 30 FPS at 4K, making this resolution impractical for demanding titles.

The pair's average FPS of 100.2 across all games and resolutions places it at rank 2738 out of 3732 pairs, indicating this configuration sits in the mid-to-upper tier for overall gaming performance. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the data strongly supports this build. For 1440p, it handles esports and older titles well but requires settings reductions for modern AAA games. For 4K, it is only viable for competitive shooters and lighter titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3, providing ample capacity for data-heavy workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 94th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 69355. Its nearest rivals in aggregate performance are the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (deltaPct -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (deltaPct -0.7%), AMD EPYC 9115 (deltaPct 0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (deltaPct -0.9%). This grouping shows the i7-14700K trades blows with high-end Ryzen 9 parts, typically within 1% of their average scores.

Real-world workload interpretation: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 indicates excellent sustained multi-threaded performance for rendering, encoding, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 2160 is strong for gaming and productivity applications that rely on few threads. PassMark results show particular strengths in integer math (182876), floating-point math (134222), and extended instructions (40632), while the find prime numbers score of 212 is comparatively weak, suggesting the architecture favors certain workload types over others.

The CPU's 125 W TDP, combined with the GPU's 190 W TDP, means overall system power draw is manageable with a 450 W suggested PSU. The 10 nm process keeps thermals reasonable for a high-core-count desktop processor, though a capable air or liquid cooler is recommended for sustained all-core loads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and hardware decode support, useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This 26-percentile gap indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most workloads, particularly in gaming at higher resolutions. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this middle ground.

FPS scaling across resolutions confirms the GPU bottleneck: at 1080p, the average FPS of 100.2 demonstrates the CPU can feed the GPU adequately. However, at 1440p and 4K, frame rates drop proportionally more than resolution scaling alone would suggest, pointing to GPU limitations. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 41.7 FPS at 1080p to 35.2 at 1440p (a 15.6% decrease) and 24.1 at 4K (a 42.2% decrease from 1080p). Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 goes from 37.9 to 29 to 20.2 across the same resolutions.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the processor shows no signs of strain. Competitive titles like Valorant at 344 FPS and CS:GO at 331.6 FPS at 1080p are likely hitting GPU render limits rather than CPU frame generation limits. The PassMark single-thread score of 4472 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160 indicate the CPU can handle high-FPS gaming without becoming the limiting factor.

For productivity workloads, the CPU dominates and the GPU plays a supporting role. Video editing and 3D rendering rely on CPU multi-core performance, where the i7-14700K's 33440.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures no bottleneck. GPU compute tasks (PassMark GPU compute score of 7729) are modest, so users should expect GPU acceleration to be a secondary benefit rather than a primary driver in rendering or machine learning workloads.

The practical implication is that upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant gaming performance gains, while the CPU has headroom to support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Conversely, the GPU is more than adequate for CPU-heavy productivity tasks where the processor does the heavy lifting.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, making this platform suitable for workstation-class reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the Intel Arc B580 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The platform's memory flexibility is a key advantage: users can choose DDR4 for cost-effective builds or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, depending on motherboard selection. The 33 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory controller provide sufficient bandwidth for gaming and productivity, though the absence of a memory bandwidth figure in the data means quantitative comparison is not possible.

The suggested PSU of 450 W provides adequate headroom for the 125 W CPU and 190 W GPU, totaling 315 W of component power draw. This leaves roughly 135 W for other components, which is sufficient for a typical desktop configuration with a few drives and fans. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot, making it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

For upgrades, the most sensible next step is a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier graphics card in most scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs can run at full bandwidth, though current PCIe 4.0 x8 on the Arc B580 is sufficient for its performance level. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (or higher-speed DDR5) could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, but the data does not specify a memory bandwidth figure to quantify the gain.

The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but mixing is not possible, so users should choose one memory type at build time. The CPU's unlocked multiplier enables overclocking for additional performance, though the data does not provide overclocked benchmark results. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets three primary user groups. First, competitive gamers at 1080p who prioritize high refresh rates: the measured FPS of 344 in Valorant, 331.6 in CS:GO, and 178 in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p supports 240 Hz or higher monitors. These users benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's ability to render esports titles at very high frame rates.

Second, content creators and developers who need serious CPU compute but do not require top-tier GPU acceleration. The 20-core, 28-thread processor with 33440.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The GPU's 12 GB memory and 68th percentile ranking provide adequate display output and light GPU acceleration without the cost of a high-end graphics card.

Third, students and small business users running productivity suites, coding environments, and occasional gaming. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures longevity for software updates and multitasking, while the GPU handles light gaming and desktop compositing. The 450 W PSU requirement keeps system cost and power consumption reasonable for office environments.

Users targeting 1440p or 4K gaming with modern AAA titles should look elsewhere, as the data shows sub-40 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1440p. Similarly, users needing heavy GPU compute for machine learning or GPU rendering would find the Arc B580's 7729 PassMark GPU compute score limiting.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, indicating this build outperforms 81% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD EPYC 9115, 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and 0.9% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B580 ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 23021 is 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and 1% lower than the NVIDIA P106-100.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 100.2, placing this pair at rank 2738 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-14700K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, based on the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i7-14700K includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display output and serves as a fallback if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700K (20 cores, 28 threads, Raptor Lake architecture) with the Intel Arc B580 GPU (Xe2-HPG architecture, 12 GB GDDR6 memory). The CPU is a 14th Gen Core i7 processor launched in October 2023, while the GPU is from the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation launched in December 2024. The GPU uses the BMG-G21 chip with 19,600 million transistors on a 5 nm TSMC process.

The CPU's 94th percentile ranking places it among the top processors, while the GPU's 68th percentile places it in the upper-mid range. The combined percentile of 81 reflects a build that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and 1080p gaming but is limited by GPU performance at higher resolutions. The average FPS of 100.2 across all tested games confirms this build is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and productivity workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 69355, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 33440.5, Cinebench R23 single-core at 2160, Geekbench multi-core at 20767, Geekbench single-core at 2569, and PassMark multithread at 52392. The CPU's nearest rival in average score is the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (deltaPct -0.2%), showing near-identical aggregate performance.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 23021, ranking in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Key scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3068, Geekbench OpenCL at 92821, Geekbench Vulkan at 109672, and PassMark G3D at 15748. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (deltaPct -0.2%), with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23172 (deltaPct -0.7%) being slightly faster.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 94% of processors but a GPU that only outperforms 68% of graphics cards. This asymmetry means the CPU will not bottleneck most workloads, but the GPU will limit gaming performance in demanding titles at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data confirms this: 1080p gaming is strong with 100.2 average FPS, but 4K performance drops below 30 FPS in most AAA titles. This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU compute and 1080p gaming over 1440p or 4K gaming performance.