SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A770: A High-Performance Desktop Combination

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc A770 represents a formidable desktop build that sits at the 92nd combined percentile among all hardware configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance with its 20 cores and 28 threads, while the GPU offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth that positions it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Benchmark data shows this pairing is well-matched for demanding workloads, though no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die. This GPU ships with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth — a substantial figure that supports high-resolution texture workloads and large datasets without capacity constraints. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the GPU core operates at a 2100 MHz base clock and boosts up to 2400 MHz.

The rendering pipeline is robust: 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units produce a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, with FP16 performance doubling to 39.32 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The inclusion of 32 ray tracing cores enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores — a distinction from rival architectures that rely on tensor hardware for AI-accelerated features.

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with the latest rendering features, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 provide broad API coverage. Display output includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, enabling multi-monitor setups at high refresh rates. The GPU occupies a dual-slot form factor and requires both a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2969, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 109175 and 94284 respectively. These scores indicate strong rasterization performance and capable compute throughput. The average benchmark score of 68809 places it in close competition with the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (69000, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562, 0.4% behind), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870, 1.5% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986, 1.7% ahead). The GPU trails these rivals by margins of 0.3% to 1.7%, indicating that performance is competitive with professional-grade cards from the previous generation.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM capacity is particularly significant — it allows large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside entirely in graphics memory, reducing the need for memory swapping. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports rapid data transfer for texture streaming and compute operations. Ray tracing performance, while not directly benchmarked here, is enabled by the 32 dedicated RT cores and should handle moderate ray-traced effects at acceptable frame rates.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and a single-core score of 2160, demonstrating strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 and single-core score of 2569 reinforce this dual strength. PassMark multithread score reaches 52392, with single-thread performance at 4472.

The GPU's benchmark scores, as detailed above, show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, Geekbench OpenCL of 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan of 94284. The average GPU benchmark score of 68809 places it in the 90th percentile, while the CPU's average benchmark score of 69355 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 92, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 92% of all recorded desktop configurations. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9115 (avg score 69288, 0.1% behind), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69515, 0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875, 0.7% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (avg score 69996, 0.9% ahead). These deltas are remarkably small, showing that the i7-14700K sits in a tightly contested performance tier where the top contenders are separated by less than 1%.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while providing solid GPU performance for gaming and content creation. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 90th percentile, suggesting that the processor has slightly more headroom than the graphics card in this pairing. For workloads that depend primarily on CPU throughput — such as video encoding, software compilation, or physics simulation — this configuration will perform near the top of the desktop market. GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions will see the Arc A770 as the limiting factor, though it remains competitive with the professional cards listed as its nearest rivals.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel's 10 nm process node. The die measures 257 mm² and features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. Base clock runs at 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770, and the processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The average benchmark score of 69355 places this CPU in the 94th percentile of all processors. Cinebench R15 multi-core and single-core scores of 5035 and 313.5 respectively show strong performance in legacy benchmarks, while R20 scores of 18544 multi-core and 2617 single-core continue the trend. The R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 represents the most demanding render test and indicates that the processor can handle substantial multi-threaded workloads.

PassMark tests provide insight into specialized workloads. Data compression scores 695234, data encryption reaches 40091, and extended instructions score 40632. Floating-point math achieves 134222, integer math reaches 182876, and random string sorting scores 74733. Physics performance is measured at 2964, while prime number finding scores 212. These results show balanced performance across diverse computational tasks, with particularly strong results in string sorting and integer math that benefit from the high core count and boost clocks.

Real-world workload implications are direct. Video editing software that utilizes multi-core rendering will see the 28 threads put to good use, with the R23 multi-core score indicating rapid export times. Software development benefits from the high single-thread score of 4472 in PassMark, which accelerates compilation and code analysis tasks. Data compression and encryption workloads see strong throughput as evidenced by the PassMark scores. The 5.60 GHz boost clock provides excellent responsiveness for single-threaded applications, while the 20 cores ensure that background tasks do not starve foreground processes.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.7% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 (0.9% ahead). This clustering indicates that the i7-14700K is at the center of the current high-end desktop CPU performance envelope, with no single competitor holding a decisive advantage.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The percentile differential between the CPU (94th) and GPU (90th) creates a predictable bottleneck pattern. In CPU-intensive workloads such as physics calculations, data compression, and software compilation, the processor will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU's lower percentile ranking will not impede these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A770's 90th percentile position becomes the limiting factor, with the CPU's additional headroom going unused.

The PassMark physics score of 2964 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 demonstrate that the CPU can feed even demanding GPU workloads without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and its average benchmark score of 68809 indicate that it can handle modern game engines at high settings, but the 0.3% to 1.7% deficit to its nearest rivals suggests that it will not lead the pack in GPU-bound scenarios.

For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4472, Geekbench single-core of 2569) will typically allow the GPU to operate near its maximum potential. At 4K resolution, however, the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become more critical, and the Arc A770's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will determine the frame ceiling regardless of CPU performance.

The combination of 16 GB VRAM and 20 CPU cores creates a system where neither component is severely underpowered for the other. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking provides enough compute headroom for the GPU's 90th percentile performance to be fully utilized in most workloads. Only in heavily GPU-accelerated tasks — such as real-time ray tracing at high resolutions — will the GPU clearly limit overall system performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are qualitative estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and its 90th percentile ranking, this system should deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p in most modern titles. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2160, PassMark single-thread of 4472) ensures that game logic and physics calculations will not bottleneck frame generation. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory capacity and transfer speed for high-resolution textures and effects, though the GPU's raw compute throughput (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) will determine the upper frame rate limit.

For esports titles, the combination should support high refresh rate displays (144 Hz or higher) at 1080p, given the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 2400 MHz boost clock. For AAA single-player games with ray tracing enabled, performance will drop due to the 32 RT cores handling the additional workload, and users may need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 614.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate solid fill performance, but the 1.5% to 1.7% deficits to the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 suggest that the Arc A770 will not outpace those professional cards in rasterized gaming workloads.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 16 GB memory capacity is sufficient for high-detail textures, but the compute throughput will likely limit frame rates to below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU will not be the bottleneck at this resolution; the GPU's 90th percentile performance is the primary constraint.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4472 and 5.60 GHz boost clock ensure that frame generation is not CPU-limited at 1080p, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance support high frame rates in competitive titles. Users targeting 144 Hz or higher at 1080p should find this combination capable, with the 16 GB VRAM providing headroom for texture quality settings.

Streaming: The 20-core, 28-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 can handle game encoding alongside gameplay without significant frame drops. The GPU's 32 RT cores and 4096 shading units provide additional encoding offload capabilities, though dedicated encoding hardware is not separately benchmarked here.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 695234 and floating-point math score of 134222 accelerate video codec operations and effect rendering. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM support large timelines and 4K preview renders, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 indicating solid compute acceleration.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 positions the CPU as the primary render engine for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 performance and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance support GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM allows large scenes to fit in graphics memory, reducing out-of-core swapping.

Software development: The CPU's high single-core performance (Geekbench single-core of 2569, PassMark single-thread of 4472) accelerates compilation and code analysis, while the 28 threads handle parallel build tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 182876 indicates strong arithmetic throughput for algorithmic workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, while the 20 cores handle multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The PassMark multithread score of 52392 ensures that background tasks like virus scans or system updates do not degrade interactive responsiveness. The GPU's presence is overkill for this scenario, but the system's 92nd combined percentile means it will handle any office workload with substantial headroom.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This combination targets users who prioritize CPU performance above GPU performance, given the 4-percentile gap between the two components. Gamers at 1080p will benefit most from the CPU's high single-thread score (4472 PassMark) and the GPU's 90th percentile performance, which together should deliver high frame rates in competitive and AAA titles. Gamers at 1440p will still see strong performance, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and 4K gaming will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and PassMark data compression score of 695234 well-suited for export and encoding tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large project files and GPU-accelerated effects. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will benefit from the 28 threads, while those using GPU renderers will rely on the Arc A770's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 performance.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's balanced performance across single-threaded (Geekbench single-core of 2569) and multi-threaded (Geekbench multi-core of 20767) workloads, which speeds up compilation and testing. The 125 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU make this a manageable build for workstation environments.

Small business workstations that run database applications, financial modeling, or scientific computing will see strong performance from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 182876 and floating-point math score of 134222. The GPU's presence provides acceleration for any CUDA-like workloads via OpenCL and Vulkan, with scores of 109175 and 94284 respectively.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's performance in compilation and simulation tasks, while the GPU supports any graphics or machine learning coursework. The production status is "Active" for the CPU and "End-of-life" for the GPU, meaning that buyers should consider the GPU's availability when planning a build.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 92, meaning this configuration outperforms 92% of all recorded desktop hardware combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 have, and what memory type is used?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What are the nearest CPU rivals and how do they compare to the i7-14700K?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 9115 (0.1% behind), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.7% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.9% ahead), based on average benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to increase the clock speed beyond the 5.60 GHz boost clock.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU pairing. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — the extra bandwidth of Gen 5 is available for NVMe storage or other expansion cards. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP combine for a total of 350 W across the two primary components, leaving significant headroom under the GPU's suggested 550 W PSU for additional drives, fans, and peripherals.

The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" with a successor named "Battlemage," suggesting that users should not expect future driver updates to improve performance beyond their current state. The CPU remains "Active" in production status, ensuring continued availability and support. The platform's LGA 1700 socket supports the current 14th Gen series, and given that the i7-14700K is already in the 94th percentile, a sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU rather than the CPU.

The Arc A770's nearest rivals — NVIDIA CMP 90HX, AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 — all sit within 1.7% of its average score, so upgrading to any of these would provide only marginal gains. A more meaningful GPU upgrade would target a card in a higher percentile bracket, though such a card is not listed in this FACT PACK. The CPU's 0.2% to 0.9% deltas from its nearest rivals indicate that upgrading the CPU within the same socket family would not yield meaningful improvements.

For memory, the dual-channel controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose based on platform cost and availability. The 33 MB L3 cache benefits from faster memory speeds, so DDR5 would maximize the CPU's performance potential. The 16 GB GPU VRAM is substantial and should not require upgrading for several years, but users planning to work with very large datasets or extreme resolutions may find a future GPU with more memory to be the limiting factor.

The 550 W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom for the 350 W combined TDP of CPU and GPU, leaving 200 W for other components. Users adding multiple NVMe drives, a high-end sound card, or extensive RGB lighting should verify their total power draw stays within the PSU's capacity. The dual-slot GPU requires two expansion slots and both a 6-pin and 8-pin power connector, so case clearance and cable management should be considered in the build plan.

The upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, which has strong headroom relative to the GPU's performance tier, and focus future spending on a GPU replacement when the Arc A770 becomes insufficient for target workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that next-generation GPUs and storage devices will be backward compatible, preserving the motherboard investment for the next upgrade cycle.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700K

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds