SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A380: A High-CPU, Entry-GPU Desktop Pairing

This pairing combines Intel's 20-core Core i7-14700K desktop processor with the company's entry-level Arc A380 graphics card, creating a desktop build where the CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs while the GPU rests in the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile lands at 69, reflecting a system that is heavily weighted toward processor performance. The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU carries nearly all the computational weight, while the GPU serves as a modest entry point for graphics work. This analysis draws entirely from the benchmark scores and specifications in the FACT PACK, with no measured FPS data available for this exact combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, a desktop socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds that require error correction in memory operations. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage devices and expansion cards that support the latest PCIe standard.

The power delivery requirements are modest for a 20-core processor: the CPU carries a 125 W TDP, while the Intel Arc A380 GPU has a 75 W TDP. The GPU's suggested power supply is 250 W, meaning a system built around this pairing does not demand an oversized PSU. The data suggests that a standard desktop power supply within the 250 W range for the GPU, combined with the CPU's 125 W TDP, leaves reasonable headroom for a typical desktop configuration. However, the CPU's boost clock of 5.60 GHz implies that sustained all-core workloads could draw more than the base TDP, so builders should account for that in power supply selection.

The upgrade path is interesting because the platform is mature: Intel Socket 1700 is associated with the Core 14th Gen series, and the CPU's production status is active. The GPU, however, is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. For a sensible next upgrade, the data points toward replacing the GPU first, as the CPU's 94th percentile ranking leaves substantial headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the Arc A380 means that a newer GPU with a wider bus or newer architecture would not be bottlenecked by the CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Memory upgrades are also viable, given the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5, though the specific bandwidth figures are not provided in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 33440.5, while the single-core score is 2160. The Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 20767 and a single-core score of 2569. The Passmark multi-thread score is 52392, with a single-thread score of 4472. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 69355, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show how tightly packed the high-end desktop market is. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288, just 0.1% behind the i7-14700K. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.2% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, 0.7% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, 0.9% ahead. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning the i7-14700K is essentially trading blows with the top tier of AMD's desktop and mobile flagship processors.

The GPU benchmark picture is far more modest. The Intel Arc A380 scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and a Vulkan score of 36736. The Passmark G3D score is 6252, with a GPU compute score of 2762. The average benchmark score is 8558, placing the GPU in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8595 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 (1.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 (1.2% behind), and the AMD Radeon 880M at 8436 (1.4% behind). This places the Arc A380 in the same performance tier as older mobile and entry-level desktop GPUs.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by fractions of a percent, while the GPU sits near the median of all GPUs but far below the performance level that would complement a 94th-percentile processor. The data implies that this system is designed for CPU-intensive tasks where the GPU is merely an accessory rather than a primary compute device.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the relative performance of the CPU and GPU.

The GPU's benchmark scores suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings would be challenging for the Arc A380. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is entry-level, and the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 38 and DirectX 12 score of 35 indicate that modern game engines will struggle. The Passmark DirectX 10 score is 37, with DirectX 9 at 73, showing that older titles fare better. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a baseline for estimation.

For esports titles or older games, the Arc A380 might deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings, but the data does not support expectations of high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking, when compared to rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon 880M, suggests performance in the range of entry-level laptops. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would likely be the primary limiter, with frame rates dropping well below smooth playability for demanding titles. The CPU, with its strong single-core scores (2160 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2569 in Geekbench single-core), would not be the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU would dominate the performance ceiling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward from the percentiles: the CPU sits in the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile. This gap of 50 percentile points indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads, including gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 52392 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 suggest that it can handle extremely demanding CPU workloads without breaking a sweat.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (4472 in Passmark single-thread, 2160 in Cinebench R23 single-core) would allow it to feed frames to the GPU efficiently, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance would cap the frame rate. The data implies that even a modest upgrade to a mid-range GPU would unlock the CPU's full gaming potential, as the CPU has no trouble keeping up with the Arc A380's output. Conversely, in CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding, compilation, or physics simulation, the CPU would be the star, with the GPU contributing little.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured FPS data, but the benchmark delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (94 vs. 44) makes the bottleneck clear. The GPU is the limiting component in any workload that relies on graphics processing, while the CPU is the limiting component only in workloads that are not GPU-accelerated. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this middle ground, where the system's overall capability is dragged down by the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well-served by the pairing. The GPU's 44th percentile and low DirectX 12 score of 35 indicate that achieving high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles would be difficult. The CPU's strong single-thread scores (4472 Passmark) would not compensate for the GPU's limited throughput, so gamers seeking 144Hz or higher refresh rates would need a more powerful GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 695234 and data encryption score of 40091 suggest strong throughput for streaming workloads. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (not listed in the data) means that hardware-accelerated AI upscaling would rely on the GPU's Xe-HPG architecture, but the low FP32 performance limits its usefulness.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20767. Passmark floating-point math score of 134222 and integer math score of 182876 indicate solid processing power for rendering timelines. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth provide some acceleration for effects, but the 44th percentile ranking suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering would be slow.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary render engine, with its 20 cores delivering strong performance in Cinebench R15 multi-core (5035) and R20 multi-core (18544). The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance would be useful for real-time viewport rendering, but the low overall GPU score (8558 average) means final renders would be CPU-bound.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 182876 and find prime numbers score of 212 indicate strong performance for compilation and algorithmic tasks. The 28 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 33 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a viable pairing for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for typical office tasks, but the system would handle spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's Passmark G2D score of 610 suggests decent 2D performance for desktop applications. The 125 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean the system runs relatively cool and quiet, suitable for a dorm room or small office.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who prioritizes CPU performance above all else and needs only basic graphics capability. The 94th-percentile CPU makes this ideal for developers who compile large codebases, researchers running simulations, or professionals using CPU-intensive productivity software. The 44th-percentile GPU means that gamers should look elsewhere unless they play only esports titles at low settings or older games.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering (e.g., certain 3D modeling tools) would benefit from the i7-14700K's 20 cores and 28 threads. The Passmark physics score of 2964 and extended instructions score of 40632 suggest strong performance for scientific computing and engineering simulation. Students in computer science or engineering programs would find the CPU useful for coursework, though the GPU is adequate only for basic visualization.

Small business workstations that run database applications, financial modeling, or data analysis software would see strong performance from the CPU. The Passmark random string sorting score of 74733 and data encryption score of 40091 indicate solid throughput for data-heavy tasks. However, any workload requiring 3D graphics, video editing with GPU acceleration, or gaming would be poorly served by the Arc A380. The system's overall tier is desktop-class, and the combined percentile of 69 places it in the upper-middle range of all desktop builds, but the GPU drags down what would otherwise be a top-tier system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.40 GHz, boosting up to 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that trades blows with the best AMD has to offer. The average benchmark score of 69355 places it in the 94th percentile, with nearest rivals all within 1% of its score. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.2% ahead, while the AMD EPYC 9115 is 0.1% behind. This means that in real-world workloads, the i7-14700K is effectively tied with these processors, with differences that would be imperceptible in daily use.

The multi-threaded performance is particularly strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 indicate that the 20 cores are well-utilized in parallel workloads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 52392 confirms this. Single-threaded performance is also excellent, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2569 and Passmark single-thread score of 4472, making it suitable for lightly-threaded applications that require fast response times.

The 33 MB shared L3 cache is a substantial amount, which helps in workloads that access large datasets. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz already approaches the practical limits of air cooling. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A380 would be the primary GPU. The CPU's release date of October 16, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $409, positions it as a high-end desktop part.

Build Overview

This pairing represents a desktop build that combines a top-tier 20-core CPU with an entry-level 6 GB GPU. The build class is desktop, as indicated by the Intel Socket 1700 platform and the CPU's desktop market segment. The combined percentile of 69 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds, but the gap between the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 44th percentile creates a lopsided configuration.

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a flagship-class processor in the Core 14th Gen series, with performance that rivals AMD's top desktop and mobile chips. The Intel Arc A380, by contrast, is an entry-level GPU in the Alchemist generation, with performance comparable to older mobile GPUs like the AMD Radeon HD 8870M or the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The data suggests that this build is intended for users who need maximum CPU throughput for productivity, development, or scientific workloads, and who require only basic graphics output.

The system is not well-balanced for gaming, as the GPU would be the overwhelming bottleneck in most titles. For CPU-centric tasks, however, this build would perform exceptionally well. The overall tier is that of a workstation-class CPU paired with a display adapter-level GPU, making it a niche configuration suited to specific professional or academic use cases. The end-of-life status of the GPU means that a future upgrade path exists, but the CPU's active production status ensures long-term viability of the platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. It is based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 69355, placing it in the 94th percentile. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.2% ahead, the AMD EPYC 9115 is 0.1% behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.7% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.9% ahead. All deltas are under 1%.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A380 sits in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. Its nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M, which is 0.4% ahead.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A380 is 250 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, so a typical desktop PSU should handle this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The data does not list tensor cores, so AI-accelerated workloads rely on the GPU's general-purpose compute.

The GPU's clock speeds are modest: a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The memory operates at 1937 MHz, with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus delivers 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores reflect the GPU's entry-level positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, and the Passmark DirectX 11 and 12 scores of 38 and 35, respectively, indicate that modern gaming workloads will be challenging. The Passmark G3D score of 6252 and GPU compute score of 2762 place it in the 44th percentile, with rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon 880M within 1.4%. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 are more encouraging, but still far below what high-end GPUs achieve.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which is a surprisingly modern set of connectors for an entry-level card. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs. The dual-slot design and 222 mm length make it a compact card, and the 1x 8-pin power connector is standard. The GPU's end-of-life status, with a release date of June 13, 2022, and its successor being Battlemage, means that driver support may taper off over time, but the hardware remains functional for basic graphics tasks.