SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700K and Intel Arc A310E form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile of 72. The CPU, a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor, holds the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-core strength is evident: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2569 place it in the top tier for responsiveness. However, the Arc A310E’s 50th percentile standing and its modest compute resources (3.072 TFLOPS FP32) will cap frame rates at high settings, so the pairing is better suited to 1080p medium settings than to 144Hz ultra presets.

Streaming and multitasking benefit directly from the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and the PassMark multithread score of 52392 indicate that simultaneous game encoding, voice chat, and background tasks will not saturate the processor. The GPU’s lack of dedicated video encoding hardware beyond the integrated UHD Graphics 770 (which is part of the CPU) means streaming quality relies primarily on the CPU’s software encoding headroom.

Video editing workflows are CPU-bound in the early stages of rendering and export. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 and the PassMark integer math score of 182876 suggest that timeline scrubbing, color grading, and export will be fluid. The GPU’s 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB GDDR6 memory are adequate for proxy-based editing, but 4K raw timelines may exceed the GPU’s frame buffer.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray benefits from the CPU’s high multi-core throughput: Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 18544 and R15 multi-core 5035. The Arc A310E’s 6 RT cores and 32 TMUs provide basic ray tracing acceleration, but the FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest, so final-frame rendering will be CPU-dominated. For test renders or viewport previews, the GPU can assist but not replace the CPU.

Software development compiles and unit tests benefit from the CPU’s integer math performance: PassMark integer math 182876 and data compression 695234. The 33 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce compile times for large codebases. The GPU’s role in development is minimal, making this pairing viable for developers who prioritize CPU throughput over graphics.

Student and office workloads are trivial for this CPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 4472 and Geekbench single-core 2569 ensure snappy word processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing. The GPU’s 50th percentile means it can drive two 4K displays via its four mini-DisplayPort outputs, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 would suffice for office tasks, making the Arc A310E optional.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-14700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the Arc A310E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface—the board must provide that slot. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU alone; the combined system power draw is well within a 500 W PSU’s capacity, but a higher-wattage unit is needed if the CPU is overclocked.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, since the CPU’s 94th percentile score leaves ample headroom. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 slot can accommodate future graphics cards, while the CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking to increase multi-core performance. However, the platform is at the end of its socket lifespan, so any future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, and the CPU is unlocked for overclocking.

The CPU’s benchmark scores position it at the 94th percentile among all processors. Its average benchmark score is 69355, which places it 0.1% above the AMD EPYC 9115 (average 69288) and 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515). The single-core performance is strong: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2569. The multi-core scores—Cinebench R20 18544, Cinebench R15 5035—reflect the 28-thread capability, with PassMark multithread at 52362. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels in parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data analysis, while also delivering snappy single-threaded responses.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need high CPU throughput but have limited GPU demands. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-low settings can achieve playable frame rates, but high-refresh 144Hz gaming is not realistic given the GPU’s 50th percentile. Content creators who edit 1080p or 1440p video, run multi-threaded renders, or perform data compression will benefit from the CPU’s 28 threads and 94th percentile. Software developers compiling large codebases and running parallel builds will see fast compile times, while the GPU’s low profile suits office workstations that need multiple display outputs but not heavy 3D acceleration.

Students building a desktop for coursework and light gaming will find the CPU overkill but future-proof; the GPU can handle e-sports and older titles at 1080p. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or data processing will appreciate the CPU’s ECC memory support and 33 MB L3 cache, while the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is enough for basic CAD or spreadsheet rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite is extensive. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5035 multi-core and 313.5 single-core; R20 scores 18544 and 2617; R23 scores 33440.5 and 2160. Geekbench yields a multi-core score of 20767 and a single-core score of 2569. PassMark tests include data compression (695234), data encryption (40091), extended instructions (40632), floating point math (134222), integer math (182876), multithread (52392), physics (2964), random string sorting (74733), and single-thread (4472). The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69355, placing it at the 94th percentile.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in this dataset, but its percentile is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 0, indicating no recorded results. The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pair is 72, reflecting the CPU’s high standing and the GPU’s mid-tier position.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU clock runs at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost, while memory operates at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel fill rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 64.00 GTexel/s.

With 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit bus, the GPU is designed for entry-level tasks and low-power systems. Its 75 W TDP and single-slot form factor, with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W, make it a low-power option. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and outputs via four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing, but the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limits complex scene loading. The GPU’s 50th percentile indicates it performs around the median of all GPUs, but it lacks the headroom for modern AAA titles at high settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are vastly mismatched in performance tier. The CPU is at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. In CPU-bound tasks—compiling, rendering, video encoding—the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will be idle. In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck: with a 50th percentile GPU, even the CPU’s high single-core scores cannot push frame rates beyond the GPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s 94th percentile means it can deliver over 200 FPS in esports titles at 1080p, but the GPU will likely cap at 60-80 FPS. The combined percentile of 72 reflects the CPU’s strong performance and the GPU’s average standing, so any workload that is GPU-limited will drag the overall experience down.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides a fallback, but the discrete GPU is still the primary display output. For non-gaming tasks, the CPU’s performance will shine, but the GPU’s low memory bandwidth and small frame buffer may limit productivity in GPU-accelerated applications like Adobe Premiere’s GPU effects or Blender’s viewport.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 69515. In single-core, the i7’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160 is within a few points of that rival.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have?

A: The Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-14700K has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a desktop processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s suggested power supply requirement?

A: The Arc A310E suggests a 250 W PSU, and its TDP is 75 W.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost of 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $409.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD EPYC 9115?

A: The i7-14700K is 0.1% ahead of the EPYC 9115 in average score (69355 vs 69288).

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame-rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU’s single-core performance (Geekbench single 2569, Cinebench R23 single 2160) is high enough to drive over 150 FPS in most esports titles at 1080p, but the GPU’s 50th percentile and 3.072 TFLOPS will limit actual output. For demanding AAA games, the GPU will likely average 30-50 FPS at 1080p ultra, with 4 GB VRAM causing texture pop-in at higher settings. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in modern titles. The CPU’s multi-core strength will not help gaming, as the GPU is the bottleneck. For 1080p low-medium settings, 60 FPS is achievable in most titles, but high-refresh 144Hz is not realistic.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a top-6th-percentile CPU with a mid-range GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 72. The i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor that excels at multi-threaded tasks, while the Arc A310E is an entry-level GPU that offers basic 1080p gaming and low-power operation. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes, and the CPU includes integrated graphics as a backup. The overall tier is a workstation-oriented desktop with strong CPU compute but limited GPU acceleration, making it suitable for developers, content creators, and productivity users who do not need high-end graphics performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700K

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds