SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a high-end desktop processor that anchors this build, but its pairing with the Intel Arc A310 graphics card creates a profound performance imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU rests in just the 40th percentile. This is a system built around raw processing power, not graphical fidelity. The benchmark data indicates the CPU will handle the most demanding computational tasks with ease, but the GPU will severely limit any 3D rendering or modern gaming ambitions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture and built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though the discrete Arc A310 makes that less relevant.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's dominance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 33,440.5 points in multi-core and 2,160 points in single-core. This multi-core strength is further validated by a Geekbench multi-core score of 20,767 and a single-core score of 2,569. The PassMark suite shows exceptional throughput in specific workloads: floating-point math scores 134,222, integer math scores 182,876, and data compression scores 695,234. The multithread score of 52,392 and a single-thread score of 4,472 paint a picture of a processor capable of both heavy parallel workloads and responsive single-threaded tasks.

The average benchmark score of 69,355 places it in the 94th percentile, meaning it outperforms nearly all other CPUs on the market. Its nearest rivals in the data are the AMD EPYC 9115 (0.1% slower), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.2% faster), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.7% faster), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.9% faster). This shows the i7-14700K is squarely in the flagship performance tier, trading blows with top-tier server and enthusiast chips. For real workloads, this translates to near-instantaneous compilation times, rapid video encoding, and no lag in complex simulations. The data shows a processor that is not a bottleneck in any CPU-bound scenario.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of driving high frame rates in esports titles, with a single-core PassMark score of 4,472 ensuring minimal bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the Arc A310's low GPU compute score of 2,157 will prevent reaching high refresh rates at 1080p in modern titles. The system will be limited by the GPU, not the CPU.

Streaming: The i7-14700K's 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 695,234 and encryption score of 40,091 indicate robust processing for streaming overhead. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 suggests it can handle the rendering load for less demanding games, but the overall streaming experience will be constrained by the GPU's low performance tier.

Video editing: This is a strong workload for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,440.5 will significantly accelerate timeline rendering and export times in software like Premiere Pro. The PassMark floating-point math score of 134,222 aids in effects processing. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will handle basic GPU-accelerated effects, but complex compositions will be slow.

3D rendering: The CPU is a powerhouse for CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The high multi-core scores across Cinebench and PassMark (multithread score of 52,392) will produce fast, reliable renders. The Arc A310’s 6 ray tracing cores can assist, but its low FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS means GPU rendering will be a minor supplement, not a primary tool.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit directly from the CPU's multi-core might. The PassMark integer math score of 182,876 and the extended instructions score of 40,632 show exceptional capability for build servers and heavy IDE tasks. The processor's 94th percentile ranking ensures that even large codebases compile quickly.

Student and office work: This pairing is wildly overspec'd for standard office tasks. The CPU will breeze through spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing with negligible load. The GPU is also sufficient for these tasks, with a PassMark G2D score of 625. The system is overkill for this scenario, but it will provide a responsive and future-proof experience.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores, and the figures presented here are estimates, not measured results.

The Arc A310's performance data is not encouraging for gaming. Its PassMark G3D score of 5,433 places it in the 40th percentile, alongside the AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. In DirectX 11, it scores 33, and in DirectX 12, it scores 29, indicating very low API throughput. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, the GPU will struggle with modern game assets at any resolution above 720p. In lighter esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,472) may push frame rates to playable levels at 1080p with low settings. However, in AAA titles, the GPU will be the primary limiter, and achieving 60 FPS at 1080p will likely require lowest settings and resolution scaling. The 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for modern rasterization demands.

Who Should Build It

This build is for the workstation-focused user who prioritizes CPU compute over GPU acceleration. The target user is a software developer, data analyst, or video editor who works with CPU-intensive applications and does not require high-end 3D rendering or gaming. The i7-14700K's 94th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for compiling large projects, running complex simulations, or batch processing data. The Arc A310, with its 4 GB VRAM, can drive multiple displays via its four mini-DisplayPort outputs, making it suitable for a multi-monitor office setup. However, this is not a build for gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions, as the GPU's 40th percentile ranking will prohibit high-fidelity gaming. It is a professional compute workhorse with a basic display output solution. Small business workstations handling database management or financial modeling would benefit from the CPU speed, but the GPU adds little value beyond video output.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 69,355, while the GPU's is 7,550. This stark contrast creates a scenario where the CPU is underutilized in any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the GPU will be pegged at 100% usage while the CPU idles, waiting for the next frame to be rendered. The FPS scaling will be flat; increasing the resolution will lower frame rates linearly, but the CPU will never be the limiting factor. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will also cause texture streaming issues in modern titles, leading to stutters and pop-in. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or code compilation, the GPU is idle, and the CPU operates at full capacity. The system's combined percentile of 67 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall tier down from the CPU's high standing. The 125 W TDP CPU and 30 W TDP GPU also highlight the extreme power disparity, though no specific wattage comparisons are made here.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700K a good processor for this GPU?

A: No. The CPU is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 40th percentile. This creates a significant bottleneck where the CPU's performance is wasted in graphics-heavy tasks.

Q: Can this system run modern games at high settings?

A: No. The Intel Arc A310 has a PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and only 4 GB of VRAM. Estimated frame rates at 1080p in AAA titles will be low, even at minimum settings.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The data shows the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.2% faster in average benchmark score. This places the two processors in the same performance tier, with the i7-14700K being virtually identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650?

A: The Intel Arc A310 is 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 based on average benchmark scores. They are in the same performance class.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700K supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 200 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-14700K is $409.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a system ranked in the 67th percentile, a score dragged down by the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 69,355, which places it in the 94th percentile. This is a top-tier result, with the nearest rival being the AMD EPYC 9115 at a 0.1% lower score and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at a 0.2% higher score. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,440.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20,767 are exceptional.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 7,550, which places it in the 40th percentile. This is a low-tier result, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R7 250 at a 0.1% lower score and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at a 1% lower score. The GPU's best scores are in Vulkan (28,964) and OpenCL (30,607), but these are compute-oriented tests, not gaming. Its PassMark G3D score of 5,433 confirms its weak 3D performance.

The delta between the CPU and GPU scores is stark, showing a system where the CPU is overqualified for the GPU's output. In CPU-bound workloads, this system will excel; in GPU-bound workloads, it will fall flat.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class pairing the Intel Core i7-14700K with the Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a high-end 14th Gen Core processor, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist generation card. The combined percentile of 67 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall, but this is misleading. The CPU is in the top 6% of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the bottom 60%. This is a workstation-oriented pairing where the CPU is the primary engine and the GPU serves as a basic display adapter and compute accelerator. The system is not balanced for gaming, but it is highly capable for CPU-intensive tasks like software development, data processing, and video encoding.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is a low-end discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture and TSMC's 6 nm process. It features the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. Its base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a 30 W TDP.

The benchmark data reveals the A310's limited capabilities. Its PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 show it is not designed for modern gaming. Its FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, which is low for rendering tasks. However, its Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 suggest it can handle some compute workloads. The 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray tracing, but the low compute power means any ray-traced effects will be very slow. The GPU is best suited for basic video output, media playback, and light compute acceleration. Its 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for modern game textures, and its 64-bit bus limits memory throughput. For any serious 3D rendering or gaming, this GPU will be the limiting factor. Its performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is a low-end card from a previous generation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700K

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds