SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700K

69,355 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz — that boost ceiling is critical for single-threaded responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The CPU carries a 125 W TDP, which is the rated power envelope, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, along with ECC memory for workstation-oriented builds. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 2 MB of L2 per core, provides substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, a position that signals top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 33440.5 demonstrates heavy multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 2160 shows the architecture's strength in lightly-threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores — 20767 multi-core and 2569 single-core — corroborate this balanced profile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700K trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by just 0.2% in average benchmark score, sits 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and is 0.9% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. It edges out the AMD EPYC 9115 by 0.1%. These deltas are remarkably tight, meaning the i7-14700K trades blows with flagship and near-flagship parts from both AMD's consumer and server lines.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores are revealing. The multi-thread score of 52392 and integer math score of 182876 indicate that compilation, rendering, and scientific computing tasks will run with considerable speed. The floating-point math score of 134222 supports heavy numerical simulation work. Data compression scores of 695234 and encryption scores of 40091 suggest that archiving, database operations, and secure communications benefit from the CPU's many cores. The extended instructions score of 40632 shows that AVX and similar SIMD workloads — common in modern game engines and media encoders — are handled efficiently. The single-thread score of 4472 is competitive, meaning that even older software that relies on one or two cores will not feel sluggish.

The CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 94% of all processors in the database. That is not a marginal position; it is an enthusiast-tier part. The question is whether that CPU power is matched by the GPU in this pairing, which the gaming and balance sections will address.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700K compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, which is just 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 9 7950X's 69515. In practical terms, the two are effectively tied in aggregate performance, with the Intel part being slightly behind but within a margin that most workloads will not notice.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. That places it above the majority of graphics cards, though it is not at the extreme top tier. Its average benchmark score is 27425.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, meaning this build outperforms 83% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. That is a strong overall position, though it reflects the GPU lagging behind the CPU's 94th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090?

A: The RX 6700 XT's average benchmark score of 27425 is 0.5% lower than the RTX 3090's 27565. Despite the RTX 3090 being a much larger and more expensive card historically, the RX 6700 XT is nearly its match in these aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The pair ranks 1891st out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all games of 122.7. This average is skewed by very high frame rates in esports titles, so it should be interpreted with care for AAA games.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows users to adjust clock multipliers beyond the factory boost of 5.60 GHz. The 125 W TDP is the base power envelope, and overclocking will increase power draw and heat beyond that figure.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is uncommon for consumer desktop parts and adds workstation appeal.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU is a 94th percentile part, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile. That 22-point gap means the i7-14700K will frequently be waiting on the RX 6700 XT to finish rendering frames. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as low-resolution esports gaming or heavy multi-threaded productivity — the CPU's strength shines through, but in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or ray-traced workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. In Counter-Strike 2, the build delivers 185.5 FPS at 1920x1080, dropping to 120.7 at 2560x1440, and 67.1 at 3840x2160. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is a 35% reduction, and from 1440p to 4K is another 44%. That steep scaling is typical of a GPU bottleneck — if the CPU were the limiter, the frame rate would stay flatter as resolution increases. Similarly, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate falls from 58.1 at 1080p to 39.3 at 1440p and 28.3 at 4K, again indicating that the GPU is the constraint.

The pair's average FPS across games is 122.7, but that number masks the wide variance. In Valorant, the build pushes 427.6 FPS at 1080p, while in Ark: Survival Ascended it manages only 24.3 FPS at the same resolution. That 17.6x spread is the signature of a system where the GPU is the bottleneck in demanding titles, but the CPU allows the GPU to run flat-out in lighter ones. The CPU's 94th percentile single-thread performance ensures that even at 1080p, the GPU receives frames as fast as it can render them.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-core scores — 33440.5 in Cinebench R23 and 52392 in PassMark multi-thread — indicate that rendering, compiling, and data processing will be CPU-limited, which is appropriate for a CPU-heavy workload. The GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 and 2560 shading units provide decent compute acceleration, but the CPU will still be the primary engine for most non-graphics tasks. The takeaway: this build is well-suited for CPU-heavy productivity, but for gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is the part to upgrade first.

# Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across a broad game library shows a build that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming, remains capable at 1440p, and struggles at 4K. The data is measured, not estimated, and it paints a clear picture.

At 1920x1080, esports and competitive titles run at extremely high frame rates. Valorant leads with 427.6 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 411 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 185.5 FPS. Rainbow Six Siege X hits 225.1 FPS, and Roblox reaches 239.9 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the 144 Hz or 240 Hz refresh rates of most monitors, making the GPU the secondary consideration; the CPU's single-thread strength is what enables such high output.

At 1440p, the frame rates remain playable for most titles. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 120.7 FPS, Valorant stays high at 361.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone maintains a strong 154 FPS. AAA games show the GPU's limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 19.4 FPS. These are playable but not smooth, especially for action games that benefit from 60+ FPS.

At 3840x2160, the RX 6700 XT is clearly out of its depth for modern AAA titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS, and The Medium at 26 FPS. Even less demanding games struggle: Fortnite drops to 31.4 FPS and Grand Theft Auto V to 30.3 FPS. Esports titles remain playable — Valorant at 286.8 FPS, CS:GO at 167 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 67.1 FPS — but for cinematic single-player games, 4K ultra is not viable.

The average across all games is 122.7 FPS, but this is heavily skewed by the esports outliers. For a more representative view, the 1080p AAA titles hover in the 50-90 FPS range: Control at 79, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 64.3, and Outriders at 98. The build is best described as a high-refresh 1080p machine and a solid 1440p performer for less demanding titles.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p, where the CPU's 94th percentile performance and the GPU's 72nd percentile capability combine to deliver 185+ FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 411+ FPS in CS:GO. Competitive players will find the frame rates in Valorant and Rainbow Six Siege X — 427.6 and 225.1 FPS respectively at 1080p — more than sufficient for the fastest refresh-rate monitors.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core might. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 indicate that rendering times for video projects or 3D scenes will be short. The GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 GB of VRAM provide hardware acceleration for effects and compositing, though the CPU will dominate most productivity tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 cores and 28 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 182876 and multi-thread score of 52392 suggest that build times will be significantly shorter than on mainstream 6-core or 8-core parts. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or data-processing tasks.

Students and small business users are also well-served, though the hardware is overkill for basic office work. The CPU's single-thread score of 4472 ensures that spreadsheet, document, and web applications run instantly, while the GPU can handle light photo editing or CAD work. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderate GPU-accelerated tasks in engineering or design software.

The build is less well-suited for 4K gaming enthusiasts — the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking shows it cannot maintain 60 FPS at 3840x2160 in AAA titles. Similarly, users who need maximum ray-traced performance will find the RX 6700 XT's 40 ray accelerators insufficient for demanding RT workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700K uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is the platform for Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility depending on motherboard choice and budget.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's 230 W TDP and the suggested 550 W power supply leave headroom for the CPU's 125 W TDP and other components. The power connectors — one 6-pin and one 8-pin — are standard for mid-range GPUs.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a significantly faster graphics card. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve 4K gaming performance, where the current build falls below 30 FPS in many AAA titles. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a modern GPU will have full bandwidth available.

Memory is another upgrade path. With dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support, moving to higher-capacity or faster memory modules could benefit memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU's 33 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, but bandwidth-hungry applications like data compression — where the PassMark score is 695234 — could see gains from faster memory.

The platform itself is at the end of its socket generation, so future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard. However, the i7-14700K's performance is strong enough that a CPU upgrade is unnecessary for several years. The storage subsystem can be expanded with PCIe Gen 5 SSDs, which the CPU supports, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface will not be a limiting factor.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 69355, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9115, scores 69288 — a 0.1% difference that puts the i7-14700K marginally ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.7% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 (0.9% higher). The i7-14700K is effectively neck-and-neck with these parts, despite being a smaller and lower-power chip than some of them.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and single-core score of 2160 demonstrate balanced strength. The Geekbench scores of 20767 multi-core and 2569 single-core confirm this. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 52392, integer math of 182876, and floating-point math of 134222. Data compression at 695234 and encryption at 40091 round out a profile that handles both compute and I/O-heavy tasks well.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27425, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, scores 27435 — a 0% difference, meaning the two are statistically identical. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839 (1.5% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell scores 27135 (1.1% lower). The RX 6700 XT's position among these rivals is notable: it matches a mobile RTX 4070 and comes within a hair of the desktop RTX 3090 in aggregate benchmarks, despite having far less memory bandwidth and a narrower memory bus.

The combined picture is a system with a 83rd percentile rank among all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU is the stronger component by 22 percentile points, and the GPU is the weaker link. The average FPS across all games is 122.7, which is respectable but heavily influenced by esports titles. The pair ranks 1891st out of 3732 pairs in FPS performance, putting it in the upper half but not the top tier.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700K with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The GPU is a Radeon RX 6000 series card based on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process.

The combined percentile of 83 indicates that this build outperforms 83% of all CPU-GPU pairs in the database. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, creating a system where the processor is the star component. The pair's average FPS across games is 122.7, which is skewed by very high esports frame rates but still indicates solid gaming capability.

This is a high-performance desktop for gaming and productivity, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast build. The GPU, while capable, is not in the same class as the CPU. Users who prioritize maximum gaming performance would need a stronger GPU to match the CPU's headroom. Users who prioritize productivity will find the CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, and the GPU provides adequate compute acceleration.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a traditional stationary PC rather than a laptop or mini-PC. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 230 W TDP require a mid-tower or larger case with adequate airflow, and the suggested 550 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for typical configurations.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It has 40 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores — instead relying on general-purpose compute for AI tasks.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The base clock is 2321 MHz, the game clock is 2424 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2581 MHz. The pixel rate is 165.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 413.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute rating is 13.21 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 27425. In the PassMark suite, it scores 19786 in G3D and 9336 in GPU compute. The Geekbench scores show 130896 in Metal, 44152 in OpenCL, and 93500 in Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2435. These scores indicate a mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU that is strong for rasterized gaming but not exceptional for compute-heavy workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6700 XT is statistically tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0% delta) and just 0.5% behind the desktop RTX 3090. This is surprising given the RTX 3090's much larger memory bus and bandwidth, but the aggregate scores reflect real-world performance. The GPU is 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p texture-heavy scenes, and the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without excessive stuttering. The 40 ray accelerators provide some ray-tracing capability, but the performance will be modest in fully ray-traced games. The FP32 throughput of 13.21 TFLOPS is adequate for GPU-accelerated effects in video editing suites, though dedicated renderers may favor NVIDIA CUDA cores, which are not present here.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles — 427.6 FPS in Valorant, 411 FPS in CS:GO, and 225.1 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X. The CPU's 94th percentile single-thread performance ensures these titles are not CPU-limited, allowing the GPU to run at full utilization. At 1440p, frame rates remain high for esports (361.9 FPS in Valorant, 120.7 in Counter-Strike 2), but AAA games drop to the 40-60 FPS range.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are well-suited for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 52392 and extended instructions score of 40632 indicate that x264 or x265 encoding will not significantly impact game performance. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 13.21 TFLOPS provide headroom for hardware encoding, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means no DLSS-style AI upscaling.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20767 will handle 4K video timelines with multiple effects. The GPU's 2560 shading units accelerate effects and color grading, and the 12 GB VRAM is enough for 4K preview buffers. Export times will be CPU-bound, and the 20 cores will keep them short.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, the i7-14700K's 33440.5 Cinebench R23 score will provide fast ray tracing. The GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 and 40 ray accelerators can handle GPU-accelerated rendering, though the RX 6700 XT will be slower than top-tier NVIDIA cards in CUDA-based renderers. The 12 GB VRAM limits scene complexity but is sufficient for most mid-range projects.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 182876 and multi-thread score of 52392 will accelerate code compilation, especially for large C++ or Rust projects. The data compression score of 695234 helps with build artifact packaging, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. The GPU is not a significant factor in this scenario.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4472 ensures instant responsiveness in any office application. The GPU's 951 PassMark G2D score indicates fast 2D rendering for UI elements. Students in engineering or design programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance for simulations and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM for CAD applications.