SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700HX and Intel Arc A730M form a laptop-class pairing that lands in the 87th combined percentile, indicating a strong overall tier for mobile computing. The CPU holds an 89th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU sits at an 84th percentile versus all GPUs, showing a balanced high-end mobile platform. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a 20-core, 28-thread mobile processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake-HX architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node with a 257 mm² die size. It offers a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows it to fit into high-performance laptops while still delivering substantial multi-threaded throughput. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which benefits workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24595 multi-core and 2103 single-core, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. The multi-core result is particularly strong, as it indicates the 20 cores scale well under sustained load—typical for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 2103 shows that the 5.50 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, and legacy software that cannot use many cores.

Geekbench results reinforce this picture: a multi-core score of 14390 and a single-core score of 2116. The multi-core score suggests that the CPU handles parallel workloads with ease, while the single-core score is respectable for a mobile chip, though it trails the highest-end desktop parts. PassMark tests add nuance: integer math scores 131296, floating-point math 93836, and extended instructions 25718, all pointing to strong general-purpose computational ability. Data compression scores 438539, data encryption 26092, and random string sorting 48544, indicating that the CPU is well-suited for file archiving, disk encryption, and database-style operations.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 7303 at 45960 (0% delta), AMD EPYC 4364P at 45970 (0% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030 (-0.2% delta), and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 at 46062 (-0.2% delta). The i7-14700X’s average benchmark score of 45953 sits essentially even with these server and mobile parts, showing that it competes at a level far above typical laptop processors. The 0% and -0.2% deltas indicate that the i7-14700HX is within a rounding error of these rivals, meaning real-world differences will depend on cooling, power limits, and specific workload optimizations rather than raw architectural superiority.

For real workloads, the data indicates that video editing software that uses multi-core rendering will see near-desktop-class performance, while software development tasks like code compilation will benefit from the 28 threads. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, and the 2 MB L2 per core reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle, though it is not a gaming solution on its own.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance relative to its rivals?

A: The i7-14700HX scores 24595 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 14390 in Geekbench multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 45953 is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062), and essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 7303 (45960) and EPYC 4364P (45970).

Q: How does the GPU compare to other mobile and desktop graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A730M holds an 84th percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 45592. It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384) and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), but 0.8% behind the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972) and 1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This is ample for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, as well as for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, indicating that the CPU can be overclocked if the laptop’s BIOS and cooling solution allow it. However, the 55 W TDP and mobile form factor mean that any overclocking headroom is limited by thermal constraints.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-14700HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows laptop manufacturers to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the actual supported speeds depend on the motherboard design.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status and architecture?

A: The Arc A730M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and is currently marked as end-of-life. It uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. Despite being end-of-life, its benchmark scores remain competitive.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for the i7-14700HX paired with the Arc A730M. All frame-rate expectations must be inferred from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, which is less precise than direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A730M’s 12.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can drive 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in many titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means that 144 Hz or 240 Hz displays may require reduced settings in demanding games. The CPU’s 2103 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 2116 Geekbench single-core score ensure that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load is heavier.

Streaming: The CPU’s 28 threads and strong multi-core scores (24595 Cinebench R23, 36566 PassMark multithread) allow simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant frame drops. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 enables modern encoding and rendering pipelines, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-based upscaling may rely on driver-level implementations.

Video editing: Multi-core rendering in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads, as shown by the 24595 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timelines and effects, while the CPU’s 33 MB L3 cache reduces loading times for large project files. The combined 87th percentile suggests a capable editing workstation.

3D rendering: In Blender or similar applications, the CPU’s 20 cores deliver strong ray tracing performance, as evidenced by the 24595 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU’s 24 ray tracing cores and 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renders, though the 80 W TDP limits sustained performance compared to desktop GPUs. The 406 mm² die and 21,700 million transistors indicate a well-equipped mobile rendering solution.

Software development: Code compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU’s 28 threads (with a PassMark multi-thread score of 36566) will reduce build times for large projects. The 33 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated compilation tasks, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units assist with shader compilation and testing. The CPU’s 89th percentile places it above most mobile processors, making it suitable for professional development work.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance (2103 Cinebench R23, 3947 PassMark single-thread) handles word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The GPU’s 84th percentile ensures smooth display output and hardware acceleration for office apps, while the 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP mean the laptop can run for extended periods on battery with modest power draw.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms, with the CPU at 89th and the GPU at 84th, suggesting that neither component grossly overpowers the other in typical workloads. However, the data indicates that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, as its average benchmark score of 45592 is lower than the CPU’s 45953. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile (1% slower) and RTX A2000 (1% faster), showing it sits in a competitive but not top-tier GPU segment.

In CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding or 3D scene preparation, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but its 20 cores and 28 threads provide headroom that most mobile workloads will not fully saturate. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP mean that sustained loads will likely be power-limited rather than core-limited, especially in thin laptops with limited cooling. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck analysis, but the benchmark scores suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will limit frame rates in modern games, while at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor.

The CPU’s 0% delta compared to the AMD EPYC 7303 and EPYC 4364P indicates that it offers similar raw computational throughput to those server chips, while the GPU’s -0.8% delta versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation shows a small but notable gap in graphics performance. This balance favors workloads that are both CPU- and GPU-intensive, such as real-time 3D previews or physics simulations, where the system can leverage both components concurrently.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows consistent strength across synthetic tests. Cinebench R15 scores 3812 multi-core and 296 single-core, while R20 scores 13059 multi-core and 1843 single-core. These progressions show that the CPU scales well with increasing core counts and sustained load. Geekbench single-core of 2116 and multi-core of 14390 align with the Cinebench results, confirming that the architecture performs consistently across different benchmarking methodologies. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 131296, floating-point math at 93836, and multithread at 36566. The data compression score of 438539 and encryption score of 26092 indicate strong performance in data-centric tasks.

The GPU’s benchmarks are more limited but still informative. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the Arc A730M scores 1732, which places it in the 84th percentile versus all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 70352, while Vulkan scores 64693, showing that the GPU performs well in both compute and graphics APIs. The FP32 performance of 12.60 TFLOPS and texture rate of 393.6 GTexel/s indicate a GPU that can handle modern game rendering at high settings, though the 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests it may struggle with very high resolutions or extreme anti-aliasing.

The combined percentile of 87 reflects that this pairing outperforms the majority of laptops currently on the market. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 45953 is nearly identical to the GPU’s 45592, suggesting that the two components are well-matched for balanced workloads. The 0% and -0.2% deltas to the CPU’s nearest rivals show that the i7-14700HX is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU’s 1% delta to the RTX 5090 Mobile indicates it competes with the fastest mobile graphics cards available.

Who Should Build It

This CPU-GPU pairing is targeted at users who need high-performance mobile computing across a range of tasks. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, which handle modern game textures and effects, while the CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures smooth frame pacing. Content creators working with 4K video will appreciate the CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads for rendering, as well as the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the CPU’s 24595 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 33 MB L3 cache. Students and office workers will find that the CPU’s single-core performance (3947 PassMark single-thread) handles everyday tasks effortlessly, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for presentations and data visualization. Small business workstations that run databases or virtual machines will benefit from the CPU’s 28 threads and ECC memory support, which is listed as enabled in the specifications.

The 87th combined percentile means that this system is well above average, but not at the absolute top tier. Users who require the fastest possible gaming performance might prefer a higher-end GPU, while those who need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance for professional rendering could opt for a desktop platform. However, for a laptop that can handle gaming, content creation, and productivity without major compromises, this pairing is a strong choice.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 24 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 1100 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and it has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective, and the GPU’s pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 393.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 12.60 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating that the GPU can accelerate both conventional graphics and half-precision compute tasks. The TDP is 80 W, which is modest for a GPU with this performance level, making it suitable for laptops with adequate cooling.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the GPU scores 1732, which is in the 84th percentile versus all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 70352 and Vulkan 64693, showing strong compute performance in both APIs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is useful for games that support the feature, though the performance will be lower than high-end desktop GPUs.

The nearest rivals show that the Arc A730M is competitive with mid-range desktop and high-end mobile GPUs. It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384) and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), but 0.8% behind the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972) and 1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043). This places it in a tier where it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: laptop) that pairs the Intel Core i7-14700HX with the Intel Arc A730M. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread mobile processor from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is a mobile graphics card from Intel’s Arc 7 lineup. The combined percentile of 87 indicates that this pairing outperforms roughly 87% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations, placing it in the upper tier of mobile systems.

The CPU’s 89th percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU’s 84th percentile versus all GPUs show that both components are above average, but the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. This means that the system is better suited for CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding and software development than for pure gaming performance at the highest settings. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop with a total system power draw that requires a decent cooling solution but is still portable.

The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance cannot be precisely quantified, but the benchmark scores provide a reliable estimate. The GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern games at 1080p, while the CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock ensures that the system does not become CPU-bound in most titles. Overall, this is a high-end laptop pairing that offers strong performance for a wide range of workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for memory upgrades up to the laptop’s maximum supported capacity, though the exact limit is not specified in the data. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for future high-speed NVMe SSDs or external GPU enclosures.

The GPU is an integrated mobile part (slotWidth: IGP) with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and it is marked as end-of-life, so it cannot be upgraded individually. The TDP of 80 W for the GPU and 55 W for the CPU means that the laptop’s power delivery system is designed for a combined load of approximately 135 W, which limits the ability to add more power-hungry components. The suggested PSU is not listed, so users should rely on the laptop’s factory power adapter.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the system memory, especially if the laptop ships with a lower-capacity DDR4 or DDR5 configuration. Upgrading to a larger NVMe SSD would also improve load times and storage capacity, as the PCIe Gen 5 interface supports the fastest available drives. There is no path to upgrade the CPU or GPU, so users should consider this system as a fixed configuration that can be enhanced through memory and storage upgrades. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a notable feature for professional users who require error-correcting memory, though this depends on the motherboard’s implementation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700HX

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds