SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A370M — Hardware Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a laptop-class build that is heavily skewed toward processor performance. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 82. This is a configuration where the processor is the clear dominant component, and the GPU, while capable, will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all FPS discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a 20-core, 28-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh generation. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz, providing a substantial frequency range for both efficiency and peak performance. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for multiplier adjustments in systems that support overclocking. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is critical.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24,595 in multi-core and 2,103 in single-core. The multi-core result places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors, while the single-core score indicates strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench results corroborate this: 14,390 multi-core and 2,116 single-core. The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specialized workloads. The integer math score of 131,296 and floating-point math score of 93,836 suggest robust general-purpose computing. The data compression score of 438,539 is exceptionally high, indicating that archive management and compression tasks will be handled with ease. Encryption performance, at 26,092, is solid but not class-leading, which is typical for a mobile processor without dedicated encryption hardware.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 7303 (45,960, 0% delta), AMD EPYC 4364P (45,970, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46,030, -0.2% delta), and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46,062, -0.2% delta). The i7-14700HX's average benchmark score is 45,953, placing it effectively on par with server-class EPYC processors in raw compute, though those chips are designed for different thermal and power envelopes. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 5 235 are marginally ahead by 0.2%, which is statistically negligible. This positions the i7-14700HX as a top-tier mobile compute engine, rivaling even some desktop and server parts in aggregate throughput.

For real workloads, this means the i7-14700HX is ideal for compilation, 3D rendering, video encoding, and any parallel task that can utilize 28 threads. The single-core performance, while not the absolute highest, is sufficient for responsive day-to-day use and lightly-threaded applications. The L3 cache of 33 MB (shared) and per-core L2 cache of 2 MB provide ample fast storage for working sets, reducing memory latency in cache-resident workloads. The PassMark physics score of 2,252 and single-thread score of 3,947 further confirm balanced performance across different types of instruction streams.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the Intel Arc A370M is the clear bottleneck for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's percentile rank of 89 versus the GPU's percentile rank of 74 means the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics solution can utilize in most scenarios. The CPU is capable of feeding frames much faster than the GPU can render them, especially at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly all modern titles, with the CPU sitting idle waiting for rendering to complete. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as the pixel fill rate and shading throughput of the Arc A370M are the constraining factors.

The PassMark data indicates that the CPU's multi-thread score of 36,566 and single-thread score of 3,947 are both strong, meaning there is no workload where the CPU would be the primary limiter except for extremely parallel compute tasks that do not involve graphics. Conversely, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 are moderate, suggesting that graphics workloads will be capped by the GPU's 4,198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

For gaming, the imbalance means that CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with many NPCs or real-time strategy titles with complex simulations, will still be constrained by the GPU's rendering capabilities. The CPU will not hold back the GPU in any practical sense; rather, the GPU will hold back what the CPU can deliver. For productivity tasks that do not rely on the GPU, such as code compilation or data processing, the balance is heavily in favor of the CPU, which will dominate those workloads without GPU involvement. In GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU's performance will be underutilized.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700HX delivers an average benchmark score of 45,953, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7303, scores 45,960, a 0% delta, meaning the i7-14700HX is statistically tied with a server-grade EPYC processor in aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46,030, which is 0.2% higher, a negligible difference. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3,812 multi-core and 296 single-core; in R20, it scores 13,059 multi-core and 1,843 single-core; and in R23, it scores 24,595 multi-core and 2,103 single-core. The Geekbench scores of 14,390 multi-core and 2,116 single-core confirm the trend of strong parallel performance with respectable single-thread capability.

The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, a delta of -0.1%, making them effectively identical in performance. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, which is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874, which is 1% lower. This is surprising, as the RX 6800M is a high-end mobile GPU, but the benchmark aggregate suggests the Arc A370M competes in the same bracket. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 are close, indicating consistent performance across APIs.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is in the top 11% of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 26% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 82 reflects a system that is above-average overall, but with a significant performance gap between the two components. For CPU-bound tasks, this system will outperform most desktops from a few generations ago; for GPU-bound tasks, it will provide playable frame rates in many titles at medium settings, but it will not compete with dedicated gaming laptops featuring higher-tier GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for users who prioritize processor performance above all else and have only modest graphics requirements. Software developers and engineers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or execute heavy data analysis will benefit enormously from the 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,595 indicates that compilation times will be drastically reduced compared to mainstream quad-core or hexa-core processors. Data scientists using Python or R, where the PassMark integer math score of 131,296 matters, will find this CPU to be a workhorse.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-based rendering, such as those using Blender's Cycles engine or Adobe Premiere for export, will see excellent performance from the i7-14700HX. However, they must be aware that the GPU will not accelerate these tasks significantly. For 3D artists using GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift, the Arc A370M's 4,198 TFLOPS will be a bottleneck, and they should consider a higher-tier GPU instead. Students in engineering or computer science programs, where multi-threaded performance is essential for simulations and mathematical modeling, will find this system more than adequate. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial models, or enterprise software will also benefit from the CPU's high throughput and ECC memory support, which provides error correction for critical data.

Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-low settings will find the Arc A370M sufficient for many titles, but those seeking high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or higher will be disappointed. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking means it is a mid-range part, and frame rates will be limited accordingly. For users who play older or less demanding games, the system will be perfectly serviceable, but for modern AAA titles, the GPU will struggle at high settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all tested configurations. The CPU is at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the 74th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7303?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 45,953, while the EPYC 7303 scores 45,960, a delta of 0%. They are statistically identical in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, coming from 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 4,198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 performance at 8,397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Q: How does the GPU's Vulkan score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU scores 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, has an average score of 29,197, which is 0.1% higher, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 mobile. It uses TSMC's 6 nm process node with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1550 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29,175. This places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, a 0.1% difference, meaning the Arc A370M is essentially tied with that part. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, which is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874, which is 1% lower. This is notable because the RX 6800M is a much larger GPU with more memory, yet the aggregate benchmark score is slightly lower, likely due to driver maturity or specific test characteristics.

For rendering, the GPU's 4,198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate are modest by modern standards. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s means that at high resolutions, fill-rate limits will be reached. The 8 ray tracing cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the overall performance will be low in ray-traced workloads due to the limited compute and bandwidth. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but it will be a constraint for textures in modern games, which often require 6-8 GB at high settings. For productivity, the GPU can accelerate some tasks via OpenCL or Vulkan, but it is not a compute powerhouse.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the GPU's performance, as indicated by its 74th percentile rank, will deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, but it will not sustain high refresh rates (144Hz+) in demanding AAA games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,947 in PassMark ensures that frame times are consistent, but the GPU's 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap overall FPS. Expect 60-90 FPS in light titles and 30-60 FPS in heavier ones at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming due to its 20 cores and 28 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,595 allows for simultaneous game encoding (via x264) and gameplay without significant frame drops. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and moderate compute may limit game settings, but the CPU can handle the encode workload independently, making this a viable streaming platform.

Video Editing: In applications like Adobe Premiere, the CPU's multi-thread performance will accelerate export and rendering. The PassMark data compression score of 438,539 indicates fast timeline scrubbing and preview generation. However, the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timeline performance. For 1080p editing, this is a capable system; for 4K or complex effects, it will be slow.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or 3ds Max will be fast, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,595 translating to shorter render times. GPU-based rendering will be constrained by the Arc A370M's 4,198 TFLOPS, which is below what dedicated render GPUs offer. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some acceleration, but the overall GPU render performance will be limited to simple scenes or lower resolutions.

Software Development: Compilation and testing will benefit from the CPU's 28 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 131,296 is ideal for code compilation, and the 33 MB L3 cache reduces memory access times. Virtual machines and containers will run efficiently with the high core count. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, so the system is well-balanced for a developer who does not game.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, spreadsheet manipulation, and document processing, the CPU is overkill, but it ensures no slowdowns ever occur. The single-thread score of 3,947 in PassMark makes the system feel responsive. The GPU is sufficient for desktop rendering and basic graphical tasks. Battery life may be a concern due to the high-TDP CPU (55 W), but performance is never in question.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (as indicated by the buildClass field) that pairs a top-tier mobile processor with a mid-range mobile GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700HX is a 20-core Raptor Lake-HX part designed for high-performance laptops, and it sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level Arc 3 mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, sitting at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 82 places this system above average overall, but the performance profile is lopsided: the CPU is in the top 11% of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 26% of all graphics cards.

The system is best described as a "workstation-class CPU with a gaming-capable entry GPU." It is not a gaming laptop in the traditional sense, as the GPU will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings, but it is an excellent choice for users who need extreme CPU performance and only occasional, moderate GPU usage. The CPU's average benchmark score of 45,953 rivals server parts like the AMD EPYC 7303, which is remarkable for a mobile processor. The GPU's average score of 29,175 is comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX 470, making it a competent 1080p gaming solution at medium settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded after purchase. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so users have flexibility in memory choice, but they must select one or the other at build time. ECC memory is supported, which is a rare feature in mobile platforms and beneficial for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is more than sufficient for the GPU and any NVMe storage.

The GPU is integrated into the motherboard (slotWidth is "IGP"), meaning it is not user-upgradeable. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, so no future driver optimizations are likely to change its performance. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 90 W, which is typical for a high-performance laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the mobile class and the TDPs, any laptop power brick rated for the combined TDP will suffice.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would need to purchase a new laptop, as neither component is replaceable. If the user is satisfied with the CPU but wants better graphics, they would need to look for a laptop with the same CPU but a higher-tier GPU, such as an Arc A770M or a discrete NVIDIA part. If they want better CPU performance, they would need to move to a desktop platform, as the BGA 1964 socket has no upgrade path. The memory and PCIe support are current, so no platform bottlenecks exist for the GPU or storage. Overall, this is a closed system with no meaningful upgrades available beyond what is already installed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds