SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700HX

45,953 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M is a laptop configuration that prioritizes processor muscle over graphics fidelity. The benchmark data shows a stark contrast in capability between the two components: the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile. This is a machine designed for compute-heavy productivity tasks and CPU-bound workflows, with the graphics solution serving as a competent but secondary component for light gaming and accelerated content creation. The data indicates a system that excels at multi-threaded workloads, offering desktop-class processing power in a mobile package, but its gaming potential is constrained by the entry-level Arc GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700HX is a high-end mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture. It features 20 physical cores and 28 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallel processing capability. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which can boost up to 5.50 GHz under load, allowing for both efficient low-power operation and high-frequency bursts for single-threaded tasks. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is generous, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. This large cache pool helps feed the 20 cores with data, reducing latency in complex workloads.

Benchmark scores confirm the CPU's strength. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multi-core score of 24595 and a single-core score of 2103. The multi-core result is particularly telling; it indicates that the chip can sustain high throughput across all cores for extended periods, making it suitable for video rendering, code compilation, and batch processing. The single-core score of 2103 is also strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on fewer threads. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 14390 and a single-core score of 2116, further validating the balanced performance profile.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 45953, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7303 and AMD EPYC 4364P, both with scores around 45960, showing a statistical tie. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 trail by a mere 0.2 percent, indicating that the i7-14700HX is at the top of its class among mobile and even some server processors. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 131296, floating-point math scores 93836, and extended instructions score 25718. The data compression score of 438539 and encryption score of 26092 suggest strong performance in archiving and security-related tasks. This is a processor that handles dense, parallel workloads with ease, making it ideal for professionals who need desktop-level compute in a laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is the entry point in Intel's Alchemist mobile GPU lineup. It is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and utilizes the DG2-128 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and can boost to 2200 MHz.

Compute performance is modest but not negligible. The GPU delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24744, a margin of -0.4 percent. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is also close at 24763 (-0.5 percent), while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is slightly ahead at 24442 (+0.8 percent). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 trails by 1.5 percent.

The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The TDP is just 25 W, making it an efficient part that produces minimal heat. For rendering, the A350M can handle light 3D modeling and video encoding tasks, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are limiting factors for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The ray tracing cores exist, but with only 6 units, performance in ray-traced workloads will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The i7-14700HX is more than capable of driving high frame rates, with a single-core Geekbench score of 2116 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2103. However, the Arc A350M GPU is the limiting factor. With 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM, the GPU is not suited for 144Hz gaming at high settings. Users can expect smooth performance at lower resolutions and settings, but high-refresh gaming at 1080p with details turned up will likely exceed the GPU's capabilities. This configuration targets esports titles and older games at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. PassMark data encryption score of 26092 and extended instructions score of 25718 indicate strong processing power for software encoding. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload the work. The system can handle streaming workloads, but the GPU's gaming performance will cap the stream quality and game settings. The CPU will not bottleneck the encoding process, making this a viable setup for 1080p streaming.

Video Editing: The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 24595 is a strong indicator of video editing performance. Timeline scrubbing, effects, and exports will benefit from the 20 cores. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timeline performance. The system can handle 1080p editing with ease and light 4K work, but heavy color grading or complex 3D effects will strain the GPU.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13059 and R15 score of 3812 showcase its rendering prowess. CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software will be fast. The GPU can assist with viewport acceleration and some render engines, but its 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. The combination is better suited for CPU-based rendering workflows.

Software Development: The high thread count and strong single-core performance are ideal for compilation. The Geekbench multi-core score of 14390 supports fast parallel builds. The large 33 MB L3 cache helps with code and data locality. Developers can run multiple virtual machines or containers with 28 threads available. The GPU is sufficient for basic GUI rendering and 2D acceleration.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for these tasks. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2103 ensures snappy document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 20 cores provide future-proofing for multitasking, but the power and cost are unnecessary for basic office use. The GPU is more than adequate for office applications and video playback.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck in the GPU. The CPU ranks in the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile. The average benchmark scores show a delta of about 21306 points in favor of the CPU, which is substantial. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU can easily feed the GPU, but the A350M's 768 shading units and 64-bit memory bus will cap frame rates. The pair's combined percentile is 80, reflecting the GPU pulling down the overall score.

In CPU-bound scenarios like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU is the star, with scores like the PassMark multithread score of 36566. The GPU is not a bottleneck in these tasks as long as the software uses CPU rendering. However, in GPU-accelerated workloads, the A350M's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS will limit performance. For example, in a video editor, the CPU can process the timeline, but the GPU will struggle with heavy effects.

The FPS scaling follows the GPU's capability. Since there is no measured FPS data, estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores suggest that the system will perform well at 1080p in less demanding games, but will drop below 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles at high settings. The CPU will not cause frame drops or stutters in any scenario. The bottleneck is consistently the GPU, except in tasks that are purely CPU-bound, where the system excels.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 45953, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7303, scores 45960, a 0 percent difference. The AMD EPYC 4364P also scores 45970, also 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, a -0.2 percent delta, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062, also -0.2 percent. This shows the i7-14700HX is on par with server-grade processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile. The AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744 (-0.4 percent), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 (-0.5 percent), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (+0.8 percent), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (+1.5 percent). The GPU is competitive with desktop graphics cards from the previous generation.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer and the GPU is a mid-range part. The CPU scores 14390 in Geekbench multi-core, while the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL. The pair's combined percentile is 80, indicating a well-above-average system overall, but the GPU prevents it from being a gaming powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 places the CPU in the top tier for laptops, while the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 shows it can handle modern APIs, but not at high performance levels.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for flexible memory choices. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, providing high bandwidth for future storage and GPU upgrades, though the laptop form factor limits physical upgrades.

The GPU has a TDP of 25 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 25 W indicate a modest total system power draw. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning no further driver optimizations are expected. The CPU is an active product, supporting a long-term investment.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, but the laptop form factor makes this difficult. If considering an external GPU enclosure via PCIe, the CPU's 16 Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth. However, the 4 GB VRAM on the current GPU is a limitation for modern games. The memory support for DDR5 allows for high-speed memory, which can improve CPU performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The platform is solid, with the CPU being the long-lasting component.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's capabilities. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings for most titles.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's strong single-core performance will drive high frame rates, potentially exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with low settings. The GPU's 768 shading units are sufficient for these lighter workloads. In AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU will struggle. At 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates may drop below 30 FPS. Lowering settings to medium or low should yield playable 30-60 FPS, but the 4 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in in demanding titles.

The CPU will not be the limitation in any gaming scenario. The 20 cores and 5.50 GHz boost clock ensure no frame drops due to processing power. The GPU is the sole constraint. The 64-bit memory bus is a significant bottleneck for bandwidth-heavy games. The 6 ray tracing cores provide some capability, but enabling ray tracing will likely halve performance. For 1440p gaming, the GPU is not recommended, as the 4 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth will result in poor performance.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700HX good for gaming?

A: The CPU is excellent for gaming, with a single-core Geekbench score of 2116 and a multi-core score of 14390. It will not bottleneck any game. However, the overall gaming experience is limited by the Intel Arc A350M GPU, which ranks in the 70th percentile and is the bottleneck in this system.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A350M run modern games?

A: Yes, but at lower settings. The GPU has 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM. It can run esports and older titles at 1080p with medium-to-high settings. For graphically demanding AAA games, expect to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Q: How does the i7-14700HX compare to its rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 45953, placing it in the 89th percentile. It is statistically tied with the AMD EPYC 7303 and AMD EPYC 4364P. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235 trail by 0.2 percent.

Q: Is 4 GB of VRAM enough for modern games?

A: It is limiting. The 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM with a 64-bit bus is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but high-resolution textures and large open worlds may exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality.

Q: What is the TDP of this configuration?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. The total system power draw is modest, making this a relatively power-efficient laptop configuration.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing. However, with only 6 cores, ray tracing performance will be low, and enabling it will significantly impact frame rates.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this laptop?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and is an active product, while the GPU is end-of-life. In a laptop, upgrades are typically limited to memory and storage. The platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, but a GPU upgrade would require a new laptop.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is for professionals and power users who need heavy CPU performance in a mobile form factor. Software developers will benefit from the 28 threads and 14390 Geekbench multi-core score, enabling fast compilation and virtualization. Video editors working with 1080p footage will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 valuable for rendering and export.

Students in engineering or computer science fields can leverage the CPU for simulations and coding, while the GPU handles general tasks. Small business workstations requiring data analysis, as indicated by the PassMark data compression score of 438539, will perform well. The system is not for gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p experiences, as the GPU is the weak link.

Content creators who prioritize CPU rendering over GPU acceleration will find this a suitable platform. The 20 cores and 33 MB L3 cache provide exceptional performance for 3D modeling and CPU-based render engines. The GPU is adequate for viewport display and light tasks. This is a CPU-first system, and users should build it with that expectation. The combined percentile of 80 indicates a well-rounded system, but the GPU's 70th percentile means it is not a gaming rig. It is a workstation-grade CPU paired with an entry-level GPU, making it ideal for compute-heavy tasks and casual gaming.