SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while maintaining a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are listed as N/A, meaning this is a purely compute-focused part without an iGPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53,701 — a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i7-14700F is essentially tied with that server part. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X trails by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P sits 0.8% behind. This positioning indicates that the i7-14700F delivers performance comparable to high-end server processors in aggregate workloads, despite being a mainstream desktop part.

In multi-threaded rendering, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 demonstrates substantial parallel capability for a 65 W processor. The R20 multicore score of 14,751 and R15 multicore score of 3,540 reinforce this picture. For single-threaded tasks, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958, R20 single-core score of 2,082, and R15 single-core score of 499 show strong per-core efficiency, which is critical for lightly threaded applications like legacy software or certain game engines. The Geekbench multicore score of 19,620 and single-core score of 2,429 corroborate these findings.

PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths. The multithread score of 41,317, integer math score of 155,808, and floating-point math score of 107,005 indicate heavy number-crunching ability. Data compression scores 505,885, while data encryption scores 30,144. Extended instructions hit 28,564, and random string sorting reaches 55,918. Physics simulation scores 2,455, and the single-thread score is 4,257. The find prime numbers score of 176 is notably low, suggesting that this CPU is not optimized for that particular workload pattern, but the overall package remains formidable.

What these scores mean for real workloads: video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit from the 28 threads and high boost clock. The 65 W TDP is remarkable given this performance class, indicating efficient power delivery. The 33 MB shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks, while the DDR5 and DDR4 memory support gives build flexibility. The ECC memory support is unusual for a consumer chip and will appeal to workstation users who need data integrity.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 and PassMark G3D score of 15,117 provide a baseline for expected gaming performance, while the CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the estimated frame rates will be driven primarily by the GPU. The Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest that modern titles will run at playable but not high-refresh rates. The DirectX 10 score of 108 and DirectX 9 score of 205 indicate better performance in older APIs, which is typical for workstation-oriented GPUs. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,257 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 will handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the performance limiter. The estimated frame rates will drop compared to 1080p, but the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth will manage most textures at this resolution. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 78,844 and OpenCL score of 74,540 suggest that the GPU can handle compute-heavy game effects, but the 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs means this is not a high-end gaming part.

At 4K resolution, the estimates become more conservative. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 98.88 GPixel/s pixel rate will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles. The 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, but the older Turing architecture limits the effectiveness of these features compared to newer generations. The CPU will have significant headroom at 4K, meaning frame rates will be almost entirely GPU-bound.

The absence of measured FPS data means these figures are directional rather than definitive. The CPU's 91st percentile performance and the GPU's 61st percentile performance create a pairing where the GPU is clearly the weaker link for gaming. For esports titles and older games, the estimated frame rates will be much higher, but for AAA releases at ultra settings, expectations should be moderate.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, which reflects the GPU dragging down the overall system performance. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in virtually every scenario, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,117 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41,317 illustrates the disparity. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,789 is roughly one-third of the CPU's average benchmark score of 53,620. This ratio suggests that the CPU could support a significantly more powerful GPU without becoming a constraint. The nearest rival GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a score of 17,666 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with a score of 17,639 (0.9% ahead), confirm that the Quadro RTX 4000 is entry-level in modern terms.

For CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression (505,885 in PassMark), and encryption (30,144), the CPU will be the dominant performer and the GPU will sit idle or lightly utilized. The GPU's compute score of 6,176 in PassMark GPU compute is respectable but not transformative, meaning it can assist with some parallel tasks but will not accelerate CPU-bound workflows.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, shows that the GPU will limit frame rates at all resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU could push much higher frame rates than the GPU can deliver, creating a situation where the GPU is saturated at nearly 100% utilization while the CPU remains underutilized. At higher resolutions, this bottleneck shifts even more heavily toward the GPU. In ray-traced workloads, the 36 RT cores will be the constraint, while the 288 tensor cores can help with DLSS upscaling to improve effective performance.

The 160 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP create a combined thermal envelope that is manageable, but the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is a potential bandwidth limitation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU only uses PCIe 3.0, which could reduce data transfer rates in texture-heavy gaming scenarios. The 8 GB VRAM is also a potential bottleneck at 4K ultra settings, where modern titles can exceed this capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17,789, placing it 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666), 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639), 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588), and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700F supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors and useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 76, reflecting the GPU's lower 61st percentile dragging down the system's overall position.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 delivers 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 14.24 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio).

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 35,122 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core tests.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 53,620, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This is a top-tier result for a desktop processor. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53,701 (delta -0.2%), meaning the i7-14700F is statistically tied with that server chip. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288 (delta 0.6%), and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206 (delta 0.8%). These narrow margins show that the i7-14700F competes directly with high-core-count server and enthusiast parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This is a mid-range result. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17,666 (delta 0.7%), meaning the Quadro RTX 4000 is essentially equivalent to that older card. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17,639 (delta 0.9%), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17,588 (delta 1.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17,551 (delta 1.4%). The GPU's performance is clustered tightly with these rivals, indicating it sits in a crowded mid-range band.

The combined percentile of 76 reflects the significant gap between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The CPU is a top-10% part, while the GPU is a mid-range part. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks will perform exceptionally well, but GPU-bound tasks (gaming, rendering) will be limited by the GPU's capabilities. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 and Geekbench multicore score of 19,620 are strong indicators of productivity performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 and PassMark G3D score of 15,117 are moderate for gaming and rendering.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is based on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1625 MHz, which translates to 13 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz. The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 14.24 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The card is single-slot, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. It measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height. The TDP is 160 W, and the bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 61st percentile overall. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 and Vulkan score of 78,844 indicate solid compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 15,117 and GPU compute score of 6,176 are moderate. DirectX scores are 108 for DX10, 128 for DX11, and 52 for DX12, which suggests that the GPU's DX12 performance is relatively weak. The G2D score of 846 is low, indicating limited 2D acceleration performance.

For rendering workloads, the 36 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is beneficial for professional visualization tasks. The 288 tensor cores support DLSS and AI-based rendering techniques, though the Turing implementation is older than newer architectures. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering but may be limiting for large 4K scenes or complex 3D models.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads while accepting mid-range GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find the GPU adequate, while gamers at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings will be disappointed. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators who edit video, compile code, or process large datasets, where the GPU plays a secondary role.

Content creators working with video editing software that leverages CPU encoding will benefit from the 28 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock. Software developers compiling large codebases will see excellent performance from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 and PassMark multithread score of 41,317. Data analysts and researchers running simulations will appreciate the high integer math score of 155,808 and floating-point math score of 107,005.

Students building a workstation for coursework will find the CPU's 65 W TDP efficient for dorm-room builds, while the GPU's single-slot design fits in compact cases. Small business workstations running office applications, database queries, or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 505,885 and encryption score of 30,144. The ECC memory support adds reliability for professional use cases where data integrity is critical.

Users who need strong GPU compute for rendering or machine learning should look elsewhere, as the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 6,176 PassMark GPU compute score are modest. However, for users who need a reliable workstation GPU with ray tracing and tensor core support for occasional rendering tasks, this pairing offers a balanced overall package.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake process with a 65 W TDP and a launch MSRP of $359. The GPU is built on TSMC's 12 nm process with a 160 W TDP and is now end-of-life.

The combined percentile of 76 places this build in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking at the 91st percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile. This creates a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is limited in GPU-intensive workloads. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, while the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which may limit bandwidth in some scenarios. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes ensures future upgrade potential for storage and other peripherals. The overall tier of this build is solid for productivity and acceptable for gaming, with the CPU carrying most of the performance weight.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958) is sufficient for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 limit frame rates. At 1080p with competitive settings, 144 Hz monitors may be achievable in esports titles, but AAA games will likely run at 60-90 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p but constrain higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant overhead. The PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and data compression score of 505,885 indicate strong encoding performance. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can offload encoding tasks, but the Turing implementation is older than current standards. This scenario works well for 1080p streaming.

Video editing: The CPU excels in multi-threaded editing workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 and Geekbench multicore score of 19,620. The GPU provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540. Timeline scrubbing and export will be fast, though 4K multi-layer projects may strain the 8 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads handle CPU-based rendering engines effectively, with a PassMark floating-point math score of 107,005. The GPU's 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 288 tensor cores support AI denoising. The 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering, so hybrid CPU+GPU pipelines will be most efficient.

Software development: Compilation times will be short due to the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and high integer math score of 155,808. The 33 MB L3 cache speeds up iterative builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, making this pairing a good development machine if the GPU is needed for other tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient build for daily use. Office applications, web browsing, and document processing will run flawlessly. The GPU's 2D performance (PassMark G2D score of 846) is adequate for productivity displays, and the DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multiple monitors. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running projects.