SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a desktop combination that presents a significant contrast in benchmark standings. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests in the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, yet the combined system percentile is 75. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions in the Gaming Performance section are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed data.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, so frame rates cannot be reported from direct testing. Instead, gaming performance must be estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places it in the 59th percentile, with its nearest rivals including the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0% delta) and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5% faster). This positions the RTX 5090 D V2 as a mid-pack performer in synthetic DX12 workloads, which typically translates to solid but not class-leading frame rates at high settings.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Geekbench at 2,429 points and Cinebench R23 single-core at 4,958 points, provides a strong foundation for frame generation and physics calculations in games. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means the i7-14700F is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, though the GPU’s modest 59th percentile suggests that at 1080p or 1440p with ultra settings, the graphics card will be the primary determinant of FPS. At 4K resolution, the GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth become more relevant, but the 59th percentile score indicates performance roughly on par with cards like the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (0.9% delta), which historically delivers around 60 FPS in demanding titles at 1440p ultra.

Given the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s mid-tier score, estimated FPS at 1080p ultra would likely exceed 100 in most titles, with the CPU’s strong single-core score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 supporting high refresh rates. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest frame rates in the 80-120 range for modern games, though the 59th percentile ranking means it will trail top-tier cards by a noticeable margin. At 4K ultra, the 24 GB memory capacity helps with texture-heavy loads, but the GPU’s relative standing against rivals like the NVIDIA T400 (0% delta) indicates that 4K ultra settings may drop below 60 FPS in the most demanding releases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite reveals a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700F scores 35,122 in multi-core and 4,958 in single-core, with a multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 7.1:1, reflecting its 20 cores and 28 threads. Geekbench scores are 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 41,317, with specific workloads including integer math at 155,808, floating point math at 107,005, and data compression at 505,885. The average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53,701 (-0.2%), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53,469 (0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53,288 (0.6%), and AMD EPYC 7313P at 53,206 (0.8%).

The GPU’s sole benchmark in the FACT PACK is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 16,504 points, placing it in the 59th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0.5% faster), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 (0.6% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (0.9% faster). This clustering of scores within a 1% range indicates that the RTX 5090 D V2 is performance-equivalent to these cards in DX12 synthetic tests, despite its much newer architecture and larger memory pool.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU dramatically outperforms the GPU in relative standings. The 91st percentile CPU versus 59th percentile GPU creates a 32-percentage-point gap, which suggests the processor is capable of feeding the graphics card without constraint in most workloads. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance, indicating that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU’s mid-tier standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 places it ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which scores 53,288 average across all benchmarks, showing a 0.6% delta in favor of the i7-14700F. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 further confirms its capability in heavily threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317, combined with the integer math score of 155,808 and floating point math of 107,005, suggests the CPU excels at both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads.

Real-world implications: the 28 threads handle video encoding and 3D rendering with ease, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score. The data compression score of 505,885 in PassMark indicates strong performance in archiving and file management tasks. Single-thread performance, measured at 4,958 in Cinebench R23 and 2,429 in Geekbench, is sufficient for responsive daily use and gaming, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz suggests the CPU can push high frequencies when needed. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 20-core processor, but the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not possible without external tools.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower but accept mid-tier GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU’s 91st percentile standing, as the i7-14700F can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 20-core, 28-thread configuration well-suited to multi-threaded workloads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 supporting heavy render tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 155,808 and data compression score of 505,885, which indicate fast build times and efficient file handling. Students and small business users building workstations for general productivity will find the CPU’s single-thread performance adequate, though the GPU’s 59th percentile means graphics-intensive applications will not run at top-tier speeds. The system is less suitable for users targeting 4K ultra gaming or professional GPU rendering, where the RTX 5090 D V2’s mid-pack standing against rivals like the Radeon RX 5700 XT (0.9% delta) suggests performance limitations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 supports high frame rates, but the GPU’s 59th percentile and 3DMark score of 16,504 suggest that at 1080p or 1440p, the graphics card may limit FPS in demanding titles. Estimated frame rates would likely exceed 100 FPS at 1080p ultra, but the GPU’s parity with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT indicates that competitive esports titles will run well while AAA games may require settings adjustments.

Streaming: The 28 threads and 20 cores handle encoding tasks alongside gaming, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 indicating ample headroom for simultaneous streaming and gameplay. The CPU’s 91st percentile ensures smooth encoding, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM can buffer frames for high-bitrate streams, though the 59th percentile GPU may limit game quality settings during streaming.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 accelerates export times and timeline scrubbing, while the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance assists with effects rendering. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory handles large 4K or 8K projects, but the GPU’s mid-tier benchmark standing means real-time preview at full resolution may require proxy files.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads deliver strong CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,751, while the GPU’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores support accelerated ray tracing. However, the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking suggests render times will be longer than systems with higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 155,808 and data compression score of 505,885 indicate fast compilation and file operations. The CPU’s 91st percentile ensures smooth multitasking across multiple IDE instances, though the GPU is underutilized in most development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 provides responsive performance for office suites and web browsing, while the GPU’s 24 GB memory is overkill for these tasks. The system’s overall 75th percentile indicates it exceeds requirements for typical student workloads, though the high CPU performance may be unnecessary for basic productivity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. Core clocks are 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS with FP16 at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1).

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places the GPU in the 59th percentile, with a 0% delta from the NVIDIA T400 and a 0.9% delta from the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. This indicates that despite the advanced architecture and large memory pool, the GPU’s raw DX12 performance is comparable to older or lower-tier cards. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores support ray tracing and DLSS, but the benchmark score suggests these features do not translate to top-tier rasterization performance. The 24 GB VRAM is substantial and benefits high-resolution textures, but the 59th percentile ranking limits the GPU’s overall rendering capability relative to higher-scoring cards. The TDP of 575 W and suggested PSU of 950 W indicate high power requirements, though the GPU’s performance class does not fully justify the power draw based on benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, which is 0% different from the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 and 0.5% slower than the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The i7-14700F is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what type?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU system has a 75th percentile ranking among all desktop builds.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14700F supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 575 W, and the suggested PSU is 950 W.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card in the 59th percentile. The combined system percentile is 75, reflecting a configuration where CPU performance significantly exceeds GPU performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 is nearly double the GPU’s average of 16,504, and the CPU outperforms its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, by -0.2%, while the GPU matches the NVIDIA T400 at 0% delta. This pairing is best described as a high-end CPU with a mid-tier GPU, suitable for CPU-intensive tasks but not for users seeking top-tier graphics performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 59th percentile creates a 32-point gap. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor for frame rates, as the CPU can process game logic and physics faster than the GPU can render frames. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 16,504, which is 0.9% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform similarly to that older card, despite the CPU’s superior single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 35,122 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck, but the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance may still limit certain compute tasks. The FPS scaling at higher resolutions would favor the CPU even more, as the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 1440p and 4K, reducing the impact of the CPU’s high percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck between the two. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, but the GPU’s TDP is 575 W with a suggested PSU of 950 W, so the power supply must be sized for the GPU rather than the CPU. The socket supports the Raptor Lake architecture, and since the CPU’s multiplier is locked, overclocking is not an option without changing platforms.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing card, as the CPU’s 91st percentile leaves significant headroom for a stronger graphics solution. The GPU’s 59th percentile and parity with the NVIDIA T400 indicate that upgrading to a card in the 90th percentile or above would better utilize the CPU’s capabilities. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a newer GPU would benefit from the full bandwidth. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules, and the 24 GB VRAM on the current GPU is already substantial, so the primary bottleneck to address is GPU compute performance rather than memory capacity.