SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a high-tier desktop configuration aimed at balancing multi-threaded productivity with efficient 1080p gaming. The CPU is the dominant component in this system, sitting at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is positioned at the 50th percentile, creating a significant performance differential that dictates workload suitability. Benchmark data indicates the processor is the primary driver of overall system capability, while the graphics card serves as the limiting factor in graphically intensive scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the two components is stark and defines the system’s behavior. The Core i7-14700F achieves an average benchmark score of 53,620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, a result that puts it statistically even with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which trails by only 0.6%. Conversely, the RTX 4060 AD106 sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a mid-pack graphics solution. This means the GPU will be the bottleneck in any workload that scales heavily with graphics compute, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering.

In gaming, the bottleneck is clearly the RTX 4060. The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,257 further supports this, indicating strong per-core performance that minimizes frame pacing issues. The RTX 4060’s 50th percentile standing suggests that it will saturate before the CPU in most gaming scenarios, making the GPU the primary constraint on frame rates.

For productivity, the balance shifts entirely. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122, will handle heavy multi-threaded workloads with ease. The GPU’s role is secondary in tasks like video encoding or 3D scene manipulation, where its 3,072 shading units provide acceleration, but the CPU’s raw throughput is the deciding factor. Data compression results, with a PassMark score of 505,885, show the CPU’s ability to handle data-intensive tasks without GPU assistance.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means the interplay must be inferred from benchmarks. The data suggests a system where the CPU rarely limits performance, while the GPU defines the ceiling for frame rates in modern titles. Upgrading the GPU would yield immediate gaming gains, while the CPU would remain relevant for years, indicating a platform balanced for longevity but not for high-end 1440p or 4K gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-14700F demonstrates exceptional multi-core strength in synthetic benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 is a standout figure, while the single-core score of 4,958 indicates robust per-thread performance. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics: a multi-thread score of 41,317, integer math at 155,808, floating-point math at 107,005, and extended instructions at 28,564. Data encryption scores 30,144, while data compression reaches 505,885, and random string sorting hits 55,918.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Direct rival comparisons show it is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon 6505P, which is only 0.2% higher, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.6% behind, and the AMD EPYC 7313P trails by 0.8%. These deltas are negligible, indicating the i7-14700F competes at the top tier of desktop processors despite its 65 W TDP.

The RTX 4060 AD106 has no benchmark scores in the data pack, but its 50th percentile ranking and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput define its capability. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards. Its 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores support ray tracing and DLSS, but the overall compute density is mid-range. The combined percentile for this build is 71, reflecting a system that is strong overall but held back by the GPU’s median standing.

The combined picture is of a CPU that outperforms its class and a GPU that is merely average. In CPU-bound workloads, this system will rival workstations costing significantly more, while in GPU-bound tasks, it performs like a standard mid-range gaming PC. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the processor is the star, the graphics card is the limiting factor, and the overall system tier is defined by the weaker component.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X’s score of 53,288. This places the two processors in the same performance tier, with the Intel chip having a marginal edge in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than half of all graphics cards but worse than the top half. It is a mid-pack GPU with 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and strong single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,958) far exceed the GPU’s 50th percentile standing, so the RTX 4060 will saturate before the CPU in most gaming workloads.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, as indicated by the "multiplierUnlocked" field being false. The CPU runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz out of the box.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what PSU is recommended?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300 W. This indicates a low-power build that does not require a high-capacity power supply.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Any frame rate discussion is estimated from the component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, where the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS can drive high frame rates in esports and less demanding titles. The CPU’s single-core score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 ensures low frame-time variance, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it will struggle to maintain high refresh rates in graphically demanding AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game and stream encoding workloads. The GPU’s 96 tensor cores can also offload encoding via NVENC, but the CPU is powerful enough to handle x264 encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: Multi-core performance shines here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 enabling fast export times in software like Premiere Pro. The GPU’s 3,072 shading units accelerate effects and transitions, but the CPU handles the bulk of the rendering. The 8 GB VRAM may limit working with very complex timelines or high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU is the workhorse, with PassMark floating-point math at 107,005 and integer math at 155,808, making it excellent for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU can assist with OptiX rendering, but its 8 GB memory and 50th percentile performance mean it is not a primary rendering engine.

Software development: The high core count and 33 MB of shared L3 cache benefit compilation times and parallel builds. The PassMark data compression score of 505,885 indicates fast handling of large codebases. The single-thread performance ensures responsive IDE interactions, making this a capable developer workstation.

Student and office work: This build is massively overprovisioned for standard office tasks. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking is wasted on word processing and spreadsheets, but the low 65 W TDP means it runs efficiently. The GPU is more than adequate for any office graphics needs, though the system’s power is better suited to demanding applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU compatibility, though the RTX 4060 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The system’s power requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This leaves considerable headroom for upgrades; a more powerful GPU with a higher TDP could be installed without necessarily requiring a PSU change, though a 300 W unit is the minimum recommendation.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile performance is far ahead of the GPU’s 50th percentile, so replacing the RTX 4060 with a higher-tier card would immediately improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU means a full x16 card would also benefit from the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes.

The CPU itself is end-of-life in terms of platform upgrades, as Socket 1700 is a mature platform. The 65 W TDP allows for use with a capable air cooler, and the unlocked memory support provides flexibility. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is a potential limitation for future titles; upgrading to a GPU with more memory would be the primary path to extend the system’s gaming lifespan.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 compute indicate a system capable of smooth 1080p gaming at high settings.

At 1080p, the RTX 4060’s 50th percentile performance suggests it can handle most modern titles at high or ultra settings, with frame rates typically ranging from 60 to 100 FPS depending on the game’s optimization. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant will run at much higher frame rates, limited by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games that exceed this allocation.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The 128-bit memory bus provides only 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is low for higher resolutions. Frame rates will drop significantly, and users will need to lower settings to medium or high to maintain playable performance. The CPU will not be the limiting factor at this resolution, as its performance headroom is substantial.

At 4K, the RTX 4060 is not a suitable choice. The 15.11 TFLOPS compute and 8 GB VRAM are insufficient for modern AAA titles at this resolution, and frame rates will be below 30 FPS in most cases. The CPU’s performance is irrelevant at this point, as the GPU is entirely overwhelmed. The data supports this system as a 1080p gaming machine, with 1440p possible at reduced settings.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p and prioritize high frame rates over maximum graphical fidelity. The RTX 4060’s 50th percentile performance is adequate for this resolution, and the CPU ensures no frame drops due to processor limitations. Gamers who plan to upgrade to 1440p should consider a stronger GPU.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 91st percentile multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 indicate fast rendering times. The GPU can accelerate certain tasks, but the CPU is the main attraction for these workflows.

Software developers and data analysts will find the 20 cores and 28 threads ideal for compilation and parallel processing. The PassMark data encryption score of 30,144 and data compression score of 505,885 indicate strong performance for database and file-handling tasks. The 65 W TDP also makes this an efficient workstation for long compile sessions.

Students and office workers do not need this level of performance, but the system’s low power draw and responsiveness make it a luxury option. The CPU’s single-thread speed ensures snappy application loading, while the GPU is overkill for productivity tasks. Small business workstations that handle moderate data workloads could justify the cost based on the CPU’s throughput.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build classified as a high-tier system, with a combined percentile of 71. The Intel Core i7-14700F is the standout component, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 ranks in the 50th percentile. The pairing creates an unbalanced system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU.

The build’s overall tier is defined by the GPU’s mid-pack performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 rivals server processors like the Intel Xeon 6505P, but the GPU’s lack of benchmark data and 50th percentile ranking pulls the system down. The result is a desktop that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but is only average in gaming and GPU compute.

The class is desktop, and the architecture combines Intel’s Raptor Lake CPU with NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU’s 10 nm process node and the GPU’s 5 nm process node indicate a modern, efficient pairing. The system is suitable for users who need a powerful processor and are willing to accept a mid-range graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, and uses Intel Socket 1700.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 is exceptional, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 confirms this strength. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 and integer math score of 155,808 indicate strong performance in scientific and financial computing.

Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,429. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,257 shows that the processor is not just a multi-core monster but also handles single-threaded tasks quickly. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is the key driver here.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking puts it ahead of 91% of all CPUs, with direct rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (0.6% slower) and the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.2% faster). The 33 MB L3 cache, combined with 2 MB L2 per core, provides ample data storage for demanding applications. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required, which is already present in this build.