SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It packs 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that mixes performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power draw. The base clock sits at 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, giving the chip substantial single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 pool. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported — a feature that makes the chip relevant for reliability-sensitive tasks. The integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so all visual output depends on the discrete GPU.

Benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multithreaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700F scores 35,122 multi-core and 4,958 single-core. The R20 run yields 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core, while the older R15 test shows 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. Geekbench results are equally strong: 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. PassMark numbers reinforce the pattern: multithread score of 41,317, single-thread of 4,257, integer math at 155,808, floating-point math at 107,005, and extended instructions at 28,564. Data compression hits 505,885, encryption 30,144, and random string sorting 55,918. The physics score is 2,455, and prime number finding is 176.

The CPU's percentile standing against all CPUs is 91, placing it firmly in the upper echelon. Its average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in close company with several rivals. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, averages 53,701, a delta of -0.2% — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469, a +0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X averages 53,288, a +0.6% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7313P sits at 53,206, a +0.8% delta. These margins are tiny; the i7-14700F trades blows with server-class silicon. The practical interpretation is that this CPU will not be the limiting factor in most desktop workloads, from compilation to rendering to scientific computing.

The 65 W TDP is notable for a 20-core part. That thermal envelope suggests the chip is tuned for efficiency rather than raw multi-thread burst performance, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz indicates it can still sprint when asked. The data implies a processor that can sustain heavy all-core loads without requiring exotic cooling, yet still deliver near-top-tier single-thread responsiveness.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-14700F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, while the Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288. The i7-14700F leads by 0.6%, a margin well within run-to-run variance.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Core i7-14700F sits at the 91st percentile against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 91% of processors in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14700F lists ECC memory support as a feature, along with dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support.

Q: What is the boost clock and how does it affect single-thread performance?

A: The boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. This is reflected in a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,429, indicating strong per-thread performance.

Q: How many cores and threads does the i7-14700F have?

A: It has 20 cores and 28 threads, a hybrid arrangement typical of Raptor Lake desktop parts.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i7-14700F?

A: The launch MSRP is $359.

Q: How does the i7-14700F perform in PassMark multithread versus single-thread tests?

A: The multithread score is 41,317, while the single-thread score is 4,257 — a ratio of roughly 9.7x, highlighting the massive scaling from its 20 cores.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU pairing will shape this experience more than the CPU, but the i7-14700F's single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 and Geekbench single-core of 2,429 show it can feed a high-refresh display without stuttering on CPU-bound game logic. The 91st percentile CPU standing ensures minimal bottleneck in most titles.

Streaming: The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. PassMark multithread of 41,317 and data encryption of 30,144 suggest smooth concurrent workloads. The CPU can handle x264 encoding or software encoding alongside a game without collapsing frame times.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,122 and Geekbench multi-core of 19,620 indicate strong rendering and timeline performance. PassMark integer math at 155,808 and floating-point math at 107,005 support fast filter application and color grading. The 33 MB L3 cache helps keep large media buffers local.

3D rendering: The i7-14700F's multithread capabilities shine here. With an average benchmark score of 53,620 and a 91st percentile rank, it competes with server CPUs like the Intel Xeon 6505P (delta -0.2%) and AMD EPYC 7313P (delta +0.8%). Rendering tasks that scale across cores will complete quickly, though the 65 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boost versus higher-wattage rivals.

Software development: Compilation benefits from the 20 cores and high integer throughput. PassMark data compression of 505,885 and random string sorting of 55,918 indicate strong handling of build tools and text processing. The single-core score of 4,257 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical document editing and web browsing, but the 91st percentile CPU means zero lag in multitasking. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest for a desktop, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running spreadsheets or database work.

# Who Should Build It

The Core i7-14700F targets users who need heavy multithreaded performance without stepping into HEDT or workstation platforms. Its 91st percentile CPU ranking and average score of 53,620 place it alongside server chips like the Intel Xeon 6505P (delta -0.2%) and AMD EPYC 7313P (delta +0.8%), making it attractive for small business workstations that run virtual machines or compile code.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who also stream or record will benefit from the 20 cores and 28 threads. The CPU's single-thread performance — Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,958 — keeps high-refresh gaming fluid, while the multithread muscle handles background encoding. The 65 W TDP means it fits into air-cooled builds without elaborate liquid loops.

Content creators in video editing or 3D rendering will see tangible gains. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,122 and Geekbench multi-core of 19,620 translate to faster exports and previews. PassMark floating-point math of 107,005 supports physics simulations in 3D software. The 33 MB L3 cache aids in keeping texture and geometry data close.

Developers writing multi-threaded applications or running test suites will find the integer math score of 155,808 and data compression of 505,885 useful. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for those who cannot tolerate silent data corruption. Students in engineering or data science fields get a CPU that never feels slow, even with multiple IDEs, compilers, and containers open.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 91st percentile CPU with a 57th percentile GPU creates a clear imbalance: the CPU vastly outclasses the GPU in relative standing. The i7-14700F's average benchmark score of 53,620 places it near the top of all CPUs, while the RTX 3050 OEM's average score of 15,199 sits only slightly above the midpoint. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck in virtually every scenario. The CPU can push far more frames than the GPU can render, meaning frame rate caps and resolution scaling will be dictated by the graphics card.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the star. The i7-14700F's multithread score of 41,317 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,122 indicate that CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compilation, and data analysis will run at full speed. The GPU's compute score of 5,779 in PassMark GPU compute is sufficient for light acceleration but will not accelerate most professional applications meaningfully.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — but the benchmark scores imply a system where the GPU limits gaming, and the CPU limits only the most heavily threaded non-graphics workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP versus 130 W GPU TDP also suggests a power balance where the GPU draws more under load.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

The RTX 3050 OEM's PassMark G3D score of 11,857 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 60,740 place it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. This is an entry-level to mid-range graphics card by modern standards. At 1080p, the GPU should handle esports titles and older games at high settings, but it will struggle with demanding AAA releases at ultra settings. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but will hit capacity limits at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

The CPU's high single-thread performance — Geekbench single-core of 2,429 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,958 — ensures that frame pacing will be smooth even when the GPU is the limiting factor. The i7-14700F will not introduce stutter or frame time spikes in CPU-bound scenes. For competitive gaming at 1080p with low settings, the GPU can deliver high frame rates, but the 130 W TDP and 8 GB VRAM cap its ceiling. At 1440p, the GPU will likely be the primary limiter, and at 4K, it will be severely constrained. The nearest GPU rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (delta +0.2%) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (delta -0.6%) — suggest the RTX 3050 OEM performs roughly on par with those cards, meaning it is a capable 1080p gaming solution but not a high-refresh or high-resolution part.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite is extensive. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. Cinebench R23 — the modern standard — yields 35,122 multi-core and 4,958 single-core. Geekbench results are 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. PassMark tests cover a wide range: multithread at 41,317, single-thread at 4,257, integer math at 155,808, floating-point math at 107,005, extended instructions at 28,564, data compression at 505,885, data encryption at 30,144, random string sorting at 55,918, physics at 2,455, and find prime numbers at 176. The average benchmark score is 53,620, and the CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 91.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more modest. Geekbench OpenCL is 60,740 and Vulkan is 57,103. PassMark G3D is 11,857, G2D is 973, and GPU compute is 5,779. DirectX tests show 137 for DX9, 86 for DX11, 61 for DX10, and 58 for DX12. The average benchmark score is 15,199, and the GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 57.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The combined percentile for the build is 74, reflecting the CPU's dominance pulling the overall score up despite the GPU's mediocrity. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Intel Xeon 6505P (delta -0.2%), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (delta +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (delta +0.6%), and AMD EPYC 7313P (delta +0.8%) — all sit within 1% of its average score. The GPU's nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (delta +0.2%), AMD Radeon 680M (delta -0.5%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (delta -0.5%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (delta -0.6%) — also cluster tightly around its score.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an Ampere-based graphics card. The CPU is a high-end part at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile. The combined percentile of 74 indicates a system that is above average overall, but with a significant skew toward CPU performance.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $359, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The GPU is end-of-life, having been released in early 2022. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is solidly mid-range to upper-mid-range, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strength. The GPU, while not weak, holds the system back from being a high-performance gaming or content creation machine.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-14700F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 65 W TDP is modest, meaning the existing power delivery and cooling infrastructure can handle the CPU comfortably.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and it draws 130 W. The RTX 3050 OEM uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and a single 8-pin power connector. The GPU is end-of-life, and the natural upgrade path within the same platform would be a higher-tier NVIDIA or AMD card. The CPU's 91st percentile standing means it will not bottleneck a significantly faster GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher compute performance — the RTX 3050 OEM's PassMark G3D of 11,857 and GPU compute of 5,779 leave substantial room for improvement. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads will remain relevant for years, so the platform's longevity depends on the GPU and memory.

The socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users on older DDR4 systems can reuse memory, while new builds can opt for DDR5. The ECC memory support adds a reliability option for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide bandwidth headroom for future storage or expansion cards, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for its performance class.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 18 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 72 tensor cores. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1). The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, and requires a 300 W PSU.

Benchmark scores place the RTX 3050 OEM at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL is 60,740 and Vulkan is 57,103. PassMark G3D is 11,857, with G2D at 973 and GPU compute at 5,779. DirectX 9 scores 137, DX11 scores 86, DX12 scores 58, and DX10 scores 61. The average benchmark score is 15,199. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (delta +0.2%), AMD Radeon 680M (delta -0.5%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (delta -0.5%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (delta -0.6%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM performs almost identically to a range of cards from different generations and vendors.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming and light 3D work, but the 128-bit bus limits high-resolution texture streaming. The RT cores enable ray tracing, though the raw compute of 8.087 TFLOPS means ray-traced effects will require lower settings or resolutions. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can offset the performance cost of RT and improve frame rates. The GPU's performance is essentially tied with the RTX 2060 (delta -0.6%), a card from the previous generation, indicating that the 3050 OEM is a replacement-level part rather than a step forward. In the context of this build, the GPU is the clear weak link — the CPU outclasses it by nearly 34 percentile points — and any workload that relies on graphics horsepower will see the GPU as the bottleneck.