SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 75th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The processor anchors the platform with an Intel Socket 1700 interface, a mature socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Because the CPU supports ECC memory, workstation users can populate the board with error-correcting modules, though the choice of memory generation will depend on the motherboard selected. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, which is sufficient for the RX 9060’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface; this ensures the GPU has full bandwidth headroom for data transfer. The 65-watt TDP of the i7-14700F is modest for a 20-core part, and the GPU’s 132-watt TDP, paired with a suggested 300-watt power supply, indicates that a standard mid-range PSU will suffice without overprovisioning. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz and the GPU’s boost of 2990 MHz both demand adequate cooling, but the power envelope is not extreme. For a sensible next upgrade, users on this platform could consider moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake Refresh part on the same socket, though the i7-14700F already provides 28 threads. Alternatively, a GPU upgrade to a higher-tier Radeon RX 9000 series card would be a straightforward swap, given the PCIe 5.0 slot and the 1x 8-pin power connector, which suggests the board’s power delivery is not the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks at the 75th percentile among all pairs in the database, indicating that it outperforms roughly three-quarters of tested builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The i7-14700F scores 35,122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (average score 53,288) and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P (average score 53,206) based on the avgBenchmarkScore metric.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect resolution scaling?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is evident in the measured FPS scaling: for example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate drops from 166 at 1080p to 147 at 1440p, a 11.4% reduction, but falls to 125 at 4K, a 24.7% drop from 1080p, showing the memory bus becomes a constraint at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so the i7-14700F cannot be overclocked by adjusting the clock multiplier. However, the boost clock of 5.40 GHz is already high for a 65-watt part.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile position and who is its closest competitor?

A: The RX 9060 ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores an average of 16,129 versus the RX 9060’s 16,014, a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RX 9060 is essentially tied with that card.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F had a launch MSRP of $359. This is the only pricing information available for this build.

Q: Can the CPU handle DDR4 memory, and what is the benefit?

A: Yes, the i7-14700F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Using DDR4 allows for a lower-cost build, while DDR5 offers higher bandwidth, but the dual-channel bus is the same for both; the choice does not change the core count or clock speeds.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split; the 20 cores and 28 threads imply 8 performance cores and 12 efficient cores, but this is not stated. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which boosts to 5.40 GHz, a significant dynamic range that allows the chip to idle low and surge high under load. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. This large L3 is critical for gaming and data-intensive workloads, as it reduces the need to access slower system memory.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700F scores 35,122 in multi-core, which is a dominant result for a 65-watt part. The single-core score of 4,958 is equally impressive, indicating that the boost clock of 5.40 GHz is fully utilized. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 19,620 and single-core score of 2,429 reinforce the CPU’s balanced nature. The PassMark suite provides more granular insights: the multi-thread score of 41,317 is high, while the single-thread score of 4,257 shows the chip’s responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. The data compression score of 505,885 and floating-point math score of 107,005 indicate that the CPU excels in workloads that leverage many cores, such as video encoding or scientific simulations. The integer math score of 155,808 is also robust, suggesting strong performance in general-purpose computing. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 53,620 places it just 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P, which is a server-grade part. This means the i7-14700F is competitive with enterprise silicon in raw throughput, proof of its Raptor Lake design.

The 65-watt TDP is remarkable for this level of performance. It implies that the CPU can be cooled by a competent air cooler without requiring elaborate liquid cooling, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz will generate heat under sustained all-core loads. The ECC memory support is a distinguishing feature for a consumer desktop part, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads like financial modeling or long-running renders. The absence of integrated graphics is a notable omission, but this build includes a discrete GPU, so it does not affect usability. Overall, the CPU’s benchmark scores indicate that it is a top-tier desktop processor for both productivity and gaming, with the multi-core muscle to tackle demanding creative workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-14700F and RX 9060 is skewed toward the CPU being the stronger partner. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank far exceeds the GPU’s 59th percentile, which means the processor is rarely the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, this is evident from the measured FPS data. Across all games, the average FPS at 1080p is 110.8, but this number masks significant variance. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s single-thread performance drives 171 FPS at 1080p, while in Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU limits the frame rate to 50 FPS at the same resolution. This pattern suggests that in esports titles with low graphical demands, the CPU provides ample headroom, but in graphically intensive AAA games, the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the primary constraints at higher resolutions. Looking at the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p, the average drop across games is about 30%, but this is not uniform. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate falls from 25 at 1080p to 16 at 1440p, a 36% reduction, and then to 8 at 4K, a 68% reduction from 1080p. This severe degradation indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is insufficient for the large textures demanded by modern titles at 4K. Conversely, the CPU’s performance does not degrade with resolution, as its workload remains constant. Therefore, the bottleneck shifts from CPU-bound at 1080p in esports to GPU-bound at 4K in all titles.

The pair rank of 2,321 out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS of 110.8, places this build in the upper-middle tier of all combinations. The data suggests that for 1080p high-refresh gaming, the CPU will often be the limiting factor in light titles, but the GPU will cap frame rates in heavy ones. For 1440p, the GPU is more consistently the bottleneck, as seen in Red Dead Redemption 2, where FPS drops from 46 at 1080p to 34 at 1440p, a 26% reduction. At 4K, the GPU is almost always the constraint, with only a few lightweight games like Valorant exceeding 200 FPS. This imbalance means that users who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming would benefit from a more powerful GPU, while those who play at 4K should accept that the RX 9060 is the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700F delivers exceptional benchmark numbers across all tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. The more demanding Cinebench R23 yields 35,122 multi-core and 4,958 single-core, which is a strong result for a desktop processor. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 19,620 and single-core is 2,429. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 41,317 and a single-thread score of 4,257. Specific workloads include data compression at 505,885, data encryption at 30,144, extended instructions at 28,564, find prime numbers at 176, floating-point math at 107,005, integer math at 155,808, physics at 2,455, and random string sorting at 55,918. These scores collectively place the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53,701, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i7-14700F is statistically tied with a Xeon part.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060’s benchmarks are more modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3,322. Geekbench OpenCL yields 88,183, and Vulkan scores 39,476. PassMark tests show DirectX 10 at 104, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 44, and DirectX 9 at 280. The G2D score is 1,002, G3D is 17,631, and GPU compute is 9,919. These results place the GPU at the 59th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 16,014. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, averages 16,129, a delta of -0.7%, indicating near-identical performance. The combined picture is a CPU that dominates its market segment and a GPU that is mid-pack. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this asymmetry, with the CPU pulling the overall score upward. For users, this means the CPU will not hold back any application, while the GPU will deliver playable but not exceptional frame rates in the most demanding games.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial multi-core processing power without requiring top-tier graphics performance. The i7-14700F’s 28 threads and 35,122 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make it ideal for content creators who render video or 3D scenes, where the CPU is the primary compute engine. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the high integer math score of 155,808 and the 20 cores. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the ECC memory support for reliable long-running computations. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will find the 33 MB L3 cache and 65-watt TDP attractive for dense deployments. For gamers, this is a 1080p high-refresh machine, as the CPU can push over 300 FPS in titles like Valorant (391 at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (377 at 1080p), but the GPU limits 4K performance to below 60 FPS in most AAA games. The build is not suited for 4K gaming enthusiasts or professionals who rely on GPU rendering, as the RX 9060’s 59th percentile rank is a clear bottleneck in those workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the Navi 44 chip, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. This is a dense design, with a transistor density of 149.2 million per mm². The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores reveal a GPU that is competitive with mid-range cards from the previous generation. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,322 is indicative of DX12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 suggests strong compute capability for a card in this class. The PassMark G3D score of 17,631 and GPU compute score of 9,919 are mid-pack figures. The 59th percentile rank means the RX 9060 is better than 59% of all GPUs, but it is not a high-end part. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games at high textures and 4K resolution, as evidenced by the measured FPS drops in titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (8 FPS at 4K). The 128-bit memory bus is narrow, which constrains bandwidth, but the 18 Gbps effective speed mitigates this somewhat, delivering 288.0 GB/s. For rendering workloads, the 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for entry-level 3D rendering, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The ray tracing cores, 28 in number, provide hardware-accelerated RT, but the overall performance in RT-heavy games is not specified, and the low DirectX 12 PassMark score of 44 suggests that DX12 performance may be inconsistent.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, a mid-range desktop GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all tested CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 59th percentile. This creates an unbalanced configuration where the CPU far exceeds the GPU in relative performance. The i7-14700F with its 28 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock is a productivity powerhouse, while the RX 9060 with 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but struggles at 4K. The average FPS across all games is 110.8, and the pair ranks 2,321 out of 3,861 in terms of FPS, which is slightly below the median of all pairs. This suggests that despite the strong CPU, the GPU holds back the overall gaming experience. The build is best described as a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, suitable for users who prioritize compute tasks over extreme graphical fidelity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build excels in esports titles. Valorant achieves 391 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 171 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU can drive high-refresh monitors in competitive shooters, but the GPU will cap performance in heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 50 FPS.

Streaming: The i7-14700F’s 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The multi-thread score of 41,317 in PassMark suggests that simultaneous game and stream encoding will not cause significant frame drops, though the RX 9060’s 59th percentile rank means game settings may need to be lowered to maintain high FPS.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and PassMark floating-point score of 107,005 indicate strong performance in video rendering and effects. The GPU’s 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit the size of preview buffers in 4K editing timelines.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, this is a capable machine. The 20 cores and 33 MB L3 cache are ideal for ray tracing workloads in software like Blender or V-Ray, where the CPU is the primary engine. The GPU can supplement with its 28 RT cores, but its 59th percentile rank means it is not a primary render device.

Software development: The high integer math score of 155,808 and data compression score of 505,885 make this build suitable for compiling large codebases and handling version control operations. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,257 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, while the 65-watt TDP keeps power costs low. The RX 9060 is overkill for basic productivity but allows for light gaming during breaks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing (dataIsMeasured: true), shows a clear pattern of CPU-bound performance at 1080p and GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the build delivers high frame rates in lighter titles: Valorant at 391, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 377, Roblox at 221, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 203. In contrast, heavy AAA titles see lower numbers: Cyberpunk 2077 at 50, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 25. At 1440p, the frame rates drop across the board, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 147, Counter-Strike 2 at 113, and Assetto Corsa at 71. The 4K results are consistently below 60 FPS for most games, with only Valorant (267), Call of Duty: Warzone (125), and Roblox (83) exceeding that threshold. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the limiting factors at 4K, as evidenced by the steep drops in titles like Fortnite (28 FPS), Grand Theft Auto V (30 FPS), and Control (36 FPS). The average FPS across all games is 110.8, but this is skewed by the high-performance esports titles. For a balanced experience, 1080p is the sweet spot, where the CPU can push high frame rates and the GPU only becomes the bottleneck in the most demanding games.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds