SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX form a high-performance desktop pairing aimed at 1440p and 4K gaming, with substantial multi-threaded processing capabilities for content creation. The CPU, a 14th-generation Raptor Lake Refresh part on Intel Socket 1700, offers 20 cores and 28 threads, boosting up to 5.40 GHz, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, brings 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. With a combined percentile of 78 against all builds, this system sits firmly in the upper tier of performance, though the data reveals specific strengths and limitations. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is a top-tier performer for productivity, while the GPU, despite its massive memory pool, shows a more nuanced position in the graphics hierarchy. The measured FPS data confirms the build’s capability for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and strong 1440p performance, with 4K results varying significantly by game title.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. The chip contains 20 cores and 28 threads, configured as a hybrid layout typical of the series, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, paired with a 65 W TDP, positions the CPU as a power-efficient multi-threading workhorse for a desktop platform.

Benchmark scores from the FACT PACK paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,122 in multi-core and 4,958 in single-core. These figures indicate exceptional parallel performance, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 53,620 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals: the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288 (0.6% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206 (0.8% lower). This tight cluster shows the i7-14700F is statistically even with some of the best server and consumer chips, making it a strong choice for multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,429 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,082 indicate that the 5.40 GHz boost clock delivers responsive performance for lightly-threaded tasks. PassMark tests further detail the chip’s strengths: integer math scores 155,808, floating-point math scores 107,005, and extended instructions score 28,564. Data compression performance is particularly notable at 505,885, while encryption scores 30,144. These numbers suggest the CPU handles both number-crunching and data movement efficiently, making it suitable for scientific computing and database work. The physics score of 2,455 and single-thread score of 4,257 round out a profile that excels in mixed workloads, from gaming to professional applications.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build, confirmed as measured rather than estimated, shows excellent gaming performance across a wide range of titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers extremely high frame rates in esports and lighter games. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 647.6 FPS, Valorant reaches 531.8 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 296 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 352 FPS, while Minecraft leads at 292 FPS. These results indicate the CPU-GPU combination is rarely a bottleneck at this resolution, allowing maximum refresh rates for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for most titles. Valorant still hits 502.8 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 444.9 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 227.2 FPS. Heavier AAA games like Call of Duty: Warzone average 147 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 65 FPS. The data shows a typical scaling pattern: less demanding games see minimal FPS loss, but graphically intensive titles require more GPU headroom. The average FPS across all games at this resolution is not explicitly listed, but the pattern suggests a capable 1440p experience for most users.

At 3840x2160, the build’s limits become apparent. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive still runs at 263 FPS, Valorant at 460 FPS, and Roblox at 142.9 FPS, showing that esports titles remain playable at 4K. However, demanding games see significant drops. Cyberpunk 2077 averages 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 38.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 14 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 125 FPS, indicating that optimized titles can still be smooth at 4K. The pair’s rank by FPS is 395 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 189.8 across all games, placing it in the top 10% of tested combinations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows users to choose between existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature typically aimed at professional workstations. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which offers ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe drives, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is notably low for a 20-core part, which suggests it can be cooled by a capable air cooler or a modest liquid cooler without extreme requirements. The GPU has a much higher thermal profile, with a 355 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 750 W. The power connectors are 2x 8-pin, and the card is dual-slot, measuring 287 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width. The production status shows the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, meaning the upgrade path for the graphics card is limited to remaining stock or used markets.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU rather than the CPU. The i7-14700F’s 91st percentile ranking indicates it has significant headroom for future graphics cards. However, since the RX 7900 XTX is end-of-life, users might consider a newer GPU when available, but must ensure the 750 W PSU and PCIe 4.0 slot remain compatible. The CPU’s socket 1700 is not forward-compatible with newer Intel platforms, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change. For most users, the current pairing should remain balanced for several years, with the GPU being the first component to replace.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a nuanced balance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s percentile of 91 and the GPU’s percentile of 64 indicate that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. This is reflected in the GPU’s nearest rivals, which include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (0.4% higher average score), NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (1% lower), AMD FirePro D300 (1.2% lower), and NVIDIA TITAN Xp (1.2% higher). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19,410, placing it in the 64th percentile, which is significantly lower than the CPU’s standing.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread performance and the GPU’s raw power allow frame rates to exceed 200 FPS in many titles, but the CPU may limit maximum FPS in lighter games. The data shows Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 647.6 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU is not fully utilized at such high frame rates. At 1440p, the balance is more even, with AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 65 FPS, indicating the GPU is now the limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck for demanding titles, with Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38.1 FPS.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU dominates. The PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 show that the CPU can handle heavy parallel tasks without GPU assistance. The GPU’s compute score of 17,689 on PassMark suggests it can accelerate certain workloads, but the CPU’s performance is more consistent. Overall, the system is CPU-forward for productivity, but GPU-limited for high-resolution gaming, which is a typical profile for a high-end desktop.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is based on the Navi 31 chip and RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, with a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1929 MHz, a game clock of 2365 MHz, and a boost clock of 2498 MHz. Memory is provided by 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, effective at 20 Gbps.

The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units. It also includes 96 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed, indicating a focus on rasterization rather than AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 479.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 959.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 61.39 TFLOPS for FP32 and 122.8 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These specifications make it a powerful rasterization card, but its ray tracing performance is not explicitly benchmarked in the data.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6,841. Geekbench OpenCL scores 50,465, and Vulkan scores 85,612. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 31,238, G2D of 1,267, and GPU compute of 17,689. The DirectX tests score 166 for DX10, 356 for DX11, 131 for DX12, and 330 for DX9. The GPU’s percentile of 64 is lower than expected for a flagship card, which is likely due to the benchmark suite’s weighting and the card’s end-of-life status. Its nearest rivals, including the GTX 1060 3 GB, are significantly older and less powerful, yet they score within 1.2% of the RX 7900 XTX, suggesting the benchmark methodology may underrepresent the card’s gaming capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: For esports titles, this build excels. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 647.6 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant at 531.8 FPS. At 1440p, these games still exceed 400 FPS, making it ideal for 240 Hz monitors. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal input lag.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 41,317 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game and stream encoding without major FPS drops. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is also useful for caching frames.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 suggest the CPU can handle 4K video exports efficiently. The GPU’s compute score of 17,689 can accelerate effects, though its lower percentile may limit some GPU-accelerated tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 61.39 TFLOPS also supports GPU rendering, but its ray tracing cores may not be as fast as competing architectures.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 155,808 and data compression score of 505,885 indicate fast compilation times and efficient data handling. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases.

Student and office work: The system is overpowered for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,257 ensures snappy application response. The GPU is unnecessary for such workloads, but the high frame rates in productivity apps (e.g., Pc Building Simulator at 202.4 FPS at 1080p) make it versatile.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1440p and are willing to accept lower performance at 4K for demanding titles. The measured FPS data shows that at 1440p, most games exceed 90 FPS, with esports titles exceeding 200 FPS. For 4K gaming, users should focus on less demanding games or be prepared for lower settings.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 score of 35,122 and the 91st percentile ranking make it suitable for rendering jobs that scale with cores. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is useful for large textures and scenes, though its compute performance is less impressive.

Developers and data scientists will appreciate the CPU’s integer and floating-point performance, with scores of 155,808 and 107,005 respectively on PassMark. The ECC memory support is a plus for workstation stability. Students and small business users should consider this build only if they need gaming or heavy compute; otherwise, it is overkill.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6505P, 0.3% higher than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and 0.8% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P.

Q: How does the GPU perform in 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, measured FPS varies widely. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 125 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38.1 FPS, indicating that 4K is playable only for less demanding titles.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: The CPU is in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is in the 64th percentile. In gaming, the GPU limits performance at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU may limit frame rates at 1080p in esports titles.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W, based on the GPU’s 355 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the build’s overall performance rank?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 78 and ranks 395 out of 3,732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 189.8 across all tested games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. R20 shows 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. R23 shows 35,122 multi-core and 4,958 single-core. Geekbench scores are 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 41,317, single-thread of 4,257, and an average benchmark score of 53,620. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rivals within 0.8% of its score.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more varied. 3DMark Steel Nomad scores 6,841, Geekbench OpenCL scores 50,465, and Vulkan scores 85,612. PassMark G3D scores 31,238, G2D scores 1,267, and GPU compute scores 17,689. The average benchmark score is 19,410, placing it in the 64th percentile. Its nearest rivals, including the GTX 1060 3 GB, are within 1.2% of its score, which is surprising given the architectural differences.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms most rivals in multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU, despite having a large memory pool and high bandwidth, benchmarks lower than expected. The measured FPS data, however, shows strong real-world gaming performance, with an average of 189.8 FPS across games. This discrepancy suggests that the GPU’s benchmark percentile may not fully capture its gaming capabilities, but the data is clear: the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in a desktop configuration. The CPU, part of the Core 14th Gen series, is a Raptor Lake Refresh chip on Intel Socket 1700, with 20 cores and 28 threads. The GPU, from the Radeon RX 7000 series, uses the Navi 31 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 78 places this build in the upper tier of all systems, though below the top 20 percent.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking is a standout feature, making it one of the best-performing processors in the database. The GPU’s 64th percentile is lower, but the measured FPS data shows it can drive high frame rates in most games. The build is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it delivers over 90 FPS in most titles, and for productivity workloads that benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The GPU’s end-of-life status is a consideration, but its 24 GB VRAM ensures future compatibility with larger textures and datasets. Overall, this is a balanced high-end desktop for gamers and creators who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to manage the GPU’s limitations at 4K.