SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor and a 20 GB RDNA 3 graphics card. The CPU, based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, offers a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This core configuration is substantial for modern workloads, providing a strong foundation for both heavily threaded productivity tasks and high-refresh-rate gaming. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, and includes ECC memory support, which adds a layer of stability for professional or data-sensitive applications. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides the bandwidth necessary for the latest storage and graphics solutions, ensuring the platform is not a bottleneck for current-generation peripherals.

The architecture's performance is quantified by its benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multi-core score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958, indicating exceptional multi-threaded capability for rendering and compilation, while still offering strong single-thread responsiveness for gaming and everyday tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19620 and single-core score of 2429 reinforce this balanced profile. Further analysis through Passmark tests shows a multi-thread score of 41317 and a single-thread score of 4257, alongside a data compression score of 505885 and an extended instructions score of 28564. These figures demonstrate that the CPU excels in tasks that leverage vector instructions and data manipulation, making it suitable for scientific computing and complex simulations. With a percentile ranking of 91 against all CPUs, this processor is positioned in the top tier of available chips, offering performance that rivals server-class parts. The average benchmark score of 53620 places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which has an average score of 53288 and a delta of 0.6%, indicating near-parity in overall performance, though the Intel chip edges ahead slightly.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture of this CPU and GPU pairing is strong, with a combined percentile of 73 against all system configurations. The CPU’s individual performance is a standout, with its 91st percentile ranking highlighting its position in the upper echelon of processors. This is supported by its average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P, demonstrating its competitive edge against both consumer and enterprise offerings. The GPU, however, presents a more complex picture. Its average benchmark score of 13745 places it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, which is a mid-tier position. This is reflected in its nearest rivals, where it is 1.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT but 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. This suggests that while the GPU is powerful for gaming, its raw compute benchmark average is not as dominant as the CPU’s.

The system’s gaming performance is measured directly, with an average FPS of 174.8 across all tested games. This performance places the pair at rank 668 out of 3732 pairs, putting it in the top 18% of all tested system combinations. This indicates that for gaming, the pairing is exceptionally capable, delivering high frame rates across a variety of titles. The data shows a clear trend where the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4257 ensures that frame rates remain high even at lower resolutions, while the GPU’s substantial memory bandwidth and compute power maintain performance at 4K. For instance, in Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 273.6 FPS at 1080p, 183.5 FPS at 1440p, and 99.6 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern demonstrates a balanced system where the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates, and the GPU can handle the increased pixel load at higher resolutions without a catastrophic drop in performance. The measured data confirms that this is a high-performance gaming system, with the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking providing the headroom necessary to keep up with the GPU’s output.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 31 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features a substantial 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for 4K textures and high-resolution rendering, ensuring that the GPU does not run out of memory or bandwidth in demanding modern titles. The GPU’s clock speeds include a base of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, which allows it to scale performance dynamically based on workload. The memory operates at an effective speed of 20 Gbps, further contributing to the high bandwidth figure. With 5376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, the GPU is well-equipped for rasterization tasks, and its 84 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing workloads.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial, with a FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS and an FP16 performance of 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1), making it a powerful compute accelerator for tasks that can leverage its parallel architecture. Its pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s ensure that it can fill frames quickly and apply complex textures without becoming a bottleneck. In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 5623 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 71068 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 29009 in Passmark G3D. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756 indicates strong general-purpose compute performance. However, its overall percentile ranking of 55 is lower than expected for a high-end card, which is explained by its average benchmark score of 13745. This ranking is heavily influenced by its proximity to lower-tier cards like the AMD Radeon 660M, which has a delta of -0.5%, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, also at -0.5%. In contrast, it is only 1.5% ahead of the newer AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. This suggests that while the RX 7900 XT is a very capable gaming GPU, its average benchmark score is dragged down by specific tests, such as the Passmark DirectX 9 score of 322 and DirectX 10 score of 158, which show relative weakness in legacy API performance. For rendering and modern gaming, the high bandwidth and compute power are the key strengths, but the data indicates that it is not as dominant in its class as the CPU is in its own.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance analysis of this pairing is revealing, as it shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking indicates a significant gap in their respective performance tiers. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4958 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU. For example, in Valorant at 1080p, the system achieves 531.6 FPS, a figure that is heavily reliant on the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls. The GPU is not the limiting factor here, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate is so high. However, as resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the workload shifts to the GPU. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 80.6 FPS at 1080p to 58.1 FPS at 1440p and 37.5 FPS at 4K. This scaling is a classic sign of GPU limitation, where the CPU is capable of delivering more frames, but the GPU cannot render them fast enough due to the increased pixel count.

The measured FPS data across games shows that the system is well-balanced for most titles, but there are cases where the GPU becomes a clear bottleneck. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate is only 40 FPS at 1080p, 25 FPS at 1440p, and 13 FPS at 4K. This is a game that is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU, but the low absolute frame rates suggest that the GPU is struggling to keep up, even at 1080p. Conversely, in lighter esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 605 FPS at 1080p, indicating that the CPU is not a bottleneck at all. The system’s rank of 668 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 174.8, confirms that it is a high-performing combination. The data suggests that for most users, the CPU has enough headroom to support a future GPU upgrade, but the current GPU is the limiting factor for achieving the highest possible frame rates at 4K in the most demanding titles. The CPU’s performance in Passmark integer math (155808) and floating-point math (107005) also indicates that it will not bottleneck in productivity tasks, where the GPU is less involved.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is exceptionally well-suited, particularly for competitive titles. The CPU’s single-core strength allows for frame rates exceeding 500 FPS in games like Valorant (531.6 FPS at 1080p) and over 600 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (605 FPS at 1080p). Even at 1440p, the system maintains high frame rates in these titles, such as 507.9 FPS in Valorant, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience on high-refresh monitors.

For streaming, the combination of the CPU’s 20 cores and the GPU’s encoding capabilities provides a robust platform. While the specific encoding hardware is not detailed in the data, the CPU’s high multi-thread score of 35122 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it can handle the encoding workload alongside gaming without significant performance degradation, as demonstrated by its consistent frame rates in demanding titles.

For video editing, the CPU’s multi-core performance is a major asset. The Passmark data compression score of 505885 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 indicate that rendering timelines and exporting projects will be fast. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth also help with real-time previews and effects processing.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary workhorse, and its performance is top-tier, with a 91st percentile ranking. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19620 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 41317 show that it can handle complex scenes and physics simulations efficiently. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS also contributes to GPU-accelerated rendering, though its compute benchmark average is less dominant.

For software development, the CPU’s thread count and clock speed are beneficial for compilation times. The Passmark extended instructions score of 28564 indicates strong support for modern instruction sets, which is useful for compiling optimized code. The system’s overall responsiveness, driven by the high single-thread score, makes it a pleasant development environment.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but highly capable. The CPU’s single-core performance ensures snappy application launches, and the massive thread count allows for fluid multitasking across dozens of browser tabs and office applications. The GPU is not a factor in these workloads, but its presence does not hurt, and the system’s efficiency in light tasks is high, though the 300 W TDP of the GPU means it will draw power even when idle.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this system, labeled as `dataIsMeasured: true`, provides a comprehensive look at its gaming capabilities across a wide range of titles at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strength in esports and older titles, achieving very high frame rates. For instance, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 605 FPS, Valorant reaches 531.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 325 FPS. Even more demanding titles perform well, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 166 FPS and Fortnite at 134.1 FPS. Heavily demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 manage 80.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 73.5 FPS, both playable but not at the highest refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. Esports titles continue to perform admirably, with Valorant at 507.9 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 183.5 FPS. More demanding games see a predictable drop, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 147 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 58.1 FPS. The performance at this resolution is still excellent for high-refresh 1440p monitors, with most titles staying above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, but the system still delivers playable frame rates in most titles. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 125 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 99.6 FPS, showing that the system can handle 4K gaming. However, the most demanding titles struggle, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 37.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.9 FPS, indicating that users will need to adjust settings or use upscaling technologies for a smooth experience in these games. Titles like Ark: Survival Ascended fall below 20 FPS at 4K, showcasing the limits of the GPU in the most extreme scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at gamers who want high frame rates at 1440p and are willing to compromise at 4K. The data shows that the system excels at 1080p and 1440p, with most games hitting over 100 FPS at 1440p. For 4K gaming, it is suitable for less demanding titles and older games, but not for the latest AAA releases at maximum settings. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU’s performance to be a significant asset, as its multi-core scores are in the top 10% of all CPUs. The 20 GB of VRAM on the GPU also helps with large textures and complex scenes, making it a viable option for 3D artists and video editors who work with high-resolution media.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s fast compilation times and support for modern instructions, making it a productive workstation for coding and testing. Students and office workers will find the system to be extremely responsive and capable of handling any task they throw at it, though it is far more powerful than necessary for these workloads. The system’s combined percentile of 73 indicates that it is a high-tier build, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who require top-tier CPU performance and strong GPU capabilities. The specific pairing is ideal for a user who prioritizes CPU-bound tasks like rendering or development but also wants a very capable gaming machine, as the GPU is still a high-end part, even if its percentile ranking is lower than the CPU’s.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking compared to other processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. It is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the system's overall gaming performance ranking?

A: The pair ranks 668 out of 3732 tested system pairs, with an average FPS of 174.8 across all games and resolutions tested.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (`multiplierUnlocked: false`), meaning it does not support user overclocking.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 300 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: What is the GPU's performance in DirectX 12 and Vulkan benchmarks?

A: The GPU scores 5623 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 71068 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating strong performance in modern graphics APIs.

Q: What is the memory support for the CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Build Overview

This build combines a 20-core Intel Core i7-14700F with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in a desktop form factor. The CPU is a top-tier part, ranked in the 91st percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile. The combined system percentile is 73, positioning it as a high-performance desktop configuration. The CPU’s strength is its multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620, making it a powerhouse for productivity and content creation. The GPU provides substantial frame rates in gaming, with an average of 174.8 FPS across all tested games, but its overall benchmark average is less dominant. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build, where the processor is the standout component, and the GPU is a capable but not class-leading companion. The system is well-suited for users who need heavy compute power for work and also want a strong gaming experience, particularly at 1440p resolution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the motherboard must be chosen accordingly to match the memory type. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and future graphics cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 lanes. For upgrades, the platform is at the end of its socket lifecycle, meaning that a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard. The most significant upgrade path for this system would be to replace the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s high percentile ranking suggests it will not bottleneck a more powerful GPU. The GPU’s TDP is 300 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W, so a stronger GPU would likely require a more substantial power supply. The CPU’s TDP is only 65 W, leaving plenty of power headroom for a GPU upgrade within the 700 W PSU limit, provided the new GPU does not exceed the PSU’s capacity. The platform’s memory support for DDR5 allows for a future upgrade to faster memory kits, which could improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU also ensures that future storage devices will be fully utilized. A sensible next upgrade would be to focus on the GPU, as the CPU is already performing at a near-top level, and the current GPU is the primary limiter for 4K gaming performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds