SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

11,627 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop configuration that places in the 71st percentile of all combined CPU+GPU pairings, indicating a solidly above-average performer. The CPU itself is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 2.10 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 part with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This combination targets high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with measured data showing strong frame rates in esports titles and playable performance in demanding AAA games, though 4K gaming remains a challenge for the most graphically intensive titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh) using Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that allows it to handle heavily threaded workloads with ease. The base clock of 2.10 GHz is conservative, but the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance when needed. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results show the processor's dual nature. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,122 in multi-core and 4,958 in single-core. The multi-core score is 7.1 times the single-core score, reflecting the scaling of its 20 cores. Geekbench results corroborate this, with a multi-core score of 19,620 and a single-core score of 2,429. In the PassMark suite, the multithread score of 41,317 is supported by an integer math score of 155,808 and a floating-point math score of 107,005, indicating robust performance in both general-purpose and scientific computing tasks. The data compression score of 505,885 and encryption score of 30,144 further highlight its capability in data-intensive operations.

The CPU sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. Its nearest rivals show how tightly contested this segment is. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53,701, which is only 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD EPYC 7313P trails by 0.8% with a score of 53,206. This means the i7-14700F is effectively within a rounding error of these server and workstation-class parts in average score, making it a strong choice for multi-threaded productivity without the platform costs typically associated with those rivals.

For real workloads, the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office suites, while the 20 cores handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with authority. The 65W TDP is notably low for a processor with this core count, suggesting efficient power management. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility, and includes ECC memory support, which is a boon for small business workstations that require data integrity. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, though it has no integrated graphics, necessitating the discrete GPU in this build.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-14700F have?

A: The processor has 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that supports heavy parallel workloads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i7-14700F?

A: The maximum boost clock is 5.40 GHz, while the base clock is 2.10 GHz.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The i7-14700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bus width?

A: The Radeon RX 7800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks in the 71st percentile of all combinations, with a pair rank of 1187 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The GPU suggests a 600 W power supply, and the CPU has a 65W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, so the discrete Radeon RX 7800 XT is required for display output.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-14700F and the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is heavily workload-dependent, as evidenced by their respective percentiles. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 51st percentile of all GPUs. This disparity suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor will rarely be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU will dictate performance. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU has ample headroom.

Data from gaming benchmarks confirms this dynamic. In esports and lighter titles, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. For example, in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, the system produces 229.2 FPS, but this drops to 85.8 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's resolution scaling limits. In Valorant, the 1080p score is 522.9 FPS, but the CPU's single-thread strength (4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is likely what enables such high frame rates, as the GPU would not be saturated at these levels.

In demanding AAA titles, the balance shifts. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 68.7 FPS at 1080p, but drops to 48 FPS at 1440p and 33.1 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is far below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating the GPU is the primary limiter. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 64 FPS at 1080p but only 31.5 FPS at 4K. The CPU's multi-core might (35,122 in Cinebench R23) is not the constraint here; the GPU's raw throughput is.

The average FPS across all tested games is 150.3, but this figure is skewed by esports titles. The percentile data shows the GPU is merely average (51st percentile), while the CPU is exceptional (91st percentile). For users aiming for high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU will ensure frame rates are not artificially capped, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS in heavier titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a constraint, and at 4K, it is the definitive bottleneck for most games.

Who Should Build It

This desktop configuration is well-suited for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that in competitive titles like Counter-Strike 2 (229.2 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (522.9 FPS at 1080p), the system is more than capable of driving 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. For 1440p gaming, the average FPS across many titles hovers around 60-80 FPS, making it a solid choice for high-refresh 1440p displays in most games, though not for 4K.

Content creators and software developers will find the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads highly beneficial. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and the PassMark multithread score of 41,317 indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation. The ECC memory support also makes it attractive for small business workstations where data accuracy is critical. However, the GPU's 51st percentile rank means it is not a top-tier compute device for GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable.

Students and office workers will find this build overkill for their needs, but the performance headroom ensures longevity. The 65W TDP CPU is efficient, and the system's low power draw (suggested 600W PSU) keeps operational costs manageable. The dual-slot GPU with a 267 mm length fits in most mid-tower cases, making assembly straightforward. For users who want a single system that can game at high frame rates and handle professional workloads, this pair is a compelling match.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. The R20 test shows 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. The R23 scores are 35,122 multi-core and 4,958 single-core. Geekbench results show 19,620 multi-core and 2,429 single-core. PassMark scores include a multithread score of 41,317, a single-thread score of 4,257, and a physics score of 2,455. These results place the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 53,620. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, is only 0.2% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.6% slower.

The GPU's benchmark results are more moderate. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 4,157. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 18,290 and 54,228, respectively. PassMark G3D scores 24,176, while G2D scores 1,177. The GPU compute score is 13,473. These place the GPU in the 51st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 11,627. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, is 0.5% faster, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M is 0.9% slower.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that far outperforms its GPU counterpart. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 51st percentile means the system is balanced toward compute-heavy tasks rather than pure graphics. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this disparity, with the CPU pulling the overall score up. In gaming, this means the CPU will never be the bottleneck at 1080p in most titles, but the GPU will limit maximum settings at higher resolutions. The pair's average FPS across games is 150.3, ranking 1187th out of 3732 pairs, which is above average but not elite.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which has been a mainstay for several generations. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders the option to reuse older, cheaper DDR4 modules or invest in faster DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest NVMe SSDs and GPUs, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, is a dual-slot card that is 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 50 mm wide. It requires two 8-pin power connectors and has a suggested PSU of 600 W. The GPU's 263W TDP, combined with the CPU's 65W TDP, leaves ample headroom for a 600W power supply, even with other components. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU has no headroom in terms of core count on this socket, as the i7-14700F is near the top of the consumer range. However, users could upgrade to a higher-clocked or unlocked part if they need more single-thread performance, though the 5.40 GHz boost is already high. The more impactful upgrade would be the GPU. Moving to a GPU with a higher percentile rank would address the bottleneck seen at 1440p and 4K. The platform itself is mature, so users should consider whether a new platform is needed before investing in a new CPU on Socket 1700.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system excels here. In Counter-Strike 2, it hits 229.2 FPS at 1080p and 148.9 FPS at 1440p. Valorant reaches 522.9 FPS at 1080p and 441.2 FPS at 1440p. These numbers easily drive 144Hz and 240Hz monitors, with the CPU's strong single-core score of 4,958 ensuring minimal frame drops in CPU-intensive scenes.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU is well-equipped for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 provides plenty of headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, and the GPU's 60 RT cores can assist with hardware encoding if needed. Streaming at 1080p60 should have negligible impact on gaming FPS.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and data compression score of 505,885 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in editors like Premiere Pro. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K timeline previews, though its 51st percentile rank means it won't accelerate effects as fast as higher-tier GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are ideal for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The 35,122 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will render scenes quickly. The GPU's 37.32 TFLOPS FP32 performance can also assist in GPU rendering, but its 51st percentile rank means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software development: The high core count and strong single-thread performance (4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core) make this ideal for compiling large codebases. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the ECC memory support ensures stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: This build is massively overkill for word processing and web browsing, but the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures instant response. The 65W TDP CPU means quiet operation under light loads, and the system's efficiency (suggested 600W PSU) keeps electricity costs low.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier consumer CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is a powerhouse for productivity, while the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, with 16 GB of VRAM, is a capable gamer at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 51st percentile, making this a CPU-heavy build. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that the pair is better than most, but not in the top tier.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is above average but not enthusiast-level. The CPU's performance is comparable to server-class Xeon and EPYC parts, as shown by its nearest rivals being within 0.8% of its average score. The GPU's performance is comparable to older mid-range cards like the GTX 1660, which is a significant gap. This pairing is best suited for users who need massive CPU compute power and are willing to accept mid-range graphics performance. It is a workstation-class CPU with a gamer-class GPU.

Gaming Performance

The data for gaming is measured, not estimated, providing a reliable picture of performance. At 1080p, the system is excellent for esports and competitive titles. Valorant achieves 522.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 502.7 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 273 FPS. These are far beyond what most monitors can display, ensuring the CPU is not a bottleneck.

For AAA games at 1080p, the GPU becomes the limiter. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 68.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 34 FPS. These are playable, but not at high refresh rates. At 1440p, the frame rates drop further: Cyberpunk 2077 yields 48 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 gives 46.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 21 FPS. These suggest that 1440p gaming is best for less demanding titles or with settings tuned down.

At 4K, the system struggles with the most demanding games. Cyberpunk 2077 delivers 33.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 offers 31.5 FPS, and Control hits 49 FPS. However, lighter titles remain playable: Counter-Strike 2 gives 85.8 FPS, Minecraft achieves 75 FPS, and Valorant reaches 352.6 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 150.3, but this is heavily skewed by esports titles. For a balanced gaming experience, 1080p is the sweet spot, with 1440p being viable for competitive shooters and older games.