SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 pairing represents a specific intersection of high-core-count processing and mid-range rasterization. This analysis examines the measured data, which indicates a system that excels in productivity and high-refresh 1080p gaming, while exhibiting a distinct performance ceiling at 4K resolutions. The combined build sits at the 75th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 58th, highlighting a primary imbalance for the analyst to consider.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this system is a formidable performer for competitive and fast-paced titles. Data shows exceptionally high frame rates in esports, with Valorant delivering 447 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaching 195 FPS. Tom Clancy S Rainbow Six Siege also achieves 232 FPS. These figures suggest the combination is well-suited for 1080p monitors with refresh rates of 144Hz or higher in lighter titles, providing a significant competitive edge.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. While specific streaming software benchmarks are not present, the PassMark multithread score of 41317 indicates robust parallel processing capability. The CPU’s high core count should absorb the overhead of software encoding, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering frames, which is a typical requirement for a smooth streaming experience.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong multi-core CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of VRAM makes this a viable option for video editing. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 indicates rapid rendering and export times. The GPU’s 16 GB memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth can handle large 4K timelines and effect-heavy projects without significant memory pressure. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 from the GPU further supports hardware-accelerated effects and rendering.

3D Rendering: This workload leans heavily on the CPU's parallel computing strength. The i7-14700F’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14751 and R15 score of 3540 demonstrate that it is a potent processor for CPU-based rendering tasks. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 7700’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides a capable baseline, though its 58th percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier dedicated renderer.

Software Development: Large codebases and parallel compilation benefit from the CPU's architecture. The PassMark data compression score of 505885 and integer math score of 155808 point to strong performance in tasks that involve data manipulation and logical operations. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache also helps speed up access to frequently used code segments, making this build a responsive platform for compiling and running complex applications.

Student and Office Work: This build is significantly overpowered for standard productivity tasks. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4958 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 91st percentile CPU ranking means it will breeze through spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing. The 16 GB GPU memory is irrelevant here, but the DDR4/DDR5 memory support allows for flexible and affordable system memory configurations, ensuring a smooth experience in any office environment.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear disparity between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The processor performs in the top 9% of all CPUs (91st percentile), while the graphics card sits in the upper-midrange (58th percentile). In CPU-intensive scenarios like physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 2455 indicates the processor is rarely the limiting factor.

Conversely, in gaming at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The measured FPS data shows a consistent drop as resolution increases. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, performance goes from 166 FPS at 1080p to 147 FPS at 1440p and 125 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern indicates that while the CPU can keep up with the title's logic, the GPU's rendering limits are reached at higher pixel counts.

This bottleneck is most pronounced in graphically demanding titles. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system manages only 58 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 43 FPS at 1440p. The CPU is very likely waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames. The average FPS across all measured games is 125.9, but this is skewed by high performance in esports titles. In AAA games, the GPU is the component that dictates playable settings and resolutions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at gaming performance across three resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, offering concrete figures for analysis.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers a strong mix of high and medium frame rates. Esports and older titles see exceptional performance: Valorant (447 FPS), CS:GO (431 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (232 FPS). Modern competitive titles also perform well, with Fortnite at 94 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 166 FPS. However, demanding AAA games show the GPU's limits, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, suggesting that high settings are achievable but max settings may require compromises.

At 2560x1440, performance becomes more balanced but still leans on the CPU's strength. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 147 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS. Many single-player titles, such as Control (61 FPS) and Hitman 2 (49 FPS), remain playable. However, the most demanding games begin to struggle, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 43 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS, indicating that medium-to-high settings are necessary for a consistent experience.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. Few games achieve high refresh rates; Valorant still hits 305 FPS, but this is an exception. Most titles fall into the 30-50 FPS range, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 125 FPS being a notable outlier. Heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (28 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (26 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (9 FPS) show that 4K ultra settings are not feasible for modern AAA games with this GPU.

Who Should Build It

The primary target user for this pairing is a gamer who prioritizes high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p gaming, particularly in competitive esports titles. The data supports that this system can drive very high FPS in games like Valorant and Counter-Strike, making it ideal for those who prioritize frame rate over maximum graphical fidelity. The 16 GB VRAM also provides a degree of future-proofing for 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures.

Content creators on a budget will also find this build compelling. The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 score of 35122, makes it a powerful workstation for video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The GPU, while not top-tier for rendering, offers solid compute capabilities and ample VRAM for handling complex scenes and timelines.

Software developers and engineers will benefit from the CPU's massive thread count and high cache. Tasks like compiling large projects, running virtual machines, and data analysis will be significantly accelerated. Students in STEM fields or those studying computer science will have a machine that exceeds their current requirements and can handle future, more complex workloads.

Small business workstations that require heavy multitasking, database management, or data processing can leverage the CPU's 91st percentile ranking. The system's capability to handle high CPU loads, as shown by the PassMark multithread score of 41317, ensures smooth operation even with multiple demanding applications running concurrently.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 53620, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6505P, which scores 53701, a negligible 0.2% difference. It is also 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P. This indicates that the i7-14700F is firmly in the high-end desktop and entry-level workstation performance tier.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15852, placing it at the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is closely matched with several rivals. It is 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060, while being 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500. This places the RX 7700 in a solidly mid-range position, trading blows with previous-generation and entry-level current-generation cards.

The combined build percentile is 75, which reflects the high-performing CPU dragging up the total score against a mid-tier GPU. The average FPS across all tested games is 125.9, which is a good metric for 1080p gaming but less representative of the 4K experience. The pair ranks 1776 out of 3732 in terms of FPS performance, indicating it is in the top half of all possible pairings but not in the elite tier.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Memory specifications are a strong point for this card. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This high memory capacity and bandwidth are beneficial for modern games with large textures and for compute workloads, differentiating it from many competitors in its class.

The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The memory runs at an effective speed of 19.5 Gbps. These clocks contribute to a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s, resulting in 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 20974 in PassMark G3D and 2865 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 186 indicate good API utilization. The 58th percentile ranking shows that while it is a capable card, it is outperformed by a significant portion of the GPU market. It is a mid-range part suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as the FPS data confirms.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in system building.

The CPU has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial cache is critical for gaming performance and data-heavy applications. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms.

Benchmark results show a processor that is a multi-threaded powerhouse. It scores 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 14751 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2429. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 further confirms its strength in parallel workloads.

This CPU is not meant for overclocking, as its multiplier is locked. However, its high stock boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures excellent performance out of the box. With a TDP of 65 W, it is also remarkably power-efficient for its core count, making it easier to cool than many high-core-count rivals. The data shows it is a top-tier choice for productivity and a very strong choice for gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 interface. This socket has been used for several Intel generations. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the fastest modern SSDs and future graphics cards.

Memory support is flexible, with the option to use either DDR4 or DDR5. This allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for workstation use.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is more than sufficient for this card's bandwidth needs. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, according to the suggested PSU specification. It uses two 8-pin power connectors. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, meaning a high-quality 550 W PSU has ample headroom for this configuration.

For a future upgrade, the most impactful change would be to replace the GPU. The CPU has significant performance headroom, as indicated by its 91st percentile ranking. A more powerful GPU would help unlock higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K, where the current system is limited. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the motherboard also ensures that any future high-end GPU will have the necessary bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: Is this build better for gaming or productivity?

A: The data shows it is excellent for both, but for different reasons. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23: 35122) make it a productivity beast. The GPU's 58th percentile ranking and measured FPS show it is a strong 1080p gaming card, but its performance at 4K is limited.

Q: What resolution is this PC best suited for?

A: Benchmark data indicates 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are the sweet spots. At 1080p, it achieves high frame rates in many titles (e.g., 166 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone). At 1440p, performance is still good, but it falls below 60 FPS in the most demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077. 4K performance is poor for modern AAA titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: According to the nearest rivals data, the Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53288. The performance is essentially equivalent, with the Intel chip having a very slight edge in this metric.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16129. The RX 7700 is slightly slower in these benchmarks, but it has the advantage of 16 GB of VRAM compared to the RTX 3060 Ti's likely 8 GB, which could help with high-resolution textures.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: Yes, likely well. The GPU has 16 GB of VRAM, which is sufficient for 4K timelines and effects. The CPU's multi-core performance (e.g., PassMark multithread score of 41317) also helps with rendering and export times. The main bottleneck would be the GPU's compute performance for heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This indicates that a quality 550 W power supply is sufficient for this configuration, as the combined power draw is well within those limits.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-14700F has a locked multiplier. This means it cannot be overclocked. However, its high maximum boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures strong performance without manual tuning.