SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop build that sits at the 81st combined percentile among all CPU-GPU pairings tracked in the database. The CPU alone lands at the 91st percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile of all graphics cards. This pairing targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance, with a clear emphasis on multi-threaded CPU work that the Radeon RX 6600 XT can comfortably feed at lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a distinct CPU-heavy balance. The Core i7-14700F, with an average benchmark score of 53,620, sits at the 91st percentile overall, while the RX 6600 XT achieves an average score of 24,442, placing it at the 70th percentile. The CPU’s margin over the GPU in raw compute is substantial — the processor's average score is more than double the GPU’s. In gaming workloads, the measured FPS data show the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution scales upward. At 1920x1080, the pair averages 102.5 FPS across all tested games. At 2560x1440, the average drops to around 65-70 FPS, and at 3840x2160 the average falls to roughly 35 FPS, based on the per-game figures.

The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads can push frame rates high in esports titles at 1080p. For example, Valorant averages 353.3 FPS at 1920x1080 — clearly a CPU-bound scenario. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 343 FPS at the same resolution. In these cases, the CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958, is the key enabler. However, in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS at 1080p is only 47.1, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck. The RX 6600 XT’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra, but the gap between CPU and GPU capability widens at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s nearest rival in terms of average score is the Intel Xeon 6505P, just 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.6% behind. The GPU’s nearest rival is the Intel Arc A350M, which is 0.8% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is 1.1% ahead. These margins are small, but the CPU’s percentile advantage is clear. In practice, the data shows the CPU will be underutilized in many gaming scenarios, especially at 1440p and above. For multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, the CPU can stretch its legs; for gaming, the GPU does the heavy lifting.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip, a 7 nm design with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card’s base clock is 1968 MHz, with a boost clock of 2589 MHz and a game clock of 2359 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed. Shading units total 2048, complemented by 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The architecture includes 32 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the FP32 compute rate is 10.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.21 TFLOPS.

The benchmark scores place this GPU at the 70th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,804. In Geekbench compute tests, the card scores 88,720 in Metal, 80,503 in OpenCL, and 72,417 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 16,461, and the PassMark G2D score is 912. These numbers indicate solid compute capability for a mainstream GPU, but the memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity constrain performance in 4K or in high-texture workloads. The card’s closest competitors include the Intel Arc A350M, which is 0.8% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, which is 1.1% ahead. The GTX 1630 is 0.7% behind.

The RT cores are present but limited — only 32 of them. Ray tracing performance is not the card’s strength; the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,804 is modest. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the GPU’s bandwidth needs. The card uses a 160 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested power supply. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

The average benchmark score of 24,442 places it in the mid-range tier. The GPU’s performance is consistent across compute APIs, with Vulkan being the lowest at 72,417, but still modest. The FP32 throughput of 10.60 TFLOPS is typical for the RX 6000 series. In real-world terms, the card can handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles and 1440p with adjustments. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 4K textures.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-14700F’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score is 35,122, with a single-core score of 4,958. The R20 multi-core score is 14,751, and single-core is 2,082. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 3,540, and single-core is 499. The Geekbench multicore score is 19,620, and single-core is 2,429. The PassMark multithread score is 41,317, and single-thread score is 4,257. The PassMark integer math score is 155,808, floating point is 107,005, and extended instructions are 28,564. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, and it is at the 91st percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.2% behind) and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (0.6% ahead).

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,804, and its PassMark G3D is 16,461. The GPU average is 24,442, at the 70th percentile. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which is 0.7% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is 1.1% ahead. The combined percentile for the pair is 81.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is far more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's average score is 53,620 versus 24,442 for the GPU. In a benchmark like PassMark multithread, the CPU's 41,317 score dwarfs the GPU's G3D of 16,461. The CPU's single-core performance is also strong: 4,257 in PassMark single-thread, 4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 1,804, which is modest for a gaming card. The pair ranks 2,618 out of 3,732 in its database for average FPS, with an average of 102.5 FPS across all tested games. This rank places it in the top 30% of pairs. The CPU's percentile is 91, the GPU's is 70, and the combined percentile is 81, reflecting that the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a mid-range part.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, the pair delivers high FPS in esports titles. Valorant averages 353.3 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 343 FPS. In Counter-Strike 2, the average is 157.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 184 FPS. For more demanding games, the RX 6600 XT still holds 60+ FPS in many titles: Assetto Corsa at 92 FPS, Minecraft at 153 FPS, and Ready Or Not at 125 FPS. At 1440p, the average drops to around 60 FPS in esports, and 40-50 FPS in AAA titles. At 4K, the GPU struggles, with most titles falling below 40 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 indicates strong multi-threaded performance. In a CPU-bound game like Valorant, the 1080p FPS is 353.3, leaving plenty of CPU capacity for streaming. The GPU also supports hardware encode, but the CPU is powerful enough to handle software encoding at 1080p. The system’s 81st percentile combined score suggests it can manage streaming and gaming simultaneously without significant FPS drops.

Video Editing: The CPU is the star here. The Geekbench multicore score of 19,620 and PassMark multithread score of 41,317 indicate strong multi-core performance for rendering and export. The GPU’s 21.21 TFLOPS FP16 performance can accelerate certain effects and encoding. A 4K export would be CPU-bound, but the GPU can help with real-time preview. The system handles 4K video editing with ease, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM might limit heavy effects in 4K.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench scores are stellar: 35,122 in R23 multi-core, and 14,751 in R20. The GPU’s FP32 is 10.60 TFLOPS, which is moderate for renderers that use CUDA or OpenCL. The GPU’s OpenCL score is 80,503, which is decent. For CPU-based rendering, the 20 cores shine. For GPU renderers, the RX 6600 XT is not a top-tier choice, but it can handle light to medium workloads. The system is more suited for CPU rendering.

Software Development: The CPU’s high core count and strong single-core performance make it ideal for compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 155,808 indicates strong integer performance. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,429 is solid. The GPU is not a bottleneck for development tasks. The system can handle large codebases, virtual machines, and and rapid compilation with ease.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s efficiency and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM can handle any productivity app. The PassMark G2D score of 912 is low, but that reflects 2D acceleration, not typical office use. The CPU’s single-core performance ensures snappy UI. The system is quiet and power-efficient with a 65 W CPU TDP, though the GPU is 160 W. For a student, this is a powerful workstation that can also game.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel support. The CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a 65 W TDP. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible. The memory support is DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose one. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer part. This makes it suitable for small workstations.

The platform’s memory is dual-channel. The CPU’s memory bandwidth is not specified, but the dual-channel setup. The GPU’s memory bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s. The system’s PSU requirement is 450 W for the GPU, and the CPU TDP is 65 W, so a 450 W PSU is sufficient. The GPU has a 1x 8-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU is already at the 91st percentile. The CPU’s 20 cores can handle a stronger GPU. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU could use that. The memory can be upgraded to DDR5 if not already. The CPU’s single-core is strong, so a GPU upgrade would yield the biggest FPS gains.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The average benchmark score is 53,620, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the system’s combined percentile?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pair is 81.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games is 102.5 at 1920x1080 resolution.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14700F supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock?

A: The GPU's boost clock is 2589 MHz.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p will be well served. The pair delivers 102.5 FPS average at 1080p, with esports titles hitting 150-350 FPS. At 1440p, the average drops to around 65 FPS, which is still playable. Content creators who edit 1080p video will benefit from the CPU’s 20 cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 ensures fast export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 28 threads. The PassMark integer score of 155,808 is strong. Students and small business workstations can use the system for a mix of productivity and gaming. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is enough for 1080p ultra. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming, but it excels at 1080p.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 14th-generation Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, an RDNA 2 GPU. The CPU is the stronger component, with a 91st percentile performance rank, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile. The combined system ranks at the 81st percentile. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are far ahead of the GPU's 8 GB VRAM. The CPU's average benchmark score of 53,620 is more than double the GPU's 24,442. The system is a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, making it a balanced performer at 1080p, but CPU-bound at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a Raptor Lake desktop processor, built on a 10 nm Intel process. It has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The L3 cache is 33 MB, with L1 per core at 80 KB and L2 per core at 2 MB. The TDP is 65 W. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel. It has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated graphics are N/A, so it requires a discrete GPU. The launch MSRP is $359.

The benchmark scores are outstanding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35,122, which is 5,958 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 41,317, and single-thread is 4,257. The Geekbench multicore is 19,620. The CPU’s average score of 53,620 places it at the 91st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which is 0.6% ahead. The CPU’s multi-core performance is its key strength, with a PassMark integer math score of 155,808. The 20 cores and 28 threads make it a beast for rendering, compilation, and streaming. The single-core is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core of 2,429. The CPU is a top-tier part.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is from ultra settings at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all games is 102.5. Esports titles run at extreme frame rates: Valorant at 353.3 FPS, CS:GO at 343, Counter-Strike 2 at 157.4, and Rainbow Six Siege at 184. Minecraft runs at 153 FPS, and Roblox at 199.7. In more demanding games, the RX 6600 XT still holds: Call of Duty: Warzone at 163.2 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 92 FPS, and Doom at 116.4. However, Cyberpunk 2077 only manages 47.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 is 43.9. The Medium is only 32 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average drops to ~65 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 is 102.1, Valorant is 302.9, but Cyberpunk drops to 33.8. At 3840x2160, the average is ~40 FPS. Only a few titles hit 60, like CS:GO at 139 FPS, and most AAA titles are below 30. The data is measured, so these are actual performance. The GPU is best for 1080p ultra, with 1440p playable, and 4K not viable for modern games. The CPU never bottlenecks at 1080p for most titles.

The data indicates the CPU is far ahead, so a future GPU upgrade would yield immediate FPS gains. The system's 81st percentile combined is a strong showing for a mid-range GPU.