SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6400 pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 63, placing it above the median of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P (53,701), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469), 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288), and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206).

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the i7-14700F?

A: The CPU features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a base clock of 1923 MHz and a boost clock of 2321 MHz.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6400 includes 12 dedicated ray accelerators (RT cores) and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 APIs.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank among all processors?

A: The i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance relative to the broader processor market.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact pairing. All FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6400 represent a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and a single-core score of 4,958, while the GPU produces a Passmark G3D score of 7,673 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176. This asymmetry defines the entire character of the build.

On the CPU side, the average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are all server or high-end desktop parts: the Intel Xeon 6505P (53,701, -0.2%), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469, +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288, +0.6%), and AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206, +0.8%). The deltaPct values are remarkably tight — within a single percentage point — meaning the i7-14700F trades blows with enterprise silicon in raw aggregate compute.

The GPU tells a different story. With an average benchmark score of 6,001, the RX 6400 lands in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6,000, 0.0%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5,996, +0.1%), AMD FirePro W4100 (5,987, +0.2%), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5,986, +0.3%). The GPU is effectively tied with a decade-old mobile GPU and a professional server card — a clear indicator of entry-level positioning.

The combined percentile of 63 reflects the CPU-heavy nature of this pairing. The data shows a processor capable of workstation-class throughput paired with a GPU suited for basic display output and light 3D acceleration. In the absence of measured FPS results, performance in games must be extrapolated from these scores: the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually every graphics-bound scenario.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 is more than seven times the single-core score of 4,958, demonstrating excellent scaling across the 20 cores. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 versus a single-core score of 2,429 reinforces this pattern. In Passmark tests, the multi-thread score of 41,317 and integer math score of 155,808 indicate strong throughput for parallel workloads, while the floating-point math score of 107,005 confirms solid FPU performance.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all processors means it outperforms roughly nine out of ten CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the same league as the Xeon 6505P and Ryzen 9 7900X, with deltas of -0.2% and +0.6% respectively. This is notable because those rivals include server and enthusiast-class parts with different price points and power envelopes.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,257 indicate strong per-core efficiency, which translates to snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 505,885 and encryption score of 30,144 suggest the CPU handles data-intensive tasks well. The extended instructions score of 28,564 shows robust SIMD and AVX capability, while the find prime numbers score of 176 is a weaker result that reflects a slower integer-heavy single-thread path.

For real workloads, this CPU can handle video encoding, software compilation, 3D rendering, and database operations with authority. The 65 W TDP means it achieves this performance within a modest power envelope, making it suitable for systems where thermal headroom is limited. The presence of ECC memory support (true) adds workstation credibility, though the platform's desktop socket limits some enterprise features.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance gap between CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile while the GPU sits in the 35th percentile — a 56-point spread that creates a severe imbalance. The combined percentile of 63 reflects this lopsided configuration, where one component dramatically outperforms the other.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression (Passmark score 505,885), encryption (30,144), and multi-threaded physics (2,455) — the i7-14700F will deliver exceptional results. These tasks rely on the processor's 20 cores and 28 threads, and the benchmark scores confirm that the CPU can sustain high throughput indefinitely. The Passmark multithread score of 41,317 and integer math score of 155,808 indicate that the processor is rarely the limiting factor in compute-heavy scenarios.

In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing — the RX 6400 becomes the bottleneck. The Passmark G3D score of 7,673 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 are entry-level figures. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture loading and frame buffer capacity in modern titles. The pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings but will struggle at higher resolutions or with demanding visual effects.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. However, the benchmark scores suggest that in games, the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can produce. A game that is CPU-limited on a balanced system will become GPU-limited here. Conversely, in productivity apps that use the CPU heavily — like video editing or software compilation — the GPU is largely irrelevant, and the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU's 91st percentile ranking.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 and Passmark DX12 score of 30 indicate that the GPU handles modern graphics APIs poorly relative to even mid-range parts. This means that even at 1080p with low settings, frame rates will be modest. The CPU's ability to push high frame rates is wasted in most gaming scenarios because the GPU cannot keep up.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the Navi 24 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1923 MHz, a game clock of 2039 MHz, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz.

Memory configuration is modest: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This limited memory subsystem will be a constraint in modern games that increasingly require more than 4 GB of VRAM for high-resolution textures. The bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will cause stuttering in titles that stream large assets.

The GPU includes 12 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the raw compute power is limited. The FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place it firmly in the entry-level segment. The pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are adequate for basic rendering but will not sustain high frame rates at demanding settings.

Benchmark results confirm the entry-level positioning. The Passmark G3D score of 7,673 and Passmark GPU compute score of 2,812 indicate basic 3D capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32,011 and Vulkan score of 16,372 show that the GPU can handle compute workloads, but the scores are far below what mainstream GPUs achieve. The Passmark DX10, DX11, and DX12 scores of 54, 70, and 30 respectively highlight the GPU's weakness in modern graphics APIs.

In the GPU percentile ranking, the RX 6400 sits at 35, meaning it outperforms only about a third of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the GTX 770M (a mobile GPU from 2013) and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (an enterprise card) — both with nearly identical average scores (6,000 and 5,996 respectively). The AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M round out the rival list, all within 0.3% of the RX 6400's score. This clustering suggests that the RX 6400 delivers performance comparable to decade-old hardware and budget workstation parts.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will severely limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The 12 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The GPU is more suited to 2D desktop acceleration, basic video playback, and light 3D work rather than serious rendering.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 7,673 will cap frame rates well below what high-refresh monitors demand. At 1080p with low settings, the RX 6400 may produce playable frame rates in esports titles, but the CPU's 91st percentile ranking is wasted.

Streaming: The i7-14700F's 20 cores and 28 threads can handle encoding and streaming overhead simultaneously. The Passmark multithread score of 41,317 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 indicate ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. However, the GPU will limit game visual quality, so streams will look modest.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 will accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic effects and color grading, but the Passmark GPU compute score of 2,812 means GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong — the 20 cores provide excellent throughput. The Passmark floating-point math score of 107,005 and integer math score of 155,808 confirm the CPU's capability. GPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) will be limited by the RX 6400's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and Passmark data compression score of 505,885 will speed up compilation and code analysis. The 33 MB L3 cache and 28 threads support parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: Overkill on the CPU side, adequate on the GPU side. The processor's single-core score of 4,958 (Cinebench R23) ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking is sufficient for office productivity, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are more than needed for these tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x4. The motherboard choice will determine memory type (DDR4 or DDR5), and users can select based on cost and performance preferences.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to boost behavior. The GPU has a TDP of 53 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This low power draw means the system can run on a modest power supply, leaving significant headroom for upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more capable GPU. The current RX 6400's 35th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM are the primary bottlenecks. Replacing it with a GPU in the 70th percentile or higher would balance the system, allowing the CPU's 91st percentile performance to manifest in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface limits bandwidth, so a GPU with a wider bus interface (e.g., PCIe 4.0 x8 or x16) would be preferred.

The CPU itself has headroom for future use. Its 33 MB L3 cache and 20 cores will remain relevant for several years, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal and power headroom. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop part and adds flexibility for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU means future storage and accelerator cards can run at full bandwidth.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core Raptor Lake processor in the 91st CPU percentile, with the AMD Radeon RX 6400, an entry-level RDNA 2 GPU in the 35th GPU percentile. The combined percentile of 63 reflects a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

The i7-14700F is a high-end desktop processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, 33 MB of L3 cache, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122. Its average benchmark score of 53,620 places it among server-class rivals like the Xeon 6505P and EPYC 7313P, with deltas under 1%. The RX 6400, by contrast, has an average score of 6,001 and is statistically tied with the GTX 770M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, all within 0.3%.

The system's overall tier is defined by this imbalance. In CPU-intensive tasks — rendering, compilation, data processing — the build performs at the 91st percentile level. In GPU-intensive tasks — gaming, GPU rendering, video encoding with hardware acceleration — it performs at the 35th percentile level. The build's identity is that of a workstation-class CPU with a display adapter GPU.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 53 W GPU TDP combine for a system that runs cool and quiet, requiring only a 250 W PSU. The GPU draws power solely from the PCIe slot, eliminating cable management complexity. The CPU's ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes add server-grade features to a desktop package.

# Who Should Build It

The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU throughput over graphics performance. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 cores and 28 threads, with Passmark data compression of 505,885 and integer math of 155,808. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 supports heavy parallel compilation.

Students in computer science or engineering programs will find the CPU's 91st percentile ranking suitable for coursework involving simulations, data analysis, and machine learning (CPU-based). The GPU's 35th percentile ranking is adequate for basic visualization but not for graphics-intensive research.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, database queries, and office applications will be well served. The CPU's single-core score of 4,958 (Cinebench R23) ensures responsive application use, while the low power draw (65 W CPU, 53 W GPU) keeps operating costs minimal. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-critical tasks.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-based workflows — audio production, 3D modeling (CPU rendering), video encoding with x264 — will see excellent performance. The Passmark floating-point math score of 107,005 and multithread score of 41,317 indicate strong throughput. However, those who rely on GPU acceleration (e.g., Adobe Premiere with CUDA) should look elsewhere.

Gamers at 1080p with low settings and esports titles may find the RX 6400 sufficient, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit longevity. The CPU will not bottleneck any game, but the GPU will. This build is not recommended for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

The ideal user is a professional or student who needs massive CPU compute power, runs minimal GPU-accelerated workloads, and wants a low-power, quiet system. The i7-14700F delivers server-class performance at a 65 W TDP, while the RX 6400 handles basic display and light 3D tasks. For anyone whose work revolves around the CPU, this pairing is sensible; for anyone whose work involves modern graphics, it is not.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds