SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i7-14700 paired with the Intel Arc A350 presents a stark imbalance in raw compute capability versus graphics throughput. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile. This 41-point gap indicates that the processor is capable of far more work than the graphics card can render in real-time. In gaming workloads, the Arc A350 will be the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, with the i7-14700 standing idle waiting for frames.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,301 dwarfs the GPU's average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of any GPU benchmark data in the pack. However, the GPU's 50th percentile placement and its 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest entry-level rasterization throughput. The data shows a system where the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or compilation without breaking a sweat, but the GPU will constrain any graphics-intensive task.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as software compilation or data processing, the i7-14700's 20 cores and 28 threads deliver strong results. The PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 indicate that the processor can sustain high utilization across all cores. The bottleneck analysis is clear: for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350 is the limiting component; for productivity and compute tasks, the CPU dominates and the GPU becomes irrelevant.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which places this desktop build above the majority of systems in the benchmark database, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (91 vs. 50) indicates a significant performance disparity.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i7-14700 has an average benchmark score of 52,301, which puts it 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 9 5950X's average score of 51,947. The data shows the two processors are essentially neck-and-neck in overall performance.

Q: Does the Arc A350 have any measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All FPS discussions for this pairing must be treated as estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the i7-14700 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350 still in production?

A: No. The GPU's production status is listed as "End-of-life," and its successor is Battlemage. The card is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 watts. The suggested power supply for the entire system is 200 watts.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance compared to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 2,080 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 28,398 in multi-core, a ratio of roughly 13.7:1. This indicates strong scaling across its 20 cores, with single-thread performance in the 91st percentile overall.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700 delivers a robust multi-threaded performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28,398 in multi-core and 2,080 in single-core. The Geekbench results show 17,087 multi-core and 2,409 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and single-thread score of 4,236 round out the picture. The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,301 places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H scores 52,431 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51,947 (0.7% lower). The i7-14700 sits comfortably in this range, essentially trading blows with server-class and enthusiast desktop chips.

For the Arc A350, there are no benchmark scores in the pack. The GPU's 50th percentile placement among all GPUs, combined with its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, indicates entry-level performance. The combined percentile of 71 reflects a system where the CPU carries most of the performance weight. The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at modest settings, but the data does not support expectations beyond that.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A350's 50th percentile GPU placement and 3.072 TFLOPS compute make high-refresh gaming at 1080p a stretch. The CPU could easily feed frames, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what a 144 Hz display demands. Users should expect playable but not competitive frame rates at 1080p with medium settings.

Streaming: The i7-14700's 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 indicates it can handle x264 encoding alongside other tasks. However, the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth will constrain the gaming side of the stream.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is strong here. The PassMark integer math score of 154,535 and floating point math score of 106,716 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit effects and color grading, but CPU-based rendering will be fast.

3D Rendering: The i7-14700 excels in this scenario. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,388 and R15 multi-core score of 4,061 demonstrate strong CPU render performance. The Arc A350's 6 RT cores and 48 TMUs offer some acceleration, but its 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck complex scenes.

Software Development: Compilation benefits directly from the CPU's thread count. The PassMark data compression score of 498,198 and random string sorting score of 54,340 indicate fast build times and data processing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output without needing the discrete GPU.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,236 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, but the discrete GPU offers no benefit for these workloads. The system's 65W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP keep power consumption modest.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3 cache.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for reliability-sensitive workloads. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete Arc A350 handles graphics duties in this build.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,398 places it in the 91st percentile overall. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,087 corroborates this strength. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,080 and PassMark single-thread of 4,236.

The PassMark sub-scores reveal workload characteristics: data encryption at 29,601, extended instructions at 28,388, prime number finding at 164, and physics at 2,226. The floating point math score of 106,716 and integer math score of 154,535 indicate balanced compute capabilities. The data compression score of 498,198 is particularly strong, suggesting excellent archival and file-handling performance.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700 is essentially tied with the Xeon Gold 5320H, EPYC 8124P, Core Ultra 5 235HX, and Ryzen 9 5950X, with deltas ranging from -0.2% to 0.7%. This places it in elite company for desktop processors.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The Arc A350's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is the primary constraint for gaming. Modern titles at 1080p typically require more than 4 GB of VRAM for high textures, and the 64-bit bus limits memory bandwidth. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute places it in entry-level territory.

At 1080p with low to medium settings, the A350 should manage 30-60 FPS in older or less demanding titles, based on its 50th percentile GPU ranking. At 1440p, performance would drop significantly, likely below playable thresholds for most modern games. The CPU's performance is irrelevant here, as the GPU will be the bottleneck in nearly all gaming scenarios.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and less demanding on the GPU, the i7-14700's strong single-thread performance could push frame rates higher, but the A350's 48 TMUs and 24 ROPs will still cap output. Ray tracing is supported through 6 RT cores, but the low compute throughput will make RT performance poor in practice.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need massive CPU compute but only light graphics acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20-core, 28-thread configuration. The PassMark multi-thread score of 40,318 and data compression score of 498,198 indicate fast build and packaging workflows.

Students in computer science or engineering fields could use this system for coursework, with the CPU handling virtual machines, simulations, and compilation. The 65W TDP keeps electricity costs low, and the system's 200W suggested PSU means a modest power supply suffices.

Small business workstations handling database operations, financial modeling, or data analysis would see strong performance. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity. The Arc A350 provides basic display output for multiple monitors, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could serve this role alone.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations might consider this build, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means frame rates will be below what enthusiasts expect. Content creators focusing on CPU-rendered video or 3D scenes will find the i7-14700 capable, but GPU-accelerated workflows will disappoint.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $384, which positions it as a mid-range to high-end processor. Users who already own a stronger GPU or plan to upgrade later will find the CPU a solid foundation.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700, a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A350, a 4 GB entry-level GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 71 indicates the system outperforms most database entries, but the discrepancy between CPU (91st percentile) and GPU (50th percentile) is stark.

The CPU is the centerpiece here. Its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 52,301 place it among the top processors available. The GPU, with no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile placement, serves as a basic display adapter and light gaming solution rather than a performance component.

This build is best characterized as a high-performance CPU workstation with token graphics capability. The 65W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP keep the system efficient, and the 200W suggested PSU requirement means it can run on modest power supplies. The build class is desktop, suggesting a standard tower configuration.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, utilizing the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across 157 mm², with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 RT cores. Compute throughput is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 with 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and carries a TDP of just 25W. The card is single-slot with no display outputs listed, suggesting it is intended for compute or as an auxiliary device rather than primary display. The production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with the absence of benchmark scores, indicates performance that is difficult to quantify precisely. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the primary limitations for modern workloads. The 6 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the low compute throughput will limit its effectiveness.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The socket supports future 14th Gen processors, though the platform is nearing the end of its upgrade cycle.

Memory upgrades are straightforward: users can choose between DDR4 and DDR5 depending on motherboard support. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a consumer platform and valuable for workstation reliability. The dual-channel memory bus means capacity and bandwidth scale with two DIMMs.

The GPU upgrade path is clear. The Arc A350's 25W TDP and 200W suggested PSU leave enormous headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is compatible with any modern GPU, and a user could install a card with significantly higher performance without changing the power supply or platform.

The CPU's 65W TDP is modest for its core count, and the Socket 1700 platform supports higher-TDP processors if needed. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A350 with a more capable GPU to match the CPU's 91st percentile standing. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance means it will not bottleneck most graphics cards. Alternatively, users could add more memory for memory-intensive workloads, given the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth peripherals.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds