SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700

52,301 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700 and Intel Arc A310E pairing is a desktop configuration that does not have direct measured FPS data available in this benchmark database. The FACT PACK contains no rows for measuredFpsUltraByGame for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from frame time captures. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning any FPS figures presented should be treated as projections based on synthetic workload scores and hardware specifications rather than empirical game testing. With the CPU sitting at the 91st percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards, the combined system percentile lands at 71, indicating a configuration where the processor substantially outperforms the graphics subsystem in raw compute capability.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance observations are estimated from the benchmark scores and hardware characteristics. The Core i7-14700 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and a single-core score of 2080, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs; this level of processing power is more than sufficient to feed even high-end graphics cards in most gaming scenarios. However, the Arc A310E is the limiting factor for frame rates, as its 50th percentile position among all GPUs and its modest specifications dictate the actual gaming ceiling. The GPU's FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS, 768 shading units, and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles, with esports and less demanding games likely achieving playable frame rates. At 1440p or 4K resolutions, the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth would likely become severe bottlenecks, causing significant frame rate drops or requiring substantial graphical compromises to maintain playability. For competitive titles like first-person shooters or MOBAs, the strong single-threaded CPU performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4236) should help maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not saturated, though the 4 GB VRAM could cause texture pop-in or stuttering in games that exceed this budget. Ray tracing workloads would be particularly challenging given the GPU's 6 RT cores and entry-level positioning, so users should expect to disable RT features for acceptable performance. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for this GPU class, though it does not offer the headroom that higher-end graphics cards would benefit from. Overall, the estimated FPS picture is one of a budget-oriented gaming experience where CPU performance never becomes the constraint, but the GPU limits resolution scaling and detail settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark suite shows a processor with substantial multi-threaded capability. PassMark multi-thread score reaches 40318, with integer math at 154535 and floating-point math at 106716, indicating strong performance in both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and R20 score of 14388 reinforce this picture, while Geekbench multi-core of 17087 adds another data point confirming the CPU's high throughput. Single-threaded performance is equally respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2080, Geekbench single-core at 2409, and PassMark single-thread at 4236, all of which place the CPU well above average for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The CPU's average benchmark score of 52301 and its 91st percentile position against all CPUs mean it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H (deltaPct -0.2), AMD EPYC 8124P (deltaPct 0.3), Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (deltaPct 0.4), and AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (deltaPct 0.7). These tiny deltas indicate that the i7-14700 sits in a tightly contested performance tier where no single rival holds a meaningful advantage. The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, so its 50th percentile position is derived from hardware characteristics alone, making direct score comparisons impossible. The combined percentile of 71 for this build reflects a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU is squarely mid-pack, creating an asymmetric performance profile where CPU-bound tasks will excel and GPU-bound tasks will lag behind that CPU potential.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-R) using Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it relatively power-efficient for its core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled, making this CPU suitable for workstation tasks that require error correction. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not officially supported, but the boost clock of 5.40 GHz already delivers high single-thread performance without manual tuning. The PassMark data compression score of 498198 and data encryption score of 29601 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while the extended instructions score of 28388 shows good SIMD throughput for vectorized workloads. The find prime numbers score of 164 is relatively low, suggesting that pure integer brute-force calculations are not this CPU's strongest suit compared to its other metrics. Real-world workloads that benefit from this processor include video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, where the 28 threads can be fully utilized. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and hardware video decode, though it is not intended for gaming or compute-heavy tasks. The release date of January 7, 2024, places this as a relatively recent processor in the Core 14th Gen series, and its production status is listed as Active, meaning it is still being manufactured and sold.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this build is stark, and the data indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every graphics-intensive workload. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile, creating a scenario where the processor is roughly capable of supporting much higher-end graphics solutions. In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck frame rates at higher resolutions and detail settings, because the CPU has more than enough headroom to process game logic and physics. The estimated FPS scaling would show minimal improvement when lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p, since the GPU is already near its compute limit, whereas CPU-bound scenarios like high-FPS esports titles might see the CPU allow frame rates that the GPU cannot physically render. In productivity tasks that are purely CPU-bound, such as Cinebench rendering or PassMark integer math, the system will perform at a level consistent with the 91st percentile CPU, showing no GPU influence. Conversely, GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding with hardware encoders or 3D rendering that offloads to the graphics card will be constrained by the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 6 RT cores. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that is better than average overall but far from optimal in its component pairing. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks, this balance is acceptable, but for gaming or GPU compute, the processor is significantly overqualified relative to the graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (generation Alchemist, Arc 3 series) using TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates at a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, which is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in texture-heavy games at higher resolutions. The compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 6.144 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, and the 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing acceleration. The 50th percentile position among all GPUs indicates that this card performs at the median level of the graphics card market, meaning it will handle older or less demanding games comfortably but struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings. The 75 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it an energy-efficient and compact option, with a suggested PSU of 250 W that allows installation in modest systems. Display outputs include 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, supporting multiple monitors, and the API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current game engines. The production status is listed as End-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, so this is a legacy product that may not receive long-term driver optimization. For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance is sufficient for entry-level 3D modeling and CAD, but the 4 GB memory capacity will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The absence of benchmark scores for this GPU in the FACT PACK means that its 50th percentile is an estimate based on specifications, and users should temper expectations accordingly.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth storage and graphics cards. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, cheaper memory or newer, faster modules, though the CPU's ECC support is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the Arc A310E is adequate for this GPU but would not fully utilize the bandwidth available from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so a future GPU upgrade would benefit from the platform's headroom. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU mean that the current configuration draws minimal power, and the suggested PSU of 250 W provides enormous headroom for upgrades; even a high-end graphics card with a 250 W TDP could be accommodated with this power supply, though the CPU's boost behavior might require a slightly larger unit in practice. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU, since the CPU's 91st percentile performance can support graphics cards that are far more powerful than the Arc A310E without becoming a bottleneck. Replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model would immediately improve gaming and GPU compute performance, while the CPU would continue to perform at its high percentile. The motherboard socket and chipset would need to be checked for compatibility with higher-end GPUs, but the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that bandwidth is not a limiting factor. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 would provide a modest performance boost, but the CPU's large L3 cache of 33 MB already mitigates memory latency in many workloads. The production status of the CPU is Active, meaning replacement parts are available, while the GPU is End-of-life, so users should consider the long-term availability of the Arc A310E when planning upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, reflecting a system where the CPU (91st percentile) significantly outperforms the GPU (50th percentile).

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support enabled, which is a useful feature for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, provided by 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i7-14700?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A310E still in production?

A: No, the GPU is listed as End-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W, which provides ample headroom given the CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not officially supported.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core i7-14700, a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52301, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, making this a CPU-heavy build where the processor is the dominant component. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system outperforms the majority of desktop configurations, but the imbalance means that its overall capability is constrained by the graphics card. The CPU's strong multi-core and single-core scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark benchmarks make it suitable for a wide range of tasks, but the GPU's modest specifications limit gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. This is a desktop-class build with a 65 W CPU and 75 W GPU, making it a low-power configuration that is quiet and efficient, but not intended for high-end gaming or professional rendering. The overall tier is mid-range, with the potential to become a high-performance system by upgrading the GPU, while the CPU remains a solid foundation for years to come.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability, such as software developers who compile code frequently, data analysts running multi-threaded computations, or students in STEM fields who need a responsive system for simulations and coding. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and 28 threads make it excellent for content creation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering in CPU-based renderers, where the GPU's limitations are less relevant. Gamers at 1080p with a preference for esports titles or older games will find acceptable performance, but those seeking high frame rates in AAA games at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere. Small business workstations that run office productivity, database management, or virtualization workloads will benefit from the CPU's high multi-threaded performance and ECC memory support, while the low power draw of the entire system reduces operating costs. The Arc A310E's 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups, making this a viable option for financial trading desks or scientific visualization that requires multiple displays but not intensive 3D rendering. For hobbyists who want to learn about GPU architecture or experiment with Intel's Xe-HPG features like ray tracing at a basic level, this build offers a low-cost platform, but the GPU's End-of-life status means long-term driver support is uncertain. Ultimately, this pairing is ideal for users who need a powerful CPU for compute-heavy tasks and only occasional, light gaming, rather than those who want a balanced gaming rig.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds