SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14650HX

41,576 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile graphics solution built on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that positions it comfortably for 1080p and entry-level 1440p textures, though not for heavy 4K asset streaming. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective, which is modest by current discrete GPU standards but appropriate for the laptop thermal envelope this part occupies.

Compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz with a boost of 1300 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. Single-precision floating-point throughput is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS, while half-precision reaches 10.65 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These figures indicate a GPU designed for balanced 1080p gaming and light-to-moderate creative workloads rather than extreme compute density.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 16 dedicated RT cores, which aligns with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, along with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 API compatibility. The absence of a listed tensor core count means the A570M relies on standard shader-based AI acceleration, which is relevant for workloads like DLSS-style upscaling that depend on dedicated tensor hardware — those features would be limited or absent here. The GPU's OpenCL benchmark score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, a strong showing that puts it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (score 58392) and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100 (score 58528, delta -0.5%). This is notable: the A570M's raw OpenCL performance rivals desktop-class GPUs from the previous generation, but the comparison should be tempered by the fact that this is a laptop part with a 75 W TDP, so sustained performance in real workloads may vary due to thermal and power constraints.

For rendering tasks specifically, the benchmark data indicates the GPU can handle 3D scene compilation and GPU-accelerated effects with competence, given its 88th percentile rank. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p rendering projects and moderate 1440p compositing, though scenes exceeding that footprint will spill into system memory over PCIe 4.0 x8, which has half the bandwidth of a full x16 slot. The 16 RT cores suggest ray-traced previews in applications like Blender or D5 Render are feasible at reduced settings, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means final-frame path tracing will be slow compared to higher-tier desktop cards.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 88, indicating both components sit at nearly identical performance tiers relative to their respective pools — the CPU at the 88th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. This near-matched percentile ranking suggests a well-balanced system where neither component dramatically outstrips the other in general-purpose compute. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on workload type.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions and detail settings. The Arc A570M's OpenCL score of 58239, while strong, represents a mid-range mobile GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 and single-core score of 1969 indicate it can feed frames at high rates, especially in esports titles where CPU overhead dominates. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the constraint, as the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth cap fill-rate-bound scenes. Conversely, at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU's 16 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock can push frame rates high enough that the GPU becomes the ceiling.

For productivity, the balance flips. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 33495 and data compression score of 398418 suggest it handles multi-threaded compilation and encoding tasks with ease. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 16 RT cores are adequate for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 75 W TDP limits sustained compute. In video editing, the CPU will handle timeline scrubbing and codec encoding, while the GPU accelerates preview renders and effects — neither becomes a hard bottleneck, but the GPU's thermal envelope could throttle in long export sessions.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. This means any specific game resolution performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The percentile parity (88 vs 88) argues for a system where upgrading one component without the other would yield diminishing returns; a faster GPU would be starved by the CPU in CPU-bound titles, and a faster CPU would idle waiting on the GPU in GPU-bound scenes. The data supports a verdict of balanced mid-range performance, with the GPU being the more likely bottleneck in modern AAA titles at high settings.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-HX Refresh), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows for aggressive boosting in laptops with adequate cooling. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache — a substantial pool that aids in multi-threaded workloads with large working sets. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported, and the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for discrete GPUs or NVMe storage.

Benchmark results are consistently strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 20454, while single-core scores 1969 — the multi-core figure is 10.4 times the single-core, reflecting excellent scaling across the 16 cores. Geekbench multi-core hits 14249 and single-core 2173, showing balanced performance in mixed integer/floating-point workloads. PassMark results are particularly revealing: multi-thread score of 33495, integer math at 116661, floating-point math at 84999, and extended instructions at 24150. The data encryption score of 22917 and compression score of 398418 indicate strong AES-NI and compression engine performance, which matters for file archiving and VPN throughput. Random string sorting at 43035 and find prime numbers at 152 (a low score relative to others, but this test favors specific instruction patterns) round out the picture.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 41576 places it at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals being the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (score 41621, delta -0.1%), Intel Core 7 251TE (score 41650, delta -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (score 41376, delta 0.5%), and Intel Core i7-12850HX (score 41779, delta -0.5%). The deltas are all within 0.5%, meaning the 14650HX trades blows with a previous-gen desktop flagship (5900X) and newer mobile parts within a negligible margin. For real workloads, this translates to: compiling code with 24 threads will be fast; 4K video exports in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be smooth; and the 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response in office apps and legacy software.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X in CPU benchmarks?

A: The 14650HX scores 41576 on average, while the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376 — the Intel part is 0.5% ahead. This puts them in the same performance class, despite the 5900X being a desktop chip with higher power limits.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p, but may limit texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions where bandwidth becomes a constraint.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking in laptops with appropriate BIOS support and cooling. The base clock is 2.20 GHz and boost is 5.20 GHz, so there is headroom for enthusiasts.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. This ensures compatibility with modern ray-traced games and the latest graphics APIs.

Q: How does the GPU's ray tracing performance compare to its raster performance?

A: The GPU has 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The OpenCL score of 58239 (88th percentile) suggests solid raster performance, but the modest FP32 throughput means ray-traced workloads will be slower relative to higher-tier GPUs.

Q: Is the CPU's 30 MB L3 cache sufficient for gaming?

A: Yes, 30 MB of shared L3 cache is generous for a mobile CPU and helps reduce memory latency in games. The 5.20 GHz boost clock also ensures high single-thread performance, which is critical for frame pacing.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, matching both the CPU and GPU individual percentiles. This indicates the two components are well-matched for balanced performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost and 24 threads ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles, while the GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score (58239) can push 1080p high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle medium settings at 60+ FPS, but 240 Hz panels will likely be GPU-limited in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 33495, can handle x264 encoding at 1080p60 while gaming simultaneously. The GPU's 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS can offload NVENC-style encoding if software supports Intel Quick Sync, but the 55 W CPU TDP means sustained streaming plus gaming will require robust laptop cooling.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 and Geekbench multi-core of 14249 accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate handle effects and color grading in real-time preview. For 4K timelines, the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for scrubbing, but final exports may be CPU-bound rather than GPU-accelerated.

3D rendering: The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 24 threads excel at CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles), with a PassMark floating-point score of 84999. The GPU's 16 RT cores and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 support hybrid rendering, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 means GPU-only renders will be slow for complex scenes. The 8 GB VRAM limits texture sizes to moderate resolutions.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 398418 and encryption score of 22917 speed up build tools and package management. The 24 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 indicates large codebases will compile quickly. The GPU is less relevant here, but its OpenCL support can assist with compute tasks in scientific computing.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread Geekbench score of 2173 and PassMark single-thread of 3841 ensure snappy response in web browsers, office suites, and coding IDEs. The 55 W TDP means the laptop can run cool and quiet for battery life, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks but useful for occasional photo editing or light CAD.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All game-specific frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores — the CPU's 88th percentile rank and the GPU's 88th percentile rank (OpenCL score 58239) indicate a mid-to-high-tier laptop gaming experience.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated performance for modern AAA titles would be in the 60-80 FPS range, based on the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. Esports titles like CS2 or Valorant would likely exceed 144 FPS given the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core 1969). At 1440p, ultra settings would drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, requiring medium settings to maintain 60 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but 1440p high-texture packs may exceed the 128-bit bus bandwidth, causing stutter.

Ray-traced titles would see significant frame rate drops due to the 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS compute — estimated 30-40 FPS at 1080p with RT enabled on medium settings. The GPU's 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate supports 1440p output, but fill-rate-bound scenes with heavy post-processing will struggle. For competitive gaming at 1080p with low settings, the system could push 200+ FPS in lighter titles, but the lack of measured data means these figures should be treated as directional estimates, not guarantees.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 41576, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 20454 and single-core is 1969; Geekbench multi-core is 14249 and single-core is 2173; PassMark multi-thread is 33495 and single-thread is 3841. The nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at 41621 (delta -0.1%), followed by the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41650 (delta -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41376 (delta 0.5%), and Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 (delta -0.5%). These sub-1% deltas mean the 14650HX is statistically tied with a desktop Ryzen 9 from the previous generation.

The GPU's only benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL at 58239, which places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 (delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (delta 0.3%), NVIDIA P102-100 at 58528 (delta -0.5%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (delta -0.7%). The A570M's OpenCL score is within 0.7% of the RX 6950 XT, a desktop card with significantly higher power draw — this is a remarkable efficiency metric for a 75 W mobile GPU.

The combined picture shows a laptop with both CPU and GPU at the 88th percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 88. This is a rare alignment where both components are equally matched in their respective performance tiers, meaning no single component drags the system down. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample multi-threading, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 2048 shading units deliver competent 1080p gaming. The average benchmark scores (CPU: 41576, GPU: 58239) indicate a system that outperforms roughly 88% of all tested configurations.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i7-14650HX with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-HX Refresh part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 30 MB L3 cache, targeting high-performance mobile workstations and gaming laptops. The GPU is an Arc A570M based on the Xe-HPG architecture, with 8 GB GDDR6, 2048 shading units, and 16 RT cores, designed for mainstream gaming and creative work.

Both components sit at the 88th percentile in their respective categories, and the combined percentile is also 88. This places the build in the upper-mid tier of laptop configurations — not flagship territory (where you'd see 95th+ percentile GPUs like the RTX 4080 mobile or 90th+ percentile CPUs like the i9-14900HX), but well above average. The CPU's nearest rival is the Ryzen 9 5900X, a previous-gen desktop flagship, while the GPU trades blows with the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL — both are impressive for a laptop.

The overall tier is "high-end mainstream" — suitable for 1080p ultra gaming, 1440p medium-to-high gaming, and professional productivity. The 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that requires decent cooling but is not a desktop replacement in size or weight. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for future-proofing at higher resolutions, but for the target user, this build offers a balanced, capable package.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This build is ideal for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p resolution. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost and strong single-core score (Cinebench R23 single-core 1969) ensure esports titles run at 144+ FPS, while the GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score (58239) handles AAA games at ultra settings with 60+ FPS.

Gamers at 1440p (medium settings): Users with 1440p monitors can run medium-to-high settings at playable frame rates, leveraging the 8 GB VRAM for moderate texture loads. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for high-res textures, but the system remains viable for 40-60 FPS in most titles.

Content creators on a budget: Video editors and 3D artists who work in 1080p or light 1440p will benefit from the CPU's 24 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 20454) for fast exports and the GPU's 16 RT cores for real-time previews. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p projects.

Software developers: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 116661 and data compression score of 398418 accelerate compilation and build processes. Developers working on large codebases will see significant time savings in build pipelines.

Students in STEM fields: Engineering and computer science students running simulations, CAD software, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's multi-threading (PassMark multi-thread 33495) and the GPU's OpenCL compute for parallel workloads.

Small business workstations: For tasks like photo editing, accounting software, and office productivity, this build offers snappy performance (single-thread Geekbench 2173) and reliability, with ECC memory support on the CPU for data integrity.

Not for: 4K gamers, heavy ray-tracing enthusiasts, or those needing massive VRAM for AI model training — the 8 GB VRAM and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 are insufficient for those workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14650HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14650HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds