SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13850HX sits at the heart of this mobile platform, built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. This is a 20-core, 28-thread processor that combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports demanding workloads that benefit from large, fast data pools.

The CPU's benchmark results place it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for mobile computing. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 30,695 points, while single-core reaches 4,333 points. The R20 results show 12,891 multi-core and 1,819 single-core, and R15 shows 3,093 multi-core and 436 single-core. These scores reveal a processor that excels in heavily threaded tasks — video rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations — while still delivering competitive single-thread responsiveness for everyday applications.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multi-thread score is 36,870, with integer math at 126,852 and floating-point math at 92,369. Data compression scores 441,525, while encryption hits 26,062 and extended instructions reach 26,586. Random string sorting is strong at 49,198, and the physics score of 2,483 suggests solid performance in simulation-based tasks. Single-thread PassMark is 3,769, which aligns with the Cinebench single-core figures. The average benchmark score across all tests is 50,761.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i7-13850HX is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, which scores 50,718 — a delta of just 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i9-14900T is 0.5 percent ahead at 51,015, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is 0.6 percent behind at 50,448, and the Intel Core i9-13980HX trails by 0.7 percent at 50,398. This clustering shows that the i7-13850HX delivers performance squarely in the range of flagship desktop and mobile chips, despite its mobile-class positioning.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support — a feature typically associated with workstation reliability. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output and basic acceleration. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking on supported platforms. Its TDP is 55 W, which is modest for the core count, underscoring the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture. The launch MSRP is $428.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13850HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in average benchmark score. The Intel chip scores 50,761, while the AMD scores 50,718, a delta of only 0.1 percent. In practical terms, this means performance parity across most workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Core i7-13850HX ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the benchmark database. This places it firmly in the high-end segment.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-13850HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor. This makes it suitable for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has a 192-bit memory bus paired with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750 MHz, which yields an effective data rate of 14 Gbps and a total bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming textures.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: The Intel Arc A730M is listed as end-of-life in production status. This means it may still be available in existing laptop inventory, but Intel is no longer actively manufacturing new units for this model.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, which places this laptop configuration above the vast majority of systems in the database. This reflects the strong CPU performance complemented by a capable discrete GPU.

Q: Does the system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU connection is limited to Gen 4 bandwidth, while storage and other devices can potentially utilize Gen 5 lanes.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. This is a large, complex GPU for a laptop part, reflecting Intel's ambition in the discrete graphics space.

Memory configuration is substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. This yields a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The 12 GB capacity is notably generous for a mobile GPU, allowing for larger texture pools than many competitors in the same class.

Compute resources are robust. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It also includes 24 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed in the data. Pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS for FP16 (with a 2:1 ratio). The base clock is 1100 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. TDP is 80 W, which is moderate for the performance level offered.

API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications, including those that leverage ray tracing and mesh shaders. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's needs.

Benchmark results are strong. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1,732 points. Geekbench OpenCL yields 70,352, and Geekbench Vulkan reaches 64,693. The average benchmark score is 45,592, placing the GPU in the 84th percentile among all GPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating that the Arc A730M outperforms the majority of graphics cards in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384, just 0.5 percent behind. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 0.8 percent ahead at 45,972, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is 1.0 percent behind at 45,152. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 leads by 1.0 percent at 46,043. These small deltas place the Arc A730M in a competitive band with professional and high-end mobile GPUs, though it trails the top performers slightly.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 12.60 TFLOPS provides solid throughput for 3D modeling and animation, while the 24 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The 12 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for rendering large scenes or training machine learning models that fit within memory constraints.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of a 90th-percentile CPU and an 84th-percentile GPU creates a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to the rest of the market. In most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor at high resolutions, as the CPU's 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them in many titles.

The CPU's multi-threaded dominance — 30,695 in Cinebench R23 multi-core — means that CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, AI processing, and background streaming will not starve the GPU of data. However, the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest compared to the CPU's throughput capabilities, so in GPU-bound workloads like ray-traced rendering at high settings, the GPU will be the constraint.

The combined percentile of 87 reflects a balanced system overall, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the CPU has headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future. In gaming, this means that at 1080p, the CPU may be able to push frame rates higher than the GPU can deliver, while at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. Video editing and 3D rendering that use both CPU and GPU will see the CPU handling physics, encoding, and scene setup, while the GPU handles rasterization and effects. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,333 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive UI interaction, while the multi-core score accelerates batch operations.

The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is a notable asset that prevents memory capacity from becoming a bottleneck in modern games at high settings, even if raw compute is not top-tier. This capacity also supports larger deep learning batches or bigger texture atlases than GPUs with 6-8 GB typically handle.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need strong multi-core CPU performance without sacrificing gaming capability. The 90th-percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators who render video, compile code, or run virtual machines, as the 20 cores and 28 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the GPU sufficient for most titles at high settings, though the data indicates it is not a top-tier GPU — it sits at the 84th percentile. The 12 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for texture-heavy games, but users seeking maximum frame rates at 4K should look elsewhere.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's strong PassMark scores, particularly integer math at 126,852 and data compression at 441,525, which accelerate build times and package management. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation jobs.

Students and small business users will appreciate the balance of performance and portability, as the CPU handles spreadsheet, database, and coding tasks with ease, while the GPU accelerates presentations, light video editing, and occasional gaming. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop.

Professional workstation users — architects, engineers, and scientists — will find the CPU's 30,695 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 90th-percentile ranking compelling for simulation and analysis. The GPU's 24 ray tracing cores provide acceleration for visualization tasks, and the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 84th-percentile ranking and 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it should handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings, achieving playable frame rates in the 60-80 range for most games, though this is an estimate rather than a measured result.

At 1440p, the GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM are sufficient for high settings, but frame rates will drop below 1080p levels. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,732 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance, which translates to playable but not exceptional frame rates in demanding titles.

The CPU's strong single-core performance — 4,333 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,769 in PassMark single-thread — ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates will be smooth, as the CPU can quickly process game logic and draw calls. Multi-core workloads like streaming gameplay while gaming will benefit from the 28 threads.

For esports titles that are CPU-bound, the processor's high clock speeds and 20 cores will deliver high frame rates, potentially exceeding the GPU's rendering capability at 1080p. For AAA titles that are GPU-bound, the Arc A730M will be the limiting factor, and users should expect to adjust settings to achieve target frame rates.

Ray tracing performance is supported via 24 dedicated cores, but the modest FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS means ray-traced effects will incur a significant performance penalty. Users seeking high ray-traced frame rates should consider lower resolutions or reduced ray tracing quality.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is viable with this configuration. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to drive high frame rates, while the GPU's 84th-percentile ranking supports 100+ FPS in less demanding titles, though AAA games may require medium settings to hit such targets.

Streaming gameplay is a strong use case. The CPU's 28 threads handle encoding and streaming overhead without stealing significant resources from the game, and the 30,695 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures smooth stream output even during CPU-intensive scenes.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be responsive. The CPU accelerates timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU handles effects and color grading. The 12 GB VRAM is ample for 4K timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya benefits from the CPU's multi-core throughput. The 20 cores, 28 threads, and 30 MB L3 cache reduce render times compared to lower-core-count processors, while the GPU's FP32 performance accelerates viewport interaction and final renders in GPU-accelerated engines.

Software development is a natural fit. The PassMark integer math score of 126,852 and data compression score of 441,525 speed up compilation and build processes. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites and virtualized environments.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and document processing, while the GPU accelerates presentation graphics and light photo editing. The combined 87th-percentile ranking means this system outperforms the vast majority of laptops in the database.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13850HX with the Intel Arc A730M in a laptop form factor, classified as a mobile workstation or high-performance gaming laptop. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 90th-percentile ranking, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 Mobile chip with an 84th-percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 80 W TDP indicate a balanced power envelope for a laptop, allowing for sustained performance without excessive thermal demands. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 for CPU-attached devices, and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the GPU.

This is not a budget configuration. The CPU's launch MSRP of $428, combined with the discrete GPU and laptop chassis, places it in the premium segment. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect availability, but the CPU remains active in production.

The system is well-suited for users who need desktop-class CPU performance in a portable form factor, with enough GPU power for gaming and content creation. It represents a high-tier pairing that outperforms the majority of laptops in the benchmark database.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 50,761, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, scores 50,718 (0.1 percent behind), while the Intel Core i9-14900T leads by 0.5 percent at 51,015. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 trails by 0.6 percent, and the Intel Core i9-13980HX trails by 0.7 percent.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 45,592, placing it in the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, scores 45,384 (0.5 percent behind), while the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation leads by 0.8 percent at 45,972. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile trails by 1.0 percent, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 leads by 1.0 percent at 46,043.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the standout performer, ranking higher relative to its peers than the GPU does. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,695 and single-core score of 4,333 are strong indicators of balanced performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,732 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 70,352 confirm its mid-to-high tier standing.

The 87th combined percentile reflects a system that outperforms the vast majority of laptops in the database, with the CPU providing a stronger contribution to this ranking than the GPU. Users should expect excellent CPU-bound performance and good, but not class-leading, GPU-bound performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the processor is not upgradable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, so users can choose either memory type depending on the laptop's motherboard implementation.

Memory capacity is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel bus supports standard SODIMM modules. The CPU's ECC memory support is a differentiator, though ECC memory may not be available in all laptop configurations.

PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which can be used for high-speed NVMe storage. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU connection is limited to Gen 4 bandwidth, but this is sufficient for the Arc A730M's performance level.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and is listed as end-of-life, so future upgrades would require replacing the entire laptop or using an external GPU enclosure, which is not supported by the data. The CPU's TDP of 55 W suggests that the laptop's cooling solution is designed for moderate power draw.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU's memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also be beneficial, given the CPU's 20 Gen 5 lanes. However, the CPU and GPU are both soldered components in a laptop form factor, limiting upgrade options to memory and storage.

The system is well-balanced for its class, and users should consider that the GPU's end-of-life status may mean no driver updates in the future, which could affect compatibility with upcoming games. The CPU's active production status ensures continued support, but the platform is ultimately constrained by the laptop form factor's limited upgradability.