SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13850HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13850HX

50,761 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13850HX + Intel Arc A350M: A Desktop-Class CPU Paired with a Modest Mobile GPU

This build pairs a high-core-count mobile processor with an entry-level discrete graphics solution, creating a system that excels at CPU-intensive productivity tasks while offering only modest gaming capability. The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350M is a 4 GB GDDR6 mobile GPU in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, reflecting a system that is far stronger in compute workloads than in graphics-bound scenarios. The data shows a clear split: this is a workstation-oriented laptop that can handle light gaming, not a gaming machine that happens to be productive.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13850HX is built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that mixes performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power draw. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, allowing single-threaded workloads to scale dramatically when thermal headroom permits. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool, which is substantial for a mobile part and supports large working sets in database, compilation, and rendering tasks.

The benchmark results confirm the CPU's positioning. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 30695 places it among the top mobile processors, while the single-core score of 4333 indicates strong per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 scores follow suit: 12891 multicore and 1819 single-core. Cinebench R15 results are 3093 multicore and 436 single-core. These numbers suggest that the CPU can sustain heavy all-core loads for extended periods, a critical factor for video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulation. PassMark results reinforce this: the multithread score of 36870 and the single-thread score of 3769 show balanced capability across both parallel and sequential tasks. The integer math score of 126852 and floating-point math score of 92369 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 441525 highlights efficiency in archiving and file management workloads. The extended instructions score of 26586 suggests good SIMD performance, useful for AVX-heavy applications like physics simulations and some machine learning inference tasks.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-13850HX sits in a tight performance band. Its average benchmark score of 50761 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (score 50718), 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (score 50448), and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13980HX (score 50398). It trails the Intel Core i9-14900T by 0.5% (score 51015). These near-parity results mean the i7-13850HX is effectively interchangeable with those parts for most workloads, though its 90th percentile rank among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The 20-core design with 30 MB of L3 cache is particularly well-suited to multi-threaded productivity, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that legacy single-threaded applications still run responsively.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13850HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable; the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving OEMs flexibility in balancing cost and performance. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling fast connectivity for NVMe storage and discrete GPUs, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is available as a fallback display output.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A350M, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a 25 W TDP. The suggested PSU field is null for this GPU, indicating that the power supply is integrated into the laptop design and not user-serviceable. The CPU's 55 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, which suggests the laptop's cooling solution must handle sustained loads efficiently, but the combined thermal envelope of CPU and GPU is manageable within a larger chassis. A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would be a higher-tier Arc GPU, such as the A500M or A700M series, if the laptop design supports it, though the BGA socket and soldered components mean the CPU itself is the permanent anchor of the system. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user could theoretically upgrade RAM if the laptop has SODIMM slots, but the 4 GB GPU memory is fixed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU benchmark scores tell a story of divergent strengths. The CPU's average benchmark score is 50761, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, as noted, are all within 0.7% of its score, meaning the i7-13850HX is competitively positioned against both AMD and Intel parts from the same era. The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (score 24744, 0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (score 24763, 0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (score 24442, 0.8% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (score 24277, 1.5% behind). These deltas are small, indicating the A350M performs at a level comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, which are nearly identical, suggesting consistent compute performance across APIs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 80, which reflects the CPU's high rank dragging up the overall position despite the GPU's more modest standing. The data shows a system that is in the top 20% of all laptop builds for overall performance, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU. The GPU's 70th percentile is respectable but not exceptional, and the practical impact is that gaming and graphics workloads will be limited by the GPU long before the CPU becomes a constraint.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i7-13850HX will deliver near-top-tier performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30695 and PassMark multithread score of 36870. The GPU, however, with only 768 shading units and 4 GB of VRAM, will cap frame rates in gaming and slow down GPU-accelerated rendering tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the GPU's benchmark scores. The A350M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 places it just above the GTX 1630, which is a 1080p entry-level card. In practice, this means the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in modern titles, and even at 1080p, settings will need to be reduced to medium or low for demanding games. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming; rather, the GPU will be the ceiling, and the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames. For productivity, the opposite is true: the GPU's compute capabilities (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) are sufficient for light acceleration, but the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting, and the GPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck in CPU-bound tasks like spreadsheet analysis or code compilation.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a die size of 157 mm² and 7,200 million transistors. It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a narrow memory bus, which limits performance in bandwidth-hungry scenarios like high-resolution textures and compute workloads that stream large datasets.

The GPU's pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that place it in the entry-level segment. FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1), the latter being useful for AI inference tasks that leverage half-precision arithmetic. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is feature-complete for modern games and applications, including hardware ray tracing via its 6 RT cores. However, the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor; at 1080p with high textures, some games will exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or texture pop-in.

The benchmark data shows the A350M's compute performance is competitive with older desktop GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 indicate that it can handle general-purpose compute tasks, but its 70th percentile rank among all GPUs places it below the median of discrete desktop parts. The nearest rival data shows it trades blows with the RX 590 and GTX 1630, both of which are several years old. In rendering workloads, the GPU will accelerate basic effects and compositing, but for professional 3D rendering, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause significant slowdowns compared to higher-tier parts.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU performance, making it suitable for professionals in fields like software development, data analysis, and content creation. The 20-core CPU with a 90th percentile rank is a strong fit for developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or perform continuous integration builds. The ECC memory support is a draw for researchers and engineers who need data integrity in long-running computations. Students in computer science or engineering programs will benefit from the CPU's multithreaded performance in simulations and mathematical modeling, while the GPU is sufficient for light CAD work or basic image editing.

Small business workstations that handle accounting, database management, or office productivity will find the CPU's high single-thread score of 4333 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy response in spreadsheet and word processing applications. Content creators who edit video will see strong performance in encoding and export tasks, thanks to the CPU's multicore scores, but will be limited by the GPU in effects-heavy timelines. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the system playable, but it is not a gaming-first build. The combined percentile of 80 means this system outperforms most laptops on the market, but the specific mix of CPU and GPU makes it a niche product for compute-focused users.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 70th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will struggle to drive high-refresh displays at 1440p or above. At 1080p, competitive titles like esports games may reach 60-100 FPS on low settings, but demanding AAA titles will likely fall below 60 FPS, making this a poor choice for high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores can handle encoding via x264 at high quality while maintaining gameplay, but the GPU's modest performance limits the game's own frame rate. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause issues in streaming + gaming scenarios where the GPU must also render the game.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30695 accelerates timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 helps with effects, but 4 GB VRAM limits the use of high-resolution textures and complex color grading.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles will leverage the 20 cores effectively, with the PassMark multithread score of 36870 indicating strong performance. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is far below dedicated workstation GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread and multithread scores make compilation fast, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for iterative builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, except for machine learning training, where 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for all but the smallest models.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 4333 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth operation in web browsing, document editing, and presentation software. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the 55 W TDP means the laptop will run cool and quiet under light loads.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful in this build?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 50761, while the GPU ranks in the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K gaming, as the A350M's performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which are entry-level 1080p cards.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The Core i7-13850HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be replaced by the user.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13980HX?

A: The i7-13850HX has an average benchmark score of 50761, which is 0.7% ahead of the i9-13980HX's score of 50398, making them effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is derived from 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus at 14 Gbps effective speed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-13850HX and Intel Arc A350M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and its position relative to known rivals. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 places it just above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (score 24277, 1.5% behind) and slightly below the AMD Radeon RX 590 (score 24744, 0.4% ahead). These rivals are both entry-level desktop cards from previous generations, which suggests the A350M will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to low settings in most games.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4333) will help maintain high frame rates, and the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance should be sufficient for 100+ FPS at 1080p on low settings. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Elden Ring, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors, with frame rates likely falling to 30-50 FPS at 1080p on medium settings. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern titles, and ray tracing, while supported, will have a severe performance impact due to the low RT core count and limited bandwidth. The CPU will not be a bottleneck in any gaming scenario; the GPU is the clear constraint.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs the Intel Core i7-13850HX, a 20-core mobile processor with a 90th percentile rank, with the Intel Arc A350M, a 4 GB mobile GPU with a 70th percentile rank. The combined percentile of 80 indicates that this system outperforms 80% of all builds in the database, but the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 50761 is competitive with top-tier desktop parts, while the GPU's average score of 24647 is entry-level. This is a workstation-oriented laptop for users who need serious compute power for coding, rendering, or analysis, but who only need light graphics capability for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The system's tier is upper-midrange overall, but its CPU tier is near-flagship, and its GPU tier is budget. The build class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor with integrated components and no user-upgradeable CPU or GPU.