SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13800H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13800H

34,988 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Arc A550M represent a mobile pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of laptop performance. The combination of a 14-core hybrid processor with a discrete Alchemist-series GPU places this build in the 85th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average for a laptop. Benchmark results suggest a capable platform, though the data provided contains no measured frame rates for this specific configuration. All performance discussions regarding gaming must therefore be considered estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13800H is a Raptor Lake-H architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring a 14-core, 20-thread configuration. The core layout combines performance and efficiency cores to balance high-load throughput with power consumption, a design choice that directly impacts the benchmark scores. The processor's base clock is 2.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread performance when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which aids in reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded environments. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18358 is a strong indicator of sustained performance under heavy parallel workloads. This is supported by a Passmark multithread score of 26545 and a floating-point math score of 66579, both of which suggest the CPU can handle complex calculations efficiently. The data compression score of 299179 is particularly high, indicating that the i7-13800H is well-suited for archiving, file management, and other data-intensive tasks. In single-thread performance, the Cinebench R23 score of 2591 and Passmark single-thread score of 3543 are respectable, though not class-leading, indicating strong responsiveness in everyday applications.

The processor's 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster of competition: the Intel Core i9-12900HX scores nearly identically with a deltaPct of 0, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE is 0.1% ahead, and the Intel Xeon 6349P is 0.3% ahead. The Intel Core i5-14500HX trails by 0.3%. This indicates the i7-13800H is positioned as a high-end mobile chip that trades blows with the previous generation's top-tier HX parts.

For real-world workloads, these numbers translate to a processor that can edit 4K video timelines, compile large codebases, and handle complex 3D modeling without bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The 45 W TDP is relatively high for a laptop, suggesting the system will require adequate cooling to maintain sustained boost clocks. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 allows system integrators flexibility in balancing cost and performance, while the dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class of processor. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units provides a fallback for basic display output and light tasks, though the discrete GPU handles the heavy lifting.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 34988, which places it in the 84th percentile. The GPU, an Intel Arc A550M, achieves an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 85, reinforcing that this pair is balanced at a high level. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 show consistent performance across different compute APIs, which is a good sign for cross-platform compatibility.

The GPU's nearest rivals are a mixed bag of high-end desktop and mobile parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 0.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 2.4% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 2.6%. This places the Arc A550M in the same performance tier as last-generation high-end desktop GPUs, which is remarkable for a mobile part with a 60 W TDP. The data suggests the Arc A550M is capable of driving high refresh rate displays at 1080p and likely 1440p in many titles, though the lack of measured FPS means these are estimates.

The CPU's Cinebench R20 scores of 7710 multicore and 1088 single-core align with its position in the 84th percentile. The Passmark integer math score of 92589 and extended instructions score of 18011 indicate strong general-purpose compute capabilities. The encryption score of 17726 is solid for tasks like VPN throughput or encrypted storage access. The physics score of 1924 is moderate, which may impact very CPU-intensive simulations in games, but is unlikely to be a primary bottleneck.

The combined picture is a system that is well-suited for high-end gaming and content creation. The CPU provides ample multi-threaded headroom for background tasks while gaming, and the GPU offers compute performance that rivals desktop parts from a few years ago. The absence of measured frame rates means that specific FPS comparisons cannot be made, but the benchmark scores suggest a system that will handle modern titles at high settings without issue.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking and performance parity with the RX 6900 XT in synthetic benchmarks suggests it can push high frame rates in esports titles and maintain playable framerates in AAA games. The CPU's single-thread score of 3543 in Passmark ensures that the processor will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, making this a viable platform for 1080p high-refresh displays.

Streaming: The i7-13800H's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample capacity for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 26545 indicates significant headroom for x264 encoding at reasonable quality settings, while the GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units can handle the rendering load. The system should handle a single-PC streaming setup for most titles without major frame drops.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18358 and the floating-point math score of 66579 are strong indicators of performance in rendering and effects-heavy workloads. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines with multiple layers and effects. The high data compression score of 299179 will accelerate export and preview processes.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 20 threads will accelerate CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles, while the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides a solid foundation for GPU-accelerated renderers. The Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking suggests it can handle moderate complexity scenes, though long renders may be slower than high-end desktop GPUs.

Software Development: The high integer math score of 92589 and the multithread score of 26545 make this build suitable for compiling large projects and running multiple virtual machines. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows for flexible configuration, and the processor's 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs and terminal operations.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread score of 3543 ensures that everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheet software run smoothly. The low power draw of the GPU at 60 W, combined with the CPU's ability to scale down to lower power states, suggests reasonable battery life for a performance laptop, though the discrete GPU will draw power when active.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing for most workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 34988 places it in the 84th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile. The 2-percentage-point difference is minor, suggesting that neither component will consistently dominate the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck.

However, specific workloads will stress one component more than the other. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor, and the Arc A550M's performance parity with the RX 6900 XT (2.4% delta) suggests it can handle most titles at high settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3543 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the moderate physics score of 1924 could become a limiting factor in games with heavy physics simulation.

In contrast, CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or data compression will be limited by the processor. The data compression score of 299179 is high, but the CPU's 84th percentile ranking means there are many faster processors available. The GPU's compute performance, as measured by Geekbench OpenCL at 49894, is respectable but will not accelerate these tasks significantly.

The lack of measured FPS data is a notable gap. Without frame rates, it is impossible to determine the precise balance point in gaming. The synthetic scores suggest a system that is balanced for 1080p gaming, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation at 1440p in future titles that require more memory. The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 60 W TDP combine for a 105 W total power draw for the core components, which is manageable for a laptop cooling solution.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13800H compare to the Intel Core i9-12900HX?

A: The two processors are statistically tied in average benchmark score. The i9-12900HX scores 35003, while the i7-13800H scores 34988, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. Performance is effectively identical in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M a good GPU for 1080p gaming?

A: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and performance parity with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% delta) indicate strong 1080p performance. However, no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination, so these are estimates based on synthetic scores.

Q: What is the total power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W. The combined TDP for the core components is 105 W, though actual power draw may vary based on workload and cooling.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13800H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The choice of memory type will affect system performance and cost.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18358 and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute make it suitable for moderate 3D rendering tasks, both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated.

Q: Is the GPU's production status a concern?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is marked as End-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production. However, it remains a capable part that performs in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who need a high-performance laptop for both gaming and content creation. The 84th percentile CPU and 86th percentile GPU make it suitable for gamers who want to play at 1080p with high refresh rates, as the synthetic scores suggest the GPU can handle the load without the CPU becoming a bottleneck. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities, making this a versatile workstation.

Software developers will find the high integer math score of 92589 and the multithread score of 26545 useful for compiling code and running tests. The processor's 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tools remain responsive. Students and office workers will find the single-thread performance of 3543 more than sufficient for everyday tasks, and the system's overall 85th percentile ranking ensures it will remain relevant for several years.

Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like video conferencing, photo editing, or light CAD work will also benefit. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for these workloads, and the CPU's high data compression score of 299179 will accelerate file transfers and backups. However, the End-of-life status of the GPU may be a concern for businesses that require long-term supply chain stability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using a 6 nm process from TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, which is a substantial boost ratio that indicates good power scaling. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

The GPU is equipped with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, which are the core building blocks for rasterization performance. The pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s are strong figures for a mobile part. The ray tracing hardware includes 16 dedicated RT cores, which is important for modern games that feature ray-traced effects. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 16.79 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580. These results place the GPU in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, which is a high ranking. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% ahead). The performance delta to the RX 6800 XT is 2.6%, meaning the Arc A550M is actually faster than that desktop card. This positions the GPU as a high-end mobile part that can compete with desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

For rendering, the GPU's compute performance and 8 GB of VRAM make it suitable for 1080p and 1440p rendering workloads. The 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most texture-heavy scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13800H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard, and any future upgrade would require a new laptop. The system supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for a memory upgrade but not a CPU upgrade. The PCIe interface for the CPU is Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is sufficient for the Arc A550M's bandwidth needs.

The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, totaling 105 W for the core components. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data, but the system is a laptop, so power delivery is handled by the motherboard and battery. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, which means it is no longer being manufactured, but this does not affect the current build's functionality. The GPU is marked as an IGP slot width, which is unusual for a discrete GPU, but the data indicates it is integrated into the laptop's design.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel memory bus will benefit from higher capacity and speed. Storage upgrades are also possible, as the platform likely supports NVMe SSDs. However, the CPU and GPU are both non-upgradeable, so the user should plan to use this system as-is for its intended lifespan. The 10 nm process node for the CPU and 6 nm for the GPU indicate that this is a mature platform, and the 85th combined percentile suggests it will remain competitive for a few years.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13800H, a 14-core mobile processor from the Raptor Lake generation, with the Intel Arc A550M, a discrete mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is a laptop, and the combined percentile is 85, indicating a high-performance mobile system. The CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced platform that avoids severe bottlenecks in most workloads.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18358 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 are the standout figures, indicating strong multi-threaded compute and graphics performance respectively. The system is positioned as a high-end laptop that can handle gaming, content creation, and software development with aplomb. The lack of measured FPS data is a limitation, but the synthetic scores point to a capable platform. Overall, this is a solid pairing for users who need a portable system that does not compromise on performance.