SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of the Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Arc A750, not from direct gameplay capture.

The GPU’s raw compute and memory metrics form the basis for these estimates. The Arc A750 produces an FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s, with a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 1080p ultra settings in most titles and sufficient for many 1440p scenarios, though 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in the most VRAM-hungry releases at higher resolutions.

At 1080p ultra, the pairing should achieve high frame rates in esports and lighter titles, given the CPU’s single-thread performance. The Core i7-13790F scores 4212 in Passmark single-thread and 4998 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating strong per-core capability that avoids bottlenecking the GPU in draw-call-heavy scenes. Estimated 1080p ultra performance would likely land in the 100–144 FPS range for competitive shooters and in the 60–90 FPS range for demanding AAA games, based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 and the CPU’s high percentile ranking.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest playable frame rates (typically 50–75 FPS) in optimized titles, but the 8 GB VRAM may force texture quality reductions in games exceeding that capacity. The RTX 3070 Mobile rival, with an average score of 20534 versus the A750’s 20582 (a 0.2% delta), provides a reference point: the A750 is essentially on par with that mobile GPU in synthetic benchmarks, so 1440p expectations should be moderate.

For 4K ultra, the data suggests this combo is not suited. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its 8 GB VRAM, combined with the bandwidth ceiling, would likely produce sub-30 FPS in most AAA titles. The CPU, however, would not be the bottleneck at this resolution; the GPU’s pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s is the limiting factor.

Ray tracing workloads would further reduce estimated frame rates. The A750 includes 28 RT cores, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support does not guarantee competitive RT performance. Given the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 (relative to DirectX 9’s 181), the architecture shows a regression in newer API paths, suggesting RT performance would be a significant compromise.

In summary, the estimated gaming profile is: strong 1080p performance, acceptable 1440p with settings adjustments, and 4K effectively out of reach. These figures are estimates derived from synthetic benchmarks, not measured gameplay data.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 80th percentile among all desktop configurations, per the `combinedPercentile` field.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F has an average benchmark score of 63080, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173) and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13790F does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status and socket type for the CPU?

A: The Arc A750 is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and is currently in active production.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The Core i7-13790F has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the GPU’s average benchmark score compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750’s average score is 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570’s 20556.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4212 and the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS should sustain frame rates above 144 FPS in competitive titles, though the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking suggests esports titles are the sweet spot rather than AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 31703 indicates strong throughput for stream encryption overhead, though the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores for AI-based encoding acceleration.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (Passmark multithread score of 44737) and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 98554 suggest a capable editing rig. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth aids in scrubbing timelines and applying effects, while the CPU handles export rendering efficiently.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14869 and R15 multi-core of 3568 show the CPU excels in CPU-based rendering workloads. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the A750’s FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS and 28 RT cores provide a baseline, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 151416 and data compression score of 567473 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and code indexing. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 85631 supports graphics programming and testing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4212 handles everyday productivity with ease, while the GPU’s 2D score of 732 is more than adequate for spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP suggests efficient operation for prolonged academic use.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a 1080p gamer seeking high refresh rates without sacrificing CPU headroom for multitasking. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures no bottleneck in gaming, while the GPU’s 66th percentile is sufficient for 1080p ultra in most titles. Users at 1440p should consider this build only if they are willing to adjust settings, given the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute.

Content creators working in 1080p or light 1440p video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 places this CPU in a professional tier, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 98554 accelerates effects rendering. However, 3D artists requiring large textures should look elsewhere due to the 8 GB VRAM ceiling.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 151416 and data compression score of 567473. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache reduces memory stalls in multi-project builds.

Students and small business workstations will find the build overkill for office tasks but future-proof for occasional content creation. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP require a 550 W PSU, which is a modest requirement for the performance class. The absence of ECC memory and unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) indicates this is not a workstation for mission-critical servers.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, with the CPU and GPU percentiles (93rd and 66th, respectively) indicating the GPU is the primary performance limiter in graphics-bound workloads. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4212 prevents frame drops in CPU-heavy scenes, while the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS handles the pixel workload. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at higher resolutions, where its 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become constraining.

In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the GPU contributes little. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 is 7.1x higher than its single-core score of 4998, showing excellent scaling. The GPU’s compute score (Passmark GPU compute of 5368) is not a substitute for CPU cores in compilation or rendering.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent (no measured FPS), but the benchmark scores imply that overclocking the CPU (if unlocked) would yield diminishing returns in gaming since the GPU is the weaker link. Conversely, upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant FPS improvement at 1440p, while the CPU would remain capable.

The memory subsystem shows balance: the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4/DDR5, and the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth aligns with the CPU’s L3 cache of 33 MB to minimize data transfer bottlenecks in mixed workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, providing 8 GB of GDDR6 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The 28 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support enable hardware ray tracing, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 (versus 181 for DirectX 9) suggests the API path is not fully optimized. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate strong compute for AI inference, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means this relies on shader-based execution.

The benchmark scores show a mixed profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is modest, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 is strong. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 places the GPU in the 66th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 20582. The nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, has an average score of 20556 (0.1% lower), indicating the A750 holds its own against newer Intel parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% lower at 20534, showing parity with a mobile high-end GPU.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS and 537.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide solid rasterization performance, but the 8 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy scenes. The pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s supports up to 1440p at high refresh, but 4K would exceed the memory bandwidth and capacity.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, supported by a 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark scores reveal a strong multi-threaded performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 is exceptional, while single-core of 4998 is competitive. Passmark multithread score of 44737 and single-thread of 4212 confirm this dual strength. The data compression score of 567473 and integer math of 151416 indicate excellent throughput for database and compilation workloads.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 63080 places it in the 93rd percentile, with nearest rivals being the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173, 0.1% higher), AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839, 0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (63331, 0.4% higher), and Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62738, 0.5% lower). This shows the 13790F is statistically tied with modern competitors, despite being from the 13th generation.

The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for a 16-core processor, with the die size of 257 mm² and 2.10 GHz base clock contributing to this. The lack of integrated graphics (iGPU: null) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which the Arc A750 fulfills. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i7-13790F with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 225 W, 8 GB GDDR6 card with 17.20 TFLOPS. The combined performance percentile is 80th, indicating a solid mid-high tier configuration.

The CPU is in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, making it a top-tier processor for its generation. The GPU is in the 66th percentile, which is mid-range. This asymmetry means the build excels in CPU-bound tasks (compilation, rendering, multitasking) but is average in GPU-bound gaming at high resolutions.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $441, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 289 USD. The pairing is best described as a “productivity-first gaming build” — the CPU offers workstation-class multi-threading, while the GPU provides adequate 1080p gaming and compute acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s key benchmark scores are: Cinebench R23 multi-core 35404, single-core 4998; Cinebench R20 multi-core 14869, single-core 2099; Passmark multithread 44737, single-thread 4212; Passmark integer math 151416; floating point math 110512; data compression 567473; data encryption 31703. The average benchmark score is 63080, with a 93rd percentile ranking.

The GPU’s key scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2612; Geekbench OpenCL 98554; Geekbench Vulkan 85631; Passmark G3D 12534; Passmark GPU compute 5368. The average benchmark score is 20582, with a 66th percentile ranking.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart significantly. The CPU’s 93rd percentile means it outperforms 93% of all CPUs, while the GPU’s 66th percentile means it outperforms 66% of all GPUs. The combined 80th percentile reflects the GPU dragging the overall score down.

In relative terms, the CPU is 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The GPU is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Arc B570 and 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. These deltas are within statistical noise, indicating the components are well-matched to their immediate competitors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible. The platform supports memory expansion, but the CPU’s memory bandwidth is not specified in the FACT PACK, so the dual-channel capability is the only known constraint.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, while the CPU TDP is 65 W and the GPU TDP is 225 W, totaling 290 W of component draw, leaving ample headroom in the 550 W PSU for drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which the PSU must provide.

A sensible next upgrade is the GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking leaves little room for improvement in CPU-bound tasks. The GPU’s 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM are the primary bottlenecks. Upgrading to a GPU with higher VRAM and compute would shift the combined percentile upward, though the CPU would remain the stable anchor.

The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the motherboard choice determines which memory type is used. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces the need for high-frequency memory, but dual-channel is required for optimal performance. The lack of ECC memory support rules out certain workstation use cases.

The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, meaning driver updates may diminish over time. The CPU remains in active production, so replacement parts are available. The platform does not support CPU overclocking (multiplierUnlocked: false), but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high, so this is not a significant loss.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds