SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13790F paired with the Intel Arc A310E is an unusual desktop combination that pits a high-end 16-core Raptor Lake processor against a low-profile, entry-level graphics card. The benchmark data shows a stark imbalance in raw capability between the two components, with the CPU operating in the 93rd percentile of all processors while the GPU sits exactly at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing is defined by that contrast, and the analysis below quantifies what it means for real workloads, from high-refresh gaming to professional rendering tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen desktop series and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts. Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for a desktop part in this segment. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 13790F demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404 and single-core score of 4,998 indicate a processor that is equally adept at parallel workloads and lightly-threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 44,737 reinforces this, while the single-thread score of 4,212 confirms strong per-core efficiency. Real-world data processing tasks show similarly strong results: Passmark data compression scores 567,473, integer math scores 151,416, and floating-point math scores 110,512. The processor sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors currently benchmarked. Its average benchmark score of 63,080 places it within a narrow competitive band; the nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63,173, a delta of only -0.1%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is 0.4% slower and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is 0.5% slower. The 13790F effectively trades blows with these newer parts, showing that its Raptor Lake architecture remains highly competitive despite being a prior generation.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 24 threads make the 13790F a capable choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation where thread scaling is well understood. The high single-core boost of 5.20 GHz ensures that legacy applications and games that rely on one or two threads still perform admirably. The 65-watt TDP is modest for the core count, suggesting efficient power delivery for sustained all-core loads. This is a desktop CPU that can handle heavy productivity tasks without the thermal overhead typically associated with high-core-count parts.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that is positioned firmly in the high-end desktop segment. In Cinebench R15, the 13790F achieves 3,568 multi-core and 503 single-core points. In the newer Cinebench R20, it scores 14,869 multi-core and 2,099 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results of 35,404 multi-core and 4,998 single-core confirm a strong balance between parallel throughput and single-thread responsiveness. Passmark results further detail the chip's strengths: encryption scores 31,703, extended instructions score 34,828, and random string sorting scores 58,607. The find prime numbers test yields 207, and physics simulation scores 3,017.

The Intel Arc A310E, by contrast, presents a very different picture. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, using the DG2-128 chip comprised of 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster output units, and 6 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 compute is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS. The card has no benchmark scores listed in the data set, but its percentile ranking of 50th among all GPUs places it exactly at the median of all tested graphics cards. The average benchmark score is listed as zero, meaning no direct performance data was captured for this GPU in the database.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 72, which is dragged down significantly by the GPU's mid-pack positioning. While the CPU is elite at the 93rd percentile, the GPU at the 50th percentile means the overall system performance is limited by graphics throughput in any GPU-bound scenario. For CPU-heavy tasks like compression or math workloads, the system will perform near the CPU's potential, but for graphics-intensive applications, the A310E becomes the defining constraint.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates an unbalanced pairing where the CPU vastly outclasses the GPU. The 13790F's 93rd percentile ranking against the A310E's 50th percentile means the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in almost any workload that requires graphics processing, including gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated video encoding. The CPU has far more compute headroom than the GPU can utilize, so in games or applications that are not heavily multi-threaded, the A310E will limit frame rates well below what the 13790F could otherwise support.

Conversely, in purely CPU-bound tasks—such as data compression, encryption, spreadsheet calculations, or software compilation—the system will perform at a level consistent with the high-end processor, because the GPU is not involved. The Passmark data compression score of 567,473 and integer math score of 151,416 are purely CPU results and will be fully realized in this system. This creates a dual-personality machine: exceptional in productivity, but distinctly modest in graphics-heavy applications. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further constrains its ability to feed data to the processor, especially at higher resolutions where memory capacity and bandwidth become critical.

For users who intend to use this system for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the bottleneck is severe and unavoidable without swapping the graphics card. For users whose primary workloads are CPU-centric, the pairing is less problematic, though it means the GPU is largely underutilized in those tasks. The FPS scaling evidence, if available, would likely show that frame rates are dictated by the A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS compute and 32 GPixel/s pixel rate, not by the CPU's capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or above. The Arc A310E's mid-pack GPU performance and 4 GB VRAM will bottleneck the 13790F, and frame rates will be limited to entry-level levels, likely well below the refresh rates of most high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The 13790F's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the Passmark multithread score of 44,737 suggests. However, the A310E's lack of benchmark data means its encoding capabilities are unproven. A software x264 or x265 encode on the CPU is feasible, but the GPU's low compute will limit game performance simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404 suggests strong performance for timeline rendering and export tasks in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, especially when using CPU-based effects. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 will accelerate some GPU-optimized effects, but the 4 GB VRAM will cap the complexity of effects and the resolution of previews.

3D rendering: For CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray, the 13790F's 24 threads will deliver strong performance, as indicated by its high multi-core scores. For GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift, the A310E's limited compute and VRAM will be a severe bottleneck, making it impractical for serious production work.

Software development: The 13790F excels here. The Passmark integer math score of 151,416 and data compression score of 567,473 indicate fast compilation times and efficient code execution. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid pairing for coders.

Student and office work: The 13790F is massively overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but it will handle any such task with ease. The A310E is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration and basic video playback. For this use case, the system is powerful but inefficient, as the CPU's capabilities are largely wasted on light workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The Arc A310E's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it delivers performance typical of a mid-pack or entry-level graphics card. Its 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute are modest figures, and the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for modern game textures.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the A310E will likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the low compute means ray tracing effects will be very costly. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU may deliver playable frame rates, but the CPU's high single-core boost of 5.20 GHz will not be the limiting factor. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause severe performance degradation and potential texture thrashing. The 32 GPixel/s pixel rate and 64 GTexel/s texture rate indicate that the GPU can handle basic rasterization but will fall behind in resolution scaling. All gaming performance figures should be treated as estimates, not measured results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a low-profile, single-slot graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU clock is fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The card includes 6 ray tracing cores, indicating support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its compute of 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 will limit the practical use of such features.

The A310E is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs. Display output is provided via 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections. The card's TDP is 75 watts, with no power connectors required, and the suggested PSU is 250 watts. It is listed as end-of-life production status, having been released on 2024-03-31. The card's predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage.

For rendering tasks, the A310E's FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS is roughly half of what one might expect from a mid-range desktop GPU, and its 64-bit memory bus severely limits bandwidth for large textures or complex scenes. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low shading unit count will bottleneck any heavy RT workload. The 50th percentile ranking means it performs at the median of all GPUs, but that median is skewed by the inclusion of integrated and low-end parts. In practice, this GPU is suitable for entry-level 1080p gaming, basic video playback, and desktop use, but it is not a high-performance rendering solution.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over graphics performance. The 13790F's 93rd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running analysis scripts, or office workers running complex spreadsheets and databases. The Passmark data encryption score of 31,703 also suggests capability for security-related tasks. Content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering in applications that do not heavily leverage the GPU will find the 13790F's multi-threaded scores compelling.

Gamers at 1080p who play undemanding titles may find the A310E sufficient, but for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming, this system will disappoint. The A310E is better suited for a small form factor office workstation or a basic media center PC, where its low profile and 75-watt TDP are advantages. For users with a strict need for both strong CPU and GPU performance, this pairing is mismatched. The system is most sensible for a developer or power user who occasionally plays light games and does not require high-end graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13790F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, ensuring that a future graphics card upgrade will have ample bandwidth. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU means that most power supplies will have headroom; the suggested PSU for the A310E is 250 watts, which is low, but a future GPU upgrade will likely require a more robust unit.

The most sensible next upgrade is the graphics card. The 13790F has significant headroom to support a much faster GPU, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes will not bottleneck any current or near-future graphics card. Replacing the A310E with a more powerful GPU would transform this system from a CPU-focused workstation into a balanced high-performance gaming and rendering machine. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will remain relevant for years, so no immediate CPU upgrade is warranted. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules if the board supports it, though the exact capacity and speed depend on the motherboard. The 13790F's cache configuration and 5.20 GHz boost clock mean that it will not be a limiting factor in any gaming or productivity scenario for the foreseeable future.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13790F a good processor for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU is excellent for gaming, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a single-thread Passmark score of 4,212. However, in this specific system, the Arc A310E GPU will limit frame rates, so the CPU's gaming potential is not fully realized.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A310E have, and is it enough?

A: The A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for entry-level 1080p gaming with modest textures, but it will be insufficient for high-resolution or high-detail modern games.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 watts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 watts, leaving substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13790F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the CPU cannot be overclocked. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum it will achieve automatically.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A310E handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS means ray tracing performance will be very limited compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The 13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The exact speed and capacity depend on the motherboard used.

Q: Is this system good for video editing?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404 makes it strong for CPU-based video editing and export tasks. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and mid-pack performance will limit GPU-accelerated effects and high-resolution previews.