SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series, uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, and carries a 45 W TDP, positioning it as a high-performance part for laptops. The CPU's base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz indicate strong single-thread headroom, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, a configuration that supports both latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks and throughput-oriented multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly four-fifths of the tested processor pool. Its average benchmark score of 32076 is statistically identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 32040 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121 (0.1% lower), and the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 (0.5% lower). This clustering suggests the i7-13705H sits at a performance plateau where generation and core-count differences translate into negligible real-world deltas. The multi-core Cinebench results — 1612 in R15, 6719 in R20, and 15998 in R23 — show consistent scaling across render workloads, with the R23 number indicating strong sustained multi-threaded throughput for a 45 W mobile part.

For real workloads, the PassMark suite offers granular insight. The multicore score of 24460 and single-thread score of 3483 demonstrate balanced capabilities. Integer math scores 85927, floating-point math scores 63064, and extended instructions score 15810, indicating robust number-crunching for scientific and financial applications. Data compression scores 273720, which is exceptionally strong, while data encryption scores 16324, suggesting the CPU handles AES and other cryptographic workloads competently. Find prime numbers scores 116, and random string sorting scores 29285, both typical for this class. Physics calculations score 1854, reflecting the CPU's ability to handle simulation and gaming physics without bottlenecking the GPU. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 8 lanes for the CPU. Integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units are present, offering a fallback for display output and light graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is idle or absent.

The 14-core hybrid layout, while not explicitly broken into performance and efficiency clusters in the data, delivers 20 threads, which is ideal for parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks such as spreadsheet recalculation, web browsing, and legacy application execution remain snappy. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across cores helps reduce memory latency in multi-threaded scenarios, though the dual-channel memory bus limits peak bandwidth compared to higher-end HX parts. The production status is Active, with a release date of January 3, 2023, and a launch MSRP of $502. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the factory clocks are sufficient for most users.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the Intel Core i7-13705H and the Intel Arc A370M, and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

The CPU side of this pairing is more than capable of feeding the GPU in most titles. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258 and PassMark single-thread score of 3483 indicate that the i7-13705H can handle the game logic, physics, and draw-call submission required by modern engines. The multi-core performance, evidenced by the R23 multi-core score of 15998 and PassMark multicore score of 24460, ensures that background tasks, streaming overlays, and anti-cheat software do not starve the game of CPU resources. For competitive esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or Fortnite at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength should allow the GPU to reach its performance ceiling, but the Arc A370M's modest compute resources will limit absolute frame rates.

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a constraint for high-resolution textures and heavy scene complexity. The boost clock of 2050 MHz and base clock of 1550 MHz yield a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, placing it in the entry-level discrete GPU tier. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will require medium or low settings to maintain smooth performance, especially with the 4 GB VRAM limit.

The GPU's benchmark scores — Geekbench OpenCL at 29676 and Geekbench Vulkan at 28673 — place it in the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 29175 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), while outperforming the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% higher) by small margins. This positioning suggests the A370M delivers performance comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago, which means 1080p gaming at medium settings is the realistic target. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with modern titles due to bandwidth and VRAM limitations, and at 4K, only very light or older games will be playable. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility indicate the GPU is feature-complete for modern APIs, but raw throughput is the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis for this pairing is straightforward: the GPU is the primary constraint in gaming workloads, while the CPU is the stronger component. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile ranking shows an 8-percentile gap, which translates to the CPU having more headroom than the GPU in most scenarios. In CPU-bound games at low resolutions or with reduced graphics settings, the i7-13705H can maintain high frame rates, but the A370M will cap the output due to its 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions or with ultra settings, the CPU will sit partially idle while the GPU works at full capacity.

FPS scaling evidence from benchmark scores supports this imbalance. The CPU's single-thread score of 3483 and multi-thread score of 24460 on PassMark indicate it can handle frame generation well above what the GPU can render. The GPU's Geekbench scores, while respectable for its class, do not suggest the ability to push high frame rates in demanding titles. For 1080p gaming, the system will be GPU-limited in most modern games, meaning the CPU will have spare capacity for streaming, voice chat, or background downloads. At 720p or with esports settings, the CPU might become the limiting factor in very light titles, but this is an edge case. For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary workhorse, with the GPU providing acceleration for effects and previews. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is a hard limit for large textures and complex scenes, and once it is exhausted, performance will drop significantly regardless of CPU capability.

The combined percentile of 78 for this build indicates a system that is well-matched for general use but leans toward CPU-heavy tasks. The CPU's nearest rivals, all within 0.5% of its average score, show that the i7-13705H is not a performance outlier; it is a solid mid-to-high-end mobile processor. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the RX Vega M GH and RX 470, suggest it is a competent entry-level discrete GPU. In practice, users will experience a system that excels at productivity, content creation, and light-to-medium gaming, but will not break records in high-end gaming or GPU compute tasks.

Who Should Build It

This Intel Core i7-13705H + Intel Arc A370M pairing is suited for laptop buyers who prioritize CPU performance for work tasks while needing a discrete GPU for moderate gaming and graphics acceleration. Gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings will find this build adequate for esports titles and older AAA games, based on the GPU's benchmark scores. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures that gaming performance is not hampered by processor limitations, even in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games. Content creators who work with video editing, photo manipulation, or 3D modeling will benefit from the 14-core, 20-thread CPU, which scores 15998 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for effects and rendering previews.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The PassMark integer math score of 85927 and data compression score of 273720 indicate fast code compilation and file processing. Students and small business users who need a versatile laptop for coursework, office applications, and light gaming will find this build sufficient, as the CPU's single-thread score of 3483 ensures responsive everyday use. The build class is laptop, so it is designed for portability, but the 45 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP mean it requires adequate cooling and will have moderate battery life under load. Users who need high-refresh gaming, 1440p or 4K resolution, or heavy GPU compute should look elsewhere, as the A370M is the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13705H achieves an average benchmark score of 32076, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest competitor, the Intel Core i5-14450HX, scores 32040, a delta of 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121 (0.1% lower), and the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 (0.5% lower). These minuscule differences mean the i7-13705H is effectively tied with its rivals, and real-world performance will depend more on cooling, memory configuration, and workload specifics than on the CPU alone. In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 15998 and single-core score of 2258 are strong for a 45 W mobile part. PassMark results show a multicore score of 24460, single-thread score of 3483, and specialized scores that highlight strengths in integer math (85927), floating-point math (63064), and data compression (273720).

The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 28673. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH with a score of 29197 (0.1% lower), the AMD FirePro W8000 with 29211 (0.1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 470 with 28996 (0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M with 28874 (1% higher). The GPU's performance is consistent with an entry-level discrete part, and its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are the primary constraints in gaming and graphics workloads. The combined percentile for this build is 78, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 78% of tested configurations, with the CPU contributing more to this score than the GPU. The picture is clear: this is a CPU-forward build where the processor's strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance is paired with a GPU that handles moderate graphics demands.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3483 can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit output to around 60-90 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The 74th percentile GPU ranking suggests 144Hz displays will not be fully utilized in most games.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU with a PassMark multicore score of 24460 can handle game capture and encoding while gaming, but the GPU's limited compute means the game will demand most of the system's graphics resources. Software encoding on the CPU is viable for 1080p streams, as the integer math score of 85927 supports efficient compression.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 ensures fast timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 1024 shading units provide acceleration for effects, but large projects may exceed VRAM capacity, causing slowdowns.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache deliver strong performance for CPU-based renderers, with the R20 multi-core score of 6719 indicating solid throughput. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-based renderers at reduced quality settings, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 273720 and integer math score of 85927 make code compilation and test execution fast. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking with IDEs, containers, and databases running simultaneously.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3483 delivers responsive everyday performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled to save battery, and the 45 W TDP is manageable for a laptop chassis.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H scores 15998 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197) and 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996).

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning the system outperforms 78% of tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the CPU cannot be overclocked. The base clock is 2.40 GHz and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

Q: What are the CPU's PassMark single-thread and multicore scores?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 3483, and the multicore score is 24460.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022. The CPU is active, with a release date of January 3, 2023.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13705H, a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is laptop, meaning all components are designed for mobile use with power and thermal constraints. The CPU operates at a 45 W TDP, while the GPU operates at a 35 W TDP, and the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is available as a low-power alternative. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 78, is solidly mid-range: the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 74th percentile ranking is respectable but not exceptional. This is a system that prioritizes processor performance for productivity and content creation, with the GPU serving as a capable companion for moderate gaming and graphics acceleration. Users seeking a high-end gaming laptop or a GPU-compute workstation should look at different pairings, but for balanced mobile work and play, this configuration is well-considered.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1550 MHz, and the boost clock is 2050 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 35 W. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern games and applications.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673, placing the GPU in the 74th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 29175. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% higher). These deltas are minimal, meaning the A370M performs on par with a mid-range desktop GPU from several years ago. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints; large textures, high-resolution renders, or complex scenes will exceed the memory capacity, forcing the GPU to spill to system memory and tanking performance. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT effects, but the relatively low compute throughput means ray-traced games will run at reduced settings. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022, and no launch MSRP is listed. For users who need GPU compute for machine learning or heavy graphics, this part is not suitable; it is designed for light gaming, media playback, and basic acceleration of creative applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13705H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds