SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H and Intel Arc A350M pairing is a mobile configuration that occupies a distinct middle ground in the performance spectrum, combining a high-end 14-core Raptor Lake processor with an entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU. The data indicates a system where the CPU is clearly the dominant component, ranking in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, though capable, sits lower at the 70th percentile. This creates a significant performance imbalance that dictates the system's suitability: it is a potent productivity and content-creation machine that can handle modern gaming at modest settings, but it is not a high-refresh-rate gaming powerhouse. The combined percentile of 76 for this pairing reflects a capable, well-rounded laptop that prioritizes processor-heavy workloads over raw graphics throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this build is defined by a pronounced CPU-bound nature. The Intel Core i7-13705H's average benchmark score of 32,076 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, showcasing its substantial processing power. In contrast, the Intel Arc A350M's average score of 24,647 places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This gap in percentile rankings is the clearest indicator of the system's balance: the CPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own. Consequently, in almost any workload that utilizes both components, the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor.

This bottleneck manifests most clearly in gaming and 3D rendering scenarios. The CPU has ample headroom to feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU's compute capacity, with 768 shading units and a 64-bit memory bus, will saturate long before the processor is stressed. In lighter, single-threaded tasks, the CPU's high boost clock of 5.00 GHz and strong single-core scores (e.g., 2,258 in Cinebench R23) ensure snappy responsiveness, but the GPU may idle, waiting for the next frame to render. The data suggests that the CPU is capable of handling far more graphics-intensive workloads than the A350M can deliver, making the GPU the definitive performance ceiling for this pairing.

The bottleneck shifts only in specific scenarios. For instance, in tasks that are purely memory-bandwidth or texture-fill-rate limited, the GPU's 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate will be the primary constraint. However, for the majority of mixed-use applications, including office productivity, software compilation, and video encoding, the CPU's multi-core dominance ensures that the processor is the engine of the system, while the GPU provides a moderate acceleration layer. The PassMark multithread score of 24,460 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998 confirm that the CPU will not be the source of slowdowns in these tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13705H demonstrates its class-leading position in the mobile processor space. Its average benchmark score of 32,076 places it in the 82nd percentile, making it a top-tier performer. It sits extremely close to its nearest rivals, with a delta of just 0.1% compared to the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32,040) and the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121), and a -0.1% delta against the Intel Core i5-14400 (32,115). This places it statistically in a dead heat with these powerful chips. The multi-core performance is particularly impressive, with a Cinebench R23 score of 15,998 and a PassMark multithread score of 24,460, indicating exceptional capability for heavily threaded workloads. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,258 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,483, ensuring snappy system responsiveness.

The Intel Arc A350M, while a capable entry-level discrete GPU, occupies a lower tier. Its average benchmark score of 24,647 places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This performance level puts it in direct competition with older desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, a -0.4% delta) and significantly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277, a 1.5% delta). It is also within a hair's breadth of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, a -0.5% delta), though that is a mobile workstation part. The GPU's Geekbench scores are consistent, with 24,546 in OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan, showing balanced compute performance. However, with only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit bus, its raw throughput is limited.

The combined picture is of a system where the CPU is the star performer, delivering a 82nd-percentile result, while the GPU provides solid, but not exceptional, 70th-percentile graphics capability. This pairing yields a combined percentile of 76, indicating that the whole is slightly less than the sum of its parts in graphics-intensive tasks, but the CPU ensures that the system remains highly responsive and capable in a wide range of applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A350M is not suited for high-refresh-rate gaming. Its 70th-percentile performance, while competitive with an RX 590, is insufficient to drive modern titles at high frame rates on high-refresh displays. Gamers targeting 144Hz or higher will find the GPU to be the limiting factor, often requiring drastic reductions in resolution and graphical settings. The CPU, however, is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU, ensuring that the processor will not cause frame hitches or stutters.

Streaming: This laptop is a capable streaming machine. The Intel Core i7-13705H's powerful multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998, provides ample headroom to encode a stream using the CPU's x264 encoder while simultaneously running a game. The PassMark data compression score of 273,720 further indicates strong throughput for encoding tasks. The GPU's dedicated encoders can also be leveraged, offloading the work from the CPU, but the processor's raw power ensures that software encoding is viable.

Video Editing: The combination here is quite good for video editing. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a high PassMark multithread score of 24,460, will handle 4K timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export rendering with ease. The Arc A350M provides hardware acceleration for effects and encoding, and its 4 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p or light 4K work. The system is more than adequate for hobbyist and semi-professional video editing tasks.

3D Rendering: In 3D rendering, the system's performance is a tale of two components. CPU-based rendering engines will be exceptionally fast, leveraging the i7-13705H's 82nd-percentile performance and high Cinebench scores. However, GPU-based renderers will be limited by the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB memory capacity. While capable of rendering, the GPU will be significantly slower than the CPU in most render workloads, making this a CPU-first rendering system.

Software Development: This build is a fantastic choice for software developers. The CPU's high single-thread performance (3,483 PassMark) ensures fast compilation of individual files and a responsive IDE. The multi-core power (24,460 PassMark) is excellent for parallel builds, significantly reducing compile times. The PassMark data encryption score of 16,324 also indicates strong performance for secure development tasks. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the system's overall balance makes it a great all-around dev machine.

Student and Office Work: For students and office professionals, this system is overkill in the best way. The CPU's performance ensures that even the most demanding spreadsheet, database, or virtualization workloads will feel instant. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,483 guarantees snappy UI interactions, and the multi-core performance allows for effortless multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, office applications, and communication tools. The discrete GPU is a bonus for any light photo or video editing, but the CPU is the primary driver of this system's excellent office productivity.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is targeted squarely at users who prioritize processor performance over graphics power. It is ideal for content creators who work heavily with CPU-bound tasks like video editing and software development, where the i7-13705H's 82nd-percentile performance will shine. Software developers will particularly benefit from the high multi-core scores, reducing build times and improving overall workflow efficiency. Engineering and science students running simulations or data analysis tools that are multi-threaded will find the CPU to be a significant asset. For small business workstations, the powerful CPU can handle database management, financial modeling, and heavy multitasking without breaking a sweat, while the discrete GPU provides a bit of graphical acceleration for presentations or light design work.

However, this is not a system for gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p experiences. The Arc A350M, while a competent entry-level GPU at the 70th percentile, is the bottleneck. Gamers at 1080p on medium to low settings will find it usable, but those seeking high detail or high refresh rates should look elsewhere. It is also not suited for 3D artists who rely on GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane or Redshift, as the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will severely limit scene complexity and render times.

Gaming Performance

Note: There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following gaming analysis is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A350M, specifically its 70th-percentile ranking and its performance parity with the AMD Radeon RX 590.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, particularly its Geekbench Vulkan score of 24,747 and its close proximity to the RX 590, the Intel Arc A350M is best classified as a 1080p entry-level gaming GPU. In modern, demanding AAA titles, gamers should expect playable frame rates in the range of 30-50 FPS at 1080p with a mix of low and medium settings. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor in titles with high-resolution textures, potentially causing stuttering or texture pop-in. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or League of Legends, the GPU has enough power to push well over 100 FPS at 1080p, but this will be dependent on the game's optimization and the CPU's ability to feed frames. The CPU is certainly not the limiting factor here, as its high single-thread score of 3,483 ensures that it can handle the high frame-rate demands of esports titles. At 1440p, the GPU will be heavily challenged, and most users will need to drop to low settings to achieve playable frame rates. Overall, users should treat this as a 1080p gaming system capable of medium settings in most titles and high settings in less demanding or older games.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the Intel Core i7-13705H?

A: The i7-13705H is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32,076. It performs nearly identically to the Intel Core i5-14450HX, with a performance delta of just 0.1%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to other desktop graphics cards?

A: The Arc A350M's benchmark results place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 24,647 is 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 590, indicating it performs in the same class as these older desktop cards.

Q: Is this laptop configuration good for gaming?

A: It is suitable for entry-level 1080p gaming. The GPU is the limiting factor, and users should expect to play modern AAA titles at medium to low settings to achieve playable frame rates. Esports titles will run well, but it is not suited for high-refresh or high-detail gaming. The CPU is more than capable of supporting the GPU.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The system's memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but its support for both memory types offers flexibility in system design.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H?

A: The performance difference is negligible. The i7-13705H has an average benchmark score of 32,076, which is only 0.1% lower than the i7-12800H's score of 32,121. In practical terms, they are perform identically.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. This provides a fallback display output and basic graphics acceleration, but the discrete Intel Arc A350M handles the primary graphics workload.

Q: What is the FPS performance in games for this exact build?

A: The data does not contain any measured FPS results for this specific CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores relative to other components, and should be treated as approximations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform for this build is based on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The system's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for some flexibility, but the maximum capacity is not specified in the data. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides a PCIe Gen 5 connection with 8 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the fastest NVMe SSDs. The GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth requirements.

The power delivery situation is modest. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. Adding other components, a typical system like this would likely be paired with a power adapter in the 100-130 W range. There is no suggested PSU listed for the GPU, and the slot width is listed as "IGP" (Integrated Graphics Processor), which is an unusual classification, but it implies the GPU is designed for a compact mobile form factor. Given the soldered nature of the CPU and the end-of-life status of the GPU, the most sensible upgrade path for this system is a full platform replacement. There is no room for a "next upgrade" for the CPU or GPU in the traditional desktop sense. Users looking for more performance would need to purchase a new laptop with a newer, more powerful CPU and GPU.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration pairing the Intel Core i7-13705H, a high-performance 14-core mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level discrete graphics solution. The system is defined by its processor. The i7-13705H is a clear leader, ranking in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, making it one of the most powerful mobile processors available. The GPU, while competent, is a tier below, ranking in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This makes the overall system a "CPU-first" design, where the processor is the primary driver of performance. The combined percentile of 76 for this pairing confirms its status as a well-above-average laptop, but one that is optimized for compute-intensive tasks rather than graphics-intensive gaming. It is a desktop-class processor in a laptop, paired with a modest discrete GPU to handle basic graphics acceleration and light gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a member of the Raptor Lake-H family, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a hybrid architecture with a total of 14 cores and 20 threads, combining high-performance Performance-cores (P-cores) and high-efficiency Efficient-cores (E-cores) to balance power and performance. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing for rapid single-thread execution when needed. The processor has a 24 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB per core L2 and 80 KB per core L1. This configuration is designed to deliver exceptional multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its 82nd-percentile ranking. In real-world workloads, the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 24,460 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998 indicate that it can handle heavy parallel tasks like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations with ease. Its single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,258, ensuring fast application load times and responsive system interactions. The 45 W TDP is typical for a high-performance mobile processor and allows it to sustain significant boost clocks under load. The processor's 24 MB of cache and high clock speeds are key to its competitive standing, placing it in a statistical tie with the Intel Core i5-14450HX and showing a slight edge over the older Intel Core i9-11900, which it leads by 0.5%.