SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake architecture with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is an 8GB GDDR6 card with a 115W TDP. The combined system sits at the 73rd percentile among all desktop builds in the database, indicating a solidly above-average configuration. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket used across Intel's 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This means the motherboard ecosystem is mature and well-established, with a wide range of options available from budget to premium tiers. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more prevalent DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. This dual support is particularly useful for upgrades, as it allows users to keep existing DDR4 memory when moving to this platform, reducing the cost of a new build.

The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which is the current high-end standard for connecting graphics cards and NVMe storage. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the x16 slot most desktop GPUs use. This is an important consideration for upgrade planning, as the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means future high-end GPUs with x16 Gen 5 interfaces will run at their full potential on this platform. The 35W TDP of the CPU is remarkably low for a 16-core part, and the 115W TDP of the GPU means the total system power draw is modest. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 300W, which means a standard 400-500W power supply from a reputable brand will have ample headroom for this configuration, even with several drives and peripherals installed.

Memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means the platform can scale with faster RAM kits if the user chooses to upgrade. The CPU's L3 cache is 30 MB shared, which is substantial for gaming and productivity workloads. For a sensible next upgrade from this configuration, the user could consider moving to a higher-core-count CPU on the same Socket 1700, or upgrading the GPU to a model with more VRAM and a wider memory bus. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPU upgrades will not be bottlenecked by the motherboard interface. The unlocked multiplier on this CPU (noted as true) also means overclocking is possible, though the low TDP suggests the chip is designed for efficiency rather than extreme overclocking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, which is a practical convenience for troubleshooting.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results place it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database, which is a strong position for a low-power part. Its average benchmark score is 35403, placing it within 0.1% of the Intel Core 5 213PE (which scores 35428) and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF (which scores 35365). The CPU is also 0.3% ahead of both the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305) and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287). This clustering shows that the i7-13700T delivers performance nearly identical to some of the best-known desktop CPUs from previous generations, despite its dramatically lower TDP.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the multi-core scores are particularly telling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 is strong for a 35W part, while the single-core score of 3282 is competitive with higher-TDP chips. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11573 and single-core score of 2490 reinforce this pattern. PassMark scores show a multi-thread score of 28211 and a single-thread score of 3821, with the integer math score of 105397 and floating-point math score of 73928 indicating solid all-around computational performance. The data compression score of 327700 and encryption score of 19230 suggest the CPU handles data-intensive tasks well.

The GPU's benchmark results place it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (scoring 17666, 0.2% ahead), followed by the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% behind). These are older or integrated graphics parts, which highlights an important point: the RTX 4060's average score is dragged down by its relatively modest compute performance in some tests, but its modern architecture and feature set make it more capable in real-world scenarios than the raw average suggests.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and PassMark G3D score of 19545 show the GPU's gaming-oriented performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 demonstrate strong compute capability. The combined percentile of 73 for this CPU-GPU pairing indicates that the system as a whole outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU carries most of the performance weight, with its 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile, creating a system that is CPU-dominant in benchmark terms.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10nm process node. The die size is 257 mm², and the chip features a hybrid core design typical of 13th-generation Intel parts, with performance cores and efficiency cores working together. The base clock is 1400 MHz, which is quite low, but the boost clock reaches 4900 MHz. This wide clock range is the key to the chip's efficiency: it runs at very low clocks during light loads to conserve power, but bursts up to nearly 5 GHz when performance is needed.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a generous amount of cache for a desktop CPU, which helps with gaming performance and reduces latency in workloads that fit within the cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for a discrete GPU and fast NVMe storage.

In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2343 and the single-core score is 330. The R20 scores are 9764 multi-core and 1378 single-core, while the R23 scores are 23248 multi-core and 3282 single-core. These scores indicate that the CPU scales well with increased thread counts, which is typical for a 16-core, 24-thread part. The PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 28211, with the physics score of 1769 and the find prime numbers score of 127. The extended instructions score of 19306 and random string sorting score of 34939 suggest the chip handles AVX and other modern instruction sets efficiently.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs is remarkable given its 35W TDP. Most processors in the top 15% of the database draw significantly more power. This makes the i7-13700T an excellent choice for systems where power consumption and heat output are primary concerns, such as small form factor builds or office environments where noise and cooling are limited. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the low base clock suggests the chip is designed to be efficient rather than pushed to extreme frequencies. The launch MSRP is $384, which positions it as a mid-range to upper-mid-range processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking suggest this system can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming well. The CPU's strong single-core score of 3282 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without bottlenecking at high frame rates. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicates it can push high frame rates at 1080p in most titles, though 1440p ultra settings may require some compromises.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28211 shows the CPU can handle the extra load of streaming software while maintaining game performance. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its tensor cores, which offloads the encoding work from the CPU entirely.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and PassMark data compression score of 327700 indicate strong performance in video editing workloads. The GPU's 8GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, and the CUDA acceleration from the RTX 4060 will speed up effects and rendering in compatible software.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9764 showing it can handle complex scenes. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 RT cores provide solid GPU-accelerated rendering capability, though 8GB VRAM may limit very large scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 105397 and encryption score of 19230 show strong performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The multi-thread score of 28211 means parallel builds will complete quickly. The GPU's compute performance (OpenCL score of 95057) can accelerate certain development tasks like machine learning inference.

Student and Office Work: The 35W TDP makes this system quiet and cool, ideal for dorm rooms or shared offices. The CPU's single-core performance (3821 in PassMark single-thread) handles everyday tasks with ease, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system is overkill for basic office tasks but provides excellent headroom for more demanding academic work.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. As a result, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 place it in the 61st percentile, indicating it is a solid mid-range card for 1080p gaming. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this system should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU's 8GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures and effects, though some games with very high-resolution texture packs may exceed the VRAM capacity. At 1440p, the GPU will likely need settings reduced from ultra to high in demanding titles to maintain smooth frame rates. At 4K, this system is not well-suited for ultra settings, as the 8GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will struggle with the data requirements.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with all modern game APIs, including ray tracing. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects and DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3282) ensures that even CPU-bound games will run smoothly. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 76 and DirectX 11 score of 175 suggest the GPU performs better in older graphics APIs, which is typical for NVIDIA cards.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the AD107 chip, built on TSMC's 5nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. This gives a transistor density of 118.9 million per mm², which is extremely high and contributes to the card's efficiency. The GPU has 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While this is modest for a modern GPU, it is sufficient for 1080p gaming and many productivity tasks.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz. The memory runs at 2125 MHz, which translates to 17 Gbps effective. The card has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It also includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI workloads respectively. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU's TDP is 115W, with a suggested PSU of 300W. It uses a single 12-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. The card is 240mm long, 111mm tall, and 40mm wide, making it suitable for most cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicate solid DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show the GPU is capable in compute workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 is relatively modest, indicating the card is optimized more for graphics than pure compute. The 61st percentile ranking places it in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, which is appropriate for a card designed for 1080p gaming.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers who play at 1080p and want high frame rates in competitive titles or high settings in AAA games. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, and the GPU's 61st percentile ranking is sufficient for smooth 1080p gameplay. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28211 providing ample compute power.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math performance (PassMark score of 105397) and encryption speed (19230), which accelerate compilation and security-related tasks. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel build systems efficiently. Students and professionals in office environments will find the 35W TDP CPU produces minimal heat and noise, making the system unobtrusive in shared spaces. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a reliable fallback for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Small business workstations that need reliable multi-threaded performance for data processing, financial modeling, or database work will find this system capable. The CPU's data compression score of 327700 and random string sorting score of 34939 indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks. The 8GB VRAM GPU can handle GPU-accelerated applications in these fields, though users with very large datasets may need to consider alternatives with more memory. The system's overall 73rd percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop configurations in the database.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-13700T use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the same socket used across Intel's 12th and 13th generation Core desktop processors.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this pairing?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP, while the GPU has a 115W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score that is 0.3% higher than the i7-12700K, making them essentially equal in overall performance despite the 13700T's much lower TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bus width?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing support. It also has 96 tensor cores for DLSS.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4900 MHz. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the CPU and GPU in this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This means the CPU is capable of significantly more work than the GPU can keep up with in most scenarios. In gaming, this is generally a positive characteristic, as it means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, and the CPU will rarely cause frame rate drops. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 and the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3282) suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in GPU-intensive games.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as simulation games, strategy titles, or games with heavy physics calculations, the CPU's performance may still be a limiting factor at very high frame rates. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1769 is modest, which could indicate some weakness in physics-heavy workloads. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a bottleneck for texture-heavy workloads at high resolutions, but for 1080p gaming, this is less of a concern.

In productivity workloads, the CPU will dominate performance, with the GPU providing acceleration for specific tasks like rendering or compute. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 is relatively low, meaning the CPU will handle most general-purpose computing tasks. For video editing, the CPU's multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 23248) will be the primary driver, with the GPU accelerating effects and encoding. For 3D rendering, the GPU's 8GB VRAM may be a limiting factor for very large scenes, while the CPU can handle most rendering tasks without issue.

The overall bottleneck picture is a system where the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming, the CPU is the dominant performer for productivity, and the memory bandwidth of the GPU is the most likely constraint in high-resolution scenarios. The 73rd combined percentile reflects this balance, showing a system that is stronger in CPU performance than GPU performance. For users who want better gaming performance, a GPU upgrade would be the most effective path, as the CPU has significant headroom to support a faster graphics card.