SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a study in contrasts: a 35-watt efficiency-focused processor mated to a 415-watt flagship graphics card. This combination creates a desktop build with a unique performance profile, where the CPU’s modest power envelope and the GPU’s raw throughput define the system’s character. The benchmark data reveals a platform that excels in single-threaded and multi-threaded productivity, while the GPU’s score presents a puzzling picture that requires careful interpretation against its specifications.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, housing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, which are notably high frequencies for a large chip. Memory configuration is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. This bandwidth figure is critical for 4K texture streaming and heavy compute workloads, as the effective memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with a 32 Gbps effective data rate.

The compute core layout is robust, with 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation processors. Ray tracing hardware includes 84 RT cores, while 336 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS and neural rendering. The raw throughput numbers are equally impressive: FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating strong compute capability for both gaming and professional rendering. Pixel rate reaches 293.1 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, which positions the card for high-resolution, high-detail rendering scenarios.

The GPU’s benchmark score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is 3075 points. This score, however, places the RTX 5080 SUPER at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, which is unexpectedly low for a card with such specifications. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (avg score 3163, deltaPct -2.8), Intel Arc Pro B60 (avg score 3182, deltaPct -3.4), NVIDIA GeForce 820A (avg score 2983, deltaPct 3.1), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (avg score 2967, deltaPct 3.6). This data suggests that the benchmark score may not reflect the card’s true gaming potential, or that the Steel Nomad test is not representative of the RTX 5080 SUPER's architecture. The deltaPct values show the RTX 5080 SUPER is within 3.6% of these lower-tier cards, which contradicts the massive specification advantage it holds in VRAM, bandwidth, and compute units.

For rendering workloads, the 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are the defining features. Large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and complex ray-traced environments will fit comfortably in memory, avoiding spillover to system RAM. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and denoising, respectively, which accelerates final-frame rendering in supported applications. The FP32 and FP16 throughput suggest strong performance in GPU-accelerated renderers that rely on compute shaders, such as those found in Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The interpretation must be cautious: the low percentile score (19th) and close rivals indicate that the benchmark database does not capture the card’s expected performance tier, so real-world rendering should be judged by the architectural specs rather than the Steel Nomad score alone.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a strong set of benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 23,248, and the single-core score is 3,282. Cinebench R20 shows 9,764 multi-core and 1,378 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 2,343 multi-core and 330 single-core. Geekbench results are 11,573 multi-core and 2,490 single-core. The PassMark suite includes a multi-thread score of 28,211, single-thread score of 3,821, integer math at 105,397, floating-point math at 73,928, and extended instructions at 19,306. Data compression scores 327,700, data encryption 19,230, physics 1,769, random string sorting 34,939, and find prime numbers 127. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35,403, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

The GPU’s sole benchmark score is 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which corresponds to the 19th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 52, which sits near the median of all build combinations. This combined figure masks the wide disparity between the CPU’s high percentile (85th) and the GPU’s low percentile (19th). The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35,428, deltaPct -0.1), Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35,365, deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35,305, deltaPct 0.3), and Intel Core i7-12700K (avg score 35,287, deltaPct 0.3). These deltaPct values are all within 0.3%, meaning the i7-13700T is effectively performance-matched with these previous-generation chips, despite being a low-power T-series variant.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is a top-tier performer in its class—85th percentile means it outperforms 85% of all CPUs tracked—paired with a GPU whose benchmark indicates it underperforms relative to its specifications. The pairing’s 52nd combined percentile suggests that, on paper, this system sits in the middle of the pack, but the CPU is clearly the stronger component in terms of benchmark ranking. For workloads that are CPU-bound, such as compilation or spreadsheet calculations, the system will feel fast. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming or rendering, the benchmark data is ambiguous: the GPU’s specs suggest it should dominate, but the score indicates otherwise. The interpretation must weigh the architectural evidence (24 GB GDDR7, 56.28 TFLOPS) against the empirical benchmark (3,075 points, 19th percentile). The data suggests that the RTX 5080 SUPER’s Steel Nomad score may be an outlier or a test artifact, but from a pure database standpoint, the GPU is the weak link.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T is at the 85th percentile, meaning it scores higher than 85% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rival in benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3,075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000’s average score of 3,163.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 5080 SUPER?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the i7-13700T?

A: The multi-core score is 23,248 and the single-core score is 3,282.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the i7-13700T does not support ECC memory; it supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the i7-13700T and RTX 5080 SUPER is 52, which is near the median for all build combinations.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with a matching 56.28 TFLOPS for FP16.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i7-13700T and RTX 5080 SUPER is heavily skewed toward the CPU in terms of benchmark percentile. The CPU’s 85th percentile against all CPUs indicates a high-performing component, while the GPU’s 19th percentile suggests it is a limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. For CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark score 327,700), or encryption (19,230)—the i7-13700T will deliver strong performance, and the GPU will sit idle, so no bottleneck exists. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 28,211 in PassMark indicates it can handle heavily threaded tasks effectively, and the 85th percentile means it outperforms most processors in the database.

For GPU-bound workloads like gaming or 3D rendering, the bottleneck analysis is complicated by the GPU’s low benchmark score. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 19th percentile implies it will constrain frame rates or render times, but the architectural specs—24 GB VRAM, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, 56.28 TFLOPS—suggest the opposite. The measured FPS data is absent for this exact combination, so FPS scaling cannot be quantified. However, the combined percentile of 52 indicates that, on average, this system performs at a median level across all benchmarked builds. This suggests that in mixed workloads, neither component entirely dominates, but in pure graphics tasks, the GPU’s percentile ranking will likely be the ceiling.

The CPU’s low TDP of 35 watts means it will not generate excessive heat, allowing the GPU to be the primary power consumer (415 W TDP). In scenarios where the GPU is fully loaded, such as ray-traced rendering, the CPU must feed it with draw calls and geometry data. The i7-13700T’s single-thread score of 3,282 in Cinebench R23 is strong, so it can handle game logic and physics calculations without stalling the GPU. The PassMark physics score of 1,769 is relatively low compared to the multi-thread score, which could indicate a minor bottleneck in physics-heavy simulations, but this is a secondary consideration. The data shows that the GPU’s benchmark percentile is the primary concern; if the Steel Nomad score is accurate, it will limit high-resolution gaming, but if it is an artifact, the GPU will be the dominant performer.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. The base clock is 1,400 MHz, which is very low, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, indicating a wide dynamic range that allows the chip to be efficient at idle and responsive under load. The TDP is 35 watts, which is a fraction of the GPU’s power draw, making this CPU suitable for compact cooling solutions. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is ample for gaming and productivity.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output, though it is not intended for gaming. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, which is a mainstream desktop platform. The CPU was released in January 2023 and has a launch MSRP of $384. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, although the low base clock suggests the headroom is limited by the 35 W TDP.

Benchmark scores indicate the CPU’s real-world strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,248 is excellent for a 35 W processor, showing that it can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The single-core score of 3,282 is also strong, which benefits applications that rely on a few fast threads, such as web browsing or office software. Geekbench multi-core at 11,573 and single-core at 2,490 confirm these trends. PassMark integer math at 105,397 and floating-point math at 73,928 show robust arithmetic performance for scientific or financial calculations. The extended instructions score of 19,306 indicates good SIMD throughput for vectorized code. Data compression at 327,700 and encryption at 19,230 are high, making the CPU suitable for file archiving and secure communications.

The nearest rivals—Intel Core i7-12700KF (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i5-13600T (deltaPct 0.3), and Intel Core i7-12700K (deltaPct 0.3)—all have average scores within 0.3% of the i7-13700T. This means the 35 W TDP does not sacrifice performance compared to higher-power chips from the previous generation, making it an efficient choice for workstations where power draw and heat are constraints. The 85th percentile ranking solidifies its position as a high-tier CPU, suitable for demanding productivity tasks without requiring exotic cooling.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080 SUPER’s specifications—24 GB VRAM, 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, and 56.28 TFLOPS—should drive high frame rates at 1440p or 4K, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075 (19th percentile) suggests the GPU may not perform as expected in this metric. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,282 in Cinebench R23 will avoid bottlenecks in most games, but the GPU’s low percentile could limit frame rates at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 23,248 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s tensor cores (336) can accelerate NVENC-based encoding. The PassMark data encryption score of 19,230 indicates secure stream handling, though the GPU’s low Steel Nomad score may reduce gaming performance during simultaneous encode and render.

Video editing: The i7-13700T’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,248 and PassMark integer math of 105,397 support fast timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM will handle 4K or 8K footage, and the FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects, though the benchmark percentile raises questions about real-world stability.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23: 23,248) handles CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 84 RT cores and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 are designed for GPU rendering. The 24 GB VRAM prevents memory overflow in complex scenes, but the 19th percentile Steel Nomad score may indicate driver or thermal issues in this specific test.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28,211 and data compression score of 327,700 speed up code compilation and package management. The single-thread score of 3,821 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, so the CPU’s 85th percentile makes this an excellent development machine.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low 35 W TDP allows for quiet, cool operation, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,282 handles spreadsheet and word processing tasks effortlessly. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive displays without the discrete GPU, though the RTX 5080 SUPER is overkill for this scenario, and its 415 W TDP will increase electricity use.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme graphics performance and are willing to accept the GPU’s benchmark ambiguity. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, which are future-proof for high-resolution textures. Content creators working in 3D rendering or video editing will find the CPU’s multi-thread score of 23,248 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 sufficient for heavy workloads. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and PassMark multi-thread score of 28,211, which compile code quickly.

Students and office workers are not the target audience, as the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 415 W TDP and dual-slot size are excessive for document editing or web browsing; the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is more than enough for those tasks. Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated compute, such as AI inference or simulation, will use the 336 tensor cores and 24 GB VRAM, but the low GPU percentile may be a concern for reliability. The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes this a viable option for compact desktop builds where CPU cooling is limited, but the GPU’s length of 304 mm (12 inches) requires a spacious case. Overall, this is a niche pairing for users who prioritize GPU memory capacity and CPU efficiency over absolute GPU benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700T, a 16-core/24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 GPU with 24 GB GDDR7 memory and a 415 W TDP. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 52. The pairing is unusual because the CPU is an efficiency-focused T-series chip, while the GPU is a high-end flagship. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35,403, and the GPU’s average is 3,075, showing a massive gap in raw scores that reflects the different benchmark scales. This system is a desktop-class workstation or gaming rig, depending on the interpretation of the GPU’s performance. The combined percentile of 52 places it near the median for all builds, suggesting that the CPU’s high ranking offsets the GPU’s low ranking in the overall assessment.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and architectural specifications, and they should be treated as approximations, not empirical results. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth suggest that 4K gaming with ultra textures is feasible, and the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates high frame rates in rasterized titles. The 84 RT cores should handle ray tracing at playable frame rates with DLSS enabled, given the 336 tensor cores.

However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075 (19th percentile) is a red flag. If this score is representative, the GPU may perform closer to entry-level cards like the Intel Arc Pro B60 (deltaPct -3.4) or NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (deltaPct -2.8), which would cap FPS at 1080p medium settings rather than 4K ultra. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,282 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU’s low percentile is the primary constraint. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance may push frame rates high, but the GPU’s uncertain benchmark makes it impossible to guarantee. For 1440p or 4K, the VRAM and bandwidth are sufficient, but the estimated FPS will depend heavily on whether the Steel Nomad score is an outlier. Gamers should expect variable performance until real-world benchmarks are available.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is compatible with the RTX 5080 SUPER’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s 35 W TDP means that power delivery is not a concern for the processor, but the GPU requires a 415 W TDP and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, but the GPU’s TDP alone suggests a high-wattage power supply is necessary; the CPU’s low power draw provides headroom. The GPU measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width (12.0 x 5.4 x 1.6 inches), so case compatibility is a consideration.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can choose between older, cheaper DDR4 modules or newer, faster DDR5, depending on motherboard selection. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, but the low base clock of 1,400 MHz and 35 W TDP limit the potential gains. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the CPU’s 85th percentile is already strong, and the GPU’s 19th percentile is the bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more system memory or faster NVMe storage would leverage the CPU’s data compression score of 327,700. The platform is mature, with the CPU released in January 2023, so the upgrade path is limited to the GPU and memory rather than the CPU itself. The 35 W TDP also allows for passive or low-profile CPU coolers, freeing space for the GPU’s dual-slot design.