SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a distinctive desktop combination: a low-power 16-core Raptor Lake processor mated to Intel’s end-of-life Alchemist graphics card. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 66th percentile of all graphics cards, giving the overall build a 76th percentile combined ranking. This is a system that prioritizes CPU throughput and platform features over raw graphics dominance, and the benchmark data confirms a clear split in capability between the two halves.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node. Its base clock of 1400 MHz is remarkably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, which explains its strong single-threaded performance. The chip carries 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. This hybrid design—combining performance and efficiency cores—allows the T-series chip to maintain a 35 W TDP while still delivering substantial multi-threaded compute.

Benchmark results confirm the processor’s dual nature. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 23248 is the headline figure, placing it well within striking distance of higher-TDP desktop chips. The single-core score of 3282 in the same test shows that even with the reduced power envelope, the boost clock delivers competitive responsiveness for lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores reinforce this: 11573 multi-core and 2490 single-core. The Passmark suite breaks down the CPU’s strengths further. Integer math scores 105397, floating-point math 73928, and extended instructions 19306. Data compression hits 327700, while encryption manages 19230. The multi-threaded Passmark score is 28211, with a single-thread score of 3821.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 35403, which places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals show how tightly packed this performance tier is. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the i7-13700T is effectively tied with it. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365, just 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, 0.3 percent behind, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, also 0.3 percent behind. The practical takeaway is that the 13700T matches or slightly exceeds the previous generation’s K-series parts in aggregate performance while operating at a fraction of the power draw.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2343 and R20 multi-core score of 9764 show consistent scaling across rendering generations. The R15 single-core score of 330 and R20 single-core of 1378 indicate that the boost clock is not just a paper specification—it translates into tangible single-thread wins. The Passmark physics score of 1769 and find prime numbers score of 127 are modest, but they reflect the efficiency-oriented tuning of the T-series. The random string sorting score of 34939 and data encryption score of 19230 suggest solid performance for database and security tasks. This is a CPU that can handle heavy compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering without breaking a sweat, while its low TDP makes it suitable for compact builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a pronounced imbalance in this pairing. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means the graphics card is the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this compromise. When the CPU can produce a Passmark multi-thread score of 28211 and the GPU produces a Passmark G3D score of 12534, the disparity is clear.

In gaming, the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck at standard resolutions. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3821 Passmark single-thread score, is more than sufficient to feed frames to the Arc A750. However, the GPU’s 66th percentile standing means that at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings, the Arc A750 will cap performance well before the i7-13700T reaches its limits. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a modest result, and the Passmark DirectX scores—65 for DX10, 72 for DX11, 70 for DX12, and 181 for DX9—show that the card is not a top-tier performer in legacy or modern APIs.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores mean that CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, video encoding, and 3D scene processing will be handled with ease. The GPU’s compute capabilities, measured by a Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554, are adequate for acceleration but will not match the CPU’s relative strength. The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU for graphics work and the CPU for compute-heavy tasks, but the CPU’s higher percentile suggests it will hold up better over time.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU has ample bandwidth, and the platform is forward-compatible with faster storage and expansion cards.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 225 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. This leaves significant headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The power connectors on the Arc A750 are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, which are standard for mid-range cards. The CPU is multiplier unlocked, allowing overclocking despite its efficiency focus, though the low base clock suggests the headroom is limited by the silicon’s power design.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a higher-tier graphics card. The 550 W suggested PSU is sufficient for the current card, but a future GPU with a higher TDP would require a PSU upgrade. The platform’s DDR5 support means memory bandwidth can be improved without changing the motherboard, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that storage and other peripherals will not be bottlenecks. The CPU’s release date of January 2023 and active production status mean it remains a viable purchase, while the GPU’s end-of-life status suggests replacements are already available.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but do not require top-tier gaming graphics. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the multi-threaded scores in Cinebench R23 (23248) and Passmark integer math (105397) indicate rapid build times. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s encoding capabilities, while the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines.

Students and small business workstations will find the 35 W TDP appealing for quiet, efficient systems that still deliver strong multi-tasking performance. The 24 threads handle virtualization and parallel workloads effectively. Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A750 sufficient for medium to high settings, but those targeting 1440p or high refresh rates will need to lower expectations. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3282 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even the most demanding esports titles will run smoothly, but the GPU’s 66th percentile will cap frame rates in graphically intensive AAA games.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, making this build viable even without the discrete GPU installed. The dual-channel memory support and DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allow builders to choose memory based on budget without sacrificing platform longevity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can drive high frame rates, but the GPU limits performance. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggest that 1080p esports titles will run at high refresh rates, while AAA games will require reduced settings to hit 144 Hz. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p but may cause stuttering at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding without a dedicated capture card. The multi-core score of 23248 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game capture and encoding run simultaneously without frame drops. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 provides some hardware acceleration, but the CPU is the primary workhorse.

Video editing: The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance accelerates export times, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 28211 indicating rapid rendering. The GPU’s 8 GB memory and 512 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects and timeline scrubbing, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 places this CPU in a strong position for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS offers GPU-accelerated rendering support, but the 28 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units are modest.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 105397 and data compression score of 327700 show rapid compilation and packaging. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the low TDP keeps power costs down for always-on development machines.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3821 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet performance. The integrated graphics provide a reliable fallback, and the 35 W TDP allows for quiet, low-heat systems.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking despite the low base clock of 1400 MHz.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i7-13700T’s average benchmark score of 35403 is 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF’s 35365 and 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T’s 35305.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The Intel Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, based on the GPU’s 225 W TDP and the CPU’s 35 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance—evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 3821 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282—indicates that the processor will not limit frame rates in most titles. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 suggest a mid-range graphics card.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A750 can be expected to deliver playable frame rates in most games, with esports titles reaching high refresh rates and AAA games requiring settings adjustments to maintain 60 FPS. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus will handle textures, but the GPU’s overall compute power will cap performance, making medium settings a more realistic target. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 181 is notably higher than its DirectX 12 score of 70, suggesting that older games may run disproportionately well, while modern DX12 titles will see lower relative performance. The 28 ray tracing cores provide some hardware RT capability, but the modest shading unit count will limit RT effects to light usage.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700T, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, and the Intel Arc A750, a 225 W Alchemist-generation GPU. The CPU is in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, placing this system in the upper mid-range tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s architecture is Raptor Lake-S on a 10 nm process, while the GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm process from TSMC. This pairing emphasizes CPU capability over GPU raw power, making it suitable for productivity-focused users who game occasionally.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35403, with a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 213PE, scores 35428, a -0.1 percent delta, meaning the i7-13700T is statistically tied. The Intel Core i7-12700KF trails by 0.1 percent with a score of 35365, and the Intel Core i5-13600T and i7-12700K are 0.3 percent behind with scores of 35305 and 35287 respectively. This places the 13700T at the top of a tightly contested performance cluster.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, with a percentile rank of 66 among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20556, a 0.1 percent delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.2 percent behind, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, putting the Arc A750 0.4 percent behind that rival. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.5 percent behind the Arc A750. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its immediate competitors by a slim margin and a GPU that trades blows with a mix of desktop and mobile parts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 define the system’s capability split, with the processor providing the majority of the overall performance weight.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700T

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds