SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF paired with the Intel Arc B580 represents a desktop configuration that balances a high-core-count CPU with a mid-range GPU. The data indicates a system that is heavily skewed toward processor-heavy workloads, with the GPU serving as a capable but secondary component for graphics-intensive tasks. This analysis is based entirely on synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class components. The processor connects via Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed to feed the 16 cores efficiently, particularly in multi-threaded scenarios where cache hits are critical for throughput. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor has been in active production since its release in late September 2022.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704 places it firmly in high-end desktop territory, while the single-core score of 5464 indicates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749 and max-thread score of 12462 suggest that the CPU scales well with thread count, though the scaling from 16 to 24 threads is modest, indicating that the efficiency cores contribute less than the performance cores in heavily threaded tasks.

The PassMark multithread score of 45817, combined with an integer math score of 154507 and floating-point math score of 114997, paints a picture of a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads with ease. The data compression score of 596493 and random string sorting score of 62726 further reinforce its strength in data manipulation tasks. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47330, placing it just 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile is 79, indicating that this pairing outperforms roughly four-fifths of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU alone holds the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile, showing a clear disparity in component tiers.

The CPU's synthetic benchmark results are consistently strong. Geekbench multicore scores reach 18258, with a single-core score of 2435. Cinebench R20 results show 16255 in multicore and 2294 in single-core, while the older R15 test yields 3901 multicore and 550 single-core. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2263 and 4-thread score of 4474 demonstrate solid scaling for lightly threaded applications. PassMark single-thread performance is 4336, which is competitive for everyday tasks and gaming.

The GPU's benchmark results are more varied. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821 and Vulkan score of 109672 indicate strong compute capability, but the PassMark DirectX scores are lower: DirectX 11 scores 128, while DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 both score 76. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 and GPU compute score of 7729 place the GPU in the mid-range tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 is a more modern indicator of gaming performance.

The overall picture shows a CPU that can drive demanding workloads without becoming a bottleneck, paired with a GPU that delivers solid but not exceptional frame rates. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 23021, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, though 0.7% below the RTX 3080.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, along with 20 RT cores for ray tracing. It does not have dedicated tensor cores, relying instead on standard shader hardware for AI-related tasks. The base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, yielding a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 27.34 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio.

Memory bandwidth is a key strength of this GPU. At 456.0 GB/s, the Arc B580 offers substantially more bandwidth than typical 12 GB cards in its class, which directly benefits texture-heavy rendering and high-resolution workloads. The 192-bit bus width and 12 GB capacity provide a balance between capacity and speed, though the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface slightly limits bandwidth to the CPU compared to a x16 connection.

The GPU's passmark DirectX scores are unusual, with DirectX 9 scoring 183, DirectX 11 scoring 128, and DirectX 10 and 12 both at 76. These scores suggest that the GPU's performance varies significantly by API generation, with older APIs performing relatively better. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 92821, indicating that the GPU excels in Vulkan-based workloads, which is relevant for modern game engines.

The power requirements are modest, with a 190 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The card uses a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot wide, measuring 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports, supporting modern high-refresh-rate and high-resolution displays.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4336 in PassMark supports high frame rates, but the GPU's 68th percentile position limits performance at high refresh rates. In esports titles at lower resolutions, the CPU can drive high FPS, but the GPU may struggle to maintain 144+ FPS in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 45817 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads, though the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means software encoding is preferable.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704 and Geekbench multicore score of 18258 make this system well-suited for video editing. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth help with timeline scrubbing and effects rendering, though the 68th percentile ranking suggests longer export times than higher-tier GPUs.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels in this workload, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 114997 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16255 indicating strong rendering performance. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS provides decent GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 20 RT cores are relatively few for ray-traced workloads.

Software Development: The CPU's high thread count and strong integer math score of 154507 make compilation tasks fast. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the DDR5 memory support speeds up build processes. The GPU is sufficient for basic graphics work but not a primary focus.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's compute capability handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing effortlessly, but the hardware is far more capable than needed for these tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy configuration. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile creates an imbalance where the processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can deliver in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most modern titles, particularly at higher resolutions and with ray tracing enabled.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will operate near its full potential, with the GPU playing a supporting role. The PassMark physics score of 2650 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 12462 indicate the CPU can sustain high utilization across all cores, which is essential for these tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that in games, the GPU's frame rate will cap the CPU's output. The GPU's position near the RTX 2080 in average score (0.6% higher) suggests frame rates typical of that class, while the CPU could support much higher FPS if paired with a stronger GPU. This imbalance is acceptable for productivity-focused users but may frustrate gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in choosing memory. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP together suggest a total system draw that the 450 W suggested PSU can handle, leaving headroom for minor upgrades. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU means future GPUs using PCIe 5.0 will be fully supported, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The most sensible upgrade path is a stronger GPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher would create a more balanced system and significantly improve gaming performance. The 20 CPU lanes of PCIe Gen 5 provide ample bandwidth for any current or near-future GPU.

The platform supports up to 20 PCIe lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The ECC memory support is a distinct advantage for workstation use, and the dual-channel memory controller can handle both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose based on budget and performance needs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures presented here are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's position at the 68th percentile and its proximity to the RTX 2080 (0.6% higher average score), estimated gaming performance is as follows. At 1080p ultra settings, most modern titles should run at 60-100 FPS, with lighter esports titles potentially exceeding 144 FPS. At 1440p ultra, frame rates are expected to drop to 40-70 FPS in demanding titles, with ray tracing significantly reducing performance due to only 20 RT cores. At 4K ultra, the GPU will struggle, with most games running below 40 FPS.

The CPU's single-thread performance of 4336 in PassMark and 5464 in Cinebench R23 indicates it will not limit frame rates in most games. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2263 suggests strong performance in games that rely heavily on one or two threads. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for current titles at 1080p and 1440p, but may become a limitation at 4K with high-resolution textures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 47330, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900F, 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B580 has 20 dedicated RT cores, though this is a relatively low count for ray-traced workloads.

Q: What is the system's combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning the system outperforms 79% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP and the GPU has a 190 W TDP.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and includes ECC memory support.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming performance. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will benefit most from the i7-13700KF's 16-core, 24-thread configuration and its 89th percentile ranking. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45817 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704 indicate strong performance in these tasks.

Students in computer science or engineering programs will appreciate the compilation speed and multitasking capability, though the hardware is far more than needed for most coursework. Small business workstations handling data analysis, virtualization, or database work will benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's high integer math score of 154507.

Gamers should consider this system only if they plan to play at 1080p or 1440p with settings below ultra, or if they intend to upgrade the GPU shortly. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking means it is suitable for mid-range gaming but will not deliver high-refresh-rate experiences in demanding titles. The 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth make it capable for 1080p ultra and 1440p high settings in most games.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700KF, a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the Intel Arc B580, a mid-range GPU from Intel's Battlemage generation. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 190 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W.

The system's combined percentile of 79 places it above the majority of desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile. This creates an unbalanced system that is significantly stronger in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47330 puts it in the top 11% of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 23021 puts it in the top 32% of all GPUs.

The pairing is best described as a productivity-focused desktop with gaming capability. The CPU is capable of sustaining heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. For users who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance, this build offers a strong foundation that can be upgraded with a more powerful GPU in the future.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds