SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a desktop build centered on a high-thread-count 13th Gen processor and a current-generation Intel discrete GPU. The CPU, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, lands at the 65th percentile. This combination produces a 77th percentile overall build, indicating a system that is heavily weighted toward processing power rather than graphics performance. The data shows a clear asymmetry: the CPU is a top-tier performer for productivity and multi-threaded workloads, whereas the GPU is a solid mid-range option for gaming and rendering.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process. Its hybrid design, which the benchmark scores reflect strongly, combines high-performance cores with efficient cores to deliver a maximum boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz. The processor's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for demanding applications. With a TDP of 125 W and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, this chip offers flexibility in platform configuration, though it does require a discrete GPU as it lacks integrated graphics.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704 points places it in a class where it can handle heavy rendering tasks, while the single-core score of 5,464 points ensures strong responsiveness in everyday applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 18,258 and single-core score of 2,435 further corroborate this balance. The 3DMark thread scaling is particularly telling: the processor scores 10,749 with 16 threads, 8,230 with 8 threads, 4,474 with 4 threads, 2,263 with 2 threads, and 1,137 with a single thread. This scaling pattern indicates near-linear gains as thread counts increase, which is a hallmark of a well-designed high-core-count chip.

The PassMark suite reveals specific workload strengths. The integer math score of 154,507 and floating-point math score of 114,997 show robust arithmetic performance, while the data compression score of 596,493 and random string sorting score of 62,726 highlight its capabilities in data manipulation tasks. The extended instructions score of 36,700 suggests strong SIMD and vector processing, which is beneficial for scientific computing and multimedia encoding. The average benchmark score of 47,330 places it just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while sitting 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. This places it in a highly competitive tier where performance differences are marginal.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where multi-threading is paramount. The 24 threads allow for efficient parallel processing, and the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks like web browsing and office productivity remain snappy. The processor's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of available processors, making it a strong choice for power users who need both high core counts and fast single-core speeds.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13700KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900F?

A: The i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47,330, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-12900F's score of 47,176. This means the i7 is slightly faster overall, though the difference is negligible in real-world use.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking, and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This means it outperforms 65% of all graphics cards, placing it in the mid-range tier, but it is not a top-tier performer.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked on the Core i7-13700KF, allowing users to adjust the clock multiplier in the BIOS to increase performance beyond the stock 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Core i7-13700KF has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is available to all cores. This helps reduce latency when multiple cores access shared data.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has a 160-bit memory bus with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings.

Q: Is the GPU's performance closer to the RTX 3070 Mobile or the Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20,556, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 3070 Mobile's 20,534 and 0.1% lower than the Arc A750's 20,582. It sits essentially between these two cards, with performance differences of less than a single percent.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant performer. The Core i7-13700KF achieves an average benchmark score of 47,330, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This score is driven by strong multi-threaded results: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704, a PassMark multithread score of 45,817, and a Geekbench multicore score of 18,258. The single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,464 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,336. These results show a processor that can handle both heavily threaded workloads and lighter single-threaded tasks with equal aplomb.

The Intel Arc B570 presents a contrasting picture. Its average benchmark score is 20,556, which places it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,649, while its Geekbench OpenCL score is 83,514 and its Vulkan score is 96,844. The PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and GPU compute score of 7,281 show that the GPU is capable, but it is not in the same performance tier as the CPU. The nearest GPU rivals illustrate this: the Arc B570 is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.1% behind the Arc A750, 0.4% ahead of the Quadro M4000M, and 0.5% behind the Radeon R9 M390X. These are all mid-range to older high-end parts, confirming the B570's position as a mid-range GPU.

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 77, which is a weighted average that reflects the CPU's high standing pulling the overall build upward. The 3DMark thread scores for the CPU (10,749 at 16 threads, 8,230 at 8 threads) indicate that the processor can keep pace with the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's lower percentile means it will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. For productivity workloads that rely on CPU computation, such as video encoding or data analysis, the system will perform admirably. For gaming at high resolutions with ultra settings, the GPU will cap performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary bottleneck in this build, particularly in gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations, data compression, or software compilation, the system will perform near the level of the top 11% of all CPUs. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform at the level of the top 35% of all GPUs, which is a substantial step down.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the database for this exact combination, as no measured FPS rows exist. However, the benchmark scores provide a basis for estimation. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,749 suggests it can feed frames quickly to the GPU, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and PassMark G3D score of 14,195 indicate its rasterization limits. In a CPU-heavy game with high physics demands, the processor will not bottleneck the GPU. Conversely, in a graphically demanding game with high-resolution textures and effects, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare.

The PassMark scores further illustrate this. The CPU's physics score of 2,650 and find prime numbers score of 186 show strong computational throughput, while the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 72 and DirectX 11 score of 118 are moderate. The GPU's compute score of 7,281 is lower than the CPU's integer math score of 154,507, confirming that for non-graphics compute tasks, the CPU is far more capable. This means that for tasks like machine learning inference or video transcoding that can use either component, the CPU will often be the faster choice, while tasks specifically optimized for GPU shaders will be limited by the B570's throughput.

The imbalance is not necessarily a flaw; it is a design choice that favors productivity. Users who primarily perform CPU-intensive work and game occasionally will find this pairing well-suited. Users who prioritize gaming at 4K ultra settings will find the GPU lacking. The 77th combined percentile reflects a system that is above average overall but excel in specific niches.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower and are willing to accept mid-range graphics performance. The 89th percentile CPU makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data sets. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704 and Geekbench multicore score of 18,258 indicate that tasks like rendering a complex 3D scene or exporting a long video will complete quickly. Software developers will benefit from the 24 threads for compiling large codebases, and the PassMark data compression score of 596,493 suggests strong performance in archiving and file manipulation tasks.

Students and researchers in fields like engineering, finance, or data science will find the CPU's floating-point math score of 114,997 and extended instructions score of 36,700 valuable for simulations and numerical analysis. The support for ECC memory adds a layer of reliability for long-running computations where data integrity is critical. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet analysis will also benefit from the CPU's multi-threading capabilities.

For gamers, this build is best suited to 1080p or 1440p resolution with high but not ultra settings. The GPU's 65th percentile means it can handle most modern titles at 1080p with high settings, but it will struggle at 4K or with ray tracing enabled. Gamers who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity will find it adequate, but those who want maximum settings will need a more powerful GPU. The CPU's high single-thread score of 5,464 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even in CPU-bound games, the processor will not be a limiting factor.

The build is also a reasonable choice for a general-purpose desktop where the user wants a fast, responsive system for everyday tasks and occasional gaming. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,336 and the GPU's PassMark G2D score of 661 indicate that desktop navigation, web browsing, and office applications will run smoothly. The system is not well-suited for users who need top-tier gaming performance or who rely heavily on GPU-accelerated compute tasks like deep learning, where the B570's compute score of 7,281 would be a bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700KF and Intel Arc B570 combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's 65th percentile and the CPU's 89th percentile provide a basis for these estimates.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 14,195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649, the Arc B570 is positioned as a mid-range card. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this GPU is likely to deliver playable frame rates in most titles, typically in the 60-90 FPS range for modern games, though exact numbers cannot be confirmed. At 1440p ultra, performance will drop, and users may need to lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. At 4K ultra, the GPU will struggle, and frame rates are likely to be below 30 FPS in demanding titles.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming. Its 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,749 and 8-thread score of 8,230 show that it can handle the multi-threaded workloads of modern game engines. Even in games that are heavily single-threaded, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,464 ensures high frame rates. The bottleneck will consistently be the GPU. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 72 and DirectX 11 score of 118 suggest that it performs better in older APIs, while its Vulkan score of 96,844 in Geekbench indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based titles.

For esports titles and older games, the GPU will easily push high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p. For AAA titles at high settings, the user should expect 60 FPS at 1080p, but may need to reduce settings to achieve higher frame rates. The 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but at 4K, some games may exceed this capacity, causing performance dips. The 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for this class of GPU and should not be a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements, and it will fit in most modern motherboards with a dual-slot design.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 150 W, for a combined draw of 275 W. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 450 W, which provides adequate headroom for the entire system, including other components like storage and fans. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard on most power supplies. The system's power requirements are modest, leaving room for upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. Since the CPU is at the 89th percentile, it has significant headroom to drive a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Users who find the Arc B570 limiting could upgrade to a higher-tier GPU, such as those in the 90th percentile or above, and the CPU would still be able to keep up. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample processing power for even the most demanding graphics cards.

Memory upgrades are also possible. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose the platform that fits their budget and performance needs. DDR5 offers higher bandwidth, which can benefit CPU-bound workloads. The 30 MB L3 cache is generous, so users are unlikely to need a CPU upgrade before the platform becomes obsolete. The Intel Socket 1700 is a mature platform, so the next upgrade would likely involve a new motherboard and CPU, rather than just a CPU swap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the Intel Arc B570. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 77, indicating an above-average system overall. The CPU is a top-tier processor, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part, ranking in the 65th percentile of all GPUs.

The system's overall tier is defined by its CPU strength. For productivity, it is a high-end machine capable of handling demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease. For gaming, it is a mid-range system that will run most titles at 1080p or 1440p with high settings. The i7-13700KF is a capable air cooler, and the GPU is a dual-slot card that fits in most cases.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $384, and the launch MSRP of the GPU is 219 USD. The combination provides a balanced platform for users who need CPU power more than GPU power. The 77th percentile ranking reflects a system that is well above average for general use, but it is not a top-tier gaming machine. The build is best suited for users who value processing performance and are willing to compromise on graphics fidelity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the BMG-G21 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both set at 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is a moderate amount of VRAM and bandwidth, sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but potentially limiting at 4K with high-resolution textures. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, indicating solid rasterization throughput for its class.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the GPU's overall performance level suggests that ray tracing at high settings will be challenging. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for the GPU's bandwidth requirements.

In benchmarks, the Arc B570 scores 2,649 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 83,514 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 96,844 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 14,195, and the GPU compute score is 7,281. The average benchmark score of 20,556 places it at the 65th percentile, with nearest rivals being the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% faster), Arc A750 (0.1% slower), Quadro M4000M (0.4% faster), and Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% slower). This indicates that the B570 is a capable mid-range GPU, but it is not competitive with high-end cards.

For rendering and compute tasks, the GPU's performance is moderate. The OpenCL and Vulkan scores show that it can accelerate certain workloads, but the CPU's compute performance is far higher. The GPU is best suited for gaming, video playback, and light content creation tasks that leverage its hardware encoders and decoders. The 10 GB VRAM is useful for larger textures and some professional workloads, but the 160-bit bus limits memory bandwidth compared to higher-end cards. The GPU's TDP of 150 W and suggested PSU of 450 W make it an efficient choice for a mid-range system.