SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc A750

The Intel Core i7-13700KF pairs a 16-core Raptor Lake-S processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card in a desktop configuration that sits at the 78th percentile overall among combined CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is a strong performer at the 89th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 66th percentile against all GPUs, creating a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component rather than from direct gameplay data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor with substantial multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13700KF scores 38,704 in multi-core and 5,464 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results are 16,255 multi-core and 2,294 single-core, while R15 shows 3,901 multi-core and 550 single-core. Geekbench reports 18,258 multi-core and 2,435 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal a clear progression: 2,263 at 2 threads, 4,474 at 4 threads, 8,230 at 8 threads, 10,749 at 16 threads, and 12,462 at max threads. This scaling curve indicates that the processor continues to gain performance as more threads are utilized, though the gains diminish beyond 16 threads where the efficiency cores are fully engaged.

The average benchmark score of 47,330 places this CPU at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, scores 47,468, a delta of -0.3% meaning the i7-13700KF is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i9-12900F scores 47,176 (0.3% behind), while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47,527 (-0.4%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47,022 (0.7% ahead of the i7). These sub-1% deltas mean the i7-13700KF sits in a very tight competitive cluster at the top of the desktop CPU market.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores provide additional context. Multi-thread performance is 45,817, with single-thread at 4,336. Integer math scores 154,507, floating-point math scores 114,997, and extended instructions score 36,700. Data compression hits 596,493, data encryption 33,314, and random string sorting 62,726. The physics score is 2,650, and prime number finding is 186. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at heavily threaded productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while also maintaining strong single-threaded responsiveness for everyday applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of this pairing is 78, which sits well below the CPU's individual 89th percentile. This gap is explained by the GPU's 66th percentile standing, which means the Arc A750 is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them in most gaming scenarios, making the GPU the bottleneck at typical gaming resolutions.

The benchmark data supports this interpretation. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,749 and max-thread score of 12,462 show substantial headroom for game logic, physics, and AI tasks. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 are more modest. In CPU-bound scenarios like competitive esports titles at lower resolutions, the i7-13700KF's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,137, Cinebench R23 single-core 5,464) would push frame rates high, but the GPU would cap output at a lower level. In GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the CPU would be underutilized while the GPU works at maximum capacity.

The FPS scaling picture is uneven because of this imbalance. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's throughput limits overall performance. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the bottleneck, and the CPU's advantage over lesser processors narrows in practice. For productivity workloads, however, the balance shifts entirely toward the CPU, where the 16 cores and 24 threads handle rendering, compilation, and encoding tasks with the GPU only occasionally assisting through compute workloads like OpenCL and Vulkan.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13700KF compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47,330, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. It is within 0.7% of four rivals: the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47,468, -0.3%), Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176, 0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527, -0.4%), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022, 0.7%). These deltas are negligible in practice.

Q: What is the GPU's competitive position?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20,556 (0.1% delta), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.2%). The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (-0.4%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (0.5%).

Q: Does this system support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, meaning the i7-13700KF can be overclocked beyond its 5.40 GHz boost clock. The KF designation also means it lacks integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is notable for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer rate.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all recorded system configurations. The CPU is the stronger component at the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this exact combination?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations must be estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the i7-13700KF and Arc A750.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong CPU performance first and GPU performance second. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit most, as the i7-13700KF's 16 cores and 24 threads deliver top-tier multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45,817 indicate the CPU can handle demanding render jobs, while the Arc A750 provides hardware-accelerated encoding and compute support through its 28 ray tracing cores and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong gains from the high core count and the PassMark integer math score of 154,507. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU's capability for simulations and data processing, though the GPU is less of a differentiator for their workloads. Small business workstations running virtualization, database transactions, or financial modeling will find the CPU's threading advantage valuable, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running jobs.

Gamers should approach this build with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU can feed high frame rates, but the Arc A750's 66th percentile standing means it will cap performance below what the CPU could theoretically support. Gamers at 1440p or 4K who play visually demanding titles will be GPU-bound, which makes the CPU's power less relevant for their specific use case. Competitive gamers who prioritize CPU-bound esports titles at high refresh rates will see the best balance, as those games rely more on processor speed than graphics throughput.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700KF achieves strong results across all major benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38,704 multi-core and 5,464 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show scores of 1,137 single-thread, 2,263 at 2 threads, 4,474 at 4 threads, 8,230 at 8 threads, 10,749 at 16 threads, and 12,462 at max threads. Geekbench reports 18,258 multi-core and 2,435 single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 45,817 and single-thread of 4,336, with a physics score of 2,650. The average benchmark score is 47,330, placing the CPU at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, is only 0.3% ahead, making this a top-tier desktop processor.

The Intel Arc A750 GPU delivers more modest results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612, and Geekbench OpenCL scores 98,554 with Vulkan at 85,631. PassMark G3D scores 12,534, with GPU compute at 5,368. The DirectX tests show scores of 65 for DX10, 72 for DX11, 70 for DX12, and 181 for DX9. The G2D score is 732. The average benchmark score of 20,582 places the GPU at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, nearly identical to the Intel Arc B570 at 20,556 (0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.2% delta).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates in the top 11% of all processors while the GPU operates in the top 34% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU providing the bulk of the system's overall capability. For productivity workloads that heavily utilize the CPU, this build performs near the level of much more expensive configurations. For gaming, the system's performance tier is determined almost entirely by the GPU's 66th percentile standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i7-13700KF's single-thread score of 4,336 in PassMark and 5,464 in Cinebench R23 single-core can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the Arc A750's 66th percentile GPU standing limits overall output. Estimated frame rates would be lower than what the CPU alone could support, with the GPU becoming the constraint above roughly 100-120 FPS in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,817 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 12,462 indicate the processor can handle encoding workloads without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU's hardware acceleration also supports stream encoding tasks.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704 and Geekbench multi-core of 18,258 show strong rendering performance for video exports. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with real-time previews and effects processing. The system handles 1080p and 1440p editing workflows comfortably, with 4K editing possible but slower due to GPU limitations.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores deliver excellent CPU-based rendering performance, with PassMark floating-point math at 114,997 and integer math at 154,507. GPU rendering is supported through the Arc A750's 28 ray tracing cores and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute, though the GPU's 66th percentile standing means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software development: The high core count and strong multi-threaded scores make compilation and test execution fast. The PassMark data compression score of 596,493 and random string sorting of 62,726 support large codebase operations. ECC memory support adds stability for long build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,336, Cinebench R23 single-core 5,464) ensures responsive everyday computing. The system's 78th combined percentile means it exceeds the requirements for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, with substantial headroom for more demanding academic software.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer rate. The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. It features 28 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card is dual-slot, requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, with a TDP of 225 W and a suggested 550 W PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0.

The GPU's benchmark results show a mixed profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is a modern DirectX 12 test, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85,631 indicates strong compute through the Vulkan API. The OpenCL score of 98,554 shows capable general-purpose compute performance. PassMark scores are more varied: the G3D score of 12,534 is the headline number, while the DirectX tests show low scores (65 DX10, 72 DX11, 70 DX12, 181 DX9), which likely reflect driver overhead or benchmark-specific issues rather than raw hardware capability. The GPU compute score of 5,368 and G2D score of 732 round out the picture.

At the 66th percentile of all GPUs, the Arc A750 sits in the mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20,556, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, 0.2%), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, -0.4%), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.5%). These sub-1% deltas mean the A750 is competitive with a wide range of mid-range GPUs, though it does not reach the performance tier of high-end desktop cards. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p use, but may be limiting for 4K textures or heavy ray tracing workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining Intel's Core i7-13700KF processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a TDP of 125 W and unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The GPU is an Arc A750 with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 225 W TDP. Both components are from Intel, making this an all-Intel configuration.

The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all recorded CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU's 89th percentile standing is the primary driver of this position, while the GPU's 66th percentile brings the overall score down. In terms of system balance, the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU for gaming workloads, but this imbalance is advantageous for productivity tasks that rely heavily on processor performance. The system would be classified as a high-performance desktop workstation capable of gaming, with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of each component. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty.

Based on the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,464, PassMark single-thread 4,336) and the GPU's mid-range standing (66th percentile, PassMark G3D 12,534), the estimated gaming performance at 1080p ultra settings would place this system in the 60-100 FPS range for most modern titles. The CPU can feed high frame rates, but the GPU's throughput caps overall output. At 1440p ultra, estimated frame rates would drop to 40-70 FPS as the GPU becomes more heavily loaded. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 66th percentile standing would limit performance to 20-40 FPS in demanding titles, with lower settings required for playable frame rates.

The GPU's DirectX 12 support and 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware ray tracing capability, though the 66th percentile GPU performance means ray tracing workloads would be demanding. Games that are CPU-bound (esports titles, strategy games, simulation games) would see the best performance relative to other systems, as the i7-13700KF's 89th percentile CPU performance drives high frame rates. Games that are GPU-bound (AAA action titles, open-world games) would perform at a level consistent with the GPU's mid-range tier, making the CPU's power largely irrelevant in those scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The platform supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation use. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested 550 W power supply, so the total system power draw requires a PSU in that range or higher.

The upgrade path for this system is primarily through the GPU. The CPU is already at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, so upgrading the processor would yield minimal gains. The most sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU to better match the CPU's performance headroom, which would raise the combined percentile from its current 78. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth headroom for future GPUs, and the platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means memory upgrades are possible without replacing the motherboard.

For users who purchased this system with DDR4 memory, upgrading to DDR5 would improve memory bandwidth, though the CPU's dual-channel configuration means the gains would be modest. The unlocked multiplier allows CPU overclocking to extract additional performance, which could help close the gap to the CPU's nearest rivals. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as the successor, so replacing the Arc A750 with a newer Intel GPU or a competitor's product would be the primary upgrade consideration. The system's overall 78th combined percentile leaves room for improvement through GPU upgrades, while the CPU platform remains competitive at the top tier.