SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: It is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor from Intel's Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S). It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W, and uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A350?

A: It is an Intel discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, Arc 3 tier), fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a peak FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700KF compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,330, placing it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. It also trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4%.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Arc A350 have any display outputs?

A: No. The specification lists "No outputs" for display outputs, which means this GPU is not designed to drive a monitor directly; it requires a system with an alternative display solution or is intended for compute-only workloads.

Q: What is the memory support for the Core i7-13700KF?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory (true), which is notable for workstation or server-type applications.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct gameplay testing.

---

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13700KF paired with the Intel Arc A350, all gaming performance figures here are estimated from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The data shows the CPU is exceptionally strong for gaming workloads, with a single-thread score of 1,137 in the 3DMark single-thread test and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,336. These numbers indicate the processor can feed frames at very high rates in CPU-bound titles.

However, the GPU is the limiting factor. The Arc A350 has a 4 GB GDDR6 memory buffer with only 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and its FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS. For 1080p gaming at high settings, this GPU is likely to deliver playable but modest frame rates. In less demanding esports titles, the strong CPU could push frame rates toward the 60–100 FPS range at 1080p, but in graphically intensive AAA games, the GPU's limited memory and compute resources will cap performance well below that.

At 1440p, the situation worsens. The 4 GB VRAM is likely to be a bottleneck in modern titles that exceed this capacity, causing texture pop-in or reduced texture quality. The estimated frame rates at 1440p would be lower than 1080p, and the GPU's 64-bit memory bus becomes a significant constraint. At 4K, the Arc A350 is not a viable option for gaming; the bandwidth and VRAM are insufficient for smooth gameplay in most titles.

It is important to note that the GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it performs better than half of all recorded GPUs, but for gaming specifically, the lack of measured data means these estimates carry uncertainty. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios; instead, the GPU will determine the overall experience.

---

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i7-13700KF and the Arc A350 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's average benchmark score of 47,330 places it in the 89th percentile, while the GPU's percentile is exactly 50, meaning the GPU is an average performer. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance: the CPU is pulling the system up, but the GPU is holding it back in graphics-intensive tasks.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 2,650 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,749 demonstrate ample headroom. The processor can handle complex simulations and high entity counts without breaking a sweat. In GPU-bound workloads, however, the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will saturate quickly, meaning the GPU becomes the limiting factor in any task that relies on rasterization or compute shaders.

The FPS scaling pattern reinforces this: in gaming, the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,137) would allow for high frame rates if the GPU could keep up, but the GPU's modest specs cap the output. In content creation, the CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 38,704) suggest that rendering tasks will be CPU-bound, with the GPU contributing only where accelerated features are used.

The TDP figures also highlight the imbalance. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, while the GPU has a 25 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, which is far below what a system with this CPU would typically require, indicating that the GPU is a low-power component designed for efficiency rather than raw performance. The data shows a system that is over-provisioned on the CPU side and under-provisioned on the GPU side for any graphics-heavy workload.

---

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and need only modest graphics acceleration. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes this an excellent choice for software developers compiling large codebases, students running virtual machines or data analysis tools, and professionals using office productivity suites where the GPU is barely utilized.

For gamers, this build is only appropriate for those playing at 1080p with low to medium settings, and even then, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern titles. It is not recommended for high-refresh gaming or for resolutions above 1080p. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 8,230 and 4-thread score of 4,474 indicate good responsiveness in everyday tasks, but the GPU will disappoint anyone expecting smooth gameplay in demanding titles.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video encoding or 3D rendering with CPU-only engines, will benefit from the Core i7-13700KF's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704. The GPU's compute capabilities, while limited, can still handle some acceleration tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard constraint for large datasets. Small business workstations that run database applications, spreadsheets, and web services will find the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45,817 and data compression score of 596,493 more than adequate, with the GPU serving as a basic display adapter.

---

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that excels across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38,704 in multi-core and 5,464 in single-core. In Geekbench, it achieves 18,258 in multi-core and 2,435 in single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 45,817, with a single-thread score of 4,336. These numbers place the CPU at the 89th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 47,330.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, but its percentile is 50, indicating an average performer. The combined percentile for the system is 70, which is a direct result of the CPU's high standing and the GPU's median position. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (deltaPct -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-12900F (deltaPct 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (deltaPct -0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (deltaPct 0.7%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the Core i7-13700KF is effectively tied with these processors in average score.

The data shows a clear picture: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a modest entry-level part. The combined picture is one of a system that is CPU-dominant, with the GPU providing basic graphics functionality. For anyone evaluating this build, the CPU is the star of the show, and the GPU is a secondary consideration.

---

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 tier). It uses the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, yielding a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

For rendering, these specs indicate a GPU that can handle light to moderate workloads. The 50th percentile ranking means it is average among all GPUs, but the 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern rendering tasks that often require more memory. The low TDP of 25 W and the single-slot design suggest this is an efficiency-focused part, not a performance part. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for this performance class. The lack of display outputs is a critical detail: this GPU is not meant to be the primary display driver, and its use case is likely compute or secondary acceleration.

---

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which allows for high-bandwidth add-in cards. The multiplier is unlocked, meaning the CPU can be overclocked for additional performance, subject to adequate cooling and power delivery.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a suggested PSU of 200 W, which is well below what a system with a 125 W TDP CPU would typically require. The GPU's TDP is only 25 W, so power consumption is minimal. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with its successor being Battlemage. The CPU is still marked as active in production.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more capable GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The CPU's high percentile and strong multi-threaded scores mean it will not be the bottleneck in most systems, so a GPU upgrade would directly improve graphics performance. Alternatively, adding more memory (DDR4 or DDR5, depending on the motherboard) could benefit memory-intensive workloads. The platform itself is mature, with support for PCIe Gen 5, so future storage devices and accelerators can be accommodated.

---

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining an Intel Core i7-13700KF (16 cores, 24 threads, Raptor Lake architecture) with an Intel Arc A350 (Xe-HPG architecture, 4 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a high-end desktop processor, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete part. The combined percentile is 70, indicating that this pairing outperforms 70% of all recorded systems in the database.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a clear performance hierarchy: this is a CPU-centric build with a GPU that is adequate for basic tasks but not for demanding graphics workloads. The data shows that the CPU is the dominant component, and the system's overall tier is defined by the processor's strength. For users who need raw CPU power without a strong GPU, this build makes sense; for anyone expecting balanced performance, the GPU will be a disappointment.

---

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support enabled.

Benchmark results show exceptional performance across the board. The 3DMark scores scale well with thread count: 1,137 (single-thread), 2,263 (2-thread), 4,474 (4-thread), 8,230 (8-thread), 10,749 (16-thread), and 12,462 (max-thread). Cinebench R23 scores are 5,464 (single-core) and 38,704 (multi-core). Geekbench scores are 2,435 (single-core) and 18,258 (multi-core). PassMark results include 45,817 (multithread), 4,336 (single-thread), 596,493 (data compression), 33,314 (data encryption), and 154,507 (integer math).

The 89th percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier CPU. The average benchmark score of 47,330 places it within 1% of several high-end rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. For real workloads, the high thread count and strong multi-core scores make this ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-thread scores are also strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks.

---

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can easily support high frame rates, but the GPU limits this scenario. At 1080p, the Arc A350 may achieve playable frame rates in esports titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS compute will prevent high-refresh (144 Hz+) gaming in demanding titles. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests average performance, not high-refresh capability.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 45,817, can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's modest performance will cap the game's frame rates. Streaming at 1080p is feasible, but the overall experience will be limited by the GPU.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704 is excellent for rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU can assist with effects, but its 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for large projects or 4K workflows. The CPU is the workhorse here.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering engines, this CPU is outstanding. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12,462 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16,255 indicate strong performance. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, so this scenario is CPU-dominated.

Software development: The CPU's high core count and fast single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4,336) make it ideal for compiling code, running tests, and managing virtual machines. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering but not for GPU-accelerated development tasks.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for office tasks, but the CPU's responsiveness (3DMark 2-thread score of 2,263) ensures smooth multitasking. The GPU's low power draw (25 W) and single-slot design make it a quiet, efficient addition, though the lack of display outputs means a separate solution is needed for connecting a monitor.