SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF paired with an Intel Arc A310E is a desktop configuration that pairs a high-end 16-core Raptor Lake processor with an entry-level Alchemist graphics card. This is a profoundly unbalanced pairing, where the CPU operates in a completely different performance class than the GPU. The following analysis is based strictly on the provided benchmark data, with all FPS figures treated as estimates due to the absence of measured gaming data for this specific combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, and the benchmark data confirms its high ceiling.

In multi-threaded performance, the CPU scores 38,704 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 45,817 in Passmark multithread. The 3DMark max threads score of 12,462 further demonstrates its ability to scale across all 24 threads. These scores place the CPU at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score of 47,330 puts it in a dead heat with its nearest rivals: it is only 0.3% slower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, while being 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900F and 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. This suggests that for heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, compiling code, or scientific simulations, the i7-13700KF delivers top-tier performance that is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competitors.

Single-threaded performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,464 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2,435 show excellent per-core efficiency. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,137 and 2-thread score of 2,263 indicate that even lightly threaded applications, such as older games or everyday productivity tasks, will run very smoothly. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,336 reinforces this. The balanced scaling from 2 threads (2,263) to 4 threads (4,474) to 8 threads (8,230) shows the architecture scales nearly linearly, meaning there is no bottleneck in the CPU's internal design that would hinder performance in moderately threaded applications.

For real workloads, this means the CPU is a powerhouse for both productivity and gaming. In content creation, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16,255 and Geekbench multicore score of 18,258 indicate rapid video encoding and 3D rendering times. The Passmark data compression score of 596,493 and integer math score of 154,507 show strong performance in database operations and financial modeling. However, the Passmark find prime numbers score of 186 is comparatively low, suggesting the architecture is not specifically optimized for that particular type of integer workload, though this is a niche concern. Overall, the CPU analysis shows a processor that will not be the limiting factor in any modern workload, whether it is gaming, streaming, or professional content creation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a severe bottleneck situation where the GPU is the limiting component in virtually all gaming and graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 47,330 and a 89th percentile rank, is a top-tier performer. The GPU, the Intel Arc A310E, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This massive gulf in performance class indicates that the CPU will be waiting on the GPU to finish rendering frames, leading to low GPU utilization and underutilization of the CPU's potential.

In gaming, the CPU could easily feed a much more powerful GPU. The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 5,464, multicore 38,704) mean it can handle frame generation and physics calculations with ease. However, the GPU's specifications are modest: 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS. This is an entry-level graphics solution. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also be a constraint in modern games that require more video memory and bandwidth.

The bottleneck is therefore unequivocally the GPU. In any 3D application, the Arc A310E will be pegged at its maximum load while the i7-13700KF is largely idle. The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, would show that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, whereas upgrading the CPU would not. The combined percentile of this build is 70, which reflects the drag the GPU places on the overall system. For non-graphics tasks, the balance is excellent, as the CPU's power is fully utilized. But for gaming, this is a classic case of overspending on the processor and underspending on the graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature useful for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is future-proof for high-speed NVMe SSDs and next-generation GPUs, though the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU is a single-slot card with a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W. This is very low, considering the CPU alone has a TDP of 125 W. This suggests that a 250 W power supply is only suitable for a system with minimal additional components and the GPU running at stock settings. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, but doing so would increase power draw beyond the suggested PSU rating. The GPU requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot, which simplifies installation.

A sensible next upgrade path is to replace the GPU. The CPU is a high-end part that will remain relevant for years, but the Arc A310E is an end-of-life product with a successor in Battlemage. Upgrading the GPU to a mid-range or high-end card would transform this system into a top-tier gaming and workstation machine, fully utilizing the CPU's 89th percentile performance. The motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a modern GPU will not be bandwidth-limited. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 offers an upgrade path for users on older platforms, though they would need a new motherboard. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the platform's overall efficiency mean that a 550 W to 650 W PSU would be a sensible upgrade to handle a more powerful GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS values discussed here are estimates based on the CPU's benchmark scores and the GPU's hardware specifications. The Arc A310E has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with 768 shading units. Its FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, which is entry-level.

Given the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus, gaming performance will be limited to 1080p resolution with low to medium graphical settings. In esports titles, which are less demanding on the GPU, the CPU's strong single-thread performance could allow for high frame rates, but the GPU's raw throughput will still be the limiting factor. For example, in a game like Counter-Strike 2, the CPU could push well over 300 FPS, but the Arc A310E would likely cap the output around 60-80 FPS at medium settings.

In AAA titles, the performance will be significantly lower. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 1080p gaming in modern titles. Estimates suggest that games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield would run at 30-40 FPS at 1080p with low settings, and may struggle with stuttering due to the limited 4 GB VRAM. The CPU's performance is irrelevant here, as the GPU is the sole bottleneck. The 50th percentile ranking for the GPU confirms its mid-pack status, meaning it is neither a terrible performer nor a good one. For users expecting a gaming experience, this combination will disappoint, and the CPU's power will be entirely wasted in this context.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not ideal for gamers. The intended users are those who need maximum CPU compute power but have minimal graphics requirements. The target audience includes software developers who compile large codebases, where the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704 and Passmark multithread score of 45,817 will dramatically reduce build times. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,435) also benefits developers running heavy IDE tools and unit tests.

Content creators focused on CPU-bound tasks, such as video transcoding or audio processing, would also benefit. The Passmark data encryption score of 33,314 and floating point math score of 114,997 indicate strong performance in encryption and scientific computing tasks. Small business workstations running database applications would benefit from the data compression score of 596,493. Students in engineering or data science fields who run simulations would see excellent performance in CPU-bound workloads. However, if any of these users require 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU will be a severe limitation. This build is for users who prioritize compute over graphics, and who may later add a discrete GPU for gaming or rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 89% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How much faster is the i7-13700KF than the Intel Core i9-12900F?

A: The i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47,330, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-12900F's score of 47,176.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and power connector requirement?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W and requires no power connectors, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700KF supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-correcting workloads in professional applications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, utilizing 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Is this build suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: No. The GPU's modest specs (768 shading units, 3.072 TFLOPS) will bottleneck any gaming workload, making high refresh rates at 1080p unlikely even with the CPU's strong performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU configuration?

A: The combined percentile is 70, reflecting the overall system performance level, which is dragged down by the entry-level GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The CPU can easily handle high refresh rates, but the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates to 30-60 FPS at 1080p low settings. The GPU is the bottleneck and prevents the CPU's potential from being realized.

Streaming: Acceptable for CPU-side encoding. The i7-13700KF's 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704, can handle game streaming and encoding simultaneously without impacting CPU-bound tasks. However, the GPU will limit the game's graphical quality and frame rate.

Video editing: Excellent for CPU-accelerated encoding and effects. The Passmark multithread score of 45,817 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16,255 indicate rapid rendering of timelines and exports. The GPU is insufficient for GPU-accelerated effects, but basic editing will be smooth.

3D rendering: The CPU is top-tier for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,704. However, the GPU's 6 ray tracing cores and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance are too weak for GPU rendering or real-time viewport work.

Software development: Ideal. Compilation times will be minimal thanks to the CPU's high integer performance (Passmark integer math 154,507) and multithreaded capabilities. The GPU is irrelevant for text editing and command-line tools.

Student and office work: Overkill. The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2,435) is more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The GPU's 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multiple monitors, though the overall system is more powerful than needed for these tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration. It combines the Intel Core i7-13700KF, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level 4 GB Alchemist GPU. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This creates a significant imbalance, with the CPU vastly outperforming the GPU. The overall tier of the system is reflected in its combined percentile of 70, which positions it as a mid-range system for general use, but a low-tier system for gaming. The CPU's strength makes it a workstation-class compute machine, but the GPU limits it to basic display output and light graphics tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across all tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38,704 multicore and 5,464 single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 18,258 multicore and 2,435 single-core. The Passmark multithread score is 45,817, and the single-thread score is 4,336. These results place the CPU at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47,330. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, scores 47,468, a difference of -0.3%, meaning the i7-13700KF is nearly identical in performance.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310E, has no benchmark scores listed in the data, with an average benchmark score of 0. It holds a 50th percentile rank against all GPUs. Its hardware specs include 768 shading units, a base/boost clock of 2000 MHz, and a FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS. The GPU is an end-of-life product. The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier performer in the 89th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-pack entry-level card in the 50th percentile. The system's combined percentile of 70 indicates that while the CPU pulls the overall score up, the GPU significantly limits the system's gaming and graphics capabilities. For compute-heavy tasks, the system performs at a high level; for graphics-intensive tasks, it performs at a basic level.