SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 represents a compelling desktop combination that balances a high-core-count CPU with a modern mid-range GPU. The data indicates a system positioned at the 79th combined percentile, with the CPU performing in the 89th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU in the 68th percentile against all GPUs. This pairing is notable for its strong CPU foundation, which supports a GPU that delivers solid 1080p and 1440p performance, though it faces limitations at higher resolutions in demanding titles.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and the BMG-G21 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for the class, offering headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The hardware configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, supporting a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The raw compute performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

For ray tracing, the Arc B580 includes 20 dedicated RT cores, which is a significant feature for a GPU in this tier. The benchmark scores for the GPU place it at the 68th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 23021. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Arc B580 sits within a tight cluster: it is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (score 23061), 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (score 22895), 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (score 23172), and 1% behind the NVIDIA P106-100 (score 23249). This indicates that the Arc B580 performs at a level commensurate with older high-end cards, though its architectural advantages in VRAM capacity and modern API support may not be fully captured in raw average scores.

The GPU’s performance in synthetic benchmarks shows a strong showing in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 109672, and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821. In Passmark tests, the G3D score is 15748, with a GPU compute score of 7729. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068, which is a modern test that reflects current rendering workloads. For rendering applications, the 12 GB VRAM buffer is advantageous for holding large scenes and textures, reducing the need for frequent data transfers. The combination of 20 RT cores and 2560 shading units suggests that the GPU can handle hybrid rendering workloads that mix rasterization and ray tracing, though the raw FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS is a limiting factor for compute-heavy tasks compared to higher-tier cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on their budget and performance goals. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is a forward-looking interface for fast NVMe storage and future GPUs. The Arc B580, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 190 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450 W. This suggests that the combined power draw is well within the range of a standard mid-range power supply, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, with dimensions of 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width. This is a manageable size for most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be to increase memory capacity or speed, particularly if using DDR4, to better feed the CPU’s 24 threads. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which can extend its lifespan. For the GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a potential bottleneck when compared to a full x16 slot, but the performance delta in most games is minimal. The next logical upgrade would be to a GPU with higher raw compute throughput, as the current card’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the primary limiting factor for 4K gaming. The platform’s support for PCIe Gen 5 means that a future GPU upgrade will not be constrained by the motherboard’s bandwidth, provided the CPU’s 20 lanes are sufficient.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache is beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as database operations and certain scientific computations.

In benchmark tests, the CPU demonstrates strong scaling from 2 threads to 16 threads. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 2262 for 2 threads to 8193 for 8 threads, and reaching 12412 for max threads. The single-thread score is 1136, and the 16-thread score is 10717, indicating a slight regression from the 8-thread score due to thermal or power constraints under full load. In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score is 30745, while the single-core score is 2116, showing a multi-core advantage of approximately 14.5x. The R20 scores are 16292 for multi-core and 2299 for single-core, and the R15 scores are 4507.5 for multi-core and 303 for single-core.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (score 46971, delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (score 47022, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (score 46654, delta 0.5%), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (score 46653, delta 0.5%). This places the i7-13700K in a competitive position, essentially neck-and-neck with the Ryzen 9 5900 and slightly ahead of the Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon w3-2535. The Passmark scores further illustrate its strengths: multithread score of 45887, single-thread score of 4333, integer math of 154446, floating-point math of 114867, and data encryption of 33249. The extended instructions score of 36625 indicates strong SIMD performance, which is relevant for scientific and engineering software.

For real workloads, the 24 threads are well-suited for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where parallel tasks can saturate the cores. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks, such as legacy applications or certain game engines, will perform well. The data shows this CPU is a balanced choice for both productivity and gaming, with a slight edge in multi-threaded tasks over its immediate rivals.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This desktop build is targeted at users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance paired with a capable mid-range GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the 24 threads and high IPC are beneficial. The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking, while lower, is still adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the measured FPS data.

For gamers at 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 168 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 149.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, these figures drop to 150 FPS, 117 FPS, and 100.5 FPS respectively, which are still excellent for high-refresh monitors. However, at 3840x2160, the GPU struggles in demanding titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 21.4 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 17.8 FPS. This suggests that the target gamer is primarily a 1080p or 1440p user, not a 4K enthusiast.

Content creators will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 useful for rendering tasks, and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is beneficial for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support it. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 154446 and data compression score of 595292, which are relevant for compilation and data processing. Students and small business workstations can leverage the system’s balance for general productivity, office applications, and light multitasking, though the GPU may be overkill for pure office work unless it involves graphical design or light video editing. The build is less suited for users who require maximum GPU compute, such as AI researchers or high-end 3D animators, given the GPU’s modest FP32 throughput.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This system excels at 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. Measured FPS at 1920x1080 includes 332.1 FPS in CS:GO, 339.9 FPS in Valorant, and 180.7 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege X. At 2560x1440, these drop to 224 FPS, 288 FPS, and 114.7 FPS, respectively, still well above the 144 Hz threshold for most monitors. For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU delivers 47.1 FPS at 1080p, which is playable but not high-refresh territory.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. With a 3DMark max-thread score of 12412 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745, the i7-13700K can handle x264 encoding at moderate presets without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM also helps when using GPU-based encoders, as it can hold both the game and encoding buffers.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 45887 and floating-point math score of 114867 indicate strong performance for rendering and applying effects in video editors. The GPU’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM are sufficient for 4K timeline scrubbing and preview, though final renders will be CPU-bound. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821 suggests the GPU can accelerate certain effects, but the CPU remains the primary workhorse.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the i7-13700K’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4507.5 and R20 multi-core of 16292 show it can handle complex scenes. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, but the 20 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 indicates the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads, though render times will be longer than with higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 595292 and integer math score of 154446 are directly relevant to code compilation and data processing. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, significantly reducing compile times. The system’s 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures that even the most demanding developer workloads, such as running multiple virtual machines or containers, will be handled smoothly.

Student and office work: For typical office applications, this system is overkill but provides a smooth experience. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4333 ensures snappy response in web browsers and productivity suites. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 709 is adequate for 2D desktop rendering and multiple monitors, though the power consumption of 190 W is unnecessary for this use case.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc B580 is 79, based on the pairRankByFps data.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700K compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, which is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900’s score of 46971.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc B580?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, using 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for a system with this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B580 is 450 W, while the GPU itself has a TDP of 190 W.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: How many RT cores does the Intel Arc B580 have?

A: The GPU includes 20 dedicated ray tracing cores as part of its Xe2-HPG architecture.

Q: What is the measured FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1920x1080?

A: The measured FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1920x1080 is 47.1, which drops to 31.3 at 2560x1440 and 21.4 at 3840x2160.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily workload-dependent. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as software compilation or scientific computing, the i7-13700K’s 89th percentile ranking ensures it is rarely the bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4333 in Passmark and 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few fast cores. However, in multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU can be saturated, but this is a desirable state as it indicates full utilization.

In GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions, the Arc B580 becomes the limiting factor. The FPS scaling across resolutions is telling: for example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, FPS drops from 168 at 1080p to 150 at 1440p, a mere 11% decrease, but then to 127 at 4K, a 24% decrease from 1440p. This suggests the CPU is able to feed the GPU adequately at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU’s compute limits become apparent at 4K. In contrast, in a CPU-heavy game like Ark: Survival Ascended, the FPS is only 22 at 1080p, 14 at 1440p, and 7 at 4K, indicating that both components struggle with this unoptimized title.

The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 89th percentile creates a natural imbalance where the CPU is underutilized in most gaming scenarios. The pairRankByFps data shows an average FPS of 98.7 across games, with a rank of 2809 out of 3732 pairs. This places the pair in the 25th percentile of all pairs, which seems low, but is a reflection of the GPU’s mid-range status rather than a CPU deficiency. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU in gaming, as evidenced by the steep FPS drops at 4K in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (47.1 to 21.4 FPS from 1080p to 4K). For productivity, the CPU is the primary compute engine, and the GPU’s role is secondary, so the bottleneck shifts to the CPU’s 125 W TDP limit under sustained all-core loads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc B580. The pairing represents a configuration where a high-end CPU is matched with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that is optimized for productivity and high-refresh 1080p/1440p gaming rather than 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute. The combined percentile of 79 places this build in the upper fifth of all configurations, though the individual component percentiles reveal the disparity: the CPU is in the 89th percentile, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile.

The overall tier of this build is that of a capable workstation and gaming hybrid. The CPU is a top-tier performer in its class, rivaling the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 within a 0.2% margin. The GPU, while not in the same league, performs similarly to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, with deltas of 0.6% and -0.7%, respectively. This means the build offers a level of performance that was considered high-end several generations ago, but with modern features like 12 GB VRAM and 20 RT cores. The system is well-balanced for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-13700K achieves an average benchmark score of 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with a score of 46971, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i7-13700K is essentially tied with it. The CPU’s key scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and a single-core score of 2116, a Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 and single-core of 2529, and a Passmark multithread score of 45887. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks, with a slight edge in multi-core workloads.

The Intel Arc B580 achieves an average benchmark score of 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a score of 23061, a delta of -0.2%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a score of 22895, a delta of 0.6%. The GPU’s key scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672, and a Passmark G3D score of 15748. These scores show that the GPU is competitive with older high-end cards, but it is not a top-tier performer.

The combined picture is that of a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile is 21 points higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile. In practical terms, this means that the system’s overall performance is more likely to be limited by the GPU in gaming and graphics workloads, while the CPU will provide ample headroom for productivity. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this balance, positioning the build as a strong all-rounder but not a specialist in either extreme.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured, and the gaming performance varies widely by title and resolution. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent frame rates for esports titles: Valorant hits 339.9 FPS, CS:GO 332.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X 180.7 FPS. For AAA games, performance is solid but more variable: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 168 FPS, Minecraft at 148 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 149.5 FPS. However, demanding titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 41.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22 FPS.

At 2560x1440, FPS drops are consistent but manageable for most games. Valorant runs at 288 FPS, CS:GO at 224 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 150 FPS. The demanding titles fall below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 is 31.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is 14 FPS. This resolution is playable for competitive games but not for the most graphically intensive AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overwhelmed in many titles. Valorant still runs at 232.4 FPS, and CS:GO at 134.6 FPS, but most games drop below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is 21.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is 7 FPS. Even less demanding titles like Fortnite run at 24 FPS and Minecraft at 49 FPS. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 98.7, with a pair rank of 2809 out of 3732 pairs, indicating that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for esports or older titles.