SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the Intel Arc A750 represents a desktop configuration built around two of Intel’s flagship component lines from the same era. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part based on the Xe-HPG architecture. As a pairing, it sits at the 78th percentile against all CPU and GPU combinations in the database, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems. However, the benchmark data for this specific combination is incomplete: no measured FPS rows exist in the FACT PACK for this exact pairing. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are therefore estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not derived from direct testing of this configuration.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is substantial for the GPU’s class, and it directly supports the 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units.

The Arc A750 includes 28 ray tracing cores, though the FACT PACK lists no tensor core count for this part. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which positions it for modern rendering APIs. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS for FP16, with the latter at a 2:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed picture across different APIs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2612 points. Geekbench results show 98554 in OpenCL and 85631 in Vulkan. Passmark results are more granular: DirectX 9 scores 181, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, DirectX 12 scores 70, G2D scores 732, G3D scores 12534, and GPU compute scores 5368. The G3D score of 12534 is the most representative of overall rendering performance, while the lower DirectX 10 and 11 scores suggest the architecture may not be as optimized for legacy APIs as it is for modern ones.

The GPU’s percentile rank against all GPUs is 66, which means it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the database. Its nearest rivals by average benchmark score are the Intel Arc B570 (deltaPct 0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.2), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (deltaPct -0.4). The Arc A750’s average benchmark score is 20582, placing it in a tight cluster with these competitors — the largest delta from any listed rival is only 0.5 percent. For rendering workloads, the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are the key resources; the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 rate indicates capable compute throughput, while the 28 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i7-13700K are extensive and consistently strong. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 10717 in 16-thread, 2262 in 2-thread, 4469 in 4-thread, 8193 in 8-thread, 12412 in max-thread, and 1136 in single-thread. Cinebench results show R15 multicore at 4507.5 and singlecore at 303, R20 multicore at 16292 and singlecore at 2299, and R23 multicore at 30745 and singlecore at 2116. Geekbench scores are 19429 multicore and 2529 singlecore. The Passmark suite shows multithread at 45887, single-thread at 4333, integer math at 154446, floating point math at 114867, extended instructions at 36625, data compression at 595292, data encryption at 33249, physics at 2716, and random string sorting at 62670. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46881, and its percentile rank against all CPUs is 89.

The nearest CPU rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (avgScore 46971, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (avgScore 47022, deltaPct -0.3), AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (avgScore 46654, deltaPct 0.5), and Intel Xeon w3-2535 (avgScore 46653, deltaPct 0.5). The Core i7-13700K is within 0.5 percent of all these parts, indicating that its multi-threaded performance is statistically tied with a range of high-end desktop and mobile processors. The single-core score of 4333 in Passmark places it well ahead of its multi-threaded rivals in lightly-threaded tasks, but the data does not include rival single-core figures for direct comparison.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, which is less than half the CPU’s average of 46881. The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, meaning the system outperforms 78 percent of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The gap between the CPU’s 89th percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build: the processor is a top-tier part, while the graphics card is solidly mid-range. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 and Geekbench multicore score of 19429 indicate a chip that excels in heavily parallelized workloads, while the GPU’s G3D score of 12534 places it in a competitive but not elite segment.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing of this configuration.

Given the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 20582, which is nearly identical to the Intel Arc B570 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, the Arc A750 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p for most titles, but it is not a high-refresh-rate powerhouse at 4K. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern games at 1080p with high settings, and likely adequate for 1440p with some compromises on texture quality in VRAM-heavy titles. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 in Passmark suggests that performance in modern APIs will be stronger than in legacy ones, so games using DirectX 12 or Vulkan should see better frame rates than those using DirectX 11.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4333 in Passmark and 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 indicate excellent per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most gaming situations. For 1080p gaming, the pairing should be capable of high refresh rates in esports titles, and for 1440p, the GPU will likely be the primary constraint, with frame rates dropping as resolution increases. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute performance will limit settings to medium or lower in demanding titles. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game and driver version.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU’s percentile rank of 89 versus the GPU’s 66 means the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where frame rates scale with GPU compute. The estimated FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K would show the GPU becoming progressively more dominant as the bottleneck, with the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensuring that it can feed the GPU adequately even at lower resolutions.

In compute and rendering workloads, the CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-threaded scores — Cinebench R23 multicore at 30745 and Passmark multithread at 45887 — will carry the load for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 in Passmark GPU compute indicates it can assist in some workloads, but it is not a primary compute part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 shows the GPU’s limitations in modern DX12 gaming workloads, which aligns with its 66th percentile position.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent of its average score, include both desktop and mobile parts, suggesting that the i7-13700K is well-balanced against the competition. However, the GPU’s nearest rivals include a mobile RTX 3070, which indicates that the Arc A750 is performing at a level comparable to mid-range mobile parts, not desktop high-end. This reinforces the bottleneck analysis: the CPU is overqualified for the GPU in gaming, while in CPU-heavy productivity tasks, the GPU becomes a secondary accelerant rather than a primary driver.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K ranks at the 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms 89 percent of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is only 0.1 percent higher than the Intel Arc B570 (20556) and 0.2 percent higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534).

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc A750 is 78, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: Does this configuration have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46881, which is 0.2 percent lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971) and 0.5 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654).

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute performance in TFLOPS?

A: The Intel Arc A750 delivers 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators, software developers, and professionals running heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and data compilation. The 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 provide substantial headroom for these tasks, while the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking is adequate for moderate gaming and general GPU acceleration.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this pairing viable, with the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supporting high settings in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but it should still deliver playable frame rates with adjustments. The system is less suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU’s mid-range compute performance and 8 GB VRAM will require significant compromises. Students and small business workstations can benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for office tasks, though the GPU is overkill for basic productivity.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The process node is 10 nm at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support listed. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 4333 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming and latency-sensitive applications. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive: Geekbench multicore at 19429, Cinebench R23 multicore at 30745, and Passmark multithread at 45887. The Passmark integer and floating point math scores of 154446 and 114867 respectively show robust compute throughput for scientific and financial workloads.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46881 places it at the 89th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, both within 0.5 percent. For real workloads, the 24 threads handle video rendering and code compilation with ease, while the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded tasks. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy applications, and the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in platform choice.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock and 125 W TDP, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part with 8 GB GDDR6 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The combined percentile of 78 places this system above the majority of configurations in the database, though the gap between the CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 66th percentile defines its character as a CPU-first build.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46881 and the GPU’s average of 20582 show a significant disparity in raw compute. This pairing is best understood as a high-end processor with a mid-range graphics card, making it suitable for productivity-heavy users who game occasionally. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with standard power and cooling infrastructure.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested power supply is 550 W, which is adequate for this configuration but leaves limited headroom for overclocking or adding power-hungry peripherals. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W and the GPU’s 225 W combined suggest a system draw that a 550 W PSU can handle, but a higher-capacity unit would be advisable for future upgrades.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, so immediate upgrades would likely target a higher-tier GPU such as the Intel Arc B570, which has a similar average score (20556) but represents a newer generation. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking for users with adequate cooling. A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom — its 89th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows users to keep existing memory or upgrade, depending on their motherboard.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4333 and the GPU’s G3D score of 12534 suggest the system can drive high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU will limit performance in AAA games. Estimated FPS figures are not available, but the 66th percentile GPU ranking indicates it is not a top-tier gaming part.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and Passmark multithread score of 45887 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit game settings while streaming at higher resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 and Geekbench multicore score of 19429 make it well-suited for rendering timelines and exporting video, while the GPU’s compute score of 5368 can assist with effects and acceleration.

3D rendering: For CPU-based renderers, the 24 threads are a strong asset, with Passmark integer math at 154446 and floating point math at 114867. The GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores speed up compilation, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is not a primary factor in most development workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide smooth basic productivity, while the discrete GPU is unnecessary for typical office tasks but available for occasional gaming or media work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds