SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350 is a compact, low-power graphics solution built on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9M per square millimeter. The chip, designated DG2-128, belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 family) and is positioned at the entry level of Intel's discrete GPU lineup. Its production status is listed as end-of-life, with a successor in the Battlemage architecture.

Memory configuration is modest: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. This bandwidth figure is a critical constraint for modern gaming and rendering workloads, as the narrow bus limits how much data can flow between the GPU and its frame buffer. For texture-heavy scenes or high-resolution rendering, this becomes the primary bottleneck. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, indicating a fixed operating point rather than a dynamic boost range.

Compute resources include 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 6 dedicated RT cores, which is a small count relative to higher-tier Arc parts but still provides hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability. No tensor core count is specified in the data, meaning AI-accelerated workloads would rely on the general compute units rather than dedicated matrix engines.

The GPU occupies a single slot, has no display outputs, and draws a TDP of just 25 W. The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, reflecting the extremely low power envelope. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's 4 GB memory pool. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics standards. The percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution. Notably, the GPU has no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals, indicating that the database lacks direct performance measurements for this part.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A350's capabilities are constrained by its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. These figures suggest it can handle light 3D modeling, basic CAD, and 2D compositing, but complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed the memory capacity. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing, though the modest compute throughput will limit ray-traced effects to simple scenes or low resolutions. The FP16 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS could benefit tasks that leverage mixed-precision computation, such as certain AI inference workloads or procedural generation.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks provide a comprehensive picture of the Intel Core i7-13700K's performance. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 10717 with 16 threads, 2262 with 2 threads, 4469 with 4 threads, 8193 with 8 threads, 12412 with max threads, and 1136 in single-thread. These results show strong scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns as thread count increases to the maximum of 24. The Cinebench results reinforce this trend: R15 multicore scores 4507.5 and single-core 303; R20 multicore scores 16292 and single-core 2299; R23 multicore scores 30745 and single-core 2116. The Geekbench multicore score is 19429 and single-core is 2529.

PassMark tests cover a range of workloads. Data compression scores 595292, data encryption 33249, extended instructions 36625, find prime numbers 191, floating-point math 114867, integer math 154446, multithread 45887, physics 2716, random string sorting 62670, and single-thread 4333 (listed twice in the data). The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 46881, placing the chip at the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show a tight cluster around the i7-13700K's average score. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.2% lower (deltaPct of -0.2). The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, also 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653, also 0.5% higher. These deltas are all within 0.5%, indicating that the i7-13700K sits in a performance band where these four rival CPUs are essentially equivalent. The percentile position of 89 reflects that the vast majority of CPUs in the database score lower.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is 0. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70. This figure is lower than the CPU's individual 89th percentile because the GPU drags the overall performance down. The pairing creates an unusual imbalance: a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU (50th percentile). For workloads that are CPU-bound, the system performs at the 89th percentile level; for GPU-bound tasks, it drops to the 50th percentile. The combined picture is one of a system that excels at compute-heavy CPU tasks but is firmly mid-range in graphics performance.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The TDP is 125 W. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The processor was released on 2022-09-26, with a launch MSRP of $409. Its part number is SRMB8.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The market segment is desktop, and production status is active.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well across thread counts. The 3DMark scores show that going from 2 threads (2262) to 4 threads (4469) nearly doubles performance, and from 4 to 8 threads (8193) it nearly doubles again. From 8 to 16 threads (10717), the scaling is 30.8% improvement, and from 16 to 24 threads (12412), it is 15.8%. This diminishing scaling is expected given the hybrid architecture, where performance cores handle the bulk of the work and efficiency cores contribute less per thread.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 is a strong result for a desktop processor. The single-core score of 2116 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 19429 and single-core of 2529 follow the same pattern. The PassMark multithread score of 45887 and single-thread of 4333 confirm that both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads benefit from this chip's design.

Data compression and encryption scores (595292 and 33249, respectively) suggest strong performance in archival and security tasks. The floating-point math score of 114867 and integer math of 154446 indicate robust number-crunching capability for scientific and financial workloads. The physics score of 2716 is comparatively lower, which may reflect the test's sensitivity to clock speed rather than core count. The random string sorting score of 62670 shows good memory and cache handling for data organization tasks.

The architecture's hybrid design, combining performance and efficiency cores, allows the processor to balance power consumption with throughput. The 125 W TDP is moderate for a 16-core part, and the unlocked multiplier enables enthusiasts to push clocks higher if cooling permits. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives builders flexibility, though the performance difference between the two memory types would be measurable in memory-bound workloads.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The 89th percentile CPU performance makes this system suitable for users who need strong multi-threaded computation. Content creators working with video editing software that utilizes multiple cores would benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745. The data compression score of 595292 suggests that archivists or professionals handling large datasets would see efficient throughput. Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, particularly in build environments that parallelize compilation tasks.

The GPU's 50th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM limit the system's graphics capabilities. Gamers at 1080p could run esports titles or older games, but modern AAA games at high settings would likely exceed the memory capacity or require significant settings reductions. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus are entry-level specifications. For users whose primary workload is gaming, this pairing would be unsatisfactory at higher resolutions.

Students in computer science or engineering programs would find the CPU's performance adequate for coursework involving programming, data analysis, and simulation. The single-thread score of 4333 in PassMark ensures responsive day-to-day use. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity would be well-served by the CPU's integer math score of 154446, though the GPU is more than sufficient for 2D applications.

The 25 W GPU TDP and 200 W suggested PSU make this a power-efficient build for offices or environments where energy consumption is a concern. The single-slot GPU with no display outputs suggests it is not intended for direct display connection; the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 would handle display output. This configuration could suit a headless compute server where the GPU is used for acceleration tasks rather than rendering to a monitor.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this compromise. In CPU-bound workloads—compilation, data processing, spreadsheet calculations, video encoding—the system performs near the level of the top 11% of CPUs. In GPU-bound workloads—gaming, 3D rendering, GPU-accelerated effects—performance drops to the median.

The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is the limiting factor for modern games. Even if the compute units could handle the load, many games require more than 4 GB of video memory at 1080p with high textures. The 64-bit bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further constrain performance by limiting how quickly textures and geometry can be streamed. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support provide ample data feeding capability, but the GPU cannot consume data at the rate the CPU can supply it.

FPS scaling would be heavily GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios. A game that runs at 60 FPS on a faster GPU would likely drop to 30-40 FPS with the Arc A350, regardless of the CPU's capability. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 indicates it can handle game logic and physics efficiently, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits pixel and vertex processing. For CPU-bound games with simple graphics, such as strategy titles or simulation games, the system would perform well because the GPU is not the bottleneck. For visually intensive games, the GPU would be the clear constraint.

In productivity applications, the balance shifts. Video editing software that relies on CPU encoding would benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745. GPU-accelerated effects in the same software would run at the GPU's 50th percentile level, creating a mixed experience. 3D rendering in Blender or similar tools would be GPU-limited, with the 4 GB VRAM preventing large scenes from fitting in memory. The system is best suited for workloads that are predominantly CPU-bound.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K is at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 89% of processors in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 0.3% lower, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 0.5% higher, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 0.5% higher.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 has 6 dedicated RT cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The i7-13700K has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70, reflecting the CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, and sensible next upgrades

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is supported, which is valuable for workstation reliability. The TDP is 125 W, and the CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU runs at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, which is very low. The CPU's 125 W TDP plus the GPU's 25 W TDP total 150 W, leaving headroom for other components within the 200 W recommendation. However, a PSU with higher capacity would be needed if the CPU is overclocked or additional components are added.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides display output, which is necessary since the Arc A350 has no display outputs. This means the system must use the CPU's integrated graphics for any monitor connection, and the Arc A350 is used solely for compute acceleration. This is an unusual configuration that limits the GPU's usefulness for gaming or any application requiring direct display output.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more capable GPU that has display outputs and larger VRAM. The CPU's performance headroom is substantial, given its 89th percentile rank, so a faster GPU would not be bottlenecked by the CPU in most scenarios. The motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs can run at full bandwidth. The memory support for DDR5 would benefit from faster memory kits, though the current DDR4 support provides a lower-cost entry point.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700K, a 16-core, 24-thread processor at the 89th percentile, with the Intel Arc A350, a low-power GPU at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 70, placing the system in the upper-mid range of overall performance. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor with strong single-thread and multi-thread capabilities, while the GPU is an entry-level part with 4 GB VRAM and modest compute resources.

The pairing is unusual because the CPU's performance far exceeds the GPU's capabilities. This configuration would be sensible for users who primarily need CPU compute power and require GPU acceleration for specific tasks that do not demand high graphics throughput. The GPU's 25 W TDP makes it extremely power-efficient, but its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 RT cores limit its applicability. The system's overall tier is defined by the CPU's strength, with the GPU acting as a secondary accelerator rather than a primary graphics solution.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM would struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. Esports games with low graphical demands might achieve 60+ FPS, but the 64-bit bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit texture streaming. The CPU's single-thread score of 4333 in PassMark ensures game logic runs smoothly, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's lack of display outputs means streaming would rely on the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 for capture, while the Arc A350 could offload encoding tasks if supported. The system's 70th combined percentile indicates adequate overall performance for streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45887 and data compression score of 595292 provide strong performance for video encoding and file handling. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM would limit effects and color grading at high resolutions. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance offers some acceleration for compatible effects, but complex projects would likely exceed memory capacity.

3D rendering: The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide entry-level rendering capability. Scenes with high polygon counts or large textures would exceed the 4 GB VRAM, causing slowdowns or failure. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores would handle scene preparation and physics, but the render itself would be GPU-limited.

Software development: The CPU's 89th percentile rank and integer math score of 154446 make it excellent for compilation, testing, and running development environments. The GPU's modest performance is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging. The 125 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU keep power costs low for always-on development machines.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4333 in PassMark ensures responsive word processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The data encryption score of 33249 supports secure file handling. The GPU is more than adequate for office applications, and the system's 70th combined percentile places it above the median for general productivity tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component specifications, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile rank, 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, and 4 GB VRAM, gaming performance would be entry-level. At 1080p, older or less demanding games such as esports titles could run at acceptable frame rates, likely 60 FPS or higher in low-settings configurations. Modern AAA games would require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates, and the 4 GB VRAM would cause texture pop-in or stuttering in memory-intensive scenes. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's bandwidth constraint of 124.0 GB/s would severely limit performance, making high-resolution gaming impractical.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4333 PassMark, 2116 Cinebench R23 single-core) would keep frame times consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU would dominate frame rate limitations in most titles. The 6 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the low compute throughput would restrict ray-traced effects to minimal settings. Overall, this system is not recommended for gaming beyond casual or esports-level play at 1080p.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds