SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the Intel Arc A310E is a fundamentally unbalanced desktop combination, where a top-tier 16-core processor is saddled with an entry-level graphics card. The CPU operates in the 89th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits precisely in the 50th percentile. This pairing produces a system where the processor's immense capabilities are largely left untapped in graphics-intensive tasks, making it a niche build for specific computational workloads rather than a general-purpose gaming machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is the weakest scenario for this pairing. The Arc A310E's 50th percentile standing and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are insufficient to drive high-refresh-rate monitors in modern titles. While the i7-13700K's single-thread score of 1136 in 3dmark_single_thread and 4333 in Passmark ensures the CPU is never the limiting factor, the GPU will cap frame rates well below the thresholds required for 144Hz or 240Hz displays. The data indicates the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in this use case.

Streaming: The i7-13700K is exceptionally well-suited for streaming workloads. Its 24 threads and strong multi-threaded scores, including a 30745 in Cinebench R23 multicore and a 45887 in Passmark multithread, provide ample headroom for encoding video while running a game. The Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated encoding features, but its low pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s will limit the resolution and quality of the game being streamed. The CPU is the star here; the GPU will hold back the overall stream quality.

Video Editing: The CPU provides outstanding performance for video editing tasks such as rendering timelines and applying effects. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 12412 and the Geekbench multicore score of 19429 indicate rapid processing of complex projects. However, the GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are severe constraints for real-time previews of high-resolution footage or applying GPU-accelerated effects. Editors working with simple timelines will benefit from the CPU, but those relying heavily on GPU effects will encounter significant slowdowns.

3D Rendering: This is a scenario where the i7-13700K can dominate. CPU-based rendering will be exceptionally fast, as evidenced by the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4507.5 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 114867. The 16 cores and 24 threads are ideal for ray tracing on the CPU. The Arc A310E's role is minimal here, as its 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS of compute are not suited for professional-grade rendering. This build is a CPU rendering powerhouse with a GPU that is merely present for display output.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis are heavily multi-threaded tasks that will benefit directly from the CPU's performance. The Passmark integer math score of 154446 and the data compression score of 595292 show exceptional throughput for build pipelines. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with frequently accessed data. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong, if unconventional, choice for a developer workstation.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is massively overqualified for standard office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (2116 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 24 threads handle any background tasks with ease. The Arc A310E's 50th percentile performance is more than enough for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. However, the system's 125W TDP for the CPU alone makes it an inefficient and power-hungry choice for a simple student or office machine where a lower-power processor would be more appropriate.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the two components. The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end desktop processor, evidenced by its 89th percentile rank among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 46881, placing it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971 (a negligible 0.2% difference). The CPU's multi-threaded performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 and a Passmark multithread score of 45887. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2529 and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2299.

Conversely, the Intel Arc A310E sits exactly at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is an average, entry-level graphics card. It has no benchmark scores listed and an average benchmark score of 0, meaning its performance is defined by its specifications rather than measured tests. Its FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS and a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s are modest figures that place it firmly in the entry-level segment, suitable for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings, not for high-end workloads.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The system's combined percentile is 70, pulled down significantly by the GPU. In any workload that does not rely heavily on the GPU, the system will perform in the top tier of desktop PCs. In any graphics-intensive workload, the system will perform like a budget PC. The data shows the CPU is capable of performing at a level near the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while the GPU has no rivals listed to compare against, highlighting its standalone position in the low-end market.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700K a fast processor?

A: Yes. It is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs and has an average benchmark score of 46881. It performs within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535, and is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Intel Arc A310E have?

A: The Arc A310E has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, utilizing 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and includes 6 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W. The GPU has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i7-13700K and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has an average score of 46971, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-13700K's score of 46881. This difference is negligible and they are effectively tied in performance.

Q: What kind of memory does the i7-13700K support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who require only basic graphics output. The primary audience is professionals in software development, data analysis, and CPU-based 3D rendering. The i7-13700K's 24 threads and 89th percentile standing provide the computational muscle for compiling large codebases, running complex simulations, and rendering scenes with CPU-based engines.

Content creators who work primarily with audio or CPU-accelerated video effects may also find value, as the processor's high multi-threaded scores will reduce export times. However, video editors who rely on GPU acceleration would be better served by a different GPU. Students and office workers in technical fields, such as engineering or science, would benefit from the CPU's power for their computational coursework, provided their graphics needs are minimal. It is not a system for gamers at any resolution, as the Arc A310E's 50th percentile performance is a hard ceiling for frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 30 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores show a processor that is dominant in both single and multi-threaded workloads. Its 89th percentile rank among all CPUs confirms its high-end status. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 is a strong indicator of its capability in rendering and encoding tasks. The Passmark data encryption score of 33249 and extended instructions score of 36625 show it is well-prepared for security and complex mathematical workloads. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 10717 versus the 3dmark_2_threads score of 2262 illustrates excellent scaling with core count, meaning applications that can utilize all 24 threads will see massive performance gains. The single-thread score of 4333 in Passmark and 2529 in Geekbench ensures that even lightly-threaded applications like games and office software will run responsively.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist. It is built on TSMC's 6nm process and features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It has 6 RT cores for ray tracing and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. Its base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, and it has a TDP of just 75 W, requiring no external power connectors.

The GPU's performance is strictly entry-level. Its 50th percentile rank places it as an average GPU, but its specifications suggest it is at the lower end of that average. The FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are modest. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games, which often require more for high-resolution textures. The 6 RT cores allow for ray tracing to be enabled, but the low compute power will make performance with ray tracing active very poor. This is a card designed for basic display output, light gaming at 1080p with low settings, and multimedia tasks, not for the high-end workloads the CPU is capable of handling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is overwhelmingly the GPU. In any workload that requires 3D rendering, video encoding, or GPU-accelerated effects, the Intel Arc A310E will limit performance to its 50th percentile level. The CPU's 89th percentile performance will be wasted in these scenarios, as it will spend most of its time waiting for the GPU to finish its tasks.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data processing, and CPU-based rendering, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system performs at the CPU's high level. The data shows a clear divide: for gaming, the Arc A310E is the limiting factor, capping FPS at entry-level levels. For productivity tasks, the i7-13700K is the star, and the GPU is just a display adapter. This is not a balanced system; it is a powerful CPU with a placeholder GPU. The 125W TDP of the CPU and 75W TDP of the GPU also show a power draw heavily skewed toward the processor.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700K, a high-end desktop processor, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level desktop GPU. The CPU is part of Intel's Core 13th Gen series and uses the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is part of Intel's Arc Alchemist generation. The combination is a desktop-class system with a combined percentile rank of 70, which is a mediocre score that is dragged down by the GPU.

The i7-13700K is a top-tier processor, but the Arc A310E is not a top-tier graphics card. This pairing creates a system that is exceptionally fast for some tasks and very slow for others. The overall tier is that of a powerful productivity workstation that is not suitable for modern gaming. The CPU's performance is comparable to the best from AMD, while the GPU is a low-end part with no direct rivals listed in the data. This is a lopsided configuration that serves a very specific niche.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications of the components.

The gaming performance of this system will be entirely dictated by the Intel Arc A310E. With its 4 GB of VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS of compute power, it is capable of running esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings. The i7-13700K's robust single-thread performance (1136 in 3dmark_single_thread) will prevent CPU-related stutters and frame drops.

However, for modern AAA titles, the GPU will struggle. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be a limiting factor. Frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings will likely be low, and at 1440p or 4K, the system will be unable to deliver playable performance. This pairing is not recommended for gaming beyond esports titles. The system's high CPU performance is negated by the GPU bottleneck in almost all gaming scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds