SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc A310 pairing presents a stark contrast in performance capabilities. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor that sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-profile, entry-level card that ranks in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. This combination creates a system where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics adapter, leading to a significant bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

The data indicates a desktop-class build with a combined percentile of 65. The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional, but the GPU's modest results will limit the system's utility for gaming and 3D rendering. This analysis uses only the provided data to interpret what these scores mean for real-world use, the upgrade paths available, and the types of users who might consider such a configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and supports ECC memory.

Benchmark results show a processor with formidable multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 30745 points in the multi-core test, while its single-core score is 2116 points. The Geekbench scores are similarly strong, with 19429 in multi-core and 2529 in single-core. The 3DMark results reveal excellent scaling: 2262 for 2 threads, 4469 for 4 threads, 8193 for 8 threads, 10717 for 16 threads, and 12412 for max threads. This scaling indicates that the CPU can efficiently utilize its 24 threads, making it well-suited for heavily parallelized workloads like video rendering and scientific computing.

The PassMark suite provides further insight into specific workload performance. The multi-thread score is 45887, with integer math at 154446 and floating-point math at 114867. Data compression scores 595292, and encryption hits 33249. The CPU's extended instructions score is 36625, which is beneficial for cryptography and complex mathematics. The single-thread PassMark score is 4333, indicating strong per-core performance for less parallel tasks.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i7-13700K is essentially tied with top competitors. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. It performs 0.5% better than both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. These negligible deltas mean that in multi-threaded applications, the i7-13700K will perform nearly identically to these alternatives. Its average benchmark score of 46881 places it in the 89th percentile, meaning it is faster than the vast majority of CPUs on the market.

For real workloads, the CPU's high multi-threaded scores translate to fast video export times, efficient 3D rendering, and smooth compilation of large software projects. The single-thread performance is also top-tier, ensuring responsive daily use and strong performance in lightly threaded applications like legacy games or office software.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700K scores 12412 in the 3DMark max threads test and 30745 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its average score of 46881 is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, -0.3%).

Q: How fast is the single-core performance?

A: The CPU achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116. The PassMark single-thread score is 4333, indicating strong responsiveness for everyday tasks.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. It is based on the Raptor Lake architecture on the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. However, the specific bandwidth figures are not provided in the data.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the processor?

A: The TDP is 125 W. This is the power draw the cooling solution must handle under sustained loads, excluding the suggested PSU requirements for the whole system.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon w3-2535?

A: The i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, which is 0.5% higher than the Xeon w3-2535's 46653. This difference is minimal, making them equivalent in overall computational performance.

Q: What is the process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process and uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. The die size is 257 mm².

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a massive disparity between the components. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 65.

The CPU's raw compute strength is evident in its Cinebench R20 scores: 16292 multi-core and 2299 single-core. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 further confirms its high placement. The data indicates this processor is in the top 11% of all CPUs, making it an excellent choice for compute-heavy tasks.

The GPU, in contrast, offers modest performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 30607, and its Vulkan score is 28964. In PassMark, the DirectX 12 score is 29, DirectX 11 is 33, and DirectX 10 is 31. The G3D score is 5433, and the GPU compute score is 2157. These numbers place the Arc A310 near the performance level of an AMD Radeon R7 250, which it trails by 0.1% (7557 vs 7550), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which it beats by 1% (7472 vs 7550).

The 89th percentile CPU combined with a 40th percentile GPU means the system will excel at CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, data analysis, and office productivity. However, it will struggle with GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution gaming, 3D rendering, and video encoding. The combined percentile of 65 reflects this compromise, suggesting a system that is well above average overall but not balanced for graphics-centric applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth connectivity to modern storage and expansion cards. The processor also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W. This is a very low power draw, meaning the system will not require a large power supply. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, so a combined system would have a modest total power requirement. The GPU is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. The current GPU's 40th percentile rank is the primary bottleneck for gaming and rendering. Replacing the Arc A310 with a higher-tier graphics card would transform the system from a CPU-dominated workstation into a balanced gaming or content creation machine. The CPU has enough headroom to support significantly faster GPUs, as its 89th percentile rank suggests it will not bottleneck most graphics cards. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory compatibility ensure that future upgrades to memory and storage will not be limiting factors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as indicated by the absence of rows in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 places it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low score, indicating that the GPU is only suitable for light gaming at best. With 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, it will struggle with modern games at high resolutions and detail settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 is particularly low, suggesting poor performance in modern graphics APIs.

For 1080p gaming, the GPU can likely handle esports titles and older games at medium to low settings. However, for AAA games released in recent years, the frame rates would be expected to be very low, often below playable thresholds. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4333) ensures that the system will not be CPU-limited in games, but the GPU will be the definitive limiting factor. Users should expect to lower resolutions to 720p or use the integrated graphics for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is insufficient. The data does not support a recommendation for high-refresh gaming or 1440p/4K play with this GPU.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not ideal for most enthusiasts. The primary target user is someone who requires extreme CPU performance for professional workloads but does not need GPU acceleration. This could include software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists running CPU-bound analytics, or researchers working with complex simulations.

The CPU's high multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23: 30745, PassMark Multi-thread: 45887) make it suitable for content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering engines. Video editors who use software encoding would benefit from the CPU's strong performance, though GPU acceleration would be lacking. The 89th percentile CPU rank ensures that any CPU-intensive task will be handled with ease.

Students and small business workstations could also benefit, provided their workloads are not graphics-heavy. The system would excel at spreadsheet analysis, document processing, and programming. However, for users who intend to play games or do 3D modeling, this build is severely imbalanced. The GPU's 40th percentile rank means that these users would be better served by a less powerful CPU and a more balanced GPU to Committee on the overall system performance.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and low DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate poor gaming performance. The GPU will be the bottleneck, making high-refresh gaming unattainable at 1080p or higher. Users should not expect smooth frame rates in modern titles.
  • Streaming: Streaming requires encoding video, which is typically offloaded to the GPU. The Arc A310's compute score of 2157 is too low for efficient real-time encoding. The CPU could handle software encoding due to its high multi-threaded scores, but this would consume resources and impact game performance.
  • Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 is excellent for software-based video editing and rendering. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit real-time effects and previews. The system will handle CPU-intensive exports well but will struggle with GPU-accelerated effects.
  • 3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads (3DMark max threads: 12412) will render scenes efficiently in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's low FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS and 6 RT cores will make GPU rendering very slow. The 40th percentile GPU rank means this is not a viable GPU rendering workstation.
  • Software development: The CPU's high integer math score of 154446 and data compression score of 595292 are ideal for compiling code and handling large datasets. The system will provide a fast development environment, and the GPU is sufficient for basic desktop acceleration and multiple monitors via its four mini-DisplayPort outputs.
  • Student and office work: For word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4333) is more than adequate. The GPU's low power draw (30 W) and the system's suggested 200 W PSU make this an efficient and quiet workstation for academic or office tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700K and the Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46881. The GPU is an entry-level model, ranking in the 40th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 7550.

The overall tier of this build is reflected in its combined percentile of 65. This indicates a system that is above average in general, but the performance is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound tasks. The i7-13700K is a high-end processor suitable for enthusiast workstations, while the Arc A310 is a basic display adapter. This is a CPU-first build where the GPU serves primarily to provide video output rather than substantial compute acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i7-13700K is the dominant component in this pairing, with an average benchmark score of 46881 versus the GPU's 7550. The CPU's 89th percentile rank vastly exceeds the GPU's 40th percentile rank, creating a severe imbalance.

The GPU is the primary bottleneck for any graphics-related workload. The PassMark G3D score of 5433 is near that of the AMD Radeon R7 250, a very old card, and the DirectX 12 score of 29 is minimal. This means that in gaming, 3D rendering, or any GPU-accelerated application, the Arc A310 will limit performance to a fraction of what the CPU can handle. The FPS scaling would be poor; even with the CPU's strong single-thread performance, the GPU's low fill rate and memory bandwidth will cap frame rates.

Conversely, the CPU is not a bottleneck for most tasks. Its high multi-threaded scores ensure it can feed data to the GPU and handle background tasks. However, for CPU-heavy workloads like software compilation or data processing, the GPU's role is minimal, and the CPU performs at its full potential. The combined percentile of 65 reflects this: the system is balanced in the sense that the CPU is a high-end part, but it is unbalanced in that the GPU does not match the CPU's tier. The data suggests that any upgrade path should focus on replacing the GPU first to achieve a more balanced system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest. It offers 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 5.376 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. These figures place it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7550.

Benchmark results show the GPU's relative performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 30607, and Vulkan is 28964. In PassMark, the G3D score is 5433, but the DirectX 9 score of 69 is the highest among the DirectX tests, with DirectX 11 at 33 and DirectX 12 at 29. This suggests the GPU performs better in legacy APIs than modern ones. The GPU compute score is 2157.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc A310 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon R7 250, trailing by 0.1% (7557 vs 7550). It is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7580) but 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472) and 1.4% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447). These deltas indicate that the Arc A310 is an entry-level card, suitable for basic desktop use, light productivity, and very old or low-demand games. Its 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the low overall compute performance means ray tracing will be very slow. For rendering workloads, the GPU's low FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM will limit its utility to simple scenes and low resolutions.