SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700HX

34,554 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The chip's base clock is 2.10 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, and it carries a TDP of 55 W. The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact hybrid split; the 16 cores and 24 threads indicate a mix of 8 performance cores with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores without it.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: each core has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that repeatedly access mid-sized datasets, such as game engines and compile tasks. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported — a feature typically found in workstation-class chips. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, making it one of the more capable mobile platforms for high-bandwidth peripherals like SSDs and external GPU enclosures.

Benchmark scores reveal the processor's character. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 1024 in single-thread, 1990 in 2-thread, 3738 in 4-thread, 6416 in 8-thread, 8051 in 16-thread, and 8988 in max-thread runs. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is roughly 25%, which shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads — a pattern consistent with a hybrid architecture where efficiency cores contribute less per thread than performance cores. The single-thread score of 1024 places it in a strong position for lightly threaded tasks, while the max-thread score of 8988 demonstrates that the full 24-thread workload still extracts meaningful additional performance.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 20479, with a single-core score of 1875. The multi-core figure is roughly 11 times the single-core score, which is respectable for a mobile chip with 24 threads. Cinebench R20 shows 11290 multi-core and 1593 single-core; R15 shows 3277 multi-core and 272 single-core. These scores track each other consistently, indicating stable sustained performance under long rendering loads. PassMark tests add more texture: integer math scores 116617, floating-point math 85863, and extended instructions 24127. Data compression hits 392725, while data encryption reaches 22386. The multithread PassMark score is 32637, and single-thread is 3819. Physics score is 1908, and finding prime numbers scores a modest 124.

The CPU sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34554. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Core i5-13450HX is 0.6% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is 0.9% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 trails by 0.9%. This places the i7-13700HX in a tight competitive cluster where a few percent separates several distinct architectures. The practical implication is that the i7-13700HX is a well-rounded performer whose position in the 84th percentile means it outpaces roughly 84% of all CPUs in the database, making it a strong choice for demanding mobile workloads.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from CPU and GPU benchmarks shows a system that is capable but imbalanced. The Intel Core i7-13700HX achieves an average benchmark score of 34554, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc A370M GPU, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, reflecting the CPU's stronger relative standing.

For the GPU, Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676 and Vulkan score is 28673. These are the only GPU benchmarks in the data, making them the primary reference points. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% ahead), AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% ahead). The fact that the RX 6800M — a high-end mobile GPU — is only 1% ahead of the Arc A370M in this specific benchmark is notable, though it likely reflects the benchmark's compute characteristics rather than real-world gaming equivalence.

The CPU's 84th percentile versus the GPU's 74th percentile creates a 10-point gap. This is the core imbalance of this build: the CPU is significantly stronger relative to the broader CPU market than the GPU is relative to the broader GPU market. In practical terms, the i7-13700HX will rarely be the limiting factor in most workloads; the Arc A370M will be. The combined percentile of 79 sits between the two individual percentiles, weighted toward the CPU score because the average benchmark score of the CPU is higher in absolute terms.

The 3DMark CPU results provide multi-threaded scaling data: single-thread 1024, 2-thread 1990, 4-thread 3738, 8-thread 6416, 16-thread 8051, and max-thread 8988. The scaling from single to 2 threads is nearly linear (94% efficiency), from 2 to 4 threads is 94%, from 4 to 8 threads is 86%, from 8 to 16 threads is 25%, and from 16 to max threads is 12%. This pattern tells a clear story: the first 8 threads scale well, but adding threads beyond 8 yields sharply diminishing returns, likely because efficiency cores operate at lower clocks and without hyperthreading.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 1024 in 3DMark and 3819 in PassMark single-thread are strong for gaming logic and physics. However, the Arc A370M with only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit bus will constrain frame rates at high refresh rates. This pairing is better suited to 1080p at moderate refresh rates rather than 144Hz or higher; the GPU's 74th percentile position suggests it will hold its own in lighter esports titles but struggle in demanding AAA games at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and strong multi-core scores (20479 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit the ability to run a game and stream simultaneously at high quality. The CPU can handle the encode workload without compromising game performance, but the GPU's modest compute (4.198 TFLOPS FP32) means the game itself will be the bottleneck.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance is excellent for export and render tasks, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20479 indicating it can handle 4K timelines and heavy codecs. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will accelerate effects and preview rendering, but large projects may exceed the VRAM capacity. The combination is workable for 1080p editing and light 4K work, though longer render times are expected compared to systems with stronger GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. Cinebench R15/R20/R23 multi-core scores of 3277, 11290, and 20479 respectively show it can handle CPU-based rendering in Blender, Maya, or similar tools. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for GPU-accelerated renderers, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for scenes with complex geometry or high-resolution textures. The 79th combined percentile reflects a system that renders competently but not exceptionally.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads and high integer math score (116617 in PassMark) make compilation and test execution fast. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with repeated builds and large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development workloads, making this a strong pairing for developers who need CPU throughput and don't require gaming-class graphics.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread strength (3819 PassMark) ensures snappy UI response, and the GPU's 74th percentile is more than sufficient for productivity apps, video conferencing, and 4K display output. The 55 W TDP means it will be a power-hungry laptop, but performance is never a concern.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need substantial CPU performance in a laptop form factor but are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. The i7-13700HX's 84th percentile CPU position makes it suitable for content creators running CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with 30 MB of L3 cache, handle heavy multi-threaded workloads effectively. Developers will appreciate the high integer math score of 116617 for builds and test suites.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with moderate settings will find the Arc A370M adequate, particularly for esports titles where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1024 in 3DMark single-thread) drives high frame rates. However, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K, or those who want maximum settings in AAA titles, should look elsewhere — the GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM are limiting factors.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like accounting software, database management, or CAD tools would benefit from the i7-13700HX's throughput. The CPU's ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstations requiring data integrity. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU capable of running simulations, compilers, and virtual machines without breaking a sweat. The GPU is sufficient for general use and light gaming, making this a versatile if not specialized, laptop configuration.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket — meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard or the entire laptop. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility depending on the motherboard. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a mobile chip and valuable for workstation use cases.

PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes is a forward-looking feature, allowing for ultra-fast NVMe SSDs and future expansion. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs (112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth does not saturate a PCIe 4.0 x8 link). The GPU's TDP is 35 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, totaling 90 W for the core compute components. The FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU value, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified, but the relatively low combined TDP suggests this is a power-efficient pairing for a laptop.

A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be adding more system memory, moving from DDR4 to DDR5 if the board supports it, or upgrading the GPU — though the BGA socket and IGP form factor (the GPU is described as "IGP," meaning integrated graphics package) suggest the GPU is also soldered and not user-replaceable. The realistic upgrade path is limited to storage and memory; the CPU and GPU are fixed for the laptop's lifetime. The 6 nm TSMC process for the GPU and 10 nm Intel process for the CPU indicate these are mature nodes, and both components are near the end of their production life (the GPU is marked end-of-life).

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die — a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, though the FACT PACK does not list tensor cores, so AI acceleration capabilities are not quantified.

Memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a narrow bus that limits memory throughput, especially at higher resolutions. The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (with 2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, averaging to 29175, placing the GPU in the 74th percentile. The nearest rivals are closely clustered: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is 0.1% ahead, AMD FirePro W8000 is 0.1% ahead, AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6% behind, and AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1% ahead. The fact that the RX 6800M — a high-end GPU — is only 1% ahead in these compute benchmarks suggests that Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores do not fully capture gaming performance differences. The Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will be the limiting factors in real-world gaming, even if compute scores are competitive.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — all modern APIs needed for current games. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and is described as "IGP" slot width, meaning it is integrated into the laptop motherboard. Display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," indicating the output configuration varies by laptop model. The GPU is end-of-life as of its production status, which may affect long-term driver support.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The primary bottleneck in this pairing is the GPU. The CPU's 84th percentile versus the GPU's 74th percentile creates a 10-point gap, and in most workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, video effects — the Arc A370M will reach its limits before the i7-13700HX does. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (8988 in 3DMark max-threads, 20479 in Cinebench R23) mean it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in many scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (392725 PassMark), and encryption (22386 PassMark), the CPU is the star and the GPU is idle. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the CPU will often sit at partial utilization while the GPU runs at near 100%. The 3DMark thread scaling shows that the CPU's performance core cluster (first 8 threads) delivers the bulk of gaming performance, with efficiency cores providing diminishing returns beyond that.

The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a hard bottleneck for modern games at high settings, which often require 6-8 GB at 1080p. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will also limit performance at higher resolutions. However, for less demanding games or older titles, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores provide enough compute to deliver playable frame rates. The combined percentile of 79 indicates this is a mid-to-upper tier system overall, but with a clear skew toward CPU capability.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The CPU is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34554. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, is 0.2% ahead.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, reflecting the CPU's stronger standing (84th) versus the GPU (74th).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score and nearest rival?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which is 0.1% ahead.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. All gaming performance figures are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 1024 in 3DMark and 3819 in PassMark single-thread suggests strong performance for game logic and physics. The GPU's 74th percentile, 4.198 TFLOPS FP32, and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a baseline for expected frame rates.

For esports titles like CS:GO, Valorant, or League of Legends, the combination of a strong CPU and mid-range GPU should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU's high boost clock of 5.00 GHz and strong single-thread performance will drive high minimum frame rates. For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will be the limiting factor, requiring medium to low settings for smooth play. At 1440p, expect significant frame rate drops due to bandwidth and VRAM constraints. The GPU's 8 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the modest compute (4.198 TFLOPS) means RT effects should be used sparingly or at lower resolutions.

The CPU's 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks during gaming, such as streaming, Discord, or browser tabs. However, the GPU's narrow 64-bit bus will cap overall gaming throughput, making the Arc A370M the clear bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Users seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should consider this pairing inadequate; for 1080p with medium settings, it is a reasonable budget option.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700HX, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-HX mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A370M, a 4 GB GDDR6 mobile GPU based on Xe-HPG architecture. The build class is "laptop," meaning both components are soldered into a mobile platform. The CPU uses Intel BGA 1964 socket, and the GPU is described as "IGP" slot width, confirming it is integrated into the laptop motherboard.

The CPU is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34554, placing it in a tight competitive cluster with the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, Intel Core i5-13450HX, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, and AMD Ryzen 5 150 — all within 0.9% of each other. The GPU is in the 74th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 29175, closely matching the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, AMD FirePro W8000, AMD Radeon RX 470, and AMD Radeon RX 6800M — all within 1% of each other.

The combined percentile is 79, indicating an overall tier that is above average but not top-tier. This is a laptop configuration where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in relative performance. The i7-13700HX is a high-end mobile CPU capable of workstation-class multi-threaded workloads, while the Arc A370M is a mid-range mobile GPU suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings and GPU-accelerated productivity. The pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU throughput — developers, content creators, engineers — and play games or use GPU-accelerated apps as a secondary concern. The CPU's ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes add workstation credibility, while the GPU's modern API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4) ensures compatibility with current software.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds