SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700H

27,355 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700H and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a specific tier of mobile computing, targeting users who need substantial multi-threaded CPU power alongside a capable discrete GPU. This analysis is based strictly on the available benchmark data, which shows a system that sits in the upper percentile for both components but requires careful consideration of its target workloads. The data indicates a platform designed to excel in productivity and content creation, with gaming performance that is respectable but not its primary defining feature. Notably, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussions are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a TDP of 45 W. The core configuration is a hybrid design typical of the generation, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput and power consumption. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This cache configuration is critical for workloads that exhibit data locality, helping to reduce latency and improve throughput in multi-threaded scenarios.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. In 3DMark, the single-thread score is 1015, while the 2-thread score is 1947, indicating a linear scaling in lightly-threaded tasks. The scaling continues effectively through 4-thread (3616) and 8-thread (5369) workloads, showing that the processor can effectively utilize its performance cores. The max-thread score of 7502 and the 16-thread score of 6885 demonstrate that the processor maintains high efficiency when all cores are engaged, though the scaling from 8 to 16 threads is not perfectly linear, suggesting some thermal or power limitations under full load. This is typical for a 45 W mobile processor.

Cinebench results reinforce this profile. The R23 multi-core score of 15474 is a strong result for a mobile chip, indicating excellent sustained performance in rendering tasks that leverage all available threads. The R23 single-core score of 1856 is equally impressive, showing that the processor can deliver top-tier responsiveness in applications that rely on a single thread. The PassMark suite shows a similar story: the multithread score of 26399 and the integer math score of 92811 highlight its prowess in heavily parallelized computational work, while the single-thread score of 3594 confirms its strength in everyday tasks. The data compression (307791) and encryption (17971) scores are particularly high, suggesting the CPU is well-suited for archival, database, and security-related workloads.

The processor's average benchmark score is 27355, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, which is essentially tied at -0.1% delta, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which is only 0.6% slower. More notably, it is 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, a previous-generation desktop-class chip, and 0.7% faster than the Intel Core i5-14400T. This positions the i7-13700H as a highly competitive mobile processor that can match or exceed the performance of several desktop parts in multi-threaded workloads. For real-world use, this means the CPU will not be a bottleneck for most software development, video editing, or 3D rendering tasks, and it will provide a fluid experience in general productivity and web browsing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13700H and the Intel Arc A550M is a nuanced one. The CPU is a high-end mobile part, ranking in the 79th percentile, while the GPU is also a strong performer, ranking in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing suggests a system where the CPU is generally capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios, but the specific workload will determine which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound tasks, such as software compilation, data processing, or heavily-threaded physics simulations, the i7-13700H will be the primary driver. Its high PassMark multithread score of 26399 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 ensure that it can handle these workloads with significant headroom. The GPU will likely be underutilized in these cases, as the workload doesn't require extensive graphical processing. The data indicates that the CPU is the more dominant component in terms of raw processing power, capable of handling complex logic and data manipulation without straining.

Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with complex shaders, the Arc A550M will be the limiting factor. While the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 is high, it is not in the same class as the very top-tier desktop GPUs. The CPU has more than enough single-thread performance (1015 in 3DMark single-thread) to issue draw calls and manage game logic, but the frame rate will ultimately be constrained by the GPU's fill rate and compute throughput. The combined percentile of 83 for this build suggests a system that is well-matched for most tasks, but the balance favors CPU performance.

The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck in gaming. However, based on the scores, it is reasonable to estimate that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary limiter in graphically intense titles, while the CPU will have headroom to spare. At lower resolutions or in esports titles, the CPU's high single-thread score will help push frame rates higher, but the GPU will still cap the maximum output. The system is balanced in the sense that neither component is so weak that it will cripple the other, but the CPU is clearly the more capable of the two relative to its respective market segment.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of the performance envelope for this pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27355, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, placing it just behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27382, -0.1%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (27507, -0.6%). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535, -0.7%) and the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166, +0.7%). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the i7-13700H is at the very top of its performance class, trading blows with the best previous-generation and current mid-range desktop processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, which places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very high ranking, placing it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, -0.4%) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.5%). It is 2.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) and 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). This is a remarkable position for a mobile GPU, suggesting that the Arc A550M offers performance comparable to high-end desktop graphics cards from a few generations ago.

The combined percentile for this build is 83, which indicates that the system as a whole outperforms 83% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores are its standout feature. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 is exceptional for a laptop chip and will translate to fast render times in Blender or Cinebench itself. The PassMark data compression score of 307791 is world-class, making this a top-tier choice for file archiving and backup tasks. The GPU's Geekbench scores, while not as directly translatable to gaming as some other benchmarks, show that it has substantial compute power for tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference. The combined picture is one of a high-performance mobile workstation that can handle demanding professional workloads and offer a solid gaming experience.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who need a mobile workstation with strong multi-threaded processing power. The primary audience is content creators, specifically video editors and 3D artists. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 will significantly accelerate video encoding, rendering, and effects processing. The GPU's high Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 will assist with GPU-accelerated effects and renderers, providing a balanced platform for creative software.

Software developers will also find this configuration compelling. The CPU's high PassMark integer math score of 92811 and multithread score of 26399 are ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and executing test suites. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing iteration time. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data structures. Students in engineering or computer science fields can benefit from this power for simulations and data analysis, though the 45 W TDP may impact battery life, making it less ideal for all-day note-taking.

Small business workstations that handle data processing, accounting, or other office tasks will find the CPU's performance more than sufficient. The high data compression score of 307791 is useful for database management and file servers. The GPU is less relevant for these tasks but provides a safety net for occasional graphical work. This is not a system for casual users or those on a tight power budget; it is a performance-first laptop for professionals who need to get serious work done on the go.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700H compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800?

A: The i7-13700H has an average benchmark score of 27355, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800's score of 27535. This indicates that the mobile i7-13700H is marginally faster than this desktop-class competitor in overall benchmark performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and who is it close to?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 49737 is 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, placing it in the same performance tier as those cards.

Q: What are the key specifications of the CPU's cache?

A: The CPU features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache hierarchy is beneficial for workloads with high data reuse, such as databases and scientific computing.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component relative to its peers?

A: The GPU is in the 86th percentile, which is higher than the CPU's 79th percentile. This indicates that the Arc A550M is a more exceptional part relative to other GPUs than the i7-13700H is relative to other CPUs, even though both are high performers.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 83. This means that the system as a whole is expected to outperform 83% of all other configurations in the benchmarking database.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it suggest?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W. This is a standard power draw for a high-performance mobile processor, indicating that the laptop will require a robust cooling solution and that battery life under heavy load will be limited.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i7-13700H does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is capable but not top-tier. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it can handle most games at 1080p with high settings, but the lack of measured FPS makes precise expectations difficult. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark will help maintain high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in AAA games.

Streaming and video editing are where this pairing shines. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 is excellent for video encoding, and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates effects and transcoding. This configuration can handle 4K video editing timelines and live streaming without significant performance drops.

3D rendering is another strong use case. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads will produce fast CPU-based renders in software like Blender, while the GPU's compute power can be used for GPU-accelerated rendering. The high PassMark multithread score of 26399 ensures that complex scenes with many objects will be processed efficiently.

Software development is a natural fit. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 92811 and multithread score of 26399 are perfect for compiling large projects. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with code navigation and build tools. The system can handle multiple virtual machines or containers without significant slowdown.

For student and office work, this system is more powerful than necessary, but the headroom is beneficial. The CPU's high single-thread performance makes spreadsheets and documents feel instant, while the multi-thread power handles any unexpected heavy tasks like data analysis or creating presentations with large media files. The GPU is largely unused in these scenarios, but its presence ensures no graphical task is impossible.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700H is socketed on Intel BGA 1744, which means it is soldered to the motherboard. Consequently, the CPU is not upgradeable. The platform is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the system supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the CPU, enabling fast NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to maximize the memory capacity and speed, as the CPU's performance scales well with faster memory. Additionally, upgrading to a larger, faster NVMe SSD would take advantage of the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, reducing load times and improving data-intensive tasks. The GPU has a TDP of 60 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics package), meaning it is also a mobile component soldered to the board. Therefore, the GPU is not upgradeable. The system's overall platform is fixed, so future upgrades are limited to storage and memory.

The CPU's TDP is 45 W, and the GPU's TDP is 60 W. Combined, this suggests a system that will require a substantial power supply and cooling solution, typical for a performance laptop. The lack of a suggested PSU in the data is typical for a laptop, as the power supply is proprietary and not user-serviceable. The platform is designed for a single, unchangeable configuration, so the upgrade path is essentially about maximizing the existing components' potential.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i7-13700H processor and the Intel Arc A550M graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H part with a 45 W TDP, and the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 mobile chip with a 60 W TDP. The system achieves a combined percentile of 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all other builds in the database.

The pairing represents a high-end mobile workstation. The CPU's performance is in the 79th percentile, and the GPU is in the 86th percentile. This indicates a system that is exceptionally well-rounded, with both components performing at a high level relative to their respective markets. The overall tier of this build is high, positioned for demanding professional workloads and serious gaming. It is a system that prioritizes compute performance over portability or battery life, targeting users who need desktop-class power in a mobile form factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It uses the DG2-512 chip, which contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz, boosting up to 2050 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, running at 14 Gbps effective.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial. It delivers a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures indicate strong raw compute throughput, which is useful for both gaming and general-purpose computing. The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across different compute APIs.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile, which is exceptionally high for a mobile part. It performs within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, and is only 2.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. This puts the A550M in the same performance class as high-end desktop GPUs from the previous generation. For rendering, this means it can handle GPU-accelerated workloads like Blender Cycles or Adobe Premiere's Mercury Playback Engine with ease. The combination of high compute throughput, dedicated RT cores, and a large memory pool makes it a capable GPU for professional visualization and content creation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and are not based on actual game testing.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT, the Intel Arc A550M is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles. It should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant with frame rates well above 144 FPS, thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread performance. For AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings, the system is estimated to be capable of 60-100 FPS depending on the title, with the GPU acting as the primary limiter.

At 1440p, the GPU will be the bottleneck for high-refresh gaming. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB of VRAM are sufficient for most games at this resolution, but the 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will struggle to maintain high frame rates in the most demanding titles. The system is estimated to be more comfortable at 1440p with medium to high settings, where it can target 60 FPS. Ray tracing performance will be a limiting factor, as the 16 RT cores are a modest count, so enabling ray-traced effects will require a significant reduction in resolution or settings. Overall, the gaming experience is expected to be solid for a laptop, but the CPU's performance will not be fully utilized in most gaming scenarios, as the GPU will cap the frame rate.