SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700H

27,355 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700H and Intel Arc A370M represent a specific pairing found in mobile workstations and thin-and-light laptops. This combination pairs a high-end 14-core mobile processor with an entry-level discrete GPU, creating a system whose performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU-intensive productivity tasks rather than high-end gaming. The data shows a significant performance gap between the processing power of the CPU and the graphical capabilities of the GPU, which dictates the system's strengths and weaknesses. This analysis relies solely on the benchmark scores provided, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant. It utilizes a 10 nm process node and features a hybrid core design with a total of 14 cores and 20 threads. This configuration is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The processor operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and can reach a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing for substantial performance bursts when needed. The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile part.

In terms of cache, the i7-13700H provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This cache hierarchy supports the processor's high throughput in complex tasks. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for system integrators. The platform uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the CPU.

The benchmark results confirm the CPU's strength in multi-threaded environments. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 15474 points in multi-core and 1856 points in single-core tests. This multi-core score indicates a strong capability for rendering and video encoding, while the single-core score is robust for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1015 points for single-thread to 7502 points for max-threads, demonstrating good scaling as more threads are utilized. PassMark scores further validate this, with 92811 in integer math and 66322 in floating-point math, suggesting solid number-crunching ability. The processor holds a 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, placing it in the upper tier of performance.

The CPU's nearest rival data shows it is effectively tied with several other processors. It scores -0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, -0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, and -0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800. Conversely, it is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-14400T. These tight margins indicate that the Core i7-13700H is in a highly competitive performance bracket, where differences of less than 1% are negligible in real-world use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for mobile. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a chip designated as DG2-128 containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. While this is sufficient for its class, it is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy graphical workloads.

The GPU's clock speeds are set at a base of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. The Arc A370M also includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for DirectX 12 Ultimate features. The compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16, which defines its capability for parallel compute tasks. The GPU operates at a TDP of 35 W, making it a power-efficient part for thin laptops. It connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results from Geekbench show a score of 29676 in OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan. These are moderate scores, positioning the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This places it in a mid-range bracket, capable of handling casual gaming and light creative workloads. The GPU's nearest rivals are extremely close in performance, with a -0.1% difference to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000, a 0.6% difference to the AMD Radeon RX 470, and a 1% difference to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. This shows that the Arc A370M's raw performance is comparable to these established mobile and desktop parts, though architectural differences may affect specific workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is present for this CPU and GPU combination across any games or resolutions. Therefore, the following discussion frames gaming expectations as estimates based on the available benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 and its 74th percentile ranking suggest it can handle less-demanding titles and older games at playable frame rates, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings.

For competitive esports titles, which are often CPU-bound and lighter on the GPU, the strong single-thread performance of the i7-13700H (evidenced by a 3594 passmark single-thread score) can help push frame rates higher. However, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor. At 1080p with low or medium settings, these games should be playable, but users should not expect high-refresh rates in demanding scenes. For more graphically intensive games, the GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS will limit frame rates. In such titles, users would need to significantly lower resolution and graphical presets to achieve smooth gameplay. The data indicates this pairing is not designed for high-end gaming, but rather for occasional or less demanding play.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 77, indicating it performs better than 77% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700H compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800?

A: The Core i7-13700H has an average benchmark score of 27355, which is 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800's score of 27535, making them effectively equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, using 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A370M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M is equipped with 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core i7-13700H?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has a boost clock speed of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W.

Q: Which component has a higher percentile ranking, the CPU or the GPU?

A: The CPU has a higher percentile ranking at 79, compared to the GPU's 74th percentile ranking.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700H delivers top-tier CPU benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 27355, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating the processor is in the upper 20% of all tested processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 and single-core score of 1856 demonstrate a balanced performance profile that excels in both heavily threaded and single-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 26399 further confirms its capability in parallel processing environments.

The Intel Arc A370M, in contrast, has an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. While this is a respectable score for an entry-level part, it is lower than the CPU's percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 indicate moderate compute capabilities. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant performer, offering a high level of processing power that is not fully matched by the GPU. This creates a platform that is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation, data analysis, and productivity applications, but less capable in graphically demanding scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The data shows the Core i7-13700H is a powerful processor, ranking in the 79th percentile, making it ideal for professionals who work with multi-threaded applications. This includes content creators who edit high-resolution video or render 3D models, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 suggests significant processing headroom. Software developers compiling large codebases will also benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads.

Students and office workers will find the high single-thread performance (3594 in PassMark single-thread) ensures a responsive system for everyday tasks like document editing, web browsing, and programming. The Arc A370M provides enough graphical power for basic tasks and light creative work, but it is not the primary focus. This build is less suitable for gamers seeking high-fidelity experiences, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 74th percentile performance will be limiting. Instead, it serves as a workstation-oriented laptop for users who need substantial computational power for their work and occasional light gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU, with a percentile ranking of 79, is significantly more powerful than the GPU, which ranks in the 74th percentile. This indicates that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most workloads that involve graphics processing. In gaming, even if the CPU can process game logic and physics quickly, the Arc A370M will limit the frame rate and graphical settings due to its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

For CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's strong multi-core scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 15474, mean it can handle these tasks efficiently. However, if these tasks rely on GPU acceleration, the bottleneck will shift to the GPU. In general productivity tasks, the CPU's high single-thread performance will ensure smooth operation, and the GPU will be sufficient for display output and basic acceleration. The data suggests that the system is well-balanced for office and development work, but the GPU is the limiting factor for any graphically intensive application.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the build class. It pairs the Intel Core i7-13700H, a high-performance mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete mobile GPU. The combined performance percentile of this pairing is 77, placing it in the upper quartile of all tested systems. This tier places it above many typical mainstream laptops, but below high-end gaming or workstation machines that feature more powerful GPUs.

The overall system is characterized by its strong CPU performance and modest GPU performance. It is not a high-end gaming rig, but it is a capable all-around laptop for productivity and development. The Core i7-13700H is an active production part, while the Arc A370M is listed as end-of-life. This pairing is typical of a business or creator laptop where CPU-intensive tasks are the primary focus, and the GPU provides additional acceleration for light graphical workloads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing will fall short. The Arc A370M's 4 GB of VRAM and 74th percentile performance will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles at high refresh rates. Users should expect to play at lower settings and resolutions to achieve playable frame rates.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a 3DMark max-threads score of 7502, can easily handle the encoding workload. However, the GPU may struggle with the game itself, forcing streamers to lower in-game settings. The system is capable, but the GPU is a limiting factor for high-quality streams of demanding games.

Video editing is a strong suit for this build. The Core i7-13700H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 and PassMark multithread score of 26399 indicate it can handle timeline editing and export rendering with ease. The Arc A370M can provide hardware acceleration for effects and encoding, but the CPU will carry most of the load.

3D rendering is also well-supported by the CPU. The high multi-core performance will significantly reduce render times in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores may help with viewport previews, but its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not sufficient for GPU-based rendering as a primary solution.

Software development is an ideal use case. The processor's high single-thread score of 3594 and multi-core strength make it excellent for compiling code, running virtual machines, and handling large datasets. The GPU is adequate for running a lightweight desktop environment and multiple displays.

Student and office work will be handled effortlessly. The high single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The Arc A370M is more than capable of driving 4K displays for productivity and providing hardware acceleration for web browsing. This system is excellent for any demanding academic or office workflow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700H is built for the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for memory capacity and speed upgrades if the motherboard has available slots. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Since the CPU is not upgradeable, the primary upgrade path for this system would be the GPU, but only if the laptop's design allows for it, which is rare in modern laptops. The Arc A370M has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, meaning the system likely has a PSU or power delivery system capable of handling more. A future upgrade to a more powerful mobile GPU would be the most logical step to improve gaming and graphics performance, but this is often impossible in a laptop form factor. The only practical upgrade is increasing the system memory and storage, which can improve overall responsiveness and loading times but will not change the fundamental performance balance between the CPU and GPU.