SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700H

27,355 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700H + Intel Arc A350M: A Mobile Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake-H mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete graphics, targeting thin-and-light laptops that need more graphical muscle than integrated solutions provide. The Core i7-13700H sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A350M lands in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, giving the combination a 75th-percentile overall standing. The data indicates a system built for mainstream productivity with moderate gaming capability, though the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus will define its limitations in demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid core layout typical of 13th-generation mobile parts, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The processor carries a 45 W TDP, placing it in the high-performance mobile segment, and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means it is permanently soldered to the motherboard.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. Single-thread performance in 3DMark reaches 1015, while two-thread and four-thread scores climb to 1947 and 3616 respectively. The eight-thread score of 5369 and sixteen-thread score of 6885 show continued scaling, with the maximum-thread score reaching 7502. This pattern indicates the hybrid architecture effectively utilizes all available cores for multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 15474 confirms strong sustained performance for rendering tasks, while the R23 single-core score of 1856 demonstrates competitive per-thread capability.

PassMark results further illustrate the processor's strengths. The multi-thread score of 26399 and floating-point math score of 66322 suggest solid number-crunching ability, while integer math at 92811 and extended instructions at 18303 indicate robust general computation. Data compression at 307791 and random string sorting at 33595 show the cache and memory subsystem handle data manipulation efficiently. Encryption performance at 17971 and find prime numbers at 103 are moderate, reflecting typical mobile processor limitations in cryptographic workloads.

The processor's average benchmark score of 27355 places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkably tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, a mere 0.1% higher; the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27507, 0.6% higher; and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i5-14400T trails slightly at 27166, 0.7% lower. This clustering indicates the i7-13700H sits at a performance plateau where minor architectural differences between generations and brands produce negligible real-world variation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's comprehensive benchmark portfolio shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks while maintaining respectable single-thread performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 translates to snappy daily responsiveness, while the max-thread score of 7502 demonstrates that the 14-core configuration can handle heavily parallelized workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 places this chip firmly in the upper echelon of mobile processors, suitable for content creation on the go.

The GPU benchmarks tell a more modest story. The Intel Arc A350M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, averaging 24647 across both tests. This places the GPU in the 70th percentile of all graphics cards, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 (0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (1.5% lower). This positioning suggests the A350M delivers roughly desktop GTX 1630-class performance, which is respectable for a 25 W mobile part but far from gaming flagship territory.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in relative standing. The 9-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile indicates the processor will frequently wait on the graphics subsystem in graphics-intensive workloads. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, spreadsheet analysis, and light rendering, the system will feel responsive; for gaming, the GPU will set the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 70th-percentile standing and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest it can drive competitive titles at 1080p with medium settings, but high-refresh 144 Hz gaming is beyond its capabilities in modern AAA games. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads handle encoding overhead well, with the max-thread 3DMark score of 7502 indicating ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's Intel Xe-HPG architecture includes dedicated media engines, though streaming at high bitrates may tax the 4 GB memory.

Video editing: The i7-13700H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 positions it well for 1080p timeline editing and rendering in applications like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. The A350M's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance and Vulkan support accelerate effects and color grading, but 4 GB VRAM limits working with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded CPU rendering is a strong suit given the R23 score, making Blender Cycles and similar CPU-based renderers viable. GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is roughly one-third of a mid-range desktop card.

Software development: The 20-thread configuration and PassMark integer math score of 92811 provide fast compilation times for large codebases. Data encryption at 17971 supports secure development workflows, while the 24 MB L3 cache reduces context-switching overhead during parallel builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and PassMark single-thread score of 3594 deliver fluid office applications, web browsing, and document editing. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides backup display output, while the discrete GPU remains idle for battery conservation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The CPU's 79th-percentile standing versus the GPU's 70th-percentile standing creates a system where the processor is capable of feeding significantly more powerful graphics hardware. In gaming workloads, the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the i7-13700H could support with a faster GPU.

Evidence from benchmark scores supports this analysis. The CPU's multi-threaded 3DMark score of 7502 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 indicate the GPU operates at a fraction of the performance level the CPU can drive. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a particular constraint, as modern games increasingly demand more than 4 GB of VRAM and higher bandwidth for high-resolution textures. The CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 interface provide substantial bandwidth for data transfer, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and 64-bit memory bus will throttle data throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data analysis, and multi-threaded rendering, the i7-13700H will perform near its full potential, with the GPU contributing minimal acceleration. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming and GPU rendering, the A350M will saturate first, leaving CPU headroom unused. This imbalance suggests the system is best suited for productivity-first use cases with occasional light gaming, rather than gaming-first scenarios.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a professional or student who needs serious multi-threaded CPU performance for work but only requires entry-level discrete graphics for occasional gaming or light GPU acceleration. The CPU's 20 threads and 15474 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make it ideal for software developers compiling large projects, engineers running simulation tools, and data analysts processing large datasets. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26399 and floating-point math score of 66322 support scientific computing and financial modeling workloads.

Content creators working with 1080p video will find the CPU's rendering performance sufficient for export tasks, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 24747 enables hardware-accelerated effects in compatible applications. The 4 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines but will struggle with 4K multi-layer compositions. Students in STEM fields benefit from the CPU's computational power for MATLAB, Python, and CAD applications, while the GPU handles visualization tasks.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for office suites, database management, and light photo editing will find this configuration capable. The CPU's data compression score of 307791 aids file archiving and backup operations, while the encryption score of 17971 supports secure communications. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations will find playable frame rates in esports titles and older AAA games, though the GPU's 70th-percentile standing limits modern high-fidelity gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A350M's 70th-percentile GPU standing and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings is feasible for contemporary titles. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, historically delivers 30-60 FPS in modern games at 1080p medium settings, providing a reference point for expected performance.

Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends should achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, as these games favor CPU performance, and the i7-13700H's single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark provides ample headroom. Older AAA titles from 2015-2020 will run at 45-60 FPS with medium settings, while recent AAA releases will require low settings and may drop below 30 FPS in demanding scenes. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in games with large open worlds or high-resolution texture packs.

Ray tracing performance will be minimal, as the A350M's 6 RT cores provide only basic acceleration, and the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for demanding ray-traced effects. DLSS and FSR upscaling are not available on this Intel GPU, so users must rely on native resolution rendering, which further limits playable settings. The 25 W TDP means sustained gaming will be thermally constrained in thin laptops, potentially reducing clocks below the 2200 MHz boost.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 1744 socket means the CPU is not upgradable; users must replace the entire laptop to change processors. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to upgrade RAM capacity and speed within the motherboard's constraints. The 45 W CPU TDP, combined with the 25 W GPU TDP, totals 70 W of power consumption for the primary components, which is manageable for most laptop power supplies and cooling solutions.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving bandwidth headroom for future expansion. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU serves as a fallback display output, allowing the discrete GPU to power down for battery saving. The platform's production status for the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is "End-of-life," suggesting the GPU may be phased out in favor of newer Arc products.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel configuration benefits both CPU and GPU performance. For users needing more graphics power, the laptop form factor limits GPU upgrades, so the next logical step is a new laptop with a higher-tier Arc or competing GPU. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future storage upgrades with NVMe drives will achieve full bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-13700H have?

A: The processor has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The i7-13700H's average benchmark score of 27355 is within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535) and 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (27507), indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the TDP for each component?

A: The CPU has a 45 W TDP, and the GPU has a 25 W TDP, combining for 70 W of total power draw.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits practical ray-traced gaming.

Q: What benchmark scores does the GPU achieve?

A: The GPU scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 24647.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor, with its 70th-percentile standing versus the CPU's 79th-percentile standing, capping frame rates in graphics-intensive workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivers 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards but appropriate for entry-level mobile graphics.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 3.379 TFLOPS, while FP16 achieves 6.758 TFLOPS via 2:1 ratio, supporting accelerated compute in applications that leverage half-precision arithmetic. The 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing capability, though performance will be limited by the relatively low compute throughput.

Benchmark results place the A350M in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 24647 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% lower). This performance tier suggests the GPU is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light GPU-accelerated productivity tasks, but it will struggle with high-resolution textures, complex shaders, and demanding ray-traced effects.

The GPU's 25 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is critical. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem, and the production status is "End-of-life," suggesting this architecture is being superseded by newer Intel Arc generations.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs Intel's Core i7-13700H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU's 79th-percentile standing and GPU's 70th-percentile standing combine to place the overall system in the 75th percentile, indicating a mid-to-upper-tier mobile platform. The CPU is actively produced with a launch MSRP of $502, while the GPU is end-of-life, reflecting the different lifecycle stages of the two components.

The system's class is laptop, designed for portable productivity with discrete graphics capability. The CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded performance for its 45 W TDP, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15474 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26399. The GPU delivers entry-level discrete performance with 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB GDDR6 memory, sufficient for 1080p gaming at moderate settings and light GPU acceleration.

The imbalance between CPU and GPU performance defines this build's character: it is a productivity-first machine with gaming as a secondary consideration. The 20-thread CPU handles demanding productivity workloads with ease, while the GPU provides a meaningful upgrade over integrated graphics without the power and thermal demands of higher-tier discrete solutions. This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU performance for work but want the flexibility of discrete graphics for entertainment and light creative tasks.